Summary: These arrays looks a little odd, most likely due to the autofix applied by `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_ARRAY_SEPARATOR`. See D12296 in which I attempt to improve the autocorrection from this linter rule.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12281
Summary:
Fixes T7199. This still isn't a shining example of perfect code, but the raw amount of copy/paste is much lower than it used to be.
- Reduce code duplication between existing receivers.
- Expose receiving objects in help menus where appropriate.
- Connect some "TODO" receivers.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to every supported object type.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12249
Summary: Ref T7199. This makes the page look less janky and provides more context about how mail commands work and how to use them.
Test Plan: {F355959}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12245
Summary:
Ref T7199. Convert the single help menu item into a dropdown and allow applications to list multiple items there.
When an application has mail command objects, link them in the menu.
Test Plan:
{F355925}
{F355926}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12244
Summary: Ref T7199. This needs some polish and isn't reachable from the UI, but technically has all of the information.
Test Plan:
{F355899}
{F355900}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12241
Summary:
Ref T7199. This fully modularizes mail command handling in Maniphest.
I had to add a couple of minor not-totally-solid-feeling tricks to deal with the "create" case, but they feel not-too-bad, and a million times better than what came before.
Test Plan: Used all commands with `receive-test`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12240
Summary:
Ref T7199. Two notable changes:
- Process multiple commands.
- Process commands when creating //or// updating a task.
And generally clean things up a bit.
Test Plan:
- Used `receive-test` to execute all commands for new tasks.
- Used `receive-test` to execute all commands for existing tasks.
- Used a combination of commands to produce varied effects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12234
Summary:
Ref T7199. In the vein of D12231, these options were a bad idea.
- They once served a very narrow, Facebook-specific need (see T1992), except even Facebook only used the Differential setting AFAIK.
- Outside of that special case, they are unused and essentially unusable (generally speaking, they do not meaningfully implement anything modular or replaceable).
- I have no knowledge of any install ever changing these settings, and can imagine no reason why they would.
Moving forward:
- If they really need to, they can fork locally and chagne one line.
- I expect "!actions" to make mail at least somewhat more modular soon, anyway.
- Any derived handlers would break after T7199 and need to be rewritten anyway, so this is just taking advantage of a BC break to do cleanup.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed configuration.
- Sent some mail from applications, verified the reply handlers set proper reply addresses.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12233
Summary:
Ref T7199. These were a bad idea which got copy-pasted a bunch.
- There is zero reason to ever set these to different things.
- Unsurprisingly, I don't know of any install which has them set to different things.
Unless I've completely forgotten about it, this option was not motivated by some obscure business need, it was just a bad decision which didn't catch anyone's attention at the time.
We partially remedied the mistake at some point by introducing `metamta.reply-handler-domain`, which works as a default for all applications, but never cleaned this mess up.
Test Plan: Sent some mail from applications, verified it picked up appropraite reply handler domains.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12231
Summary:
Ref T7199. This prepares for an exciting new world of more powerful "!action" commands. In particular:
- We parse multiple commands per mail.
- We parse command arguments (these are currently not used).
- We parse commands at the beginning or end of mail.
Additionally:
- Do a quick modernization pass on all handlers.
- Break legacy compatibility with really hacky Facebook stuff (see T1992). They've theoretically been on notice for a year and a half, and their setup relies on calling very old reply handler APIs directly.
- Some of these handlers had some copy/paste fluff.
- The Releeph handler is unreachable, but fix it //in theory//.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to a file; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a legalpad document; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a task; used various "!close", "!claim", "!assign", etc.
- Sent mail to a paste.
- Sent mail to a revision; used various "!reject", "!claim", etc.
- Tried to send mail to a pull request but it's not actually reachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12230
Summary:
Ref T7199. Although this is useful for discovery, it's un-useful enough that we already have an option to disable it, and most applications do not provide any meaningful instructions.
Throwing it away makes it easier to move forward and lets us get rid of a config option.
