The root issue here is actually just that I cherry-picked stable locally
but did not push it. However, this is a minor issue I also caught while
double-checking things.
Auditors: chad
Summary:
Ref T12464. This is a very old method which can return an existing file instead of creating a new one, if there's some existing file with the same content.
In the best case this is a bad idea. This being somewhat reasonable predates policies, temporary files, etc. Modern methods like `newFromFileData()` do this right: they share underlying data in storage, but not the actual `File` records.
Specifically, this is the case where we get into trouble:
- I upload a private file with content "X".
- You somehow generate a file with the same content by, say, viewing a raw diff in Differential.
- If the diff had the same content, you get my file, but you don't have permission to see it or whatever so everything breaks and is terrible.
Just get rid of this.
Test Plan:
- Generated an SSH key.
- Viewed a raw diff in Differential.
- (Did not test Phragment.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T12464
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17617
Summary:
Ref T11357. When creating a file, callers can currently specify a `ttl`. However, it isn't unambiguous what you're supposed to pass, and some callers get it wrong.
For example, to mean "this file expires in 60 minutes", you might pass either of these:
- `time() + phutil_units('60 minutes in seconds')`
- `phutil_units('60 minutes in seconds')`
The former means "60 minutes from now". The latter means "1 AM, January 1, 1970". In practice, because the GC normally runs only once every four hours (at least, until recently), and all the bad TTLs are cases where files are normally accessed immediately, these 1970 TTLs didn't cause any real problems.
Split `ttl` into `ttl.relative` and `ttl.absolute`, and make sure the values are sane. Then correct all callers, and simplify out the `time()` calls where possible to make switching to `PhabricatorTime` easier.
Test Plan:
- Generated an SSH keypair.
- Viewed a changeset.
- Viewed a raw diff.
- Viewed a commit's file data.
- Viewed a temporary file's details, saw expiration date and relative time.
- Ran unit tests.
- (Didn't really test Phragment.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T11357
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17616
Summary:
Fixes T12496. Sticky accept was accidentally impacted by the "void" changes in D17566.
Instead, don't always downgrade all accepts/rejects: on update, we only want to downgrade accepts.
Test Plan:
- With sticky accept off, updated an accepted revision: new state is "needs review".
- With sticky accept on, updated an accepted revision: new state is "accepted" (sticky accept working correctly).
- Did "reject" + "request review" to make sure that still works, worked fine.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12496
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17605
Summary:
Ref T12272. If you own a package which owns "/", this allows you to force-accept package reviews for packages which own sub-paths, like "/src/adventure/".
The default UI looks something like this:
```
[X] Accept as epriestley
[X] Accept as Root Package
[ ] Force accept as Adventure Package
```
By default, force-accepts are not selected.
(I may do some UI cleanup and/or annotate "because you own X" in the future and/or mark these accepts specially in some way, particularly if this proves confusing along whatever dimension.)
Test Plan: {F4314747}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17569
Summary: Ref T10967. This change is similar to D17566, but for rejects.
Test Plan:
- Create a revision as A, with reviewer B.
- Reject as B.
- Request review as A.
- Before patch: stuck in "rejected".
- After patch: transitions back to "needs review".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17568
Summary: Ref T10967. This moves all remaining "request review" pathways (just `differential.createcomment`) to the new code, and removes the old action.
Test Plan: Requested review on a revision, `grep`'d for the action constant.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17567
Summary:
Ref T10967. This is explained in more detail in T10967#217125
When an author does "Request Review" on an accepted revision, void (in the sense of "cancel out", like a bank check) any "accepted" reviewers on the current diff.
Test Plan:
- Create a revision with author A and reviewer B.
- Accept as B.
- "Request Review" as A.
- (With sticky accepts enabled.)
- Before patch: revision swithced back to "accepted".
- After patch: the earlier review is "voided" by te "Request Review", and the revision switches to "Review Requested".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17566
Summary:
Ref T11050. The old rule was "you can only resign if you're a reviewer".
With the new behavior of "resign", the rule should be "you can resign if you're a reviewer, or you have authority over any reviewer". Make it so.
Also fixes T12446. I don't know how to reproduce that but I'm pretty sure this'll fix it?
Test Plan:
- Could not resign from a revision with no authority/reviewer.
- Resigned from a revision with myself as a reviewer.
- Resigned from a revision with a package I owned as a reviewer.
- Could not resign from a revision I had already resigned from.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12446, T11050
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17558
Summary: Ref T9363, If we're in a dashboard panel, only show buckets with data, or a fallback if nothing exists.
Test Plan: Test 'active revisions' panel in a dashboard and in Differential.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9363
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17544
Summary:
Ref T12271. Don't do anything with this yet, but store who accepted/rejected/whatever on behalf of reviewers.
In the future, we could use this to render stuff like "Blessed Committers (accepted by epriestley)" or whatever. I don't know that this is necessarily super useful, but it's easy to track, seems likely to be useful, and would be a gigantic pain to backfill later if we decide we want it.
Test Plan: Accepted/rejected a revision, saw reviewers update appropriately.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17537
Summary:
Ref T12271. Currenty, when you "Accept" a revision, you always accept it for all reviewers you have authority over.
There are some situations where communication can be more clear if users can accept as only themselves, or for only some packages, etc. T12271 discusses some of these use cases in more depth.
Instead of making "Accept" a blanket action, default it to doing what it does now but let the user uncheck reviewers.
In cases where project/package reviewers aren't in use, this doesn't change anything.
For now, "reject" still acts the old way (reject everything). We could make that use checkboxes too, but I'm not sure there's as much of a use case for it, and I generally want users who are blocking stuff to have more direct accountability in a product sense.
Test Plan:
- Accepted normally.
- Accepted a subset.
- Tried to accept none.
- Tried to accept bogus reviewers.
- Accepted with myself not a reviewer
- Accepted with only one reviewer (just got normal "this will be accepted" text).
{F4251255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17533
Summary: Hit this while `arc diff`'ing something which is triggering 2+ rules which add reviewers, I think.
Test Plan: Dug this out of a production stack trace; will push and `arc diff` again.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17534
Summary:
Ref T10967. I'm not 100% sure we need this, but the old edge table had it and I recall an issue long ago where not having this key left us with a bad query plan.
Our data doesn't really provide a way to test this key (we have many revisions and few reviewers, so the query planner always uses revision keys), and building a convincing test case would take a while (lipsum needs some improvements to add reviewers). But in the worst case this key is mostly useless and wastes a few MB of disk space, which isn't a big deal.
So I can't conclusively prove that this key does anything to the dashboard query, but the migration removed it and I'm more comfortable keeping it so I'm not worried about breaking stuff.
At the very least, MySQL does select this key in the query plan when I do a "Reviewers:" query explicitly so it isn't //useless//.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, ran dashboard query, the query plan didn't get any worse.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17532
Summary:
Fixes T11050. Today, when a user resigns, we just delete the record of them ever being a reviewer.
However, this means you have no way to say "I don't care about this and don't want to see it on my dashboard" if you are a member of any project or package reviewers.
Instead, store "resigned" as a distinct state from "not a reviewer", and treat it a little differently in the UI:
- On the bucketing screen, discard revisions any responsible user has resigned from.
- On the main `/Dxxx` page, show these users as resigned explicitly (we could just hide them, too, but I think this is good to start with).
- In the query, don't treat a "resigned" state as a real "reviewer" (this change happened earlier, in D17517).
- When resigning, write a "resigned" state instead of deleting the row.
- When editing a list of reviewers, I'm still treating this reviewer as a reviewer and not special casing it. I think that's sufficiently clear but we could tailor this behavior later.
Test Plan:
- Resigned from a revision.
- Saw "Resigned" in reviewers list.
- Saw revision disappear from my dashboard.
- Edited revision, saw user still appear as an editable reviewer. Saved revision, saw no weird side effects.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11050
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17531
Summary:
Ref T10967. Improves some method names:
- `Revision->getReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->getReviewers()`
- `Revision->attachReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->attachReviewers()`
- `Reviewer->getStatus()` -> `Reviewer->getReviewerStatus()` (this is mostly to make this more greppable)
Test Plan:
- bunch o' `grep`
- Browsed around.
- If I missed anything, it should fatal in an obvious way. We have a lot of other `getStatus()` calls and it's hard to be sure I got them all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17522
Summary: Ref T10967. The old name was because we had a `getReviewers()` tied to `needRelationships()`, rename this method to use a simpler and more clear name.
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17519
Summary:
Ref T10967. There have been two different ways to load reviewers for a while: `needReviewerStatus()` and `needRelationships()`.
The `needRelationships()` stuff was a false start along time ago that didn't really go anywhere. I believe the idea was that we might want to load several different types of edges (subscribers, reviewers, etc) on lots of different types of objects. However, all that stuff pretty much ended up modularizing so that main `Query` classes did not need to know about it, so `needRelationships()` never got generalized or went anywhere.
A handful of things still use it, but get rid of them: they should either `needReviewerStatus()` to get reviewer info, or the ~3 callsites that care about subscribers can just load them directly.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed methods (`needRelationships()`, `getReviewers()`, `getCCPHIDs()`, etc).
