Summary:
Ref T13164. See PHI823. (See that issue for some more details and discussion.)
Add aural labels to various buttons which were missing reasonable aural labels.
The "Search" button (magnifying glass in the global search input) had an entire menu thing inside it. I moved that one level up and it doesn't look like it broke anything (?). All the other changes are pretty straightforward.
Test Plan:
{F5806497}
{F5806498}
- Will follow up on the issue to make sure things are in better shape for the reporting user.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19594
Summary:
Ref T12733. When a revision has unsubmitted checkmarks:
- Color the banner yellow.
- Show them in the "X unsubmitted" count.
- Make the "X unsubmitted" button cycle between all drafts (written but unpublished comments) and "draft done" (checked but unsubmitted "Done" checkbox comments).
Test Plan:
- Checked a "Done" box, saw "1 unsubmitted" and yellow banner.
- Clicked "5 unsubmitted" repeatedly, saw it cycle through all unsubmitted comments and checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18127
Summary:
Ref T12733. This paves the way for a separate "hide" operation which completely hides things.
(I didn't extend this to the server side because that would require schema changes and the new "hide" state is client-only.)
Test Plan: Collapsed and expanded inlines, viewed tooltips.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18126
Summary:
Fixes T12806. Ref T12733.
- Don't count synthetic (lint) comments as anything.
- When you begin writing an inline then cancel it, don't count it as anything.
- When we would show "0 / X", just show "X".
Test Plan:
- Viewed a diff with synthetic comments, no button.
- Wrote, then cancelled an inline. No "X comments".
- Clicked / unlicked "Done", saw "X" -> "1 / X".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12806, T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18103
Summary: Ref T12733. Shows a comment snippet when hovering inlines in the objective list.
Test Plan: {F4968490}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17980
Summary:
Add important objectives (like waygates and quest markers) to the minimap.
This also probably fixes @cspeckmim's bug with the {key @} keyboard shortcut.
Test Plan:
(This is probably easier to undestand if you `arc patch` + click around.)
{F4966037}
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17955
Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T11648. Currently, we snug up replies with a negative margin (from T10563) but this throws off the anchor highlighting.
Instead:
- Remove padding from these dolumns.
- Use margins on the stuff inside them instead.
- Less margins for replies.
- Less margins for collapsed comments.
- Show some text for collapsed comments.
Test Plan:
{F4960890}
{F4960891}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616, T11648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17913
Summary:
Fixes T8420. Now that hidden inlines no longer fold into a big clump, anchors can just jump to them in a normal way.
Move the anchors up a smidge so thing work.
Test Plan: Clicked an anchor pointed at a hidden inline, ended up in the right place.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17910
Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T12715. I suspect these are very rarely used. (I think you tried to get rid of them before but I pushed back since we couldn't really offer great alternatives at the time?)
Now that the code is in a better place:
- Click an inline's header (just the colored part) to select it with the keyboard selection cursor.
- Click again to deselect it.
- You can use "n" and "p" to jump to comments, so "click + n" is the same as the old "V" action.
- This also makes it easier to swap between keyboard and mouse workflows, since you can jump into things with the keyboard at any inline.
Also, make "Reply" render more consistently.
Test Plan:
- Did all that stuff, things seemed to work OK.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12715, T12616
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17908
Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T12153. Currently, when you hide inlines, they hide completely and turn into a little bubble on the previous line.
Instead, collapse them to a single line one-by-one. Narrowly, this fixes T12153.
In the future, I plan to make these changes so this feature makes more sense:
- Introduce global "hide everything" states (T8909) so you can completely hide stuff if you want, and this represents more of a halfway state between "nuke it" and "view it".
- Make the actual rendering better, so it says "epriestley: blah blah..." instead of just "..." -- and looks less dumb.
The real goal here is to introduce `DiffInline` and continue moving stuff from the tangled jungle of a million top-level behaviors to sensible smooth statefulness.
Test Plan:
- Hid and revealed inlines in unified and two-up modes.
- These look pretty junk for now:
{F4948659}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616, T12153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17861
Summary:
Earlier, I made some changes so that when you create or edit an inline, the comment at the bottom of the page updates (even though you didn't fiddle with the stacked actions inputs).
At the last second I broke them by spelling this wrong while cleaning things up, so they didn't actually work. Spell the property correctly ("showPreview", not "shouldPreview").
