Summary: When trying to render "BRANCH", we need the active diff. Load it
in general since it seems reasonable for custom fields to expect it to
exist during mail rendering.
Summary: Fixes T4697. When pushing moved/copied files, SVN sends an "add-file" protocol frame which has a URI in it that needs translation from external format ("/diffusion/X/") to internal format ("/path/to/svn").
Test Plan:
- Copied/moved files and committed them in SVN.
- Added files (no copy/move) and committed them in SVN.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4697
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8654
Summary: Ref T418. Fixes T4642. The "changes since last update" and "branch" fields got dropped; restore them in a general, field-driven way.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
- Commented on a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
- Updated a revision, got relevant sections in mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: spicyj, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T4642
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8657
Summary: Fixes T4683. This was just a missing method implementation. Also provide a couple of translation things.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision from the command line with a nonempty `JIRA Issues:` line, via `arc diff`.
- Looked at the translation strings.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8656
Summary: Previously, you would not receive a mail message for the first comment you make on an audit, but you would for subsequent comments because everyone who's made a comment would be CCed on the email. This mirrors DifferentialTransactionEditor's getMailTo which always adds `$object->getAuthorPHID()`.
Test Plan: With self mail turned on, made the first comment on a commit and received an email for it. With self mail turned off, commented on a different commit and saw in `bin/mail list-outbound` that the message was voided.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8650
Summary: Fixes T4703. This is a VARCHAR(255) for no particular reason.
Test Plan: {F136160}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8652
Summary: This resolves mysterious extra space below tokens in property list view and timeline view.
Test Plan: Check Property List in Phriction, Timeline examples, Token Application, and giving my fake accounts tokens.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8651
Summary: Uses cards, fixes bgcolors.
Test Plan: View edit history on a few documents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8648
Summary: Uses the standard 8px mobile gutter
Test Plan: review a task on mobile
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8647
Summary:
When sending the "Reply-To" header to Mailgun, Phabricator would
previously send two headers for every "Reply-To": "Reply-To[0][email]" and
"Reply-To[0][name]". Instead, explicitly build the header as specified by RFC
2822 and send it to Mailgun pre-baked.
Pretty sure this bug was a cargo-cult from the Sendgrid code, where (apparently)
this actually works.
Test Plan:
Triggered an email from Phabricator, saw that the header was sent
properly.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8645
Summary:
It needs attention! Serious color for serious action.
Also, Flags probably need urgent action!1!
Test Plan: Reload Hompage, see new color
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8644
Summary: Ref T3092. Ref T3549. Modernize the product creation and edit UIs and make them say "product" instead of "project".
Test Plan:
- Created products.
- Edited products.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T3549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8636
Summary: Ref T3549. This table isn't written to yet; rename it and the DAOs and modernize the history controller.
Test Plan: Viewed history page for a product.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8633
Summary:
Ref T3549. A few things here:
- Releeph has an object called a "Project". We'd like to call this a "Product" instead. See T3549. Rename easy instances that don't break URIs.
- Releeph has a "ProjectController" which tries to be smart about loading objects. However, it's big and messy and doesn't have the finesse to do policies or `needX(...)` correctly. It also generates URIs which collide with one another. Introduce "ProductController" to start to move away from it.
- Some small modernizations to this controller to take advantage of newer infrastructure (like easier dialog rendering).
Test Plan: Deactivated and reactivated products.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8632
Summary:
Fixes T3738. Facebook uses this to provide a couple of integrations (push karma, is user an intern?), but the mechanism is both very complex and not very general.
Instead, these features are better implemented in Hovercards or via CustomField. We'll help Facebook integrate things when the time comes, but per discussion in T3738 none of this is critical or especially complicated.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all callsites.
- Viewed a request and verified that author/requestor populated and rendered correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8631
Summary:
Fixes T3659. Releeph has some awkward complexity around who ends up as a commit author. Instead, we should always try to use the original author.
Metadata (like the requestor's identity) should be accessed via Conduit or other channels instead.
Test Plan: Saved some projects, grepped for all related symbols.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8630
Summary: Fixes T3658. This field doesn't make much sense and doesn't appear to ever have actually been implemented. Particularly, the `%N` pattern doesn't actually work and I can't find anything which actually calls this stuff or exposes it externally. Facebook doesn't use it (see T3658) and I don't think it's useful in general.
Test Plan: Used `grep` to look for stuff, edited a project.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3658
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8628
Summary: move code to uninstallable help app rather than diviner. Fixes T4690.