- Browsed Diffusion, Differential.
- Called `differential.query`.
It's possible I missed some stuff, but it should mostly show up as super obvious fatals ("call needReviewerStatus() before getReviewerStatus()!").
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17518
Summary:
Ref T10967.
When we query for revisions with particular reviewers, use the new table to drive the query.
When we load revisions for use in the application, also use the new table to drive the query.
This doesn't convert everything: there's some old `loadRelationships()` stuff still using the old table. But this moves the major stuff over.
(This also changes the icon for "commented" from a question mark to a speech bubble.)
Test Plan:
- Viewed revision lists and detail views on old and new code, saw identical outcomes.
- Updated revisions, accepted/rejected/commented on revisions.
- Hit the "Accepted Older" and "Commented Older" states by taking an action and then updating.
- Grepped for removed methods (like `getEdgeData()` and `getDiffID()`).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17517
Summary:
Ref T10967. We have a "commented" state to help reviewers get a better sense of who is part of a discussion, and a "last action" state to help distinguish between "accept" and "accepted an older version", for the purposes of sticky accepts and as a UI hint.
Currently, these are first-class states, partly beacuse we were somewhat limited in what we could do with edges. However, a more flexible way to represent them is as flags separate from the primary state flag.
In the new storage, write them as separate state information: `lastActionDiffPHID` stores the Diff PHID of the last review action (accept, reject, etc). `lastCommentDiffPHID` stores the Diff PHID of the last comment (top-level or inline).
Test Plan: Applied storage changes, commented and acted on a revision. Saw appropriate state reflected in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17514
Summary:
Ref T10967. `differential.createcomment` is a frozen API method which has been obsoleted by `differential.revision.edit`.
It is the only remaining way to apply an "accept", "reject", or "resign" action using the old "ACTION" code.
Instead of using the old code, sneakly apply a new type of transaction in these cases instead.
Then, remove all the remaining old code for this stuff on the write pathways.
Test Plan:
- Used "differential.createcomment" to accept, reject, and resign from a revision.
- Grepped for all removed ACTION_X constants, found them only in rendering code.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17513
Summary: Ref T10967. See that task for some discussion. This lets us do double writes on this pathway.
Test Plan: Set an Owners package to auto-review. Created revisions which triggered it: one with no reviewers (autoreview added); one with the package as a blocking reviewer explicitly (no automatic stuff happened, as expected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17512
Summary:
Ref T10967. This converts the reviewer update action in Herald from an older edge write to a newer ModularTransactions write.
The major value from this is that we get a double-write to the new reviewers table.
Test Plan:
- Wrote a Herald rule to add a reviewer and a blocking reviewer.
- Saw them added properly to a revision with: no reviewers; both as blocking; A as blocking, B as nonblocking; A as nonblocking, B as blocking.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17511
Summary:
Ref T5378. This repackages an existing check to see if a URI is a URI for the current install into a more reasonable form.
In an upcoming change, I'll use this new check to test whether `http://example.whatever.com/T123` is a link to a task on the current install or not.
Test Plan: This stuff has good test coverage already; added some more.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5378
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17502
Summary:
Via HackerOne. When you view a raw file in Differential, we currently generate a permanent file with default permissions. This may be incorrect: default permissions may be broader than the diff's permissions.
The other three methods of downloading/viewing raw files ("Download" in Diffusion and Differential, "View Raw" in Diffusion and Differential) already apply policies correctly and generate temporary files. However, this workflow was missed when other workflows were updated.
Beyond updating the workflow, delete any files we've generated in the past. This wipes the slate clean on any security issues and frees up a little disk space.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration script, saw existing files get purged.
- Did "View Raw File", got a new file.
- Verified that the file was temporary and properly attached to the diff, with "NO ONE" permissions.
- Double-checked that Diffusion already runs policy logic correctly and applies appropriate policies.
- Double-checked that "Download Raw Diff" in Differential already runs policy logic correctly.
- Double-chekced that "Download Raw Diff" in Diffusion already runs policy logic correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17504
Summary:
Ref T10967. This is an incremental step toward removing "reviewers" back to a dedicated storage table so we can handle changes like T11050.
This adds the storage table, and starts doing double writes to it (so new or updated reviewers write to both the old edge table and the new "reviewers" table).
Then we can do a migration, swap readers over one at a time, and eventually remove the old write and old storage and then implement new features.
This change has no user-facing impact, it just causes us to write new data to two places instead of one.
This is not completely exhaustive: the Herald "Add Reviewers" action is still doing a manual EDGE transaction. I'll clean that up next and do another pass to look for anything else I missed.
This is also a bit copy/pastey for now but the logic around "RESIGN" is a little different in the two cases until T11050. I'll unify it in future changes.
Test Plan:
- Did a no-op edit.
- Did a no-op comment.
- Added reviewers.
- Removed reviewers.
- Accepted and rejected revisions.
After all of these edits, did a `SELECT * FROM differential_reviewer` manually and saw consistent-looking rows in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17495
Summary:
Ref T12335. Fixes T11207. Edit-like interactions which are not performed via "Edit <object>" are a bit of a grey area, policy-wise.
For example, you can correctly do these things to an object you can't edit:
- Comment on it.
- Award tokens.
- Subscribe or unsubscribe.
- Subscribe other users by mentioning them.
- Perform review.
- Perform audit.
- (Maybe some other stuff.)
These behaviors are all desirable and correct. But, particularly now that we offer stacked actions, you can do a bunch of other stuff which you shouldn't really be able to, like changing the status and priority of tasks you can't edit, as long as you submit the change via the comment form.
(Before the advent of stacked actions there were fewer things you could do via the comment form, and more of them were very "grey area", especially since "Change Subscribers" was just "Add Subscribers", which you can do via mentions.)
This isn't too much of a problem in practice because we won't //show// you those actions if the edit form you'd end up on doesn't have those fields. So on intalls like ours where we've created simple + advanced flows, users who shouldn't be changing task priorities generally don't see an option to do so, even though they technically could if they mucked with the HTML.
Change this behavior to be more strict: unless an action explicitly says that it doesn't need edit permission (comment, review, audit) don't show it to users who don't have edit permission and don't let them take the action.
Test Plan:
- As a user who could not edit a task, tried to change status via comment form; received policy exception.
- As a user who could not edit a task, viewed a comment form: no actions available (just "comment").
- As a user who could not edit a revision, viewed a revision form: only "review" actions available (accept, resign, etc).
- Viewed a commit form but these are kind of moot because there's no separate edit permission.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12335, T11207
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17452
Summary:
Fixes T12322. Allows you to search for commits using the `tagged(...)` repository function, so you can find "any commmit in any repository tagged with android" or similar.
I moved the function from Differential (which was the application using it) to Diffusion (which is more accurately the application which provides it).
I fixed a bug where searching for `tagged(xyz)` would have no effect (constraint was ignored) if there were no repositories tagged with "xyz". The fix isn't perfectly clean, but should work properly for the moment.
Test Plan:
- Searched with `tagged(...)` in Diffusion and Differential.
- Searched by repository.
- Searched with `tagged(...)` for a project with no tagged repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12322
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17426
Summary:
Ref T12319. Currently, `bin/lipsum` uses substring matches against human-readable text to chose which objects to generate.
Instead:
- Use separate selector keys which are guaranteed to be unique.
- When a match is exact, select only that generator.
- When a match is ambiguous, fail and warn the user.
Test Plan: Generated several types of objects, tried to generate ambiguous objects like "e".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12319
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17420
Summary: Ref T12319. The product name is misspelled in some methods, and a few places in the documentation.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12319
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17419
Summary:
Fixes T12172. Fixes T12060. This allows runtime code building CSS for mail to read CSS variables, then makes all the code do that.
It reverts the non-colorblind red/green to the colors in use before T12060, which seem better for non-colorblind users since no one really complained?
Test Plan:
- Viewed code diffs in Web UI.
- Viewed prose diffs in Web UI.
- Viewed code diffs in email.
- Viewed prose diffs in email.
All modes respected the accessibility color scheme.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12172, T12060
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17269
Summary:
Fixes T12197. I //think// this field was never recognized by Differential (it doesn't appear in D17070, but maybe that isn't the right change).
It was recognized by the ad-hoc regular expression which I replaced with a formal parser in D17262.
Allow the former parser to accept "Auditor" as an alias for "Auditors".
Test Plan: Committed a change with `Auditor: dog`, saw the audit trigger correctly in the web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12197
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17306
Summary:
Ref T12173.
- If we want to fetch a tag, Buildkite needs it as a "branch" (this means more like "ref to fetch").
- The API gets upset if we pass "refs/tags/...", so just pass the tag name without the prefix, which works.
- Do a better job with commits and pass a real branch to fetch.
Test Plan:
- Built a commit with Buildkite.
- Build a revision with Buildkite.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T12173
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17282
Summary:
Ref T10978. Updates how we implement "Auditors: ..." in commit messages:
- Use the same parsing code as everything else.
- (Also: parse package names.)
- Use the new transaction code.
Also, fix some UI strings.
