Summary: See PHI292. This is just a generalization of D18851: feed stories have the same issue as mail. Don't hide "requested a review" in either mail or feed.
Test Plan:
- Enable prototypes.
- No harbormaster builds.
- Create a revision.
- Pre-patch: no feed story.
- Post-patch: feed story.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18886
Summary: Ref T13035. See that task for a description of the issue.
Test Plan:
- Enabled prototypes.
- Disabled all Herald rules that trigger Harbormaster builds.
- Created a new revision.
- Before patch: initial review request email was dropped.
- After patch: initial review request email is sent.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18851
Summary:
See PHI230. Currently, we denormalize raw line counts onto diffs and revisions, but not added/removed line counts.
I'd like to try a `[---+ ]` sort of size hint element (see D16322 for more) as a general approach to conveying size information at a glance and see how it feels, since I think the raw size number isn't very scannable/useful and it may be a significant improvement to hint about how much of a change is throwing stuff out vs adding new stuff.
This just makes the data available without any subquerying and doesn't actually change the UI.
Test Plan:
Created a revision, saw detailed change information populate in the database.
```
mysql> select * from differential_revision where id = 292\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 292
title: WIP
originalTitle: WIP
phid: PHID-DREV-ux3cxptibn3l5pxsug3z
status: draft
summary: asdf
testPlan: asdf
authorPHID: PHID-USER-cvfydnwadpdj7vdon36z
lastReviewerPHID: NULL
lineCount: 41
dateCreated: 1513179418
dateModified: 1513179418
attached: []
mailKey: h4mn6perdio47o4beomyvu75zezwvredx3mbrlgz
branchName: NULL
viewPolicy: users
editPolicy: users
repositoryPHID: PHID-REPO-wif5lutk5gn3y6ursk4p
properties: {"lines.added":40,"lines.removed":1}
activeDiffPHID: PHID-DIFF-ixjphpunpkenqgukpmce
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
```
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18832
Summary:
See PHI228. Ref T2543. The current logic gets this slightly wrong: prototypes are off, you create a draft with `--draft`, then promote it with "Request Review". This misses both branches.
Instead, test these conditions a little more broadly. We also need to store broadcast state since `getIsNewObject()` isn't good enough with this workflow.
Test Plan:
- With prototypes on and autopromotion, got a rich email after builds finished.
- With prototypes off, got a rich email immediately.
- With prototypes off and `--draft`, got a rich email after "Request Review".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18801
Summary: See PHI195. This bulks out these API methods since all the requests are pretty straightforward.
Test Plan: Ran `edge.search` and `differential.revision.search`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18762
Summary:
Ref T12539. See PHI190. Currently, each Diff has a `revisionID`, but Revisions do not point at the current active diff. To find the active diff for a given revision, we need to issue a separate query.
Furthermore, this query is inefficient for bulk loads: if we have a lot of revisions, we end up querying for all diff IDs for all those revisions first, then selecting the largest ones and querying again to get the actual diff objects. This strategy could likely be optimized but the query is a mess in any case.
In several cases, it's useful to have the active diff PHID without needing to do a second query -- sometimes for convenience, and sometimes for performance.
T12539 is an example of such a case: it would be nice to refine the bucketing logic (which only depends on active diff PHIDs), but it feels bad to make the page heavier to do it.
For now, this is unused. I'll start using it to fix the bucketing issue, and then we can expand it gradually to address other performance/convenience issues.
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations, inspected database, saw sensible values.
- Created a new revision, saw a sensible database value.
- Updated an existing revision, saw database update properly.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12539
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18756
Summary:
Ref T2543. Instead of autosubmitting revisions to "Needs Review" when builds finish, allow them to be held in "Draft" indefinitely.
There's currently no UI for this. I plan to just expose it as `arc diff --draft` for now, in a followup change.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision (via Conduit) with "hold as draft", saw it hold as draft after builds finished.
- Created a revision (normally), saw it autosubmit after builds finished.