This is becoming a more advanced/power-user feature anyway, and the new syntax will be significantly more complex and hard to explain with a one-liner. I'm currently thinking that I'll maybe make the "help" menu a dropdown and give it some options like:
+---+
| O |
+---+---------------------+
| Maniphest Documentation |
| Maniphest Email Actions |
+-------------------------+
Then you click the "Email Actions" thing and get a runtime-derived list of available options. Not sure if I'll actually build that, but I think we can fairly throw the in-mail instructions away even if we don't go in that specific direction.
Test Plan: Grepped for `replyHandlerInstructions`, got no hits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12229
Summary: Ref T7689. Ref T4100. This advances the goals of removing `loadViewerHandles()` (only 67 callsites remain!) and letting tokenizers some day take token functions like `viewer()` and `members(differential)`.
Test Plan:
- Sent a new message; used "To".
- I simplified the cancel URI construction slightly because it's moot in all normal cases.
- Edited a thread; used "Add Participants".
- Searched rooms; used "Participants".
- Searched countdowns; used "Authors".
- Created a diff; used "Repository".
- Edited a revision; edited "Projects"; edited "Reveiwers"; edited "Subscribers".
- Searched for revisions; edited "responsible users"; "authors"; "reviwers"; "subscribers"; "repositories".
- Added revision comments; edited "Add Reveiwers"; "Add Subscribers".
- Commented on a commit; edited "Add Auditors"; "Add subscribers".
- Edited a commit; edited "Projects".
- Edited a repository; edited "Projects".
- Searched feed, used "include Users"; "include Proejcts".
- Searched files, used "authors".
- Edited initiative; edited "Projects".
- Searched backers; used "Backers".
- Searched initiatives; used "Owners".
- Edited build plans; edited "Run Command".
- Searched Herald; used "Authors".
- Added signature exemption in Legalpad.
- Searhced legalpad; used "creators"; used "contributors".
- Searched signatures; used "documents"; used "signers".
- Created meme.
- Searched macros; used "Authors".
- Used "Projects" in Maniphest reports.
- Used Maniphest comment actions.
- Edited Maniphest tasks; edited "Assigned To"; edited "CC"; edited "projects".
- Used "parent" in Maniphest task creation workflow.
- Searched for projects; used "assigned to"; "in any projec"; "in all projects"; "not in projects"; "in users' projects"; "authors"; "subscribers".
- Edited Maniphest bug filing domains, used "Default Author".
- Searched for OAuth applications, used "Creators".
- Edited Owners pacakge; edited "Primary Owner"; edited "Owners".
- Searched for Owners packages; used "Owner".
- OMG this UI is OLD
- Edited a paste; edited "Projects".
- Searched for paste; used "Authors".
- Searched user activity log; used "Actors"; used "Users".
- Edited a mock; edited "Projects"; edited "CC".
- Searched for mocks; used "Authors".
- Edited Phortune account; edited "Members".
- Edited Phortune merchant account; edited "Members".
- Searched Phrequent; used "Users".
- Edited Ponder question; sued "projects".
- Searched Ponder; used "Authors"; used "Answered By".
- Added project members.
- Searched for projects; used "Members".
- Edited a Releeph product; edited "Pushers".
- Searched pull requests; searched "Requestors".
- Edited an arcanist project; used "Uses Symbols From".
- Searhced push logs; used "Repositories"; used "Pushers".
- Searched repositories; used "In nay project".
- Used global search; used Authors/owners/Subscribers/In Any Project.
- Edited a slowvote; used "Projects".
- Searched slovotes; used "Authors".
- Created a custom "Users" field; edited and searched for it.
- Made a whole lot of typos in this list. ^^^^^^
Did not test:
- Lint is nontrivial to test locally, I'll test it in production.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T7689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12224
Summary:
Ref T7689. This gives HandleLists `renderList()` and `renderHandle()` methods, which return views that can perform just-in-time data fetching and generally look and feel like other rendering code, instead of being odd pseudo-functional methods on `Controller`.
Also converts callsites on the Maniphest detail page to use these methods.
Next changes will wipe out more of the callsites.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Maniphest detail page with many relevant handles.
- Created a new subtask.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12205
Summary:
Fixes T7664. When there are a large number of tasks (400+) with the same subpriority (which can happen if the subpriority features are rarely used), it may take more than 30 seconds to rebalance them.
Make the algorithm more aggressive about rebalancing homogenous blocks of tasks.