Test Plan: Used `bin/repository reparse --herald <commit>` to re-run this code on commits with various messages (valid Auditors, invalid Auditors, no Auditors). Saw appropriate auditors added in the UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17262
Summary:
Ref T11114. Converting to EditEngine caused us to stop running this validation, since these fields no longer subclass this parent. Restore the validation.
Also, make sure we check the //first// line of the value, too. After the change to make "Tests: xyz" a valid title, you could write silly summaries / test plans and escape the check if the first line was bogus.
Test Plan: {F2493228}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17248
Summary: Ref T12136. This just yanks the band-aid off. Fundamentally these were useful well before Dashboards and advanced bucketing, but not so much any more. They also have some performance hit.
Test Plan: Add some tasks and diffs onto a new instance, see there is no count on the home menu bar.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12136
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17238
Summary:
To set this up:
- alice accepts a revision.
- Something adds a package or project she has authority over as a reviewer.
- Because alice has already accepted, she can not re-accept, but she should be able to (in order to accept on behalf of the new project or package).
Test Plan:
- Created a revision.
- Accepted as user "dog".
- Added "dog project".
- Re-accepted.
- Could not three-accept.
- Removed "dog project.
- Rejected.
- Added "dog project".
- Re-rejected.
- Could not three-reject.
Reviewers: chad, eadler
Reviewed By: chad, eadler
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17226
Summary: Fixes T6660. Uses the new stuff in Audit to build an EditEngine-aware icon.
Test Plan: {F2364304}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17208
Summary:
Ref T11114. Ref T12085. I missed a few pieces of cleanup when moving all this stuff over.
In particular, load all fields which use Custom Field storage before doing commit-message-related stuff, instead of just the ones that claim they appear on commit messages.
Test Plan: Edited revisions and made API calls without apparent issues. See followup on T12085, shortly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12085, T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17207
Summary:
Fixes T12095. Ref T6660. The old code for this was specific to Differential, using the `DifferentialDraft` table.
Instead, make the `EditEngine` / `VersionedDraft` code create and remove a `<objectPHID, authorPHID>` edge when a particular author creates drafts.
Some applications have drafts beyond `VersionedDrafts`, notably inline comments. Before writing "yes, draft" or "no, no draft", ask the object if it has any custom draft stuff we need to know about.
This should fix all the yellow bubble bugs I created in T11114 and allow us to bring the feature to Audit fairly easily.
Test Plan: Created and deleted comments and inlines, reloading the list view after each change. Couldn't find a way to break the list view anymore.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12095, T6660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17205
Summary:
Ref T12098.
We have two methods (`supportsEditEngineConfiguration()` and `isEngineConfigurable()`) which sort of do the same thing and probably should be merged.
For now, just swap which one we override to get "Create Revision" out of the Quick Create menu.
Test Plan: No more "Create Revision" in Quick Create menu.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12098
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17204
Summary:
Fixes T7076. This could probably use some tweaking but should get the basics in place.
This shows overall object state (e.g., "Needs Review"), not individual viewer state (e.g., "you need to review this"). After the bucketing changes it seems like we're mostly in a reasonable place on showing global state instead of viewer state. This makes the overall change much easier than it might otherwise have been.
Test Plan: {F2351867}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7076
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17193
Summary: Ref T11114. Ref T10978. These hadn't made it over to EditEngine yet.
Test Plan:
- Took various actions on revisions and commits.
- Used `bin/mail show-outbound --id ...` to examine the "Vary Subject", saw it properly generate "[Accepted]", "[Resigned]", etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114, T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17191
Summary:
Fixes T12092. D17164 made `DiffQuery` more strict about arguments using modern conventions, but `differential.querydiffs` uses bizarre ancient conventions.
Give it more modern conventions instead.
Test Plan: Made a `querydiffs` call with only revision IDs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17172
Summary: Fixes T12086. This got dropped by accident while cleaning up haunting.
Test Plan: Loaed a revision, hit "?", hit n/j/p/etc
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12086
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17166
Summary:
Fixes T10968. In rare situations, we can generate a diff, then hit an error which causes this update to fail.
When it does, we tend to get stuck in a loop creating diffs, which can fill the database up with garbage. We saw this once in the Phacility cluster, and one instance hit it, too.
Instead: when we create a diff, keep track of which commit we generated it from. The next time through, reuse it if we already built it.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/differential attach-commit <commit> <revision>` to hit this code.
- Simulated a filesystem write failure, saw the diff get reused.
- Also did a normal update, which worked properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10968
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17164
Summary: Ref T11114. After evaluating typeahead tokens, we could process blocking reviewer removals incorrectly: we may get structures back.
Test Plan: Removed blocking reviewers from the web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17163
Summary:
Ref T12074. The "v3" API methods (`*.search`, `*.edit`) are currently marked as "unstable", but they're pretty stable and essentially all new code should be using them.
Although these methods are seeing some changes, almost all changes are additive (support for new constraints or attachemnts) and do not break backward compatibility. We have no major, compatibility-breaking changes planned.
I don't want to mark the older methods "deprecated" yet since `arc` still uses a lot of them and there are some capabilities not yet available on the v3 methods, but introduce a new "frozen" status with pointers to the new methods.
Overall, this should gently push users toward the newer methods.
Test Plan: {F2325323}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17158
Summary:
Ref T11114. When you comment, we try to upgrade your review status to "commented".
This can conflict with upgrading it to "accepted" or "rejected", or removing it entirely.
For now, just avoid making this update. After T10967, I expect "you commented" to be orthogonal to accepted/rejected so it should stop conflicting on its own.
Test Plan:
- As an "added" reviewer, accepted a revision with a comment in the same transaction.
- Before patch: accept didn't stick.
- After patch: accept sticks.
This may be somewhat magical/order-dependent but I was able to reproduce it locally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17146
Summary: Minor color saturation here, ideal for low quality monitors.
Test Plan:
Review new colors in various scenarios.
{F2305178}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17141
Summary:
Fixes T10136. This reinforces ongoing or failed builds in the comment action area.
We already emit a similar message for unit test failures from `arc unit`. This should probably obsolete that, eventually.
Test Plan:
{F2304809}
{F2304810}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10136
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17140
Summary:
Fixes T9276. Fixes T8650. The story so far:
- We once published build updates to Revisions.
- An unrelated fix (D10911) sent them to the Diffs instead of Revisions, which isn't useful, since you can't see a diff's timeline anywhere.
- This also caused a race condition, where the RevisionEditor and DiffEditor would update the diff simultaneously (T8650).
- The diff update was just disabled to avoid the race (part of D13441).
- Instead, allow the updates to go somewhere else. In this case, we send commit updates to the commit but send diff updates to the revision so you can see 'em.
- Since everything will be using the revision editor now, we should either get proper lock behavior for free or it should be easy to add if something whack is still happening.
- Overall, this should pretty much put us back in working order like we were before D10911.
This behavior is undoubtedly refinable, but this should let us move forward.
Test Plan:
Saw a build failure in timeline:
{F2304575}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T9276, T8650
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17139
Summary: Ref T11114. Move email/command actions, like "!reject", to modular transactions + editengine.
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail receive-test` to pipe "!stuff" to an object, saw appropraite effects in web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17133
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
Summary:
Fixes T9648. Diffs currently use `return $this->getRevision()->getViewPolicy();` to inherit their revision's view policy.
After the introduction of object policies, this is wrong for policies like "Subscribers", because it means "Subscribers to this object, the diff". Since Diffs have no subscribers, this always fails.
Instead, use extended policies so that the object policy evaluates in the context of the correct object (the revision).
Test Plan:
- Create a revision.
- Subscribe `alice` to it.
- Set view policy to "Subscribers".
- View revision as `alice`.
- Before patch: nonsense fatal about missing diff because of policy error.
- After patch: `alice` can see the revision.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17123
Summary: Fixes T10312. If your first line is "Reviewers: xyz", it's a title, not a "Reviewers" field.
Test Plan: Added unit test.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10312
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17122
Summary:
Fixes T8360. We will now parse revisions out of "Differential Revision: X" followed by other ad-hoc fields which we do not recognize. Previously, these fields would be treated as part of the value.
(In the general case, other fields may line wrap so we can't assume that fields are only one line long. However, we can make that assumption safely for this field.)
Also maybe fix whatever was going on in T9965 although that didn't really have a reproduction case.
Test Plan: Added unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8360
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17121
Summary: Ref T11114. Fixes T10323.
Test Plan:
- Marked comments as done only: no warning about not leaving a comment.
- Did nothing: warning about posting an empty comment.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114, T10323
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17120
Summary: Ref T11114. Although I plan to rewrite this system eventually (T10448) it's easy enough to punt for now.
Test Plan: punt
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17119
Summary:
Ref T11114. This restores:
- Commandeering should exeucte Herald.
- Commandeering should swap reviewers.
- "Request Review" on an "Accepted" revision should downgrade reviewers so they have to accept again.
Test Plan:
- Commandeered, saw Herald run and reviewers swap.
- Requested review of an accepted revision, saw it drop down to "Needs Review" with "Accepted Prior" on the reviewer.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17118
Summary: Ref T11114. This restores warnings (e.g., failing unit tests) and fixes "Quote" behavior for comments.
