Summary: Select a similar or better FontAwesome icon to represent each application
Test Plan: Visual inspection
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11489
Summary: Fixes T6963. Long term will likely make this more like other document views, but not worth the time right now since this is only location.
Test Plan: Review Phriction document at desktop and mobile breakpoints. Click menu and see menu.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6963
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11420
Summary: Ref T6822. This method needs to be `public` because it is called from `PhabricatorApplicationSearchController::buildApplicationMenu()`.
Test Plan: I wouldn't expect //increasing// method visibility to break anything.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11416
Summary: Ref T5752, moves mobile action menus to the object box instead of crumbs.
Test Plan: View action menus at tablet, desktop, and mobile break points. Verify clicking buttons works as expected opening menu.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5752
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11340
Summary: Ref T6822.
Test Plan: Visual inspection. These methods are only called from within `PhabricatorController` subclasses.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11241
Summary: Ref T6822.
Test Plan: Visual inspection. These methods are only called from within the `PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine` class.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6822
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11242
Summary: This class is no longer required after D6675.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11169
Summary:
Removes an unused PhabricatorFeedStory Parameter from all getTitleForFeed() and getApplicationTransactionTitleForFeed() functions.
Ref D11088 Ref T6545
Test Plan: ran all unit tests and viewed some dashboard feeds
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6545
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11146
Summary:
Fixes T6651, T6682. Since policy is defined by ancestry, you can't make things outside the core tree.
An alternative fix would be to automagically stub everything in these cases. This has potential negative policy implications - consider making a public document with several levels of depth that automagically stubs out its ancestry as public - and additionally the PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor framework would make this very tricky code (i.e. you are expected to validateTransactions in said hook *and* return an error if things aren't valid and not do some automagic stubbing, etc.)
Test Plan: tried to move a doc from location/that/exists to locationz/thatz/dontz/existz/ and got an error message with links to each missing doc. tried to create a doc at locatonz/thatz/dontz/existsz/ and got an error message with links to each missing doc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6682, T6651
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10978
Summary: Fixes T6693.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of comments on a diff with differential, being sure to leave inlines here and there. This reproduced the issue in T6693. With this patch this issue no longer reproduces!
Successfully "showed older changes" in Maniphest too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6693
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10931
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.
Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
Summary: Fixes T6472. I was curious to see how many reports we'd get but we didn't get any I know of... Still, this is a nice convenient link.
Test Plan:
edited a wiki doc title + body. ran /bin/mail to see the body and liked what I saw
```TEXT BODY
btrahan changed the title from "new title is a good thing" to "new title is a good thing asdsadsadsadsada".
btrahan edited the document content.
DOCUMENT DIFF
http://phalanx.dev/phriction/diff/36/?l=3&r=4
DOCUMENT DETAIL
http://phalanx.dev/w/```
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6472
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10850
Summary:
Fixes T5492. I figured this would be easier to just fix than write a guide for; it actually took me an hour, but I spent like 75% of that futzing with my editor.
- The Move controller currently accepts either a slug or an ID. I can't find any callsites which pass a slug, and this doesn't make sense. Pretty sure this was copy/pasted from Edit or something. Only accept IDs.
- Slightly modernize the Move controller (newDialog(), handleRequest(), $viewer).
- When the user enters a bad slug, warn them that we're going to fix it for them and let them accept or reject the changes.
- Don't prefill the edit note (this feels inconsistent/unusual).
- On the form, label the input "Path" instead of "URI".
- Show the old path, to help remind the user what the input should look like.
- When a user tries to do a no-op move, show a more tailored message.
- When the user tries to do an overwriting move, explain how they can fix it.
- When normalizing a slug like `/question/???/mark/`, make it normalize to `/question/_/mark`.
Test Plan:
- Tried to move a document to itself.
- Tried to overwrite a document.
- Did a bad-path move, accepted corrected path.
- Did a good-path move.
- Did a path move with a weird component like `/???/`.
- Added and executed unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5492
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10838
Summary:
- Order checks used `=` but intended `==`. We could probably write a lint rule for this.
- Selecting `*` with a join could pick (for example) `id` columns from both the document and content tables and end up using the wrong one.
- `%Q` expects a string and chokes on `null`.
Auditors: btrahan
Summary: Fixes T4666, add Herald rules to Phriction Documents
Test Plan: add Herald rule to flag if title contains "xyz", create Phriction Document with title "xyz". Phriction Document should be flagged.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4666
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10830
Summary: when creating new documents the policy object wasn't being initialized properly. update the code to use the new handy initializeNewDocument method. Fixes T6527.
