Summary: Revisions with blocking reviewers had this stamp built incorrectly, which cascaded into trying to use `array()` as a PHID. Recover so these tasks succeed.
Test Plan: Will deploy production.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19082
Summary: Like "Commit Hook" rules, these also fire oddly and don't have an object PHID or a list of transactions.
Test Plan: Verified that "Call Webhooks" was no longer available from Diff rules, but still available from other rule types.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19069
Summary:
See PHI346. Ref T13054. If you have prototypes enabled on the server but use `master` / `stable` on the client and run `arc diff --plan-changes`, the transition is rejected because "Draft -> Changes Planned" isn't currently a legal transition.
Allow this transition if not coming from the web UI (to keep it out of the dropdown).
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc diff --plan-changes` on `master`, got a "Changes Planned" revision instead of a validation error.
- Ran `arc diff` without `--plan-changes`, got a draft, verified that "Plan Changes" still doesn't appear in the action dropdown.
Maniphest Tasks: T13054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19067
Summary:
Depends on D19065. Ref T13054. Instead of just updating `containerPHID` and hoping for the best, queue a proper BuildWorker to process a "your container has changed, update it" message.
We also need to remove a (superfluous) `withContainerPHIDs()` when loading active diffs for a revision.
Test Plan:
- Without daemons, created a revision and saw builds stick in "preparing" with no container PHID, but also stay in draft mode.
- With daemons, saw builds actually build and get the right container PHID.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19066
Summary: Depends on D19063. Ref T13054. Prepare for the addition of a new `PREPARING` status by getting rid of the "scattered mess of switch statements" pattern of status management.
Test Plan: Searched/browsed buildables. Viewed buildables. Viewed revisions. Grepped for all affected symbols.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19064
Summary: Depends on D19056. Fixes T8475. Ref T13054. Merges "ModernHunk" back into "Hunk".
Test Plan: Grepped for `modernhunk`. Reviewed revisions. Created a new revision. Used `bin/differential migrate-hunk` to migrate hunks between storage formats and back.
Maniphest Tasks: T13054, T8475
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19057
Summary: Ref T13054. Ref T8475. This table has had no readers or writers for more than a year after it was migrated to the modern table.
Test Plan: Ran migration, verified that all the data was still around.
Maniphest Tasks: T13054, T8475
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19056
Summary: See PHI356. Adds inline comment and done counts to the filetree. Also makes the filetree wider by default.
Test Plan: Fiddled with filetrees in different browsers on different revisions. Added inlines, marked them done/undone.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19041
Summary: See PHI356. Makes it easier to pick out change types in the filetree view in Differential.
Test Plan: Created a diff with adds, copies, moves, deletions, and binary files. Viewed in Differential, had an easier time picking stuff out.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19040
Summary:
Depends on D19021. Ref T13053. When you "Subscribe", or make some other types of edits, we don't necessarily have reviewer data, but may now need it to do the new recipient list logic.
I don't have a totally clean way to deal with this in the general case in mind, but just load it for now so that things don't fatal.
Test Plan: Subscribed to a revision with the "Subscribe" action.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19022
Summary:
Depends on D19019. Ref T13053. Fixes T12689. See PHI178.
Currently, if `@alice` resigns from a revision but `#alice-fan-club` is still a subscriber or reviewer, she'll continue to get mail. This is undesirable.
When users are associated with an object but have explicitly disengaged in an individal role (currently, only resign in audit/differential) mark them "unexpandable", so that they can no longer be included through implicit membership in a group (a project or package).
`@alice` can still get mail if she's a explicit recipient: as an author, owner, or if she adds herself back as a subscriber.
Test Plan:
- Added `@ducker` and `#users-named-ducker` as reviewers. Ducker got mail.
- Resigned as ducker, stopped getting future mail.
- Subscribed explicitly, got mail again.
- (Plus some `var_dump()` sanity checking in the internals.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053, T12689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19021
Summary:
Depends on D19012. Ref T13053. In D19012, I've changed "Thread-Topic" to always use PHIDs.
This change drops the selective on-object storage we have to track the original, human-readable title for objects.
Even if we end up backing out the "Thread-Topic" change, we'd be better off storing this in a table in the Mail app which just has `<objectPHID, first subject we used when sending mail for that object>`, since then we get the right behavior without needing every object to have this separate field.
Test Plan: Grepped for `original`, `originalName`, `originalTitle`, etc.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19013
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
Summary:
Ref T13053. Adds revision stamps (status, reviewers, etc). Adds Herald rule stamps, like the existing X-Herald-Rules header.
