Summary:
Fixes T12369. When you create objects they may technically be locked: either because the default state is legitimately locked, or because the default policies prevent you from viewing so we sort of technically end in a locked state.
Regardless, don't prompt during creation, since this prompt isn't useful even if the lock detection is completely legitimate.
Test Plan:
- In {nav Applications > Maniphest > Configure}, set "Default View Policy" to "No One".
- Tried to create a task.
- Before patch: prompted to override lock.
- After patch: no override prompt.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: d.maznekov
Maniphest Tasks: T12369
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17541
Summary:
Ref T12271. Don't do anything with this yet, but store who accepted/rejected/whatever on behalf of reviewers.
In the future, we could use this to render stuff like "Blessed Committers (accepted by epriestley)" or whatever. I don't know that this is necessarily super useful, but it's easy to track, seems likely to be useful, and would be a gigantic pain to backfill later if we decide we want it.
Test Plan: Accepted/rejected a revision, saw reviewers update appropriately.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17537
Summary:
Ref T12271. Currenty, when you "Accept" a revision, you always accept it for all reviewers you have authority over.
There are some situations where communication can be more clear if users can accept as only themselves, or for only some packages, etc. T12271 discusses some of these use cases in more depth.
Instead of making "Accept" a blanket action, default it to doing what it does now but let the user uncheck reviewers.
In cases where project/package reviewers aren't in use, this doesn't change anything.
For now, "reject" still acts the old way (reject everything). We could make that use checkboxes too, but I'm not sure there's as much of a use case for it, and I generally want users who are blocking stuff to have more direct accountability in a product sense.
Test Plan:
- Accepted normally.
- Accepted a subset.
- Tried to accept none.
- Tried to accept bogus reviewers.
- Accepted with myself not a reviewer
- Accepted with only one reviewer (just got normal "this will be accepted" text).
{F4251255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17533
Summary: Hit this while `arc diff`'ing something which is triggering 2+ rules which add reviewers, I think.
Test Plan: Dug this out of a production stack trace; will push and `arc diff` again.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17534
Summary: Fixes T12439. This pathway was just missing a `setContinueOnMissingFields(...)` to skip enforcement of required fields.
Test Plan:
- Added a required custom field.
- Mentioned any task without a field value in a comment.
- Edited that comment.
- Saved changes.
- Before fix: fatal in log.
- After fix: clean edit.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12439
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17536
Summary: Fixes T11865. Part of a 'clean up remarkup' pass, removing Aleo helps simplify coding, is lighter on the wire, and gives a more consistent, clean look.
Test Plan: run celerity, grep for 'aleo' and 'Aleo', test Phriction, tasks
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11865
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17535
Summary:
Ref T10967. I'm not 100% sure we need this, but the old edge table had it and I recall an issue long ago where not having this key left us with a bad query plan.
Our data doesn't really provide a way to test this key (we have many revisions and few reviewers, so the query planner always uses revision keys), and building a convincing test case would take a while (lipsum needs some improvements to add reviewers). But in the worst case this key is mostly useless and wastes a few MB of disk space, which isn't a big deal.
So I can't conclusively prove that this key does anything to the dashboard query, but the migration removed it and I'm more comfortable keeping it so I'm not worried about breaking stuff.
At the very least, MySQL does select this key in the query plan when I do a "Reviewers:" query explicitly so it isn't //useless//.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, ran dashboard query, the query plan didn't get any worse.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17532
Summary:
Fixes T11050. Today, when a user resigns, we just delete the record of them ever being a reviewer.
However, this means you have no way to say "I don't care about this and don't want to see it on my dashboard" if you are a member of any project or package reviewers.
Instead, store "resigned" as a distinct state from "not a reviewer", and treat it a little differently in the UI:
- On the bucketing screen, discard revisions any responsible user has resigned from.
- On the main `/Dxxx` page, show these users as resigned explicitly (we could just hide them, too, but I think this is good to start with).
- In the query, don't treat a "resigned" state as a real "reviewer" (this change happened earlier, in D17517).
- When resigning, write a "resigned" state instead of deleting the row.
- When editing a list of reviewers, I'm still treating this reviewer as a reviewer and not special casing it. I think that's sufficiently clear but we could tailor this behavior later.