Test Plan: viewed a doc at /w/asdsadsadsdas/ and saw the correct policy setting
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6527
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10837
Summary: Fixes T6495. convert ad hoc query to a PhrictionDocumentQuery, thus enforcing view permissions
Test Plan: noted my test user a had a great wiki while test user b couldn't see most things.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6495
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10822
Summary: ...how do you lock down entire areas otherwise? Fixes T6496.
Test Plan: used user 1 to create x/y that user 2 can't edit. tried to create x/y/z as user 2 and got a big ole error dialogue.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6496
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10819
Summary: 'cuz the wiki don't play that no more. Fixes T6497. This is mainly important to fix an incorrect policy filtering issue where a project policy can incorrectly override a document policy. Otherwise, it makes things nice and clean.
Test Plan:
- viewed the wiki - success.
- viewed wiki document list under "index" and tried a few different queries
- grep'd for things like "hasProject" and "getProject" and saw no phriction-related results
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6497
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10818
Summary:
Ref T4029. Fixes T6034.
Various front-end miscellania here. See D10814#96251. This more or less makes policy work but I am not going to call it "fixed" here since we need D10814 to be deployed too and will do that manually.
Test Plan:
- changed document policy from web ui and changes persisted
- changed document policy from web and had form error and changes persisted
- created a structure like users/users/justmyuserpolicy and made sure another user could delete the users/users/ doc
- moved a doc from a to b and verified policy persisted
- verified stub documents inherited policy of the document that stub them...!
- uploaded a file and verified that it 1) had the permissions of the page it was added to and 2) had an "attached" tab linking back to the page on the file page (this means T6034 is fixed with this)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6034, T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10816
Summary: Ref T4029. this diff makes the pertinent database changes AND adds the migration script. This is important to get the data backend straightened away before we fully ship T4029. Next diff will expose the edit controls for these policies and whatever else work is needed to get that part done right.
Test Plan: made sure the lone project page on my wiki had a project with restrictive view policy. Post migration verified correct policy applied to this lone project page AND most open policy applied to the others
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10814
Summary: Fixes T6262. Ref T4029. Also gets us ready for T5873 for these end points. I can file something new about someday adding phriction.query, etc but I think we'll remember and can look at that post T5873.
Test Plan: made a document via conduit and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6262, T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10813
Summary: Ref T4029. Even more code consolidation and cleanup for the long term benefits!
Test Plan: moved a page successfully. tried to move a page to an existing page and got an error. did the two tab trick to try to move a deleted page and got an error.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10812
Summary: Ref T4029. More cleanup and code consolidation for the long terms benefits.
Test Plan: found a document and opened up two browser tabs. Loaded delete dialog on both. Completed delete in one tab and noted document was properly deleted. Tried to complete delete in tab 2 and got an error message.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10809
Summary: Fixes T6489. In an earlier diff I forgot to update the document status itself, thinking that the content update percolated up magically. Restore this functionality so the wiki works better.
Test Plan: deleted a document and observed that i did not get the option to delete it again and it disappeared from document index
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6489
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10807
Summary:
Ref T4029. Some business logic lives outside the editor. This revision moves that logic from the edit controller into the editor proper. This makes re-using that business logic across other endpoints - say like a conduit end point - possible. This is also part of the general modernization quest for phriction I am on.
This diff also restores the functionality where you can delete a document by wiping out the content and saving.
Test Plan: tried to make a document with no title or content and saw errors. opened a document for edit with user 1, then made edits with user 2, then saw an error when i made the edit with user 1. clicking "overwrite changes" then worked. deleted a document by wiping out the body and clicking save.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10795
Summary:
Ref T4029. Long live PhrictionTransactionEditor...! this means that all existing functionality runs 100% through the modern transactions + editor framework. this diff does a few things in sum
- kills the old editor
- moves conduit-based edits to new editor
- moves stubbing out documents to new editor
- deletes moving of wiki docs for projects functionality... (T4021#59511 is a better bigger battle plan here.)
Test Plan: edited a phriction document via conduit and it worked. created a new phriction document /that/was/deep/ and verified ancestral documents were properly stubbed out. changed a project name and noted no wiki page moves.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10792
Summary:
Ref T4029. Much like D10756, D10761 this does the bare minimum to get things in there. I have a sticky with "TODOs" about moving the error-checking business logic into the editor in all three cases.
Up next - policy...
Test Plan: moved a document and it worked! verified no feed story. verified both documents involved looked good
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10763
Summary:
Ref T4029. Much like D10756 this does the bare minimum to get things in there. I have a sticky with "TODOs" about moving the error-checking business logic into the editor in both cases.