Removes the "self" stamps, since you can just write a rule against `whatever(@epriestley)` equivalently. If there's routing logic around this, it can live in the routing layer. This avoids tons of self-actor, self-mention, self-reviewer, self-blocking-reviewer, self-resigned-reviewer, etc., stamps.
Use `natcasesort()` instead of `sort()` so that numeric values (like monograms) sort `9, 80, 700` instead of `700, 80, 9`.
Remove the commas from rendering since they don't really add anything.
Test Plan: Edited tasks and revisions, looked at mail stamps, saw stamps that looked pretty reasonable (with no more self stuff, no more commas, sorting numbers, and Herald stamps).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18997
Summary:
Ref T13057. This makes "reverts" syntax more visible and useful. In particular, you can now `Reverts Dxx` in a revision or commit, and `Reverts <hash>` from a revision.
When you do, the corresponding object will get a more-visible cross-reference marker in its timeline:
{F5405517}
From here, we can look at surfacing revert information more heavily, since we can now query it on revision/commit pages via edges.
Test Plan: Used "reverts <hash>" and "reverts <revision>" in Differential and Diffusion, got sensible results in the timeline.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13057
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18978
Summary:
Ref T13051. This puts a translation layer between the raw edge data in the transaction table and the UI that uses it.
The intent is to start writing new, more compact data soon. This class give us a consistent API for interacting with either the new or old data format, so we don't have to migrate everything upfront.
Test Plan: Browsed around, saw existing edge transactions render properly in transactions and feed. Added and removed subscribers and projects, saw good transaction rendering.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13051
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18946
Summary:
See PHI307. Currently, when reviews undraft, we retroactively add in older activity to the mail ("alice created this revision...").
However, we don't add that activity to the mail tags, so the relevant tags (like "revision created") are dropped forever.
Instead, use the same set of transactions for both mail body and mail tag construction.
This should be obsoleted in the relatively near future by T10448, but it's a better/more correct behavior in general and we probably can't get rid of tags completely for a while.
Test Plan:
Applied patch, created a revision with builds, saw it auto-undraft after builds finished. Used `bin/mail list-outbound` and `bin/mail show-outbound` to see the mail. Verified that it included retroactive text ("created this revision") AND retroactive tags.
Note that the tag for "A new revision is created" is `DifferentialTransaction::MAILTAG_REVIEW_REQUEST` with literal value `differential-review-request`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18941
Summary: See PHI280. We have a similar field for tasks already, this is generally a reasonable sort of thing to support, and the addition of "draft" states means there are some pretty reasonable use cases.
Test Plan:
- Wrote a status-based ("status is needs revision") Herald rule.
- Tested it against a "Needs Revision" revision (passed) and a "Changes Planned" revision (failed).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18938
Summary:
Ref T13047. In some reasonable cases, knowing the path and line number where a symbol appears is useful in ranking or filtering the set of matching symbols.
Giving symbol sources more information can't hurt, and it's generally free for us to include this context since we just need to grab it out of the document and pass it along.
We can't always get this data (for example, if a user types `s idx` into global search, we have no clue) but this is similar to other types of context which are only available sometimes (like which repository a symbol appears in).
Test Plan: Command-clicked some symbols in 1-up (unified) and 2-up (side-by-side) diff views with symbol indexes configured. Got accurate path and line information in the URI I was redirected to.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13047
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18936
Summary:
Depends on D18924. Ref T13048. Each adapter defines which repetition options ("every time", "only the first time") users may select for rules.
Currently, this is all explicit and hard-coded. However, every adapter really just implements this rule (except for some bugs, see below):
> You can pick "only the first time" if this adapter fires more than once on the same object.
Since we already have a `isSingleEventAdapter()` method which lets us tell if an adapter fires more than once, just write this rule in the base class and delete all the copy/pasting.
This also fixes two bugs because of the copy/pasting: Pholio Mocks and Phriction Documents did not allow you to write "only the first time" rules. There's no reason for this, they just didn't copy/paste enough methods when they were implemented.
This will make a future diff (which introduces an "if the rule did not match last time" policy) cleaner.
Test Plan:
- Checked several different types of rules, saw appropriate options in the dropdown (pre-commit: no options; tasks: first or every).
- Checked mocks and wiki docs, saw that you can now write "only the first time" rules.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13048
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18925
Summary:
See PHI309. There is a window of time between when all builds pass and when Harbormaster actually publishes a revision out of draft.
If any other user tries to interact with the revision during that window, they'll pick up the undraft transaction as a side effect. However, they won't have permission to apply it and will be stopped by a validation error.
Instead, only automatically publish a revision if the actor is the revision author or some system/application user (essentially always Harbormaster).