Test Plan: uninstalled diviner, noted no links, then moved the code and suddenly helpful help links showed up once more.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8638
Summary:
Minor cleanup to the launch nav, this is more an interim diff until I can fully re-think the side
- Cleaner text
- Slighly shorter buttons
- Squarish counts
- Less in your face warning colors
Test Plan: Test with and without counts, test mobile
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8637
Summary: 0 => imploded string of hotness. Fixes T4689
Test Plan: for each spot i fixed, clicked link and it worked! (I did a grep for "/maniphest" to find these spots; 98% confident I got them all.)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8626
Summary: Use our standard blue background.
Test Plan: Quack
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8629
Summary: OMG We Have TOKENS
Test Plan: TOKENS, also UIExamples
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8624
Summary: Fixes T4641.
Test Plan: Dragged a "normal" task between "high" and "low" tasks and it stayed as "normal". Generally seems correct when playing around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: mbishopim3, Beltran-rubo, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8622
Summary: followup to D8544. This ends up creating an editor + transactions to get the job done.
Test Plan: made a column - saw a nice created transaction. edited the name - saw a nice name edit. deleted the column - saw a deleted transaction, updated "deleted" ui, and hte action change to activate. "Activated" the column and saw a transaction and updated UI. Tried to delete a column with tasks in it and got an error.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8620
Summary:
During migration of very old installs, this script no longer runs properly since at HEAD it can't index against older schemas.
Since it's pretty fluff, just toss it. Installs can run `bin/search index --type PROJ` after finishing migrations to achieve the same effect, if necessary.
Test Plan: eyeballed it
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8619
Summary:
Fixes T4677. Implements a "send an email" pre-receive action, which sends push summaries.
For use cases where features are often pushed as a large number of commits (e.g., checkpoint commits are retained), using commit emails means users get a ton of email. Instead, this allows you to get an email about a push, which summarizes what changed.
Overall, this is basically the same as commit email, but more suitable for some workflows.
Test Plan:
Wrote some rules, then made a bunch of pushes. Got email like this:
{F134929}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8618
Summary:
Ref T4677. This shows a more detailed view of an entire "git push", "hg push", or "svn commit".
This is mostly to give push summary emails a reasonable, stable URI to link to for T4677.
Test Plan:
- Pushed into SVN, Git and Mercurial.
- Viewed partial and imported event records.
{F134864}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8616
Summary:
Ref T4677. Currently, we record individual actions in a push as PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogs, but tie them together only loosely with a `transactionKey`.
Provide a real PushEvent object, and move some of the denormalized fields to it. This primarily just gives us more robust infrastructure for building, e.g., email about pushes, for T4677, since we can act on real PHIDs rather than passing awkward identifiers around.
Test Plan:
- Performed migration.
- Looked at database for consistency.
- Browsed/queried push logs.
- Pushed a bunch of stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8615
Summary: This was clobbered when we added calendar feed to profiles, not projects.
Test Plan: Browse Project on desktop and mobile, re-check profile.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8617
Summary:
Ref T4151. Addresses these issues:
- Mentions `diffusion.ssh-user`.
- Mentions `/etc/shadow` and `!!`.
- Mentions `/etc/passwd` and shell.
- Mentions `sshd -d -d -d`.
- Mentions `Defaults requiretty`.
- Adds `AllowUsers` to default configuration.
- Mentions `sudo -E ...` as a troubleshooting step.
- Mentions multiple VCS binaries.
- Fixes `sshd` paths to be absolute.
- Fixes example path in `sshd_config` template.
- Mentions `GIT_CURL_VERBOSE`.
- Walks users through cloning.
- Adds documentation for custom hooks.
- Mentions that only `daemon-user` interacts with repositories.
- Added general troubleshooting guide.
I didn't fix these:
- Weird one-time issue with `sudoers.d/`. We tell you to edit `/etc/sudoers` directly anyway.
- Insane `#includedir` magic, as above.
- Confusion around `vcs-user` for HTTP, since I think this is fairly clear.
- Confusion around parent directory permissions -- not sure about this one, `sshd` normally runs as root?
I added an `ssh-shell` as a safer alternative to `/bin/sh`. I need to test this a bit more.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Will test `ssh-shell`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: bluehawk, mbishopim3, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4151
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8586
Summary: Ref T1049. I'm fair sure this is just a case of bad data in my local install, but we probably don't want the default page for Harbormaster to break when there's invalid / missing container or buildable handles on any of the builds.
Test Plan: Loaded the page, didn't get a crash due to null reference.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: demo, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8608
Summary: Ref T4590. Ref T1049. This is primarily intended to support HTTP auth in Harbormaster.