- Requested review of a "hold as draft" revision to kick it out of draft state.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18737
Summary: See PHI90. For now, this only provides a limited amount of information, but should satisfy the use case in PHI90 and build toward a more complete version in the future.
Test Plan: Used new Conduit method to retrieve information about diffs.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18744
Summary:
Ref T2543. When a revision is created, we check if any builds are waiting/failed, and submit it for review immediately if we aren't waiting for anything.
In doing this, we ignore builds with only autotargets, since these are client-side and failures from local `arc lint` / `arc unit` should not count (the user has already chosen to ignore/skip them).
The way we do this has some issues:
- Herald may have started builds, but they may still be PENDING and not have any targets yet. In this case, we'll see "no non-autotargets" and ignore the build, which is wrong.
- We have to load targets but don't really care about them, which is more work than we really need to do.
- And it's kind of complex, too.
Instead, just let `BuildQuery` filter out "autobuilds" (builds generated from autoplans) with a JOIN.
Test Plan: Ran `arc diff` with builds configured, got a clean "Draft" state instead of an incorrect promotion directly to "Needs Review".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18721
Summary: Ref T2543. When revisions are in the draft state, tell the user what we're waiting for or why they aren't moving forward.
Test Plan: {F5228840}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18714
Summary: Ref T2543. This is a less ambitious version of the rule in D18628, which I backed off from, since I think this probably still has a fair number of loose ends to tie up.
Test Plan: Created a revision locally.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18713
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary:
Ref T13000. This marks each table as either "data" (normal data), "cache" (automatically rebuilt, no need to ever dump) or "index" (can be manually rebuilt).
By default, `bin/storage dump` dumps data and index tables, but not cache tables.
With `--no-indexes`, it dumps only data tables. Indexes can be rebuilt after a restore with `bin/search index --all ...`.
Test Plan:
- Ran `--no-indexes` and normal dumps with `--trace`, verified that cache and index (former case) or cache only (latter case) tables were dumped with `--no-data`.
- Verified dump has the same number of `CREATE TABLE` statements as before the changes.
- Reviewed persistence tags in the web UI (note Ferret engine tables are "Index"):
{F5210886}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13000
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18682
Summary:
Ref PHI91. When Owners (or Herald, or manual user action) adds package reviewers to a revision, later updates to the revision make some of them less relevant or irrelevant.
Provide a hint when a package reviewer doesn't own any of the paths that a diff changes. Humans can then decide if the reviewer is obsolete/irrelevant or not.
This is a rough cut to get the feature working, design could probably use some tweaking if it sticks.
Test Plan: {F5204309}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: jboning
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18663
Summary:
Ref T2543. Currently, we always do some special things when a revision is created, mostly adding more stuff to the mail.
With drafts, we want to suppress initial mail and send this big, rich mail only when the revision actually moves out of "draft".
Prepare the code for this, with the actual methods hard-coded to the current behavior. This will probably take some tweaking but I think I got most of it.
Test Plan: Banged around in Differential so it sent some mail, saw normal mail without anything new.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18627
Summary:
Ref T2543. There's no way to put revisions into this state yet, but start adding support for when there is.
Adds the status constant, plus support for bucketing them.
Test Plan:
- Manually put a revision in "Draft" state by updating the database directly.
- Verified my drafts showed up in a "Drafts" section on the bucket view.
- Verified others' drafts did not appear on the action bucket view.
- Viewed revisions, queried for "Draft" revisions, etc (stuff we get for free).
{F5186781}
{F5186782}
{F5186783}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18625
Summary:
Fixes T12986. I caught this bug in the changes from D18584: when we moved a large hunk to file storage, we would decompress it but keep the "deflated" flag. This could cause confusion when loading it later. I missed this in testing since I wasn't exhaustive enough in checking hunks and didn't run into a compressed one.
Instead of compressing on `save()`, compress during the normal workflow.
We currently never advise users to run this workflow so I didn't bother trying to clean up possible existing migrations.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/differential migrate-hunk` on compressed hunks, moving them to and from file storage. Saw them work correctly and remain compressed.
- Created new small (uncompressed) and large (compressed) hunks, verified they work properly and get compressed (if applicable).