Test Plan:
- Added a `echo ...; sleep(30);` to `HarbormasterBuildEngine->updateBuildable()` before the `applyTransactions()` at the bottom.
- Wrote an "Always, run an HTTP request" Herald rule and Harbormaster build plan.
- Ran daemons with `bin/phd debug task`.
- Created a new revision with `arc diff`, as user A.
- Waited for `phd` to enter the race window.
- In a separate browser, as user B, submitted a comment via `differential.revision.edit`.
- Before patch: edits during the race window were rejected with a validation error, "you don't have permission to request review".
- After patch: edits go through cleanly.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18921
Summary:
Ref T13045. See that task for discussion.
This replaces `digestForIndex()` with a "clever" algorithm in `digestForAnchor()`. The new digest is the same as `digestForIndex()` except when the original output was "." or "_". In those cases, a replacement character is selected based on entropy accumulated by the digest function as it iterates through the string.
Test Plan: Added unit tests.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13045
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18909
Summary: See PHI292. This is just a generalization of D18851: feed stories have the same issue as mail. Don't hide "requested a review" in either mail or feed.
Test Plan:
- Enable prototypes.
- No harbormaster builds.
- Create a revision.
- Pre-patch: no feed story.
- Post-patch: feed story.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18886
Summary:
Ref T13042. This is a very, very old policy-violating option from yesteryear which supported build systems publishing updates by adding comments to revisions, without sending email about it.
Harbormaster has served this role for a long time and this is policy-violating in the general case (it allows attackers to act in secret).
Test Plan: Grepped for affected symbols.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13042
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18881
Summary: Ref T13035. See that task for a description of the issue.
Test Plan:
- Enabled prototypes.
- Disabled all Herald rules that trigger Harbormaster builds.
- Created a new revision.
- Before patch: initial review request email was dropped.
- After patch: initial review request email is sent.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18851
Summary:
See PHI230. Currently, we denormalize raw line counts onto diffs and revisions, but not added/removed line counts.
I'd like to try a `[---+ ]` sort of size hint element (see D16322 for more) as a general approach to conveying size information at a glance and see how it feels, since I think the raw size number isn't very scannable/useful and it may be a significant improvement to hint about how much of a change is throwing stuff out vs adding new stuff.
This just makes the data available without any subquerying and doesn't actually change the UI.
Test Plan:
Created a revision, saw detailed change information populate in the database.
```
mysql> select * from differential_revision where id = 292\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 292
title: WIP
originalTitle: WIP
phid: PHID-DREV-ux3cxptibn3l5pxsug3z
status: draft
summary: asdf
testPlan: asdf
authorPHID: PHID-USER-cvfydnwadpdj7vdon36z
lastReviewerPHID: NULL
lineCount: 41
dateCreated: 1513179418
dateModified: 1513179418
attached: []
mailKey: h4mn6perdio47o4beomyvu75zezwvredx3mbrlgz
branchName: NULL
viewPolicy: users
editPolicy: users
repositoryPHID: PHID-REPO-wif5lutk5gn3y6ursk4p
properties: {"lines.added":40,"lines.removed":1}
activeDiffPHID: PHID-DIFF-ixjphpunpkenqgukpmce
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
```
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18832
Summary:
Fixes T13027. Ref T2543. When revisions promote from "Draft" because builds finish or no builds are configured, the status currently switches from "Draft" to "Needs Review" without re-running Herald.
This means that some rules -- notably, "Send me an email" rules -- don't fire as soon as they should.
Instead of applying this promotion in a hacky way inline, queue it and apply it normally in a second edit, after the current group finishes.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision, reviewed Herald transcripts.
- Saw three Herald passes:
- First pass (revision creation) triggered builds and no email.
- Second pass (builds finished) did not trigger builds (no update) and did not trigger email (revision still a draft).
- Third pass (after promotion out of 'draft') did not trigger builds (no update) but did trigger email (revision no longer a draft).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13027, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18819
Summary:
Ref T10233. See PHI231. When users ignore the `arc land` prompt about bad revision states, make it explicitly clear in the transaction log that they broke the rules.
You can currently figure this out by noticing that there's no "This revision is accepted and ready to land." message, but it's unrealistic to expect non-expert users to look for the //absence// of a message to indicate something, and this state change is often relevant.
Test Plan: {F5302351}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10233
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18808
Summary:
Depends on D18801. Ref T2543. See PHI229. I missed "Accept" before, but intended to disallow it (like "Reject") since I don't want drafts to be reviewable.
However, "Resign" seems fine to allow? So let's allow that for now.