Test Plan:
- Quoted a comment.
- Viewed a warning.
{F2283275}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17117
Summary: Ref T11114. This comments nearly working on EditEngine. Only significant issue I caught is that the "View" link doesn't render properly because it depends on JS which is tricky to hook up. I'll clean that up in a future diff.
Test Plan: {F2279201}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17116
Summary:
Ref T11114. See D17114 for some discussion.
For review actions: accept, reject, resign.
For revision actions, order is basically least-severe to most-severe action pairs: plan changes, request review, close, reopen, abandon, reclaim, commandeer.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions as an author and a reviewer, saw sensible action order within action groups.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17115
Summary:
Ref T11114. Differential has more actions than it once did, and may have further actions in the future.
Make this dropdown a little easier to parse by grouping similar types of actions, like "Accept" and "Reject".
(The action order still needs to be tweaked a bit.)
Test Plan: {F2274526}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17114
Summary:
Ref T11114. Some rough edges, but this largely makes Accept, Reject and Resign work in the new EditEngine comment area.
Ref T11050. This lays a little bit of groundwork for having "resign" mean "I don't want to review this, even if projects or packages I'm a member of need to", not just "remove me personally as a user reviewer".
Test Plan: Accepted, rejected and resigned from revisions without any major state issues.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114, T11050
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17113
Summary:
Ref T11114. This has two pieces of side-effect logic which I've noted locally:
- Commandeer needs to apply Herald rules.
- Commandeer needs to move the old author to become a reviewer and remove
the actor as a reviewer.
Test Plan: Commandeered some revisions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17111
Summary:
Ref T11114. This restores these actions.
One behavior is incomplete: "Request Review" on an accepted revision does not downgrade reviewers properly. I've noted this locally.
Test Plan: Planned changes and requested review of a revision.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17109
Summary:
Ref T11114. This restores these actions as selectable in the comment area.
This does not implement one special rule ("Closing a revision in response to a commit is OK from any status.") but I have a note about that separately.
Test Plan: Closed and reopened revisions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17108
Summary: Ref T11114. This begins restoring comment actions to Differential, but on top of EditEngine.
Test Plan: {F2263148}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17107
Summary:
Ref T11114. This is a transitional change that breaks a bunch of stuff. I'll hold it until I've restored features.
This stuff works:
- Commenting.
- Subscribers/tags/reviewers.
- Pinning.
- Drafts.
This stuff does not work yet:
- Preview of inline comments.
- Probably submitting inlines, whatsoever.
- Comment-area warnings like "There are failing tests."
- All meaningful actions (accept, reject, etc).
Test Plan: Commented on a revision. Essentially nothing else works yet.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17106
Summary: See D17058.
Test Plan: Ran `arc diff`, which parsed fields as a side effect.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17112
Summary: Ref T11114. We seem to be in reasonable shape here and I don't think anything needs to revert, so rename this back to boring old "edit".
Test Plan: Created, updated, edited a revision via web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17091
Summary: Ref T11114. This is still mostly in use, but toss a few commit message parsing things.
Test Plan: Viewed/edited/upated blame rev from CLI/web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17089
Summary:
Ref T11114. Keep UI, throw everything else away.
Includes an imperfect-but-not-too-awful fix to keep the field actually working.
Test Plan: Edited tasks from CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17088
Summary: Ref T11114. Keep mail and UI, toss the rest.
Test Plan: Edited/viewed repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17087
Summary: Ref T11114. Keep rendering and mail, toss the rest.
Test Plan: Edited and viewed reviewers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17086
Summary: Ref T11114. Keep UI stuff and mail stuff, toss editing.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited revision summaries.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17085
Summary: Ref T11114. This leaves mail integration and UI integration, but strips all the editing (now handled by EditEngine) and commit message stuff (now handled by CommitMessageField).
Test Plan: Viewed and edited test plans and test plan transactions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17084
Summary: Ref T11114. Obsoleted by Modular Transactions + EditEngine + CommitMessageField + we just "hard code" the title of revisions into the page because we're craaazy.
Test Plan:
- Made an edit on `stable`.
- Viewed the edit on this change, it still had the proper UI strings.
- Edited/created/updated revisions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17083
Summary: Ref T11114. Obsoleted by EditEngine.
Test Plan: Edited the view policy of a revision.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17082
Summary: Ref T11114. This is obsoleted by `DifferentialSubscribersCommitMessageField` and EditEngine.
Test Plan: Edited a revision's subscribers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17081
Summary: Ref T11114. Obsoleted by `DifferentialRevisionIDCommitMessageField`.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed class.
- Created a new revision, verified that the amended message included a proper revision ID.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17080
Summary: Ref T11114. This is replaced by `DifferentialReviewedByCommitMessageField.php`.
Test Plan:
- Used `differential.getcommitmessage` to query an accepted revision, saw "Reviewed By".
- Grepped for removed class name.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17079
Summary: Ref T11114. This is entirely obsoleted by EditEngine.
Test Plan: Edited projects on a revision.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17078
Summary: Ref T11114. This was obsoleted by UI changes and hacked around for performance in T11404. It no longer does anything.
Test Plan: Grepped for removed class name.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17077
Summary: Ref T12027. This is purely a UI hint for new users that I'd like to integrate into "Land Revision" in the future instead.
Test Plan: Grepped for removed class, browsed Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12027
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17076
Summary: Ref T11114. This is obsolted by the narrower `DifferentialGitSVNIDCommitMessageField`.
Test Plan: Browsed around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17075
Summary: Ref T11114. This is now entirely handled by EditEngine and standard policy code.
Test Plan: Edited the edit policy of a revision.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17074
Summary: Ref T11114. This is a pure paring field and now entirely handled by `DifferentialConflictsCommitMessageField`.
Test Plan: Grepped for removed class name.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17073
Summary: Ref T11114. This was obsoleted by the "Stack" graph and does nothing.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions, still saw dependency graphs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17072
Summary: Ref T11114. This hasn't done anything since we moved author information to the subheader.
Test Plan: Browsed Differential, still saw author information.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17071
Summary: Ref T11114. This field just stores the value of "Auditors" so you can trigger auditors explicitly later on if you want.
Test Plan: Created and edited revisions with "Auditors".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17070
Summary: Ref T12026. This simplifies the UI and makes T11114 easier. I plan to integrate this into "Download Raw Diff" in the future.
Test Plan:
- Browsed revisions.
- Grepped for removed class name.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12026
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17069
Summary: Ref T11114. This makes the unusual stored custom fields ("Blame Rev", "Revert Plan", etc) work somewhat correctly (?) with EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Created, updated and edited revisions with unusual stored custom fields like "Blame Rev".
- Observed that these fields now populate in "differential.revision.edit" when available.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17068
Summary:
Ref T11114. This creates `differential.revision.edit` (a modern, v3 API method) and redefines the existing methods in terms of it.
Both `differential.createrevision` and `differential.updaterevision` are now internally implemented by building a `differential.revision.edit` API call and then executing it.
I //think// this covers everything except custom fields, which need some tweaking to work with EditEngine. I'll clean that up in the next change.
Test Plan:
- Created, updated, and edited revisions via `arc`.
- Called APIs manually via test console.
- Stored custom fields ("Blame Rev", "Revert Plan") aren't exposed yet.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17067
Summary:
Ref T11114. This probably still has some bugs, but survives basic sanity checks.
Continue pulling commit message logic out of CustomField so we can reduce the amount of responsibility/bloat in the classtree and send more code through EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Called `differential.getcommitmessage` via API console for various revisions/parameters (edit and create mode, with and without fields, with and without revisions).
- Used `--create`, `--edit` and `--update` modes of `arc diff` from the CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17066
Summary:
Fixes T11660. Currently, if you try to diff a path with more than 255 total characters, we fail to create the diff because we have a `text255` column.
There are actually two issues here:
- File names may be arbitrarily long (T11660).
- File names may not be UTF8 (T6633, etc). This is much more complicated and has other issues -- largely that we can't JSON-encode non-UTF8 filenames. I'm punting on that for now and will deal with it later. This doesn't specifically address non-UTF8 paths, although it is a change that's (probably?) required to eventually support them.
This will cause some potentially slow migrations, but better to do them now, if possible, so we have fewer complicated/slow upgrades overall.
Test Plan:
Created a change touching file: //very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_directory_name/very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_long_filename.txt//
{F2137737}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17062
Summary: Ref T11114. Missed this while converting.
Test Plan: Tried to create a revision with no test plan. Before: fatal; after: helpful message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17061
Summary:
Ref T11114. See that task for some discussion.
Overall, Differential custom fields ended up with too many responsibilities. Later work in EditEngine provides a more promising model for achieving modularity with smaller, more consistent components.
In particular, we have some custom fields like `DifferentialGitSVNIDField` and `DifferentialConflictsField` which serve //only// to support the field parser.
This starts pulling commit message responsibilities out of the core list of custom fields and into simpler dedicated parsers.