Test Plan:
- Resigned from a revision.
- Saw "Resigned" in reviewers list.
- Saw revision disappear from my dashboard.
- Edited revision, saw user still appear as an editable reviewer. Saved revision, saw no weird side effects.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11050
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17531
Summary: Fixes T12434. I accidentally copy/pasted this too much in D17442.
Test Plan: Viewed a form edit page, no longer saw two copies of this action.
Reviewers: chad, cspeckmim
Reviewed By: chad, cspeckmim
Maniphest Tasks: T12434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17530
Summary: Ref T10390. Catch if the user doesn't have any dashboards they can edit and give them a helpful message instead.
Test Plan: Clean install, no dashboards, Click "Add to Dashboard" on ApplicationSearch results, see no dashboards message
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17528
Summary: Ref T10390. Dashboard usability is high enough that I think we should pin it by default for users to create custom home pages.
Test Plan: Review order of applications in sandbox.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17527
Summary: Ref T10390. Fixes the missing "fa-dashboard" icon and adds a few more for an even 25.
Test Plan: Create new dashboard, see dashboard icon, select new dashboard icon.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17526
Summary: Ref T10390. I find myself wanting to find dashboards I can edit, even if I am not the author. I think this is useful for larger installs with multiple admins. Also make disabled Dashboards more grey in UI results.
Test Plan: Log in a test user, create a dashboard with I cannot edit. Log into my account, search for editable dashboards and only see mine. Set dashboard to all users, search under test account and see editable dashboards.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17524
Summary: Ref T5307. Just makes the dialog a little easier to use. Picks a name if we already have one.
Test Plan: Test a builtin, custom saved, and a new advanced search (no name).
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17523
Summary:
Ref T10967. Improves some method names:
- `Revision->getReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->getReviewers()`
- `Revision->attachReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->attachReviewers()`
- `Reviewer->getStatus()` -> `Reviewer->getReviewerStatus()` (this is mostly to make this more greppable)
Test Plan:
- bunch o' `grep`
- Browsed around.
- If I missed anything, it should fatal in an obvious way. We have a lot of other `getStatus()` calls and it's hard to be sure I got them all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17522
Summary: Ref T10967. The old name was because we had a `getReviewers()` tied to `needRelationships()`, rename this method to use a simpler and more clear name.
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17519
Summary:
Ref T10967. There have been two different ways to load reviewers for a while: `needReviewerStatus()` and `needRelationships()`.
The `needRelationships()` stuff was a false start along time ago that didn't really go anywhere. I believe the idea was that we might want to load several different types of edges (subscribers, reviewers, etc) on lots of different types of objects. However, all that stuff pretty much ended up modularizing so that main `Query` classes did not need to know about it, so `needRelationships()` never got generalized or went anywhere.
A handful of things still use it, but get rid of them: they should either `needReviewerStatus()` to get reviewer info, or the ~3 callsites that care about subscribers can just load them directly.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed methods (`needRelationships()`, `getReviewers()`, `getCCPHIDs()`, etc).
- Browsed Diffusion, Differential.
- Called `differential.query`.
It's possible I missed some stuff, but it should mostly show up as super obvious fatals ("call needReviewerStatus() before getReviewerStatus()!").
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17518
Summary:
Ref T10967.
When we query for revisions with particular reviewers, use the new table to drive the query.
When we load revisions for use in the application, also use the new table to drive the query.
This doesn't convert everything: there's some old `loadRelationships()` stuff still using the old table. But this moves the major stuff over.
(This also changes the icon for "commented" from a question mark to a speech bubble.)
Test Plan:
- Viewed revision lists and detail views on old and new code, saw identical outcomes.
- Updated revisions, accepted/rejected/commented on revisions.
- Hit the "Accepted Older" and "Commented Older" states by taking an action and then updating.
- Grepped for removed methods (like `getEdgeData()` and `getDiffID()`).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17517
Summary:
Ref T10967. We still have double writes, so all reviewers are being written to both old and new storage. This migrates all the data in the old storage to the new storage, so both storage tables should have a complete set of data and be getting identical updates as we move forward.
After this, I can move readers over one at a time and eventually get rid of the old writes and old storage.