This may need to get even fancier, but I'd guess it can process blocks 1-2 orders of magnitude larger, which should be ~all installs.
(If someone still hits issues with this, I'll make it fancier.)
Once a block is rebalanced, it doesn't need to be rebalanced again (at least, not as a whole block) so we basically just need to get over the initial hurdle here and then we're good.
In the worst case, we can provide `bin/maniphest rebalance` or similar and do the rebalance step offline.
And, in any case, we have more test coverage here now.
Test Plan:
- Existing tests.
- New tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12166
Summary:
Fixes T7563. Fixes T5201. Reframe this as two separate operations:
- Move before or after a task.
- Move to the beginning or end of a priority.
Then:
- Make all the order queries unambiguous and properly reversible, with an explicit `id` order.
- Just reuse `ManiphestTask` to get results in the correct order.
- Simplify the actual transaction apply logic.
- Detect and recover from cases where tasks have identical or similar subpriorities.
Test Plan:
- Wrote and executed unit tests.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities and between priorities in the main Maniphest view.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities in the workboard view, when ordered by priority.
- Also poked at the "natural" order, but that shouldn't be affected.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5201, T7563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12121
Summary: Renames the method in PHUIObjectBoxView to match the new PHUIInfoView class.
Test Plan: grepped codebase. Went to Calendar and tried a new status.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12005
Summary: Fixes T7392. I kind of stink at SQL so my approach here was to "start over" conceptually and this way makes the most sense to me - we basically do one join on the dependency table and then a second join back from the dependency table to the main task table. In the where clause we filter the resulting rows, first checking the data from dependency join for existence as appropros and then checking the second join for main task table for the proper "open" task values.
Test Plan: made a task X be blocked by task Y. closed task y. search for "not blocked" tasks and saw task X.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11962
Summary: Fixes T7434. We need to LEFT JOIN, not JOIN here, because we still want result rows where the value is `null`.
Test Plan: Issued blocked/not-blocked + blocking/not-blocking queries, got results in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11939
Summary: Adding better CSS and set correct tag and examples.
Test Plan: Test UIExamples, creating and click on similar task, empty task in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7423
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11932
Summary: Fixes T7421. Now that we join the task table again to ignore //closed// blockers, all the column names are ambiguous. Make them unambiguous.
Test Plan: Issued some searches with various different parameters.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7421
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11922
Summary: Removes AphrontContext bar and uses PHUIInfoView instead. This also attaches to the ObjectBox instead for cleaner UI. Also moved phui-error-view.css which was missed.
Test Plan: Test creating a subtask or a new task, see updated info bar and action buttons.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11920
Summary: Since this element isn't strictly about errors, re-label as info view instead.
Test Plan: Grepped for all callsites, tested UIExamples and a few other random pages.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11867
Summary: Fixes T7392. When filtering blocked/blocking Maniphest tasks, don't consider closed tasks.
Test Plan:
# Created `T1` and `T2` with `T2 depends on T1`.
# Marked `T1` as resolved.
# Searched for tasks "blocked by other tasks" and noted that `T2` wasn't in the result set.
Reviewers: btrahan, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11911
Summary: Fixes T7367
Test Plan: I guess noone every used this? Click on mobile menu, get not a 404.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11880
Summary:
Ref T7185. These settings shouldn't be unlocked anywhere. Specifically:
- `reply-handler`: These are on the way out.
- `reply-handler-domain`: Also hopefully on the way out; locked because a compromised administrator account can redirect replies.
- `phabricator.cookie-prefix`: Not dangerous per se, but an admin could have a hard time fixing this if they changed it by accident since their session would become invalid immediately.
Test Plan: Browsed Config.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7185
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11764
Summary: Fixes T7088. Mainly this updates the documentation but I also snuck in tweaking how the domain reply handler is built. This does two main things -- makes the behavior consistent as some applications who didn't override this behavior would send out emails with reply tos AND makes it easier for us to deprecate the custom domain thing on a per application basis, which is just silly. On that note, the main documentation doesn't get into how this can be overridden, though I left in that mini blurb on the config setting itself. We could deprecate this harder and LOCK things if you want as well.