- Used `bin/cache purge --caches changeset` to clear changeset caches and make sure the actual table was being hit.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18624
Summary:
Ref T12932. For long-lived installs, one of the largest tables tends to be the hunk data table. Although it doesn't grow tremendously fast, it's also well suited to storage in Files instead of the database (infrequent access, relatively large blobs of data, mostly one-at-a-time access), and earlier work anticipated eventually adding support for Files storage.
Make Files storage work, and provide `bin/differential migrate-hunk` to manually test/migrate hunks. This is currently the only way hunks get moved to file storage, but I expect to add a GC step which moves them to File storage after 30 days shortly.
The immediate motivation for this is to relieve storage pressure on db001/db002 so we have more headroom for deploying the Ferret engine and its larger indexes (see also T12819).
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/differential migrate-hunk` to move a hunk to and from file storage, verified it survived intact.
- Downloaded the actual stored file, sanity-checked it. Verified permissions.
- Destroyed a diff with `bin/remove destroy`, saw the hunk and file storage destroyed.
- Verified that going from file -> text destroys the old file properly with `migrate-hunk --trace ...`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12932
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18584
Summary:
See brief discussion in D18554. All the index tables are the same for every application (and, at this point, seem unlikely to change) and we never actually pass these objects around (they're only used internally).
In some other cases (like Transactions) not every application has the same tables (for example, Differential has extra field for inline comments), and/or we pass the objects around (lots of stuff uses `$xactions` directly).
However, in this case, and in Edges, we don't interact with any representation of the database state directly in much of the code, and it doesn't change from application to application.
Just automatically define document, field, and ngram tables for anything which implements `FerretInterface`. This makes the query and index logic a tiny bit messier but lets us delete a ton of boilerplate classes.
Test Plan: Indexed objects, searched for objects. Same results as before with much less code. Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, got a clean bill of health.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18559
Summary:
Fixes T12118. See PHI54. This adds a special case for the initial "reviewers" transactions, similar to the existing special case for "projects" transactions.
Although these transactions are redudnant in the web view since you can see the information clearly on the page, they're more reasonably useful in mail.
Test Plan: {F5168838}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12118
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18542
Summary: Ref T12819. Adds storage and indexing for the Ferret engine to Differential.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index D123 --force`, saw indexes appear in database. No UI/user impact yet.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18540
Summary:
Fixes T12970. This is easier than I expected, and appears to occur in only one place.
This prevents a change from ever generating with an anchor like `#12345678`, which is ambiguous because it may be a comment anchor.
Test Plan: Viewed a revision, saw new `change-xxxyyyzzz` anchors, clicked one, got jumped to the right place.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12970
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18465
Summary:
Ref T2543. This updates and migrates the status change transactions:
- All storage now records the modern modular transaction ("differential.revision.status"), not the obsolete non-modular transaction ("differential:status").
- All storage now records the modern constants ("accepted"), not the obsolete numeric values ("2").
Test Plan:
- Selected all the relevant rows before/after migration, data looked sane.
- Browsed around, reviewed timelines, no changes after migration.
- Changed revision states, saw appropriate new transactions in the database and timeline rendering.
- Grepped for `differential:status`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18419
Summary:
Ref T2543. Rewrites all the storage to use constants.
Note that transactions still use legacy values, I'll migrate and update them separately.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Browsed around, changed revision states, viewed dashboard, etc.
- Selected `DISTINCT()` and `GROUP_CONCAT()` of the `status` field in the database, saw sane/expected before and after values.
- Verified that old Conduit methods still return numeric constants for compatibility.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18418
Summary: Ref T2543. All writers now write modern statuses. Make all readers explicit about whether they are reading modern or legacy statuses, so I can swap the storage format.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `getStatus()`, scanned the list. Other applications have methods with this name so it's possible I missed something.
- Browed around, changed revision statuses.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18417
Summary: Ref T2543. Update these for the modern stuff.
Test Plan: Created a new revision, got a revision in the right state ("Needs Review"). Accepted, planned, requested, abandoned revision; state transitions looked good.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18415
Summary: Ref T2543. Swaps these over to modern constants.