Test Plan: Created and edited revisions from the CLI. Added a bit of test coverage.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17058
Summary:
Ref T11114. I want to move this step away from custom fields. To start with, isolate all the parsing in one class with a clearer API boundary.
Next, I'll make this class use new field objects to perform parsing, without CustomField interactions.
Test Plan: Created and edited revisions from the CLI, using valid and invalid commit messages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17055
Summary:
Ref T12020. Ref T11114. If we continue here on a mention, we try to generate `$old`, which requires reviewers to be attached. They won't be for simple codepaths like mentions.
Instead, just bail early: we don't need to do anything anyway since we can't possibly find any more errors with zero transactions.
Test Plan: Mentioned a revision on a task.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T11114, T12020
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17059
Summary:
Ref T11114. This replaces the old edit controller with a new one based entirely on EditEngine.
This removes the CustomFieldEditEngineExtension hack for Differential, since remaining field types are fairly straightforward and work with existing EditEngine support, as far as I can tell.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision via web diffs.
- Updated a revision via web diffs.
- Edited a revision via web.
- Edited nonstandard custom fields ("Blame Revision", "JIRA Issues").
- Created a revision via CLI.
- Updated a revision via CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17054
Summary: Ref T11114. Much of this is around making the "comment-while-updating" flow work correctly.
Test Plan:
- Created new diffs by copy/pasting, then:
- used one to create a new revision;
- used one to update an existing revision, with a comment.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17053
Summary: Ref T11114. This one is a bit more complex, but I think I covered everything.
Test Plan:
- Added reviewers.
- Removed reviewers.
- Made reviewers blocking.
- Made reviewers nonblocking.
- Tried to make the author a reviewer.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17050
Summary: Ref T11114. The only real trick here is that we respect configuration in `differential.fields`.
Test Plan: Turned plan on and off, tried to remove the plan, edited the plan.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17048
Summary: Ref T11114. These are unambiguous and always-enabled.
Test Plan: {F2117777}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17047
Summary:
Ref T11114. Currently, all of Differential is extremely custom CustomFields. I want to back away from that somewhat and leverage more EditEngine / ModularTransactions infrastructure.
This allows EditEngine, ModularTransactions, and CustomFields to coexist in an uneasy peace. The "EditPro" controller applies a //different edit// than the CustomFields do, but everything works out in the end. I think.
Hopefully the horrible mess I am creating here will be short-lived.
Test Plan:
- Edited a revision with the normal editor.
- Edited a revision with the pro editor.
- Created a revision with `arc diff`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17044
Summary: Ref T11114. This doesn't really support anything yet, but technically works if you manually go to `/editpro/`.
Test Plan: {F2117302}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17043
Summary: Ref T10967. This makes room for a `DifferentialReviewer` object which can be a real storage table.
Test Plan: Grepped for `DifferentialReviewer`, browsed Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17041
Summary: Ref T8475. This gets rid of most of the old "legacy hunk" code. I'll nuke the rest (and drop the old table) once we're more sure that we're in the clear.
Test Plan: Browsed Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8475
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17040
Summary:
Fixes T7899. If you create or update a revision and type an enormously long first line, we currently fatal trying to insert it into the database.
This text is only used to show a single-line summary of the diff in the "History" tab, which should probably be updated anyway. For now, stop fataling.
Test Plan:
Uploaded a diff with the description "MMMM..." (thousands of them).
Before patch: fatal on description being too long.
After patch: beautiful "MMMM" summary.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7899
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17038
Summary: Spruce up the file embeds a little more, hover state, icons, file size.
Test Plan:
Add a psd and pdf, see new icons. Check differential, still see icons there too. Test mobile, desktop.
{F2042539}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16950
Summary:
Ref T11816. Since the dashboard got updated, Differential now interprets "Responsible Users: epriestley" to mean "epriestley, or any project or package epriestley is part of". You can query for just "epriestley" with "exact(epriestley)".
Give Calendar invites the same behavior: "epriestley" means "any event epriestley is invited to, or a project they are a member of is invited to". Individual invites can be queried with "exact(epriestley)".
This is a little bit copy-pastey but I want to wait for a third use case to clean it up since I think I'm going to have to do a bunch of generalization around "how does an individual PHID get turned into a bunch of PHIDs".
Test Plan: Queried for "Invited: dog", "invited: viewer", "invited; exact(dog)", etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11816
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16870
Summary: I moved and then un-moved this incorrectly in D16846.
Test Plan: Looked at the old code, which worked better.
Reviewers: jacksongabbard, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16849
Summary:
Ref T11085. To recreate the issue:
- From the web UI, click "Edit Revision".
- Write something like this as your "Summary" (i.e., put another field marker, like "Test Plan:", into the summary):
> This is a test of the
> Test Plan: field to see
> if it works.
- Save changes.
Later, when the summary is amended into a commit message, the parser will see two "Test Plan:" fields and fail to parse the message.
Instead, prevent users from making this edit.
Test Plan: {F1917640}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11085
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16846
Summary:
This has been replaced by `PolicyCodex` after D16830. Also:
- Rebuild Celerity map to fix grumpy unit test.
- Fix one issue on the policy exception workflow to accommodate the new code.
Test Plan:
- `arc unit --everything`
- Viewed policy explanations.
- Viewed policy errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16831
Summary:
Fixes T11836. See some prior discussion in T8376#120613.
The policy hint in headers in the UI is not exhaustive, and can not reasonably be exhaustive. For example, on a revision, it may say "All Users", but really mean "All users who can see the space this object is in and the repository it belongs to, plus the revision author and reviewers".
These rules are explained if you click (and, often, in the documentation), but "All Users" is still at least somewhat misleading.
I don't think there's any perfect solution here that balances the needs of both new and experienced users perfectly, but this change tries to do a bit better about avoiding cases where we say something very open (like "All Users") when the real policy is not very open.
Specifically, I've made these changes to the header:
- Spaces are now listed in the tag, so it will say `(S3 > All Users)` instead of `(All Users)`. They're already listed in the header, this just makes it more explicit that Spaces are a policy container and part of the view policy.
- Extended policy objects are now listed in the tag, so it will say `(S3 > rARC > All Users)` for a revision in the Arcanist repository which is also in Space 3.
- Objects can now provide a "Policy Codex", which is an object that represents a rulebook of more sophisticated policy descriptions. This codex can replace the tag with something else.
- Imported calendar events now say "Uses Import Policy" instead of, e.g., "All Users".
I've made these changes to the policy dialog:
- Split it into more visually separate sections.
- Added an explicit section for extended policies ("You must also have access to these other objects: ...").
- Broken the object policy rules into a "Special Rules" section (for rules like "you can only see a revision if you can see the repository it is part of") and an "Object Policy" section (for the actual object policy).
- Tried to make it a little more readable?
- The new policy dialogs are great to curl up with in front of a fire with a nice cup of cocoa.
I've made these changes to infrastructure:
- Implementing `PhabricatorPolicyInterface` no longer requires you to implement `describeAutomaticCapability()`.
- Instead, implement `PhabricatorPolicyCodexInterface` and return a `PhabricatorPolicyCodex` object.
- This "codex" is a policy rulebook which can set all the policy icons, labels, colors, rules, etc., to properly explain complex policies.
- Broadly, the old method was usually either not useful (most objects have no special rules) or not powerful enough (objects with special rules often need to do more in order to explain them).
Test Plan:
{F1912860}
{F1912861}
{F1912862}
{F1912863}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T11836
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16830
Summary:
Fixes T11748. This option currently implies a line limit (e.g., inline patches that are less than 100 lines long). This breaks down if a diff has a 10MB line, like a huge blob of JSON all on one line.
For now, imply a reasonable byte limit (256 bytes per line).
See T11767 for future work to make this and related options more cohesive.
Test Plan:
- With option at `1000`: sent Differential email, saw patches inlined.
- With option at `10`: sent Differential email, saw patches dropped because of the byte limit.
- `var_dump()`'d the actual limits and used `bin/worker execute --id ...` to sanity check that things were working properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16714
Summary:
Ref T11650. Currently, we load packages and then discard the archived ones.
However, this gets "dominion" rules (where a more-general package gives up ownership if a more-specific package exists) wrong if the more-specific package is archived: we incorrectly give up ownership.
Instead, just ignore these packages completely when loading affected packages. This is slightly simpler.
(There are technically two pieces of code we have to do this for, which should be a single piece of code but which haven't yet been unified.)
Test Plan:
- Created packages:
- Package A, on "/" (strong dominion, autoreview).
- Package B, on "/x/" (weak dominion, autoreview).
- Package C, on "/x/y" (archived, autoreview).
- Create a revision affecting "/x/y".
- Saw correct path ownership in table of contents ("B", strongest package only).
- Saw correct autoreview behavior (A + B).
- (Prior to patch, in `master`, reproduced the problem behaviors described in T11650, with bad dominion rules and failure to autoreview B.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11650
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16564
Summary:
Fixes T11610. Clean up some sketchy old code from long ago.
If you had rules that use conditions like "Accepted revision exists" and ran them in the test console, we'd never load the "CommitData" and fatal.
Instead, load CommitData in `newTestAdapter()` and generally make these pathways a little more modern.
