Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T11648. Currently, we snug up replies with a negative margin (from T10563) but this throws off the anchor highlighting.
Instead:
- Remove padding from these dolumns.
- Use margins on the stuff inside them instead.
- Less margins for replies.
- Less margins for collapsed comments.
- Show some text for collapsed comments.
Test Plan:
{F4960890}
{F4960891}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616, T11648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17913
Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T12153. Currently, when you hide inlines, they hide completely and turn into a little bubble on the previous line.
Instead, collapse them to a single line one-by-one. Narrowly, this fixes T12153.
In the future, I plan to make these changes so this feature makes more sense:
- Introduce global "hide everything" states (T8909) so you can completely hide stuff if you want, and this represents more of a halfway state between "nuke it" and "view it".
- Make the actual rendering better, so it says "epriestley: blah blah..." instead of just "..." -- and looks less dumb.
The real goal here is to introduce `DiffInline` and continue moving stuff from the tangled jungle of a million top-level behaviors to sensible smooth statefulness.
Test Plan:
- Hid and revealed inlines in unified and two-up modes.
- These look pretty junk for now:
{F4948659}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616, T12153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17861
Summary: Moves basic colors into the processor.
Test Plan: Review a diff in sandbox with and without change.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17173
Summary: Ref T12089. This reverts back to using "bright" colors for full width changes in green and red.
Test Plan:
Review diffs, see full width colors.
{F2333933}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12089
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17171
Summary: Minor color saturation here, ideal for low quality monitors.
Test Plan:
Review new colors in various scenarios.
{F2305178}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17141
Summary: Tweaks the diff colors here a bit, as well as making full diffs slightly easier to read in full. Ref T12060
Test Plan:
Tested prose diffs, email prose diffs, and a regular Differential revision.
{F2304056}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12060
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17138
Summary:
Ref T7643. When you do something like this:
- Edit a task description.
- Click "Show Details" on the resulting transaction.
- Get a prose diff dialog showing the change.
...now add some "Old" and "New" tabs. These are useful for:
- reverting to the old text by copy/pasting;
- reading just the new/old text if the diff is noisy;
- sometimes just nice to have?
(This looks a little rough but I didn't want to put a negative margin on tab groups inside dialogs? Not sure what the best fix here is.)
Test Plan: {F1909390}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7643
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16817
Summary: Fixes T11305, Ref T7754. Makes this menu dropdown act like actions and collapse to a fa-bars menu.
Test Plan:
View on mobile, desktop, browser. Click an action, spawn new page.
{F1717953}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7754, T11305
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16265
Summary:
Fixes T11225. The primary issue here is that this rule is bleeding down too far. It appears that it's only intended to put space around the inline as a whole.
Spacing still isn't //perfect// since a few other rules are bleeding, but it feels reasonable now instead of being clearly broken.
Test Plan:
- Added "background: red;" to figure out what was being affected.
- Before:
{F1704081}
- After:
{F1704084}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11225
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16184
Summary:
Ref T7643. When a large block of prose text is edited (like a wiki page), summarize the diff when sending mail.
For now, I'm still showing the whole thing in the web UI, since it's a bit more manageable there.
Also try to fix newlines in Airmail.
Test Plan:
This web diff:
{F1682591}
..became this mail diff:
{F1682592}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7643
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16098
Summary:
Ref T3353. This hooks the prose engine up to the UI and throws away the hard-wrapping hacks.
These are likely still very rough in many cases, but are hopefully a big step forward from the old version in the vast majority of cases.
Test Plan: {F1677809}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3353
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16056
Summary: Because new+old stack, these colors were darker than intended. Lightening them up a little bit.
Test Plan: Review a diff with new + old code and addtion subtractions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15994
Summary: Fixes T10959. This is the smallest/simplest fix that I could come up with, and I wasn't able to break it. Basically, I removed "line-height" and then adjusted other rules until the defaults looked reasonable again.
Test Plan:
Here's `24px / 48px impact` or something like it:
{F1310445}
{F1310446}
Here's normal stuff working properly without weird artifacts on the highlighting:
{F1310447}
Also tested Firefox and Chrome and got similar results.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: wxm20073527, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10959
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15905
Summary:
First pass at converting Differential, I likely have some buggy-poos but thought I'd toss this up now in case very bad bugs present.