Test Plan: read docs, looked good. reasoned through re-factor
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7088
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11725
Summary: I //think// Maniphest has switched to real edges now.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11716
Summary: Adds core and apps grouping to configuration options, makes it somewhat easier to browse config options.
Test Plan: Set each option, review list. Breakdown is nearly 50/50 apps/core.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11722
Summary: Fixes T7118. This does the basic "filter the list" thing, though it ends up being a little manual since I guess this hasn't come up before? There is also potential weird behavior if the user was using an app and lost access to it - they will have nothing selected on edit - but I think this is actually correct behavior in this circumstance.
Test Plan:
used a user who couldn't get access to the "quick create" apps and noted that the dropdown list on dashboard panel create was missing the expected engines
ran `arc unit --everything` to verify abstract method implemented everywhere
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7118
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11687
Summary: Fixes T7164. Adds some details about how the statuses will show up in the UI.
Test Plan: Read the text
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11686
Summary: Fixes T7094 (last of many revisions). Its important to do this filtering ASAP so that users can't deduce the identify of an unknown / invisible project.
Test Plan: executed a query for tasks in project foo using user bar. using user foo, lock user bar out of project foo. reissued the query and saw "no data" as well as "restricted project" in the project typeahead.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11660
Summary: Ref T7094. This is a bit involved and should be tackled as a separate effort. The good news is policy still saves the day here but (back to the bad news) its a bad user experience.
Test Plan: NA, just a comment
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11658
Summary: Revamps Profile to be like Projects, a mini portal and side nav with icons.
Test Plan: Viewed my own profile, as well as others. Test seeing my commits, tasks, diffs, and upcoming events. Checked mobile navigation.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11547
Summary: This sets an icon for each config, makes it easier to scan.
Test Plan:
Reload Config page, see all new icons
{F281089}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11619
Summary: Clean up the error view styling.
Test Plan:
Tested as many as I could find, built additional tests in UIExamples
{F280452}
{F280453}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11605
Summary: Fixes T3404 (post D11565), fixes T5952. This infrastructure has been getting deployed against Maniphest and its time to get these other two applications going on it.
Test Plan: created an email address for paste and used `./bin/mail receive-test` ; a paste was successfully created
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952, T3404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11570
Summary: due to typehints, passing null is going to barf here. Ref D11564, ref T5039.
Test Plan: made an edit to a task from the web ui and it didnt fatal
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11571
Summary:
Fixes T5039. The trick / possibly lame part here is we only match 1 application email and its undefined which one. e.g. if a user emails us at address x, y, and z only one of those will pick up the mail. Ergo, don't let users define non-sensical herald conditions like "matches all". Also document what I think was non-intuitive about the code with an inline comment; we have to return an array with just a phid from an object and out of context it feels very "what the...???"
Note this needs to be deployed to other applications still, but I think its okay to close T5039 aggressively here since its done from a user story perspective.
Test Plan: set up a herald rule to flag tasks created as blue via app email x. sent an email to x via `bin/mail receive-test` and verified the task had the blue flag
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11564
Summary: Ref T5952. This adds support for a "default author" and deploys it on Maniphest.
Test Plan: used augmented (by this diff) bin/mail receive-test to test creation via an application email with a default author configured and no author specified. a task was created with the author as the default author i configured.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11446
Summary:
Ref T7055. Apparently we just never had one? I feel like I'm crazy. But I can't find any trace in the logs.
I'm actually not 100% sold on this being better because it's a color glyph on OSX and those feel a little out of place / tacky to me compared to the black-and-white ones. So I'd be fine with just leaving it off, too. Clearly not important if no one noticed it until I caught it in T7055.
Test Plan: {F276917}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7055
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11524
Summary: Select a similar or better FontAwesome icon to represent each application
Test Plan: Visual inspection
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11489
Summary: Ref T5952, T3404. This lays the basic plumbing for how this will work, all the way to deploying on Maniphest. Aside from what is mentioned on T5952, I think page(s) on editing application emails could use a little more helpful text about what's going on, similar to how the config page that's getting deprecated works.
Test Plan: ran migration and noted my create email address migrated successfully. used bin/mail to make a task. added another email and used bin/mail to make a task. deleted an email. edited an email. invoked various error states and they all looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3404, T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11418