Test Plan:
- Wrote an "Accepted Revision Exists" rule.
- Ran a commit in the test console.
- Before patch, got fatal from T11610.
- After patch, got clean test result.
- Also pushed a commit and reviewed the transcript to make sure the rule ran properly.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11610
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16522
Summary:
This is hacky, and I'm not sure I'm happy with it; Until T9365 is done, this will show up
broken tests with an appropriate star in the Revision History.
Test Plan: Created 1M messages in a couple of old diffs in a revision. The query took ~80us (On SSD drive).
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16483
Summary:
Fixes T10423. Ref T11524. This changes `diffusion.rawdiffquery` to return a file PHID instead of a blob of data.
This is better in general, but particularly better for huge diffs (as in T10423) and diffs with non-utf8 data (as in T10423).
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/differential extract` to extract a latin1 diff, got a clean diff.
- Used `bin/repository reparse --herald` to rerun herald on a latin1 diff, got a clean result.
- Pushed latin1 diffs to test commit hooks.
- Triggered the the too large / too slow logic.
- Viewed latin1 diffs in Diffusion.
- Used "blame past this change" in Diffusion to hit the `before` logic.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10423, T11524
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16460
Summary: Ref T11132. This is a new default default (no dashboard) homepage. It offers (Diffs) (Tasks) (Repositories) in the main column and (Feed) in the side column. No NUX stuff, No logged out public view (upcoming diff). This should be complete, but unclear how to bucketize Differential.
Test Plan: Test new account's default homepage.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16449
Summary: This needs an `isset()` for cases when authority and packages don't completely overlap.
Test Plan:
- With a package set to trigger autoreview, created a revision.
- Observed error log, saw no more error.
- Saw package trigger autoreview properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16398
Summary:
Fixes T9719. Currently, the Herald "Test Console" has a big `instanceof` thing, so new adapters (like a Calendar adapter, or third-party adapters) aren't available automatically. Instead, do a standard modular thing: load the available adapters, ask which ones can test the object the user selected, then let the user pick which one they want to move forward with.
Additionally, it isn't very clear that you can't test "commit hook" rules because they rely on push state which we don't really have a good way to simulate. When the user picks a commit, we now show them the "Hook" events, but the options are disabled and explain why they can not be selected.
Test Plan:
- Ran test rules for revisions, commits, mocks, tasks, wiki documents, questions, and outbound mail.
- Plugged in a commit, got a more-helpful choice screen explaining why you do a test run of hook rules.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9719
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16360
Summary:
Ref T11404. Depends on D16351. Currently, both `differential.query` and `differential.revision.search` issue `2N` queries to fetch:
- dependencies for each revision; and
- projects for each revision.
Fix this:
- Take these custom fields out of Conduit so they don't load this data by default.
- For `differential.query`, put this data back in by hard coding it.
- For `differential.revision.search`, just leave it out. You can already optionally get projects efficiently, and this endpoint is a work in progress. I would tentatively be inclined to expose graph data as a "graph" extension once we need it.
This makes both methods execute in `O(1)` time (which is still 20-30 queries, but at least it's not 320 queries anymore).
Test Plan:
- Ran `differential.query`, observed no change in results but 199 fewer internal queries.
- Ran `differential.revision.search`, observed data gone from results and 200 fewer internal queries.
Reviewers: yelirekim, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16352
Summary:
Ref T11404. Depends on D16350.
Currently, custom fields can issue "N+1" queries in some cases, so querying 100 revisions issues 100 extra queries.
This affects all `*.search` endpoints for objects with custom fields, and some older endpoints (notably `differential.query`).
This change bulk loads "normal" custom fields, which gets rid of some of these queries. Instead of loading fields for each object, we build a big list of all fields and load them all at once.
The next change will tackle the remaining inefficient edge queries.
Test Plan:
- Configured a custom field with normal database storage in Differential.
- Ran `differential.query`, looking at custom fields in results for correctness.
- Ran `differential.revision.search`, looking at custom fields in results for correctness.
- In both cases, observed queries drop from `3N` to `2N` (all the "normal" custom field stuff got bulk loaded).
Reviewers: yelirekim, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16351
Summary: Ref T10909. Ref T9224. We label this field "Host" in the UI; make the storage format consistent.
Test Plan:
- Viewed month view, day view, detail view of an event.
- Created a new event, saw myself as the host.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9224, T10909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16291
Summary: Fixes T11305, Ref T7754. Makes this menu dropdown act like actions and collapse to a fa-bars menu.
Test Plan:
View on mobile, desktop, browser. Click an action, spawn new page.
{F1717953}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7754, T11305
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16265
Summary:
Ref T4788. As it turns out, our tasks are very tightly connected.
Instead of loading every parent/child task, then every parent/child of those tasks, etc., etc., only load tasks in the "same direction" that we're already heading.
For example, we load children of children, but not parents of children. And we load parents of parents, but not children of parents.
Basically we only go "up" and "down" now, but not "out" as much. This should reduce the gigantic multiple-thousand-node graphs currently shown in the UI.
I still discover the whole graph for revisiosn, because I think it's probably more useful and always much smaller. That might need adjustment too, though.
Test Plan: Seems fine locally??
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16218
Summary:
Ref T4788. This separates the revision graph view into a base class with core logic and a revision class with Differential-specific logic, so I can subclass it in Maniphest, etc., and try using it in other applications to show similar graphs.
Not sure if we'll stick with it, but even if we don't this makes the code a bit cleaner and gets custom rendering logic out of the RevisionViewController, which is nice.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions, saw the stack UI completely unchanged.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16213
Summary: Ref T10628. Turn these into tabs in a single box, since "local commits" and "similar revisions" are of particularly rare use.
Test Plan: {F1707196}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16209
Summary:
Ref T10628. Switch this to be nicer and more modern.
- When there's only one tab, add an option to hide it.
Test Plan:
- Viewed normal revisions (no tabs).
- Viewed X vs Y revisions (two tabs, rightmost tab selected by default).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16206
Summary: Fixes T11240. Also simplify things a little and share a bit more code.
Test Plan:
- Viewed revisions and tasks, opened submenu.
- Viewed as a user without edit permission, saw the menus greyed out.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16201
Summary: Ref T4788. This moves everything except "merge" to the new code.
Test Plan:
- Edited relationships in Differential, Diffusion, and Pholio.
- Uninstalled Pholio, made sure "Edit Mocks..." actions vanished.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16193
Summary:
Ref T9838.
Add a Properties field to Revision, and update a `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` when closing a revision.
Test Plan:
A quick run through the obvious steps (Close with commit/manually, with or w/o accept) and calling `differential.query` shows the `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` property was setup correctly.
Pushing closed + accepted passes the relevant herald, which was my immediate issue; Pushing un-accepted is blocked.
Test the "commit" rule (Different from "pre-commit") by hacking the DB and running the "has accepted revision" rule in a test-console.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T9838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15085
Summary:
Ref T11179. This generates the Maniphest menu items in a modular way. It doesn't change any of the underlying code yet.
Searching for commits doesn't work particularly well so I've just hidden that for now, but the item itself works fine.
Test Plan: {F1696849}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16162
Summary:
Ref T11035. This only fixes half of the issue: comment editing has been fixed, but normal transactions which edit things like descriptions haven't yet.
The normal edits aren't fixed because the "oldValues" are populated too late. The code should start working once they get populated sooner, but I don't want to jump the gun on that since it'll probably have some spooky effects. I have some other transaction changes coming down the pipe which should provide a better context for testing "oldValue" population order.
Test Plan:
- Mentioned `@dog` in a comment.
- Removed `@dog` as a subscriber.
- Edited the comment, adding some unrelated text at the end (e.g., fixing a typo).
- Before change: `@dog` re-added as subscriber.
- After change: no re-add.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16108
Summary:
When having lots of repos, seeing "all revisions in this project" is hard, and we ended up adding herald rules to basically copy project tags to the revisions on a per-project basis. Adding a "tagged: project" function to the Repositories search field allows users to find differentials within a project.
Fix T10850.
Test Plan: search differentials by tagging project and repository in the Repository field
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T10850
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16096
Summary: Ref T11123. This implements a very basic skeleton for modern revision search.
Test Plan: Viewed and executed Conduit API method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11123
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16089
Summary:
Ref T10856. The rendering logic was already there, but it was expecting the information under `properties`
field, whereas arc puts it under `metadata`. Not sure if that something that changed a long time ago or if
it was always like this.
Test Plan: {F1252657 size=full}
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T10856
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15828
Summary: Ref T4103. Fully modernize the filetree show/hide, durable column show/hide, and profile menu collapse/wide settings.
Test Plan:
- Toggled filetree on/off, reloaded page, setting stuck.
- Same with conpherence column and profile menus.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16034
Summary: Change metamta.differential.patch-format over to an enum option now that they're implemented.
Test Plan: Looked at settings page.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16032
Summary:
Ref T11092. With Quicksand (or, possibly, some as-yet-unknown non-Quicksand workflow) the client can get stuck with an out-of-date revision PHID.
We then save comments with a `revisionPHID` from one revision and a `changesetID` from a different one.