Test Plan: Viewed dashboard, no chagnes to bucketing.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18414
Summary: Ref T2543. This cleans up all the "when no one is rejecting/blocking and someone accepted, mark the revision overall as accepted" logic to use more modern status stuff instead of `ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus`.
Test Plan:
- Updated revisions, saw them go to "Needs Review".
- Accepted, requested changes to revisions.
- Updated one with changes requested, saw it go to "needs review" again.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18413
Summary:
Ref T2543. Converts the TYPE_STATUS transaction (used to render "This revision now requires changes to proceed.", "This revision is accepted and ready to land.", etc) to ModularTransactions.
Also, continue consolidating all the status-related information (here, more colors and icons) into a single place. By the end of this, we may learn that NEEDS_REVIEW uses //every// color.
Test Plan:
Reviewed old status transactions (unchanged) and created new ones (looked the same as the old ones).
(I plan to migrate all of these a few diffs from now, around when I change the storage format.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18410
Summary: Ref T2543. Now that the integer status constants are banished to the internals, we can expose status information from "differential.revision.search".
Test Plan:
Searched for revisions.
{F5093873}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18400
Summary:
Ref T2543. Add `isPublished()` to mean: exactly the status 'closed', which is now interally called 'published', but still shown as 'closed' to users.
We have some callsites which are about "exactly that status", vs "any 'closed' status", e.g. including "abandoned".
This also introduces `isChangePlanned()`, which felt less awkward than `isChangesPlanned()` but more consistent than `hasChangesPlanned()` or `isStatusChangesPlanned()` or similar.
Test Plan: `grep`, loaded revisions, requested review.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18341
Summary:
Ref T2543. Further consolidates status management into DifferentialRevisionStatus.
One change I'm making here is internally renaming "CLOSED" to "PUBLISHED". The UI will continue to say "Closed", at least for now, but this should make the code more clear because we care about "is closed, exactly" vs "is any closed status (closed, abandoned, sometimes accepted)". This distinction is more obvious as `isClosed()` vs `isPublished()` than, e.g., `isClosedWithExactlyTheClosedStatus()` or something. I think "Published" is generally more clear, too, and more consistent with modern language (e.g., "pre-publish review" replacing "pre-commit review" to make it more clear what we mean in Git/Mercurial).
I've removed the IN_PREPARATION status since this was just earlier groundwork for "Draft" and not actually used, and under the newer plan I'm trying to just abandon `ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus` entirely (or, at least, substantially).
Test Plan:
- Viewed revisions.
- Viewed revision list.
- Viewed revisions linked to a task in Maniphest.
- Viewed revision graph of dependencies in Differential.
- Grepped for `COLOR_STATUS_...` constants.
- Grepped for removed method `getRevisionStatusIcon()` (no callsites).
- Grepped for removed method `renderFullDescription()` (one callsite, replaced with just building a `TagView` inline).
- Grepped for removed method `isClosedStatus()` (no callsites after other changes).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18340
Summary:
Ref T2543. These are currently numeric values, like "0" and "3". I want to replace them with strings, like "accepted", and move definitions from Arcanist to Phabricator.
To set the stage for this, reduce the number of callsites where Phabricator invokes `ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus`.
This is just the easy ones. I'll hold this until the release cut.
Test Plan:
- Called `differential.find`.
- Called `differential.getrevision`.
- Called `differential.query`.
- Removed all reviewers from a revision, saw warning.
- Abandoned the no-reviewers revision, no more warning.
- Attached a revision to a task to get it to show the state icon with the status on a tooltip.
- Viewed revision bucketing on dashboard.
- Used `bin/search index` to reindex a revision.
- Hit the "Land Revision" endpoint.
I didn't explicitly test these cases:
- Doorkeeper Asana integration, since setup takes a thousand years.
- Disambiguation logic when multiple hashes match, since setup is also very involved.
- Releeph because it's Releeph.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18339
Summary: Fixes T12952. This never work AFAIK, so resolves this mis-information. See T4411 for follow up.
