Summary:
I need this information quite often.
I don't know how many people are working on a single project and this information will be useless for them but I guess it won't hurt much?
Test Plan: Commented on accepted revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2674
Summary:
This also changes some stuff:
- Reviewers used to be at top, now they are under comments.
- Primary reviewer is now rendered as first.
Test Plan: Added `renderValueForMail()` to a custom field, created diff, commented on it and verified e-mails.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2664
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
Some lint errors (e.g. Javelin) don't have a line number.
Put them on the first line.
Putting them above the first line would be even nicer but much more complicated.
Test Plan: Display diff with lint error on line 0 (D2583).
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2599
Summary:
If someone typos one name in a cc or reviewer list, it would be nice if we
display all of the valid names in the field when running arc diff (in addition
to the error message).
Test Plan:
used the conduit console to check that calling differential.parsecommitmessage
with a list of some valid and some invalid ccs returns a result with both an
error and a list of some ccs. Also ran arc diff with that list of ccs to check
for the correct user experience.
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason, vrana
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2542
Summary: Add support for "tests", "testplan" and "tested" as alias of "Test Plan".
Test Plan: Created a diff with test plan specified in "tests".
Reviewers: csilvers, btrahan
Reviewed By: csilvers
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2531
Test Plan: Display revision list both with last reviewer and without.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2495
Summary:
This is not so general as `getRequiredHandlePHIDs()`.
It allows bulk loading of user statuses only in revision list.
It also loads data in `render()`. I'm not sure if it's OK.
Maybe we can use the colorful point here.
Or maybe some unicode symbol?
Test Plan: {F11451, size=full}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2484
Summary:
I've tried colors, italics, strike-through and this is a compromise between me and @leebyron.
NOTE: I don't want to disturb @epriestley from playing Diablo 3.
Test Plan: {F11439, size=full}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, leebyron
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2481
Summary: Revisions don't necessarily have a backing repository, as in "--raw".
Test Plan: Looked at a "--raw" revision in accepted and closed states.
Reviewers: nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2444
Summary:
- Move email to a separate table.
- Migrate existing email to new storage.
- Allow users to add and remove email addresses.
- Allow users to verify email addresses.
- Allow users to change their primary email address.
- Convert all the registration/reset/login code to understand these changes.
- There are a few security considerations here but I think I've addressed them. Principally, it is important to never let a user acquire a verified email address they don't actually own. We ensure this by tightening the scoping of token generation rules to be (user, email) specific.
- This should have essentially zero impact on Facebook, but may require some minor changes in the registration code -- I don't exactly remember how it is set up.
Not included here (next steps):
- Allow configuration to restrict email to certain domains.
- Allow configuration to require validated email.
Test Plan:
This is a fairly extensive, difficult-to-test change.
- From "Email Addresses" interface:
- Added new email (verified email verifications sent).
- Changed primary email (verified old/new notificactions sent).
- Resent verification emails (verified they sent).
- Removed email.
- Tried to add already-owned email.
- Created new users with "accountadmin". Edited existing users with "accountadmin".
- Created new users with "add_user.php".
- Created new users with web interface.
- Clicked welcome email link, verified it verified email.
- Reset password.
- Linked/unlinked oauth accounts.
- Logged in with oauth account.
- Logged in with email.
- Registered with Oauth account.
- Tried to register with OAuth account with duplicate email.
- Verified errors for email verification with bad tokens, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2393
Summary:
- In practice, 'edit' has two modes, 'create' and 'edit'. These seem like they should map to "create a revision" and "update a revision", but they are completely different.
- We use the "create" mode:
- When creating a message from the working copy.
- When creating a message from a file.
- When creating a message from a commit.
- When creating a message from a user template.
- When creating a message from an "--edit"!
- We use the "edit" mode:
- ONLY when updating a revision with `arc diff --verbatim`.
- The only difference is in which fields may be overwritten. Under "create", all fields may be overwritten. Under "edit", only safe fields may be overwritten.
- The "Differential Revision" field currently does not render in either edit mode. This is wrong. Even though it can not be updated in the "edit" mode, it should still render in both modes. This is the only material change this revision makes.
- Without this change, when we "create" a new message from a working copy and the working copy has a "Differential Revision" field, we incorrectly discard it.
- The only field which does not render on edit modes now is "Reviewed by" (not "Reviewers"), which is correct, since we do not read the value.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff" to create/update revisions. Ran "arc diff --verbatim" to create/update revisions with implicit edits (with D2411). Ran "arc diff --edit" to update revisions with explicit edits.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed by: jungejason
CC: vrana, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2412
Summary: This allows writing inline comments and reduces different behavior between normal and very large diffs.