Also, we have some JS which rewrites "Not Visible" into "View", but it fires in an inconvenient way now and is flickery for me. Ideally this should get cleaned up slightly better eventualy, but at least make is stop doing so much flickery layout for now.
Test Plan:
- Wrote no comment on a revision.
- Added an inline.
- Saw comment preview properly update immediately.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17229
Summary:
Ref T10563. This isn't a complete fix, but should make viewing complex inline threads a little more manageable.
This just tries to put stuff in thread order instead of in pure chronological order. We can likely improve the display treatment -- this is a pretty minimal approach, but should improve clarity.
Test Plan:
T10563 has a "before" shot. Here's the "after":
{F1169018}
This makes it a bit easier to follow the conversations.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15459
Summary: Mostly for consistency, we're not using other forms of icons and this makes all classes that use an icon call it in the same way.
Test Plan: tested uiexamples, lots of other random pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15125
Summary: Some linter messages, such as those produced by `ArcanistPHPCompatibilityXHPASTLinterRule`, contain backticks but are currently rendered as Remarkup literals. I think that it is generally desirable to allow lint messages to be rendered as Remarkup, although we should ideally have a way to render Remarkup for use on the command line (I actually think that this already exists, but I don't think that `arc lint` does this when rendering linter messages).
Test Plan: Resubmitted D14481 to my dev install and saw Remarkuped lint messages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14485
Summary: Fixes T9135. This is (probably) never intended and can be confusing.
Test Plan: Saw no hide button on unpublished inlines. Saw hide button on published inlines. Clicked hide button.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9135
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14014
Summary: Ref T8099. Better alignment with TODO and Ghost Icons.
Test Plan: Test more states of inline comments, ghosts, todos, unsubmitted, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13515
Summary: Ref T8099, Simplifies the button bar with a `borderless` option and implements in Differential Inline Commenting.
Test Plan:
Review new and old comments, submitted, unsubmitted, ghosts, done.
{F562765}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13475
Summary:
Ref T7447. Implements per-viewer comment hiding. Once a comment is obsolete or uninteresting, you can hide it completely.
This is sticky per-user.
My hope is that this will strike a better balance between concerns than some of the other approaches (conservative porting, summarization, hide-all).
Specifically, this adds a new action here:
{F435621}
Clicking it completely collapses the comment into a small icon on the previous line, and saves the comment state as hidden for you:
{F435626}
You can click the icon to reveal all hidden comments below the line.
Test Plan:
- Hid comments.
- Showed comments.
- Created, edited, deleted and submitted comments.
- Used Diffusion comments (hiding is not implemented there yet, but I'd plan to bring it there eventually if it works out in Differential).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jparise, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13009
Summary: Ref T7447, these are more work than needed at least on an indivdual basis. JS openning all feels poor as well.
Test Plan: Review comments, past present and future.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12702
Summary: Ref T7447, Ref T1460. Moves "done" state to left, and no longer is a button (simpler CSS). Also feels a little nicer. Clean up some spacing issue with Ghosties.
Test Plan:
Test new and old comments, as author and reviewer.
{F389986}
{F389987}
{F389988}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aik099, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12641
Summary: This is a lighter UI treatment for previous/forward comments, where the comment is just hidden behind a click. This mayyy be too hard to discover, but I'd rather wait and make it more obvious if actually needed. Once you understand the interaction, the cleaner UI is preferable. Ref T7447
Test Plan:
Test a lot of previous and forward comments.
{F389658}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12627
Summary:
Ref T7447. This might be overkill, but I want to over-explain things until we have more confidence that this is rarely confusing.
NOTE: I'm playing it a bit fast and loose with `setIsGhost()` (passing a dictionary) because making API changes requires changing the interface and Diffusion, which is a pain. I'll clean this up at the end once the interface is more final. This is well-contained for now.
Test Plan:
- Viewed "base vs 2" in a diff with 3 diffs, saw some "older comments" and some "newer comments".
- Hovered the tags for an explanation of comment spookiness.
{F377703}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12490
Summary:
Ref T7447. This ports comments forward and backward in the best case:
- The old comment is on a changeset with the same filename.
- The old and new files are pretty much the same, line-for-line.