Detect and prevent this. This stops the workflow immediately when the use first clicks, so it should allow us to detect this issue if it has some other non-Quicksand cause.
Test Plan:
- Opened revision `D123`.
- Pressed `\` to enable the sidebar and Quicksand.
- Clicked a link to revision `D124`.
- Added inlines.
Previously, these could ghost. The exact UI behavior is difficult to describe, but in the database they end up with a `changesetID` for `D124` but the original `revisionPHID` for `D123`, presumably because state is sticking around from the first page.
After this patch, an exception is thrown immediately. Additionally:
- Reloaded to clear quicksand state, added comments fine.
- Disabled sidebar/quicksand, added comments fine.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16031
Summary:
Ref T4103. This doesn't get everything, but takes care of most of the easy stuff.
The tricky-ish bit here is that I need to move timezones, pronouns and translations to proper settings. I expect to pursue that next.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `loadPreferences` to identify callsites.
- Changed start-of-week setting, loaded Calendar, saw correct start.
- Visited welcome page, read "Adjust Settings" point.
- Loaded Conpherence -- I changed behavior here slightly (switching threads drops the title glyph) but it wasn't consistent to start with and this seems like a good thing to push to the next version of Conpherence.
- Enabled Filetree, toggled in Differential.
- Disabled Filetree, no longer visible in Differential.
- Changed "Unified Diffs" preference to "Small Screens" vs "Always".
- Toggled filetree in Diffusion.
- Edited a task, saw sensible projects in policy dropdown.
- Viewed user profile, uncollapsed/collapsed side nav, reloaded page, sticky'd.
- Toggled "monospaced textareas", used a comment box, got appropriate fonts.
- Toggled durable column.
- Disabled title glyphs.
- Changed monospaced font to 18px/36px impact.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16004
Summary:
Ref T10769. The user availability cache write shouldn't happen in read-only mode, nor should the Differential parse cache write.
(We might want to turn off the availbility feature completely since it's potentially expensive if we can't cache it, but I think we're OK for now.)
Test Plan:
In read-only mode:
- Browsed as a user with an out-of-date availability cache.
- Loaded an older revision without cached parse data.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15988
Summary:
Ref T11051. This is still not as clear as it should be, but is at least working as intended now.
I believe this part of the code just never worked. The test plan on D10489 didn't specifically cover it.
Test Plan:
Did this sort of thing in a repository:
```
$ git checkout -b featurex
$ echo x >> y
$ git commit -am wip
$ arc diff
```
Then I simulated just pushing it (this flow is a little more involved than necessary):
```
$ arc land --hold
$ git commit --amend
$ # remove all metadata -- particularly, "Differential Revision"!
$ git push HEAD:master
```
I got a not-great but more-useful dialog:
{F1667318}
Prior to this change, the hash match was incorrectly not reported at all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11051
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15989
Summary: Fixes T11010. This also needs to be inflated until we fix the whole client/server responsibility issue here.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision while observing error log, no error.
- Disabled "allow self accept", tried to make myself a reviewer, got rejected with an error message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15966
Summary:
Ref T10939. This makes the `viewer()` function work again. It retains its own meaning (viewer, plus all their projects and packages).
There's no `exact-viewer()` function; we could conceivably add one eventually if we need it.
Test Plan:
- Queried for `viewer()`, got the same results as querying by my own username.
- Browsed function in token browser.
- Reviewed autogenerated documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15951
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you haven't installed a dashboard, we show an "Active Revisions" panel on the homepage by default. I waited a bit to update this, but the new buckets don't seem to have caused any major problems so far.
Update this to use the new logic. I'm just showing "must review" + "should review", which is similar to the old beahvior.
Also replace the notification count with this same number. This is a little different from the old behavior, but simpler, and I think we should probably move toward getting rid of these counts completely.
Test Plan:
- Viewed homepage as logged-in user, saw my revisions (including revisions I have authority over only because of project membership).
- Saw consistent notification count.
- Grepped for removed method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15950
Summary:
Ref T10694. If this feels good, I'd plan to eventually add something similar to other applications ("View Task", etc).
Not sure if we should keep the object link later in the mail body or not. I left it for now.
Test Plan: {F1307256, size=full}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15884
Fixes T10981. Ref T10939. `arc` currently has some odd, hard-coded checks
(missing reviewers, all reviewers away) that depend on the field value being
in a certain format.
The recent changes swapped the field value from scalars (PHIDs) to
dictionaries and broke this workflow. It worked fine in testing because we
apply these checks very inconsistently (not on update or `--edit`).
To get around this for now, serialize into "PHID!" and then unserialize on
the other side. This is icky but keeps us from needing to require an `arc`
upgrade.
These checks are generally bad news and should move to the server side in the
long run (T4631).
(This probably prevents clean `arc diff`, so I'm just cowboy committing it.)
Auditors: chad
Summary: Ref T10939. This adds UI, transactions, etc, to adjust dominion rules.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Changed dominion rules.
- Created packages on `/` ("A") and `/x` ("B") with "Auto Review: Review".
- Touched `/x`.
- Verified that A and B were added with strong dominion.
- Verified that only B was added when A was set to weak dominion.
- Viewed file in Diffusion, saw correct ownership with strong/weak dominion rules.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15936
Summary: Ref T10939. Fixes T4887. Supports "username!" to add a reviewer as blocking.
Test Plan: Added and removed blocking and non-blocking reviewers via CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15934
Summary:
Ref T10939. Adds a `blocking(...)` token.
This code is pretty iffy and going to get worse before it gets better, but the fix (T10967 + EditEngine) is going to be a fair chunk of work down the road.
Test Plan: {F1426966}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: scode
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15933
Summary:
Ref T10939. I don't think this is hugely important, but it doesn't clutter things up much and it's nice as a hint.
T4055 was the original request specifically asking for this. It wanted a separate bucket, but I think this use case isn't common/strong enough to justify that.
I would like to improve Differential's "X depends on Y" feature in the long term. We don't tend to use/need it much, but it could easily do a better and more automatic job of supporting review of a group of revisions.
Test Plan: {F1426636}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15930
Summary: Ref T10939. These poor stragglers got left out in the rain. Didn't catch any issues otherwise.
Test Plan: {F1426604}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15929
Summary: Ref T10939. For various historical reasons, revision status is a numeric string. This comparison fails because it's `(string) !== (int)`. Just use `!=` so this will still work if we turn it into a real string in the future.
Test Plan: Tried a more specific test case locally, got better looking results in "Must Review" and "Should Review".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15928
Summary:
Ref T10939. I'm not //totally// opposed to the existence of this element, but I think it's the kind of thing that would never make it upstream today. I think this should just be a T418 custom sort of thing in the long run, not a mainline upstream feature.
Overall, I think this thing is nearly useless and just adds visual clutter. My dashboard is about 100% red. This also sort of teaches users that it's fine to let revisions sit for a couple of days, which isn't what I'd like the UI to teach. Finally, removing it helps the UI feel a little less cluttered after the visually busy changes in D15926.
Test Plan: Grepped for removed config. Viewed revision list.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15927
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T9263. Ref T4144.
First, this resolves users (converting users into all packages and projects they are responsible for) earlier, so bucketing can act on that data correctly. Previously, your own blocking reviews would appear in "Must Review" but your packages/projects' would not. Now, all of them will.
Second, this adds `exact(username)` to mean "just me, not my packages/projects". You can use this along with "Bucket: By Required Action" to create a personal view of "Active Revisions" if you'd like, and ignore all your project/package reviews.
Test Plan: Queried by "me" and "exact(me)", got reasonable looking results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T9263, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15925
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This splits the existing buckets ("Blocking Others", "Action Required", "Waiting on Others") into 6-7 buckets with a stronger focus on what the next action you need to take is.
See T10939#175423 for some discussion.
Overall, I think some of the root problems here are caused by reviewer laziness and shotgun review workflows (where a ton of people get automatically added to everything, probably unnecessarily), but these buckets haven't been updated since the introduction of blocking reviewers or project/package reviewers and I think splitting the 3 buckets into 6 buckets isn't unreasonable, even though it's kind of a lot of buckets and the root problem here is approximately "I want to ignore a bunch of stuff on my dashboard".
I didn't remove the old bucketing code yet since it's still in use on the default homepage.
This also isn't quite right until I fix the tokenizer to work properly, since it won't bucket project/package reviewers accurately.
Test Plan: {F1395972}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15924
Summary:
Ref T10939. Currently, Differential hard-codes some behaviors for the "active" filter. This introduces "buckets" to make this grouping behavior more general/flexible.
The buckets don't actually do any grouping yet, this just gets rid of the `$query === 'active'` stuff so far.
These buckets change the page size to a large value, becuase pagination won't currently work with bucketing.
The problem is that we normally paginate by selecting one more result than we need: so if we're building a page of size 10, we'll select 11 results. This is fast, and if we get 11 back, we know there's a next page with at least one result on it.
With buckets, we can't do this, since our 11 results might come back in these buckets:
- A, B, C, A, C, C, A, A, B, B, (B)
So we know there are more results, and we know that bucket B has more results, but we have no clue if bucket A and bucket C have more results or not (or if there's anything in bucket D, etc).