Test Plan: Was no longer offered "Accept" on draft revisions.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18802
Summary:
See PHI228. Ref T2543. The current logic gets this slightly wrong: prototypes are off, you create a draft with `--draft`, then promote it with "Request Review". This misses both branches.
Instead, test these conditions a little more broadly. We also need to store broadcast state since `getIsNewObject()` isn't good enough with this workflow.
Test Plan:
- With prototypes on and autopromotion, got a rich email after builds finished.
- With prototypes off, got a rich email immediately.
- With prototypes off and `--draft`, got a rich email after "Request Review".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18801
Summary: Whitespace has semantic meaning for yaml files, so we shouldn't suppress whitespace-only lines of diff by default.
Test Plan: Edited local config to include yaml files, saw expected whitespace changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18775
Summary:
See PHI180. Currently, if you begin creating or editing an inline and then swap display modes (for example, with "View Unified"), your edit is lost.
Persisting the editor state is complicated and this is very rare, so just prevent the action and warn the user instead.
Also make the warning persist for a little longer since a few of the messages, including this one, take a couple seconds to read now.
Test Plan:
- Edited a comment, tried to swap display modes, got a warning.
- Swapped display modes normally with no comment being edited.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18774
Summary:
Depends on D18771. See PHI206. Currently, `arc diff --draft` only holds revisions in draft mode: it doesn't put them into draft mode if the install isn't configured to use draft mode.
Instead, make it a bit more forceful so that `arc diff --draft` can create into draft mode explicitly even if protoypes are off. This aligns with expection a little more clearly.
Test Plan: Ran `arc diff --draft` with prototypes off, got a revision held in draft mode.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18772
Summary: See PHI210. Ref T2543. Currently, we don't set this flag if you have prototypes off and don't get any of the new draft stuff, so the mail drops some of the details it is supposed to have.
Test Plan: Disabled prototypes, created a revision, saw summary / test plan in the initial mail.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18771
Summary:
See PHI199. Ref T2543. When you run a RevisionQuery with a legacy status constraint (via `differential.query`), we currently don't match "Draft" revisions.
Use the actual complete map from `DifferentialRevisionStatus` instead of hard coding the status list so "Draft" is included.
Test Plan:
- Ran `differential.query` with `ids` and `status` for a draft revision.
- Before patch: revision not returned in results.
- After patch: revision returned in results.
(Note that it returns as "Needs Review", for compatibility.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18765
Summary:
See PHI190. This clarifies the ruleset a bit:
- If you accepted, then the author used "Request Review" explicitly, we now show "Accepted Earlier" instead of "Accepted" in the "Reviewers" list on the main revision page. This makes it sligthly more clear why the revision is back in your review queue without picking through the transaction log.
- Instead of moving all non-current accepts into "Ready to Review", move only voided accepts into "Ready to Review". This stops us from pulling older accepts which haven't been voided (which could have been incorrectly pulled) and correctly pulls older, voided accepts from before an update (for example: accept, then request review, then update) and generally aligns better with intent/expectation.
Test Plan:
- Accepted, requested review.
- Saw reviewer as "Accepted Earlier".
- Saw review in "Ready to Review" bucket.
- Accepted, updated (with sticky accept).
- Saw reviewer as "Accepted Prior Diff".
- Saw review as "Waiting on Authors".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18764
Summary: See PHI195. This bulks out these API methods since all the requests are pretty straightforward.
Test Plan: Ran `edge.search` and `differential.revision.search`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18762
Summary:
See PHI197. Populates "status" transactions and a few other obvious types where there's no security/performance/payload/formatting issue I can come up with.
The names here are the same as the names for editing with `maniphest.edit`.
Test Plan: Used `transaction.search` to retrieve transactions of all new types.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18761
Summary: Ref T12689. See PHI178. This isn't a complete solution (you may still get mailed via packages/projects) but should fix the obvious issue, where "Resigned" reviewers are incorrectly always sent mail directly.
Test Plan: Had Alice resign, interacted as Bailey, no mail to Alice.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12689
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18758
Summary:
Depends on D18756. Fixes T12539. See PHI190. Currently, when this occurs:
- Alice accepts.
- Bailey requests review.
- Alice views her dashboard.
...the revision appears in "Waiting on Other Reviewers" (regardless of whether other reviewers actually exist or not).
Instead, ignore these voided/non-current accepts and let the revisions appear in "Ready to Review", which is more natural.
Test Plan: Went through the steps above. On `master`, saw revision in "Waiting on Other Reviewers". After patch, saw it in "Ready to Review".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12539
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18757
Summary:
Ref T12539. See PHI190. Currently, each Diff has a `revisionID`, but Revisions do not point at the current active diff. To find the active diff for a given revision, we need to issue a separate query.