This will fail to port a lot of comments around and probably port a lot of comments into goofy places. We can see how bad it is in practice.
Errata:
- Design is me cobbling something together, probably worth tweaking.
- "Old Comment" should, at a minimum, say "Newer Comment" sometimes, or we should come up with some better name for this stuff.
Test Plan: {F377214}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12484
Summary: Fixes T7720. We currently leak the "draft" state of checkboxes; never treat checkboxes as drafts if you can't mark them.
Test Plan: Checked a box, reloaded page in other browser. Previously, the draft state partially propagated. Now, it no longer does.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12262
Summary:
Ref T1460. Overall:
- Pass `objectOwnerPHID` consistently.
- Pass viewer consistently.
- Set the correct draft state for checkboxes on the client.
Test Plan:
- Made inline comments in Differential.
- Made inline comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12186
Summary:
Rebuilds the UI in Differential commenting. Specifically we look at the following design patterns:
**To the author:**
- The author of the diff should be able to easily identify what comments are done and not done.
- We keep undone comments yellow
- Clicking done turns comment block into 'unsubmitted state'
**To the reviewer:**
- Easier understanding of unsubmitted states
- All conversations to be yellow/important
**Todo**
- Not all color CSS states correct
- Unpulished checkbox support
Test Plan:
Test leaving comments, published and unpublished. Checking Done, unpublished and published. Check delete states.
From the Diff Author's perspective:
{F352094}
For a Diff commenter's perspective:
{F352095}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7660, T7503
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12171
Summary:
This returns the PHID of the current revision owner, or the commit author, if one exists.
NOTE: For drafts, we currently return `null`; I'll fix that in a future change. Should be correct for submitted comments.
Test Plan: Added an inline, nothing seemed broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12185
Summary: Ref T7660. I'm not toggling "inline-state-is-draft" correctly in JS yet since it's a little tricky (you can reload to see it) but the main state should work.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "done", saw comment opacity fade with placeholder style.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12160
Summary:
Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc.
Specifically, these are the behaviors:
- You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider..").
- You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff.
- When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold:
- Be consistent with how inlines work.
- Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories.
- The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented.
- UI is bare bones.
- No integration with the rest of the UI yet.
Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
Summary: Ref T2009. These subclasses have a mixture of similar methods, move them all to the base class.
Test Plan: Created/edited/undo/submitted comments on the left and right sides of a diff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12024
Summary:
Ref T1460. Track and store which comments are threaded replies to other comments, vs merely appearing on the same lines.
This doesn't actually write `hasReplies` yet, since that needs to happen when we un-draft comments on submission.
Test Plan: Made inline comments in Differential and Diffusion, including replies. Replies were marked as "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12017
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, the code figures out if a comment is on the left or right by looking at the `<th />` preceeding the enclosing `<td />`.
This gets the right result in 2-up, but in 1-up rows are always `<th />`, `<th />`, `<td />`, so it always detects every inline as being in the new file.
Because "old" and "new" cells aren't inherently distingushable in the 1up view, we can't use a DOM test for this at all. Instead, just track this state explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Made left/right comments in 1up view and 2up view.
- Viewed them in 1up and 2up views.
- Hovered in 1up and 2up views.
- Diff-of-diff'd and reviewed old/new comments, then made some more.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12011
Summary:
Ref T2009. Inline comments have "scaffolding", which is basically some empty table cells/rows around them to get the layout correct.
The scaffolding depends on the renderer, since the cells are different for side-by-side vs unified diffs.
This is currently duplicated all over the place:
- Edit view has 1up/2up.
- Detail view has 1up/2up.
- 1up renderer has 1up.
- 2up renderer has four separate copies of the 2up logic.
These all have subtle differences, which are mostly bugs. Start making the scaffolding more composable so we can get rid of that mess.
Test Plan: Added, edited, and removed inline comments on unified and side-by-side diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11997
Summary:
Ref T2009. These classes are "Differential" now, but are used elsewhere in diff infrastructure (e.g., Diffusion).
- Rename them to "PHUIDiff".
- Move them to "src/infrastructure/".
- Give them a base class.
Test Plan: Interacted with inlines in unified and side-by-side views.
Reviewers: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11996
2015-03-06 15:00:14 -08:00
Renamed from src/applications/differential/view/DifferentialInlineCommentView.php (Browse further)