Test Plan: Click on policy for a diff, no longer see text.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18349
Summary: Adds a very basic list of all inline comments, threaded, and their status. Kept this a little simpler than the mock, mostly because sorting here feels a little strange given threads would be all over the place. Not sure sorted is needed in practice anyways. I'd probably lean towards just adding a JS checkbox to hide certain rows if needed in the future.
Test Plan:
Test various commenting structures:
- Leave Comment
- Update Diff
- Leave new comment
- Reply to comment
- Reply to comment as revision author
- Mark items as done
- Update diff again
{F4996915}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18112
Summary:
Ref T12509. Many of the calls to HMAC+SHA1 are just to compute cachekeys for remarkup objects.
Make these use HMAC+SHA256 instead. There is no downside to swapping these since they just cause a cache miss in the worst case.
I also plan to get rid of `PhabricatorMarkupInterface` eventually, but this doesn't go that far.
Test Plan: Browsed some different types of documents (tasks, legalpad documents, phame blogs / posts, pholio mocks, etc).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17631
Summary: Allow API callers to retrieve reviewer information via a new "reviewers" attachment.
Test Plan: {F4675784}
Reviewers: chad, lvital
Reviewed By: lvital
Subscribers: lvital
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17633
Summary:
Ref T12272. If you own a package which owns "/", this allows you to force-accept package reviews for packages which own sub-paths, like "/src/adventure/".
The default UI looks something like this:
```
[X] Accept as epriestley
[X] Accept as Root Package
[ ] Force accept as Adventure Package
```
By default, force-accepts are not selected.
(I may do some UI cleanup and/or annotate "because you own X" in the future and/or mark these accepts specially in some way, particularly if this proves confusing along whatever dimension.)
Test Plan: {F4314747}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17569
Summary: Ref T10967. This change is similar to D17566, but for rejects.
Test Plan:
- Create a revision as A, with reviewer B.
- Reject as B.
- Request review as A.
- Before patch: stuck in "rejected".
- After patch: transitions back to "needs review".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17568
Summary: Ref T10967. This moves all remaining "request review" pathways (just `differential.createcomment`) to the new code, and removes the old action.
Test Plan: Requested review on a revision, `grep`'d for the action constant.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17567
Summary:
Ref T10967. This is explained in more detail in T10967#217125
When an author does "Request Review" on an accepted revision, void (in the sense of "cancel out", like a bank check) any "accepted" reviewers on the current diff.
Test Plan:
- Create a revision with author A and reviewer B.
- Accept as B.
- "Request Review" as A.
- (With sticky accepts enabled.)
- Before patch: revision swithced back to "accepted".
- After patch: the earlier review is "voided" by te "Request Review", and the revision switches to "Review Requested".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17566
Summary:
Ref T12271. Don't do anything with this yet, but store who accepted/rejected/whatever on behalf of reviewers.
In the future, we could use this to render stuff like "Blessed Committers (accepted by epriestley)" or whatever. I don't know that this is necessarily super useful, but it's easy to track, seems likely to be useful, and would be a gigantic pain to backfill later if we decide we want it.
Test Plan: Accepted/rejected a revision, saw reviewers update appropriately.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17537
Summary:
Ref T12271. Currenty, when you "Accept" a revision, you always accept it for all reviewers you have authority over.
There are some situations where communication can be more clear if users can accept as only themselves, or for only some packages, etc. T12271 discusses some of these use cases in more depth.
Instead of making "Accept" a blanket action, default it to doing what it does now but let the user uncheck reviewers.
In cases where project/package reviewers aren't in use, this doesn't change anything.
For now, "reject" still acts the old way (reject everything). We could make that use checkboxes too, but I'm not sure there's as much of a use case for it, and I generally want users who are blocking stuff to have more direct accountability in a product sense.
Test Plan:
- Accepted normally.
- Accepted a subset.
- Tried to accept none.
- Tried to accept bogus reviewers.
- Accepted with myself not a reviewer
- Accepted with only one reviewer (just got normal "this will be accepted" text).