Furthermore, this query is inefficient for bulk loads: if we have a lot of revisions, we end up querying for all diff IDs for all those revisions first, then selecting the largest ones and querying again to get the actual diff objects. This strategy could likely be optimized but the query is a mess in any case.
In several cases, it's useful to have the active diff PHID without needing to do a second query -- sometimes for convenience, and sometimes for performance.
T12539 is an example of such a case: it would be nice to refine the bucketing logic (which only depends on active diff PHIDs), but it feels bad to make the page heavier to do it.
For now, this is unused. I'll start using it to fix the bucketing issue, and then we can expand it gradually to address other performance/convenience issues.
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations, inspected database, saw sensible values.
- Created a new revision, saw a sensible database value.
- Updated an existing revision, saw database update properly.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12539
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18756
Summary:
Ref T2543. Fixes two relatively minor things:
- When builds finish in Harbormaster, send mail "From" the author.
- Set the `firstBroadcast` flag so that initial mail picks up earlier history (notably, the "reviewers" line).
For now, I'm not setting `firstBroadcast` on explicit "Request Review" (but maybe we should), and not trying to deal with weird cases where you leave a bunch of comments on a draft. Those might be fine as-is or may get tweaked later.
Test Plan: Created a revision with Harbormaster builds, ran builds, saw initial email come "From" the right user with more metadata.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18748
Summary: Ref T2543. After D18731, Herald build rules run more often, but now incorrectly try to run builds when Diffusion closes a revision because a commit landed.
Test Plan: Made some mundane updates locally; this is tricky to test comprehensively locally so I'm mostly planning to just push it to `secure`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18745
Summary:
Ref T2543. Instead of autosubmitting revisions to "Needs Review" when builds finish, allow them to be held in "Draft" indefinitely.
There's currently no UI for this. I plan to just expose it as `arc diff --draft` for now, in a followup change.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision (via Conduit) with "hold as draft", saw it hold as draft after builds finished.
- Created a revision (normally), saw it autosubmit after builds finished.
- Requested review of a "hold as draft" revision to kick it out of draft state.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18737
Summary:
Depends on D18740. Prepares `arc` to receive a `--draft` flag by letting us switch to "differential.revision.edit" instead of "differential.createrevision".
To "differential.revision.edit", we need a transaction list, but we can't automatically construct this list from a field map. Return the transaction list alongside the field map.
The next change uses this list (if available) to switch us to the modern API method.
Test Plan: Ran `arc diff` on the experiemntal branch with followup changes, got a new revision.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18741
Summary: See PHI90. For now, this only provides a limited amount of information, but should satisfy the use case in PHI90 and build toward a more complete version in the future.
Test Plan: Used new Conduit method to retrieve information about diffs.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18744
Summary:
Ref T2543. Fixes T10109.
Currently, Herald only runs in Differential when a change updates the diff. This is partly for historical reasons, and partly because we don't want to restart builds every time someone makes a comment. However, this behavior is inconsistent with other applications (which always trigger on any change), and occasionally confusing to users (in T10109, for example) or otherwise undesirable.
A similar issue is that T2543 has introduced a "Draft" state, where revisions don't send normal mail until builds finish. This interacts poorly with "Send me an email" rules (which shouldn't do anything here) and particularly with "Send me an email + only run these actions the first time the rule matches", since that might have an effect like "do nothing when the revision is created, then never anything again since you already did nothing once".
To navigate both of these issues, let objects tell Herald that certain actions (like mail or builds) are currently forbidden. If a rule uses a field or action which is currently forbidden, the whole rule automatically fails before it executes, but doesn't count toward "only the first time" as far as Herald's tracking of rule execution is concerned.
Then, forbid mail for draft revisions, and forbid builds for revisions which didn't just get updated. Forbidding mail fixes the issues with "Send me an email" that were created by the introduction of the draft state.
Finally, make Herald run on every revision update, not just substantive updates to the diff. This resolves T10109.
Test Plan:
Created revisions via the draft -> submit workflow, saw different transcripts. Here's a mail action being forbidden for a draft:
{F5237324}
Here's a build action being forbidden for a "mundane" update:
{F5237326}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T10109, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18731
Summary:
Ref T2543. When Harbormaster finishes builds and promotes a draft revision to review, we currently publish "Harbormaster requested review of...".
Instead, attribute this action to the author, since that's more natural and more useful.
Test Plan: Promoted a diff locally, saw it attributed to me rather than Harbormaster.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18730
Summary: Ref T12680. Use the slightly sleeker construction from D18722 in Differential.
Test Plan: Viewed revision list, reordered by date modified.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12680
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18727