Test Plan:
Verify that normal diff works.
Verify that very large diff works.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2361
Summary:
This adds support to differential fields to display warnings before a revision
gets accepted. Since lint and unit are differential fields, the code for their
warnings was moved into their respective field specification classes, so there
is only one code path for warnings (lint, unit, or custom).
Test Plan:
Select 'Accept' on a revision with lint/unit warnings and see messages appear
like they used to. Change it back to 'Comment' and they go away. Repeat with
a revision without lint/unit warnings and see no warnings appear. Checked
darkconsole to see no errors due to this.
Reviewers: jungejason, epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2363
Summary:
When choosing a verb to show with a closed differential revision, choose the
verb based on the upstream vcs, not the vcs used to create the diff, since these
are not the same thing. I also updated the documentation for the next step for
an accepted diff for the case where the local vcs and backing vcs aren't the
same (since arc land doesn't work for those).
Test Plan:
Loaded a committed diff and an accepted diff from fbcode and www to check that
they show the correct thing.
Reviewers: jungejason, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1118
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2360
Summary:
I think this improves things, let me know if you have feedback.
Also addresses T840.
Test Plan: See screenshots...
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2357
Summary:
Before: {F10754}
After: {F10753}
Test Plan:
View revision with lint warnings and unit errors.
Click on Details.
Click on Details.
Click on Details.
Click on Details.
Reviewers: asukhachev, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2351
Summary:
This is slightly more complicated for this reason:
- We don't set `dateCommitted` for normal commits, only for markcommitted.
-- We need to add this date to old revisions now.
Test Plan:
Reparse a revision - commit date was set.
Conduit `markcommitted` - commit date was set.
Run SQL script.
Display closed revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2282
Summary:
Some Differential fields are not nullable; when Test Plan is switched to non-required mode we can end up trying to save a null value to a non-nullable column (see D2193).
(I should probably just alter the schema to make these fields nullable, but that might have farther-reaching effects.)
Test Plan: Reproduced error, applied patch, no more error.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2200
Summary:
This is a somewhat common request, and far more difficult than necessary currently.
I think the field is useful enough to leave it default-enabled, but there's wide diversity in testing philosophy.
Test Plan: Verified "test plan" field appeared. Disabled config. Verified "test plan" field vanished.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, asouza
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2193
Summary: See D2080. The introduction of `arc land`, defaulting to `origin/master`, and --auto enormously simplifies the documentation.
Test Plan: Read documentation.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T894
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2082
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around Differential.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2103
Summary:
When system agent adds a comment then he is added to CC.
When I amend and update then I get message "Commit message references nonexistent ..."
Test Plan: Update revision with system agent in CC.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: michalburger1, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2100
Summary:
If the 'Summary' is not present and not inferred to be empty from a newline after the title with no explicit 'Summary' field, we'll copy all the field values from the revision (including NULL), not overwrite the 'Summary' value from the message (since it's not present) and then write the NULL back to the revision.
Instead, string cast the read from the Revision so we write back empty string in the not-provided case.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff --create --use-commit-message HEAD" with P336 in HEAD, didn't fail (previously, it failed).
Reviewers: btrahan, 20after4
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1019
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1956
Summary:
If we can't look up the name for a mailing list, don't put 'Unknown Mailing
List' in the commit message - it will confuse things later down the road.
Surely there is a better way of doing this than checking the name of the
handle for the mailing list.
Test Plan:
called differential.getcommitmessage on a revision that had an invalid mailing
list phid.
Reviewers: epriestley, schrockn, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1910
Summary: No big surprises here, delted the unused "DarkConsole" class.
Test Plan: Ran 'testEverythingImplemented' to verify I wasn't finalizing anything we extend.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1876
Summary:
Currently, we sort all results alphabetically. This isn't ideal. Instead, sort them like this:
- If the viewing user appears in the list, always sort them first. This is common in a lot of contexts and some "Ben Evans" guy is sorting first on secure.phabricator.com and causing me no end of aggravation.
- If the tokens match a "priority" component (e.g., username), sort that before results which do not have a "priority" match.
- Within a group (self, priority, everything else) sort tokens alphabetically.
NOTE: I need to go add setUser() to all the tokenizers to make the "self" rule work, but that's trivial so I figured I'd get this out first.
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/4s2a72l5hhyyqqkq4bnd/PHID-FILE-x2r6ubk7s7dz54kxmtwx/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.03_AM.png
Previously, "aaaaaepriestley" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "epriestley" (the viewing user). Now, "epriestley" sorts first because that is the viewer.