{F4251255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17533
Summary:
Ref T10967. I'm not 100% sure we need this, but the old edge table had it and I recall an issue long ago where not having this key left us with a bad query plan.
Our data doesn't really provide a way to test this key (we have many revisions and few reviewers, so the query planner always uses revision keys), and building a convincing test case would take a while (lipsum needs some improvements to add reviewers). But in the worst case this key is mostly useless and wastes a few MB of disk space, which isn't a big deal.
So I can't conclusively prove that this key does anything to the dashboard query, but the migration removed it and I'm more comfortable keeping it so I'm not worried about breaking stuff.
At the very least, MySQL does select this key in the query plan when I do a "Reviewers:" query explicitly so it isn't //useless//.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, ran dashboard query, the query plan didn't get any worse.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17532
Summary:
Fixes T11050. Today, when a user resigns, we just delete the record of them ever being a reviewer.
However, this means you have no way to say "I don't care about this and don't want to see it on my dashboard" if you are a member of any project or package reviewers.
Instead, store "resigned" as a distinct state from "not a reviewer", and treat it a little differently in the UI:
- On the bucketing screen, discard revisions any responsible user has resigned from.
- On the main `/Dxxx` page, show these users as resigned explicitly (we could just hide them, too, but I think this is good to start with).
- In the query, don't treat a "resigned" state as a real "reviewer" (this change happened earlier, in D17517).
- When resigning, write a "resigned" state instead of deleting the row.
- When editing a list of reviewers, I'm still treating this reviewer as a reviewer and not special casing it. I think that's sufficiently clear but we could tailor this behavior later.
Test Plan:
- Resigned from a revision.
- Saw "Resigned" in reviewers list.
- Saw revision disappear from my dashboard.
- Edited revision, saw user still appear as an editable reviewer. Saved revision, saw no weird side effects.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11050
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17531
Summary:
Ref T10967. Improves some method names:
- `Revision->getReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->getReviewers()`
- `Revision->attachReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->attachReviewers()`
- `Reviewer->getStatus()` -> `Reviewer->getReviewerStatus()` (this is mostly to make this more greppable)
Test Plan:
- bunch o' `grep`
- Browsed around.
- If I missed anything, it should fatal in an obvious way. We have a lot of other `getStatus()` calls and it's hard to be sure I got them all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17522
Summary: Ref T10967. The old name was because we had a `getReviewers()` tied to `needRelationships()`, rename this method to use a simpler and more clear name.
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17519
Summary:
Ref T10967. There have been two different ways to load reviewers for a while: `needReviewerStatus()` and `needRelationships()`.
The `needRelationships()` stuff was a false start along time ago that didn't really go anywhere. I believe the idea was that we might want to load several different types of edges (subscribers, reviewers, etc) on lots of different types of objects. However, all that stuff pretty much ended up modularizing so that main `Query` classes did not need to know about it, so `needRelationships()` never got generalized or went anywhere.
A handful of things still use it, but get rid of them: they should either `needReviewerStatus()` to get reviewer info, or the ~3 callsites that care about subscribers can just load them directly.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed methods (`needRelationships()`, `getReviewers()`, `getCCPHIDs()`, etc).
- Browsed Diffusion, Differential.
- Called `differential.query`.
It's possible I missed some stuff, but it should mostly show up as super obvious fatals ("call needReviewerStatus() before getReviewerStatus()!").
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17518
Summary:
Ref T10967.
When we query for revisions with particular reviewers, use the new table to drive the query.
When we load revisions for use in the application, also use the new table to drive the query.
This doesn't convert everything: there's some old `loadRelationships()` stuff still using the old table. But this moves the major stuff over.
(This also changes the icon for "commented" from a question mark to a speech bubble.)
Test Plan:
- Viewed revision lists and detail views on old and new code, saw identical outcomes.
- Updated revisions, accepted/rejected/commented on revisions.
- Hit the "Accepted Older" and "Commented Older" states by taking an action and then updating.
- Grepped for removed methods (like `getEdgeData()` and `getDiffID()`).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17517