To do:
- Need to put status back on Hovercards
- "Diff Detail" probably needs a better design
Test Plan: Looking at lots of diffs, admittedly I dont have harbormaster, etc, running locally. Checked Diffusion for Table of Content changes on small and large commits.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15463
Summary:
Ref T10563. This isn't a complete fix, but should make viewing complex inline threads a little more manageable.
This just tries to put stuff in thread order instead of in pure chronological order. We can likely improve the display treatment -- this is a pretty minimal approach, but should improve clarity.
Test Plan:
T10563 has a "before" shot. Here's the "after":
{F1169018}
This makes it a bit easier to follow the conversations.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15459
Summary: Should make it simpler here to have more `rgba` rules in CSS for things like hovers, selected states. Maybe only use `rgb` colors? Color pallette probably needs an overhaul.
Test Plan: Bounce around random pages, buttons, menus. Everything appears normal.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15273
Summary: Ref T8099. Better alignment with TODO and Ghost Icons.
Test Plan: Test more states of inline comments, ghosts, todos, unsubmitted, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13515
Summary: Ref T8099, Simplifies the button bar with a `borderless` option and implements in Differential Inline Commenting.
Test Plan:
Review new and old comments, submitted, unsubmitted, ghosts, done.
{F562765}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13475
Summary: Ref T8099, Ref T8614. Reasonable attempt at a larger font size PostProcessor, will need additional UI cleanup (places where we fix height) but overall very decent.
Test Plan: Use lots of the UI elements with new font sizes.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099, T8614
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13457
Summary:
Ref T8096. Various tweaks here:
- Sort result lists by importance (even lint -- "errors first" seems better than "alphabetical by file", I think?).
- Do sane stuff with display limits.
- Add a "view all" view.
- Don't show a huge table of passing tests in Differential.
- Link to full results.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8096
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13407
Summary: Ref T8095. This weird grey table has no remaining callsites and can be removed.
Test Plan: Grepped for symbols.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8095
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13379
Summary: Ref T8099, No specific reason for these to be small buttons.
Test Plan: Test desktop and mobile layouts.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13081
Summary:
Ref T7447. Implements per-viewer comment hiding. Once a comment is obsolete or uninteresting, you can hide it completely.
This is sticky per-user.
My hope is that this will strike a better balance between concerns than some of the other approaches (conservative porting, summarization, hide-all).
Specifically, this adds a new action here:
{F435621}
Clicking it completely collapses the comment into a small icon on the previous line, and saves the comment state as hidden for you:
{F435626}
You can click the icon to reveal all hidden comments below the line.
Test Plan:
- Hid comments.
- Showed comments.
- Created, edited, deleted and submitted comments.
- Used Diffusion comments (hiding is not implemented there yet, but I'd plan to bring it there eventually if it works out in Differential).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jparise, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13009
Summary: Ref T7447, these are more work than needed at least on an indivdual basis. JS openning all feels poor as well.
Test Plan: Review comments, past present and future.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12702
Summary: Minor spacing updates for viewing buttons that collapse with icons. Also, minor ghost icon perfection tweak.
Test Plan: test diffusion, action menu buttons, ghost buttons at all break points.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12658
Summary: These remarkup spans bleed into other areas, but afaik they only seem to be needed on the bright rule. Also normalized the height of the label, which changed when we changed button size.
Test Plan: Review many diffs and inline comments. If this rule altered something else I can't find, let me know?
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12657
Summary: Ref T7447, Ref T1460. Moves "done" state to left, and no longer is a button (simpler CSS). Also feels a little nicer. Clean up some spacing issue with Ghosties.
Test Plan:
Test new and old comments, as author and reviewer.
{F389986}
{F389987}
{F389988}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aik099, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12641
Summary: This is a lighter UI treatment for previous/forward comments, where the comment is just hidden behind a click. This mayyy be too hard to discover, but I'd rather wait and make it more obvious if actually needed. Once you understand the interaction, the cleaner UI is preferable. Ref T7447
Test Plan:
Test a lot of previous and forward comments.
{F389658}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12627
Summary:
Ref T7447. This ports comments forward and backward in the best case:
- The old comment is on a changeset with the same filename.
- The old and new files are pretty much the same, line-for-line.