We might need to select a thousand more results to get the first (D) or the next (A).
So we could render something like "Some buckets have more results, click here to go to the next page", but users would normally expect to be able to see "This specific bucket, A, has more results.", and we can't do that without a lot more work.
It doesn't really matter for revisions, because almost no one has 1K of them, but this may need to be resolved eventually.
(I have some OK-ish ideas for resolving it but nothing I'm particularly happy with.)
Test Plan: {F1376542}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15923
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This moves the revision SearchEngine to modern code so I can add some kind of bucketing layer on top of it.
This seems to have worked pretty cleanly. One thing is that I removed the ability to search for "pending drafts":
- This was added in D1927 from a bootcamp task, was an indirect solution to a questionable problem, and almost certainly would not meet the bar today.
- Later, in D3324, we added the icons to the list. I think this is a better solution in general. In particular, it specifically addressed the query being kind of junky.
- At the time, Differential had a prebuilt "Drafts" filter. This was removed in D6347 with the move to ApplicationSearch, which simplified the large number of prebuilt filters. Although we got a lot of feedback about that, none requested that the drafts filter be restored.
Test Plan: Searched for responsible users, subscribers, orders, projects, repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15921
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you already own a package, don't trigger the subscribe/review rules.
Document how these rules work.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Removed reviewers, updated a revision, got autoreviewed.
- Joined package.
- Removed reveiwers, updated a revision, no more autoreview.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15918
Summary: Ref T10939. Packages are valid reviewers, so let Herald "Add Reviewers" and "Add Blocking Reviewers" actions add them.
Test Plan:
- Wrote a rule to add package reviewers.
- Hit the rule, saw a package reviewer added, viewed transcript.
{F1311731}
{F1311732}
{F1311733}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15917
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T8887. This enables and implements the "review" and "blocking review" options for packages.
This is a bit copy-pastey from `DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction`, which doesn't feel awesome. I think the right fix is Glorious Infrasturcture, though -- I filed T10967 to track that.
Test Plan:
- Set package autoreveiw to "Review".
- Updated, got a reveiwer.
- Set autoreview to "blocking".
- Updated, got a blocking reviewer.
{F1311720}
{F1311721}
{F1311722}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15916
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T8887. This moves toward letting packages automatically become reviewers or blocking reviewers of owned code.
This change adds an "Auto Review" option to packages. Because adding reviewers/blocking reviewers is a little tricky, it doesn't actually have these options yet -- just a "subscribe" option. I'll do the reviewer work in the next update.
Test Plan:
Created a revision in a package with "Auto Review: Subscribe to Changes". The package got subscribed.
{F1311677}
{F1311678}
{F1311679}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15915
Summary:
Ref T10939. This lets you add packages as reviewers manually.
"Project Reviewers" now lists both projects and packages. I have renamed this to "Coalition Reviewers" but that's probably horrible and confusing. I'm not sure "Group Reviewers" is much better.
Test Plan:
- Added a package as a reviewer manually.
- Joined it, got authority over it.
- Saw the review on my dashboard.
- Accepted the revision, got authority extended to the package review.
{F1311652}
{F1311653}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15914
Summary:
Ref T10939. This allows the CLI to parse reviewers and subscribers like this:
```Reviewers: epriestley, O123 Some Package Name```
The rule goes:
- If a reviewer or subscriber starts with a monogram (like `X111`), just look that up and ignore everything until the next comma.
- Otherwise, split it on spaces and look up each part.
This means that these are valid:
```
alincoln htaft
alincoln, htaft
#a #b epriestley
O123 Some Package, epriestley, #b
```
I think the only real downside is that this:
```
O123 Some Package epriestley
```
...ignores the "epriestley" part. However, I don't expect users to be typing package monograms manually -- they just need to be representable by `arc land` and `arc diff --edit` and such. Those flows will always add commas and make the parse unambiguous.
Test Plan:
- Added test coverage.
- `amend --show`'d a revision with a package subscriber (this isn't currently possible to produce using the web UI, it came from a future change) and saw `Subscribers: O123 package name, usera, userb`.
- Updated a revision with a package subscriber.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15911
Summary:
Ref T10939. This has no effect yet since packages can not actually become reviewers, I'm just inching toward support.
- When searching for "responsible users", include revisions that need review by packages you have authority over.
- When calculating review authority, include authority over packages you are a member of (these currently never exist).
Test Plan:
This isn't reachable so I just `var_dump()`'d stuff and looked at the generated queries, which appeared correct/reasonable.
I'll vet this more thoroughly once packages can actually become reviewers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15909
Summary: Fixes T9790. This uses a simple renderer, like the inline context renderer, that emphasizes getting a quick glance at small changes and working reasonably on mobile devices.
Test Plan:
- Set `inline` setting to `9999`.
- Created a diff.
- Saw it render reasonably in HTML mail.
- Also tested text mail to make sure I didn't break that.
{F1310137, size=full}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9790
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15901
Summary: Ref T10694. This setting no longer has any effect: we always show a limited amount of context now.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15886
Summary:
Ref T10694. General improvements:
- Remove leading empty lines from context snippets.
- Remove trailing empty lines from context snippets.
- If we removed everything, render a note.
- Try using `style` instead of `<pre>`? My thinking is that maybe Airmail has weird default rules for `<pre>`, since that's the biggest / most obvious thing that's different about this element to me.
Test Plan: Viewed normal comments locally, faked a comment on an empty line in the middle of a lot of other empty lines.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15864
Summary:
Ref T10694.
- Shift margins/padding around so inlines with multiple paragraphs get reasonable spacing.
- Add `text-decoration: none` to the "View Inline" link to kill the underline.
Test Plan: {F1265342}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15863
Summary: Ref T10694. Move the inline style more toward a mix of standard`<pre>` style and the web UI style for inlines.
Test Plan: See screenshots in comments.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15857
Summary:
Ref T10694. This mostly prevents us from having a degenerate case if someone leaves a 200-line inline.
- For one-line inlines, show 1 line of context above and below (3 lines total).
- For 3+ line inlines, show just the inline.
- For 7+ line inlines, show only the first part.
Test Plan: Made a bunch of weird long/short/different-sized comments, saw reasonble-appearing context in text and HTML mail output.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15853
Summary:
Ref T10694. Ref T9790. When generating inline diff context, highlight it and then mangle the highlighted output into `style="..."` so it works in HTML.
Also try to tighten up some spacing/formatting stuff.
Test Plan:
Got some output in this vein:
{F1259937}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9790, T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15852
Summary:
Ref T10694. This is still missing some pieces, but seems to get most of the data into the mail in a plausible format:
- When an inline remarks on code, show the patch inline in the mail body.
- When an inline replies to another inline, show that other inline in the mail body.
- Apply remarkup rendering to inline content.
- Apply basic styling to mail body blocks.
Not covered yet:
- Syntax highlighting.
- Diff highlighting.
- Maybe clearer style/layout hints to connect comments to what they reply to? Current approach might get messy with inlines that have blockquotes and code blocks inside them, for example.
- I probably want to cap the amount of diff context we ever show to ~7 lines, even if you drag over 200 lines of code.
- CSS is a generally a bit rough still.
- The `unified-comment-context` option is effectively always on now, and should be removed.
- Text section is getting indented right now but probably shouldn't be.
- Spacing, etc., might be a bit off.
Test Plan:
Rigged Home to render these things, got a plausible-looking render (top is text, bottom is HTML):
{F1259052}
Sent myself some inline comment mail, got a plausible result.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15850
Summary: Fixes T10906, Fixes T10820. Adds new icons, grey-er colors for previous states. Also, I think fixed a few bugs?
Test Plan: Fake each state, verify icon is as intended.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10820, T10906
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15830
Summary: This will stop breaking if you have subscribers and tags when updating a revision (`Error parsing field "Subscribers": The objects you have listed include objects which do not exist (Tags:)`), which I broke in D15749.
Test Plan: run through arc-diff --update that failed earlier.
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15762
Summary:
In calendar, dashboard, diffusion, diviner, feed, fund,
maniphest, pholio, ponder, and slowvote use the term 'tags' if possible.
This intenctionally skips diffusion, differential, and the projects application itself.
Ref T10326 Ref T10349
Test Plan: inspection on a running, locally modified, system
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10835, T10326, T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15753
Summary: Users can't find the "Tags" field in the Edit Menu; Added keyword "Tag".
Test Plan: Looked in Edit page; I think this shouldn't change anything else?
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15749
Summary: Found another bouncing around.
Test Plan: Review in diff
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15651
Summary: Bumps to 14px, fixes some on Differential
Test Plan: view various headers in Differential
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15647
Summary: Going to render these all normal case instead of all caps, and bump up the font size. Should be more consistent. Yellow if you green anything orange.
Test Plan: grep, lint
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15645
Summary: Fixes T10704. This is just bad copy-paste -- "O" for "old" should be "N" for "new".
Test Plan:
- Followed steps on T10704.
- Applied patch.
- Marked inline done, replied, etc. No more JS errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10704
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15566