Test Plan: Added a field, edited it, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4590, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8607
Summary:
Ref T1049. Currently, the "add" dialog lets you select a build step type, but then immediately creates one. If you "cancel" from the edit screen, you end up with an empty (and almost certainly invalid) build step.
Instead, don't create the step until it's valid.
Test Plan: Add Step -> Pick Type -> Add Step -> Cancel no longer creates empty step.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8605
Summary:
Ref T1049. Allows external systems to send a message to a build target. The primary intended use case is:
- You make an HTTP request to Jenkins.
- The build goes into a "waiting" state.
- Later, Jenkins calls `harbormaster.sendmessage` to report that the target passed or failed.
- The build continues as appropriate.
This is deceptively complicated because:
- There are a lot of race concerns. We might get a message back from an external system before it even responds to the request we made. We want to make sure we process these messages no matter when we receive them.
- These messages need to be sent to a build target (vs a build or buildable) because we'll get into trouble with parallelization later on otherwise (Jenkins is told to do 3 builds; we can't tell which ones failed or what overall state is unless the message are sent to targets).
- I initially thought about implementing this as a separate "Wait for a response from an external system" build step. This gets a lot more complicated for users once we do parallelization, though. Particularly, in the case where you've told Jenkins to do 3 builds, the three "wait" steps need to know which target they're waiting for (and jenkins needs to know some unique identifier for each target). So this pretty much boils down to a more complicated, more error-prone version of using target PHIDs.
This makes the already-muddy Build UI a bit worse, but it needs a general clarity pass anyway (it's showing way too much uninteresting data, and should show a better summary of results instead).
Test Plan:
- This doesn't really do anything interesting yet.
- Used Conduit to send messages to build plans.
- Viewed the messages on the build screen.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8604
Summary: Ref T1049. Tweaks some of the UI and code to improve / clean it up a bit.
Test Plan: Ran build plans, browsed UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8603
Summary: Ref T1049. For consistency, rename these to "Harbormaster...".
Test Plan: Ran migration, ran builds, everything still works fine.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8602
Summary: Ref T1049. D8588 already required custom code to change what it extends, so this is as good a time as we're going to get to move to more standard class name.
Test Plan: `arc liberate`; `arc lint`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8601
Summary:
Ref T1049. Fixes T4602. Moves all the funky field stuff to CustomField. Uses ApplicationTransactions to apply and record edits.
This makes "artifact" fields a little less nice (but still perfectly usable). With D8599, I think they're reasonable overall. We can improve this in the future.
All other field types are better (e.g., fixes weird bugs with "bool", fixes lots of weird behavior around required fields), and this gives us access to many new field types.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of step edits. Here's an example:
{F133694}
Note that:
- "Required" fields work correctly.
- the transaction record is shown at the bottom of the page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4602, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8600
Summary:
Ref T1049. In Harbormaster, build steps may have various inputs (like a host they should run on) and outputs (like a reference to an uploaded file).
- Currently, inputs aren't defined anywhere (except implicitly at runtime).
- Instead, define inputs explicitly.
- Currently, outputs are defined in a way that loses information when misconfigured (the keys will collide).
- Instead, define inputs and outputs so they work whether a step is configured correctly or not.
- Currently, there's no simple way to see a step's inputs and outputs.
- Add some UI for this.
- Currently, reordering steps has some surprising side effects.
- Instead of invalidating steps after reordering them, validate them at display time and warn the user.
Test Plan:
{F133679}
{F133680}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8599
Summary: Ref T1049. This generally simplifies things. The steps which don't support variables generally don't make sense to support varaibles anyway.
Test Plan: Edited some steps.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8588
Summary:
Fixes T3202. This fixes a couple of workflow issues:
- Accepted Revision -> Request Review. Currently this stays "accepted" due to sticky rules being too aggressive, but should transition to "needs review".
- Accepted Revision -> Plan Changes -> Request Review. Currently this stays "accepted". I think this behavior is correct, and have retained it. (In this case, you don't update the revision, you just "undo" your plan changes.) You can "Request Review" again to get back to "Needs Review".
Then implements a "sticky accept" switch:
- When off, updates downgrade accepts.
- When off, "request review" always downgrades accepts.
Test Plan:
- Went through all (I think?) of the plan changes / request review / accept / update workflows, with sticky accept on and off.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3202
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8614
Summary: Ref T4663. Ref T4659. Allows "date" fields to be filtered with range parameters.
Test Plan:
- Added a custom "date" field with "search".
- Populated some values.
- Searched for dates using new range filters.
- Combined date search with other searches.
- Ran other searches independently.
- Inspected the generated queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: shadowhand, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4659, T4663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8598