This will fail to port a lot of comments around and probably port a lot of comments into goofy places. We can see how bad it is in practice.
Errata:
- Design is me cobbling something together, probably worth tweaking.
- "Old Comment" should, at a minimum, say "Newer Comment" sometimes, or we should come up with some better name for this stuff.
Test Plan: {F377214}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12484
Summary: Fixes T7737, gets rid of not-done hover yellow, and removed the pointer on button-done state for reviewer.
Test Plan: tested numerous states as reviewer and author. Rechecked done on a few items. Verify new states work. This still seems fragile.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7737
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12313
Summary: Fixes T7690.
Test Plan: This fix worked when I applied it in the DOM inspector.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12211
Summary: This rule was missing.
Test Plan: Test a comment where "Not Done" was present. Hover over button, it doesn't change.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12193
Summary:
Ref T1460. Overall:
- Pass `objectOwnerPHID` consistently.
- Pass viewer consistently.
- Set the correct draft state for checkboxes on the client.
Test Plan:
- Made inline comments in Differential.
- Made inline comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12186
Summary:
Rebuilds the UI in Differential commenting. Specifically we look at the following design patterns:
**To the author:**
- The author of the diff should be able to easily identify what comments are done and not done.
- We keep undone comments yellow
- Clicking done turns comment block into 'unsubmitted state'
**To the reviewer:**
- Easier understanding of unsubmitted states
- All conversations to be yellow/important
**Todo**
- Not all color CSS states correct
- Unpulished checkbox support
Test Plan:
Test leaving comments, published and unpublished. Checking Done, unpublished and published. Check delete states.
From the Diff Author's perspective:
{F352094}
For a Diff commenter's perspective:
{F352095}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7660, T7503
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12171
Summary: Fixes T7655. We'll set tighter spacing around edit clusters. Also darkened up the date marker and remove unused `phabricator-transaction-view` CSS that was still scattered around the site.
Test Plan: Test a full and column multi-edit spam. Visited Ponder and Diffusion, noticed no issues using those apps. Grepped for other users of `phabricator-transaction-view`
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12148
Summary: Ref T7660. I'm not toggling "inline-state-is-draft" correctly in JS yet since it's a little tricky (you can reload to see it) but the main state should work.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "done", saw comment opacity fade with placeholder style.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12160
Summary:
Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc.
Specifically, these are the behaviors:
- You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider..").
- You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff.
- When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold:
- Be consistent with how inlines work.
- Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories.
- The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented.
- UI is bare bones.
- No integration with the rest of the UI yet.
Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
Summary:
Ref T2009. This is another almost-identical copy of the row scaffolding, which has the same 1up/2up bugs as the 8 other copies of this code.
Turn the "undo" element into an InlineCommentView so we can scaffold it.
Then, scaffold it with the same code as everything else.
Test Plan: Hit "Undo", swapped from 1up to 2up, hit "undo" again, swapped back, tried left/right, everything rendered with proper scaffolding.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12019
Summary: Ref T2009. This has two more copies of the scaffolding.
Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, replied to inline comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12018
Summary:
Ref T2009. Right now, when you mouse over a line number, we change the cursor to a "pointer", but that's the only hint we provide about the existence of inline comments.
Occasionally, users have reported confusion around how to leave inline comments.
Try to increase discoverability by showing the line reticle when you hover over the line.
(I could take this or leave it, but it seems OK / not annoying after 15 seconds of playing with it.)
Test Plan: Waved cursor over line numbers, attempted to test all the editor/noncontiguous/across-files cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12010
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, the code which draws the reticle is sort of implicitly hard-coded with some of the rules for the 2up view.
Instead, use general rules:
- Start selection at the next `<td />`.
- End selection at the rightmost adjacent `<td />`.
These rules work in all cases.
Test Plan:
- Activated reticle in 1up and 2up views by clicking line numbers and hovering over comments. It now draws correctly.
- Dragged over line ranges in 1up and 2up views, saw accurate reticle.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12009
Summary:
These aren't being populated yet; they mostly fix some JS errors with inlines.
For example, the inline hover reticle relies on adjusting its width to account for the "copy" column, and failed when the column did not exist.
Test Plan:
- Hovering inlines in unified now works, mostly.
- Interacted with inlines in side-by-side.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11985