Up next - move actions...
Test Plan: deleted a document and it worked! verified proper feed story.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: shadowhand, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10761
Summary: Fixes T6343. Grepped for all callsites and added addLinkSection where needed.
Test Plan: Tested Differential, Maniphest, Conpherence, Ponder and Macro. Inspect HTML mail for anchor tags. Inspect text mails for non-disruption.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: talshiri, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10762
Summary:
This implements as little as possible to stick a working transactions + editor codepath in the basic create / edit flow. Aside from the transaction tables, this also required adding a mailKey to a phrictionDocument.
Future work would include adding more transactions types for things like "move" and all the pertinent support. Even future work is to add things like policies which will work easily in the transaction framework. Ref T4029.
Test Plan:
- made a wiki doc
- edit a wiki doc
- had someone subscribe to a wiki doc and edited it
For all three, the edits worked, a reasonable email was sent out, and feed stories were generated.
- made a wiki doc at a /location/like/this
document "stubs" were made as expected in /location and /location/like
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10756
Summary:
Ref T5702. This is a forward-looking change which provides some very broad API improvements but does not implement them. In particular:
- Controllers no longer require `$request` to construct. This is mostly for T5702, directly, but simplifies things in general. Instead, we call `setRequest()` before using a controller. Only a small number of sites activate controllers, so this is less code overall, and more consistent with most constructors not having any parameters or effects.
- `$request` now offers `getURIData($key, ...)`. This is an alternate way of accessing `$data` which is currently only available on `willProcessRequest(array $data)`. Almost all controllers which implement this method do so in order to read one or two things out of the URI data. Instead, let them just read this data directly when processing the request.
- Introduce `handleRequest(AphrontRequest $request)` and deprecate (very softly) `processRequest()`. The majority of `processRequest()` calls begin `$request = $this->getRequest()`, which is avoided with the more practical signature.
- Provide `getViewer()` on `$request`, and a convenience `getViewer()` on `$controller`. This fixes `$viewer = $request->getUser();` into `$viewer = $request->getViewer();`, and converts the `$request + $viewer` two-liner into a single `$this->getViewer()`.
Test Plan:
- Browsed around in general.
- Hit special controllers (redirect, 404).
- Hit AuditList controller (uses new style).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10698
Summary:
Ref T1191. Now that the whole database is covered, we don't need to do as much work to build expected schemata. Doing them database-by-database was helpful in converting, but is just reudndant work now.
Instead of requiring every application to build its Lisk objects, just build all Lisk objects.
I removed `harbormaster.lisk_counter` because it is unused.
It would be nice to autogenerate edge schemata, too, but that's a little trickier.
Test Plan: Database setup issues are all green.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10620
Summary:
Ref T1191. For most text columns, we either don't care if "a" and "A" are the same, or we expect them to be different (for example: keys, domains, secrets, etc). Default text columns to the `_bin` collation so they are compared by strict character value. This is safer in cases where we aren't sure.
For some text columns, we allow the user to sort by the column in the UI (like Maniphest task titles) or we do care that "A" and "a" are the same (for example: project names). Introduce a new class of virtual data types, the "sort..." types, to cover these columns. These are like the "text..." types but use sorting collations which treat "A" and "a" the same.
Test Plan:
- Made an effort to identify all columns where the UI relies on database collation.
- Ran `bin/storage adjust` and cleared all warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: beng, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10602
Summary:
Ref T1191. Ref T6203. While generating expected schemata, I ran into these columns which seem to have sketchy nullability.
- Mark most of them for later resolution (T6203). They work fine today and don't need to block T1191. Changing them can break the application, so we can't autofix them.
- Forgive a couple of them that are sort-of reasonable or going to get wiped out.
Test Plan: Saw 94 remaining warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191, T6203
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10593
Summary: pre-patch, these fatal, since we overwrite $content to be just a string so methods fail later in the code. Instead, write a $content_str to keep $content as the proper data.
Test Plan: editing a document and on save it showed me the view page! (as opposed to fataling and staying on the eidt page)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10426
Summary: Ref T3307. Only one I thought was tricky was Excel; I went with bytes there like it was email.
Test Plan: played around on a few endpoints but mostly thought carefully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10392
Summary: Adds Phriction to list of apps that use Source Sans as default font in addition to Legalpad and Diviner.
Test Plan: Tested various layouts imported from secure. Should be reasonably tested, but will follow up on secure.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10064
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Provide an implementation for the `getName` method rather than automagically determining the application name.
Test Plan: Saw reasonable application names in the launcher.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10027
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