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/rmnxgnafz42f23fsjwui/PHID-FILE-yrnn55jl3ysbntldq3af/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.09_AM.png
Previously, "aaaagopher" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "banana" (the "priority" match). Now, "banana" sorts first because it priority matches on username.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T946
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1807
Summary:
Adds an optional "Auditors" field (like "Reviewers") to commit messages which gives installs a zero-config method for making audit requests.
This field does not appear on templates unless set, and is mostly ignored (but validated and preserved) by Differential.
It is then parsed by the daemons if present, and audit requests are pushed to valid users.
Test Plan: Made an "Auditors" commit and verified it was retained with "arc amend --show". Pushed it and verified the audit was triggered.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904, T880
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1793
Summary:
Displaying reviewer who was by coincidence listed first is quite confusing, especially for committed revisions.
This displays the one who really reviewed the revision if available.
This implementation is pretty bad from performance perspective - O(N) queries to retrieve all comments.
The page load still feels quite fast.
Test Plan: /differential/filter/revisions/
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1772
Summary:
Build the revision list table out of custom fields instead of hard-coding it, so
installs can add all sorts of zany things to it.
NOTE: You may need to implement sortFieldsForRevisionList() if you have a custom
DifferentialFieldSelector, or some fields might show up out of order.
This implementation will preserve the expected behavior:
public function sortFieldsForRevisionList(array $fields) {
$default = new DifferentialDefaultFieldSelector();
return $default->sortFieldsForRevisionList($fields);
}
Test Plan:
- Loaded differential revision list, identical to old list.
- Profiled page to verify the cost increase isn't significant (it's quite
small).
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, davidreuss, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T773, T729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1388
Summary:
I, as an author, sometimes forget branch associated with a revision.
Plus setting ##differential.show-host-field## makes a false sense of security
that branch will stay hidden so that I can name it
//finally_solve_this_crap_which_makes_no_sense//. But it is published in
Accepted and Request Changes e-mails anyway.
Test Plan: Display revision with disabled ##differential.show-host-field##.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1602
Summary:
The main purpose of this change is to allow selecting the branch by
triple-click.
Plus it is not perfectly clear that the text in brackets means branch.
Test Plan: Display revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1585
Summary:
See discussion in T838. These fields expose information which it isn't necessary
or useful to expose in the general case.
- Disable fields by default, allow them to be enabled in config (these fields
were useful for me at Facebook when I had access to all the machines).
- Remove 'sourcePath' from Conduit methods other than differential.query.
- Condition 'sourcePath' field in Conduit on the caller being the revision
author. This is a bit hacky but not so awful.
Test Plan:
- Verified fields are gone by default and restored by configuration.
- Verified Conduit no longer returns these fields other than
differential.query.
- Verified field presence/absence according to authorship in
differential.query.
- Grepped around in arcanist to make sure we aren't relying on sourcePath.
There's a workflow in "arc merge" that technically might hit it, but I think
it's unreachable, definitely irrelvant (we never use source path as a
distinguisher under git/hg, and can't 'arc merge' in SVN) and it's going away
Real Soon Now anyway.
Reviewers: btrahan, arice
Reviewed By: arice
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1582
Summary: This is kind of confusing (you need to specify an export format) and
not very useful now that "arc patch" has gotten pretty good. I'm leaving the
field itself in case installs want to add it back or otherwise depend on it.
Test Plan: Looked at a revision, wasn't told to export it.
Reviewers: nh, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1507
Summary:
Links from lint errors for large diffs don't work.
This diff adds TODO for it because I am not sure how to do it.
Move of changeset links rendering to a separate method would be still useful.
Test Plan:
Display ToC of large diff, verify link.
Repeat for small diff.
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1476
Summary:
- Even for immutable-history Git workflows, we suggest "arc amend". Instead,
suggest "arc amend" or "arc merge" (ideally we'd know which, but we can't
currently get that information).
- We suggest "arc amend --revision X", but this is less safe and less simple
than "arc amend", especially after D1480.
- For Mercurial, suggest "arc merge".
Test Plan: Looked at some "Accepted" revisions.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T662
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1481
Summary: There are lots of callsites to $changeset->getFilename() so it seemed
easier to rename getFileName() to getFilename() even if it includes database
change. Plus I think that getFilename() is better.
Test Plan:
Alter database.
Open revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1437
Summary:
We currently allow you to assign code review to disabled users, but
should not.
Test Plan:
- Created revisions with no reviewers and only disabled reviewers, was
appropriately warned.
- Looked at a disabled user handle link, was clearly informed.
- Tried to create a new revision with a disabled reviewer, was rebuffed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1429