This loads all of the edge data into memory in a big chunk. I reached out to one install to get some more information about their data size. Ours is quite manageable and I think even large installs will probably fit into memory, but we can do this in chunks if not.
However, because the Edge table doesn't have an `id` column, we can't use either the `RawMigrationIterator` or the `MigrationIterator`, and would need to write a new `EdgeMigrationIterator`. This isn't tons of work but might not be necessary.
Test Plan: Ran the migration locally, spot-checked the results in the database for sanity and correctness.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17515
Summary:
Ref T10967. We have a "commented" state to help reviewers get a better sense of who is part of a discussion, and a "last action" state to help distinguish between "accept" and "accepted an older version", for the purposes of sticky accepts and as a UI hint.
Currently, these are first-class states, partly beacuse we were somewhat limited in what we could do with edges. However, a more flexible way to represent them is as flags separate from the primary state flag.
In the new storage, write them as separate state information: `lastActionDiffPHID` stores the Diff PHID of the last review action (accept, reject, etc). `lastCommentDiffPHID` stores the Diff PHID of the last comment (top-level or inline).
Test Plan: Applied storage changes, commented and acted on a revision. Saw appropriate state reflected in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17514
Summary:
Ref T10967. `differential.createcomment` is a frozen API method which has been obsoleted by `differential.revision.edit`.
It is the only remaining way to apply an "accept", "reject", or "resign" action using the old "ACTION" code.
Instead of using the old code, sneakly apply a new type of transaction in these cases instead.
Then, remove all the remaining old code for this stuff on the write pathways.
Test Plan:
- Used "differential.createcomment" to accept, reject, and resign from a revision.
- Grepped for all removed ACTION_X constants, found them only in rendering code.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17513
Summary: Ref T10967. See that task for some discussion. This lets us do double writes on this pathway.
Test Plan: Set an Owners package to auto-review. Created revisions which triggered it: one with no reviewers (autoreview added); one with the package as a blocking reviewer explicitly (no automatic stuff happened, as expected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17512
Summary:
Ref T10967. This converts the reviewer update action in Herald from an older edge write to a newer ModularTransactions write.
The major value from this is that we get a double-write to the new reviewers table.
Test Plan:
- Wrote a Herald rule to add a reviewer and a blocking reviewer.
- Saw them added properly to a revision with: no reviewers; both as blocking; A as blocking, B as nonblocking; A as nonblocking, B as blocking.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17511
Summary: Ref T5307. Actually check the built in query with query, not engine.
Test Plan: Try a builtin query, and a custom query when making a dashboard panel.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17521
Summary: Ref T5307. Adds a better query check query, sets required for the name, adds the correct URI for cancelling.
Test Plan: Test a form without a name, fake a query string, test cancel button.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17520
Summary: Ref T5307. This adds an additional action to Use Results for creating a panel from the query.
Test Plan:
Navigate to Maniphest, select dropdown for Use Results. Try any of the following:
- Try to set a panel without a name (fail)
- Muck up query or engine (fail)
- Set a fake Dashboard ID (fail)
Give panel a name and select a dashboard I have edit permissions to, get taken to dashboard.
Reviewers: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17516
Summary: Fixes T12418. This is a fairly advanced feature and I think users can reasonably consult the documentation for their own editors to figure out how to do this.
Test Plan: Saw no more text.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17510
Summary: Fixes T12416. See that task for discussion. Slightly older versions of `git` do not appear to support use of `--` to separate flags and arguments.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/repository update PHABX`.
- In T12416, had a user with Git 2.1.4 confirm that `git ls-remote X` worked while `git ls-remote -- X` failed.
- Read `git help ls-remote` to look for any kind of suspicious `--destroy-the-world` flags, didn't see any that made me uneasy.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T12416
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17508
Summary: Fixes T12416. See that task for discussion. Slightly older versions of `git` do not appear to support use of `--` to separate flags and arguments.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/repository update PHABX`.
- In T12416, had a user with Git 2.1.4 confirm that `git ls-remote X` worked while `git ls-remote -- X` failed.
- Read `git help ls-remote` to look for any kind of suspicious `--destroy-the-world` flags, didn't see any that made me uneasy.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T12416
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17508
Summary:
Ref T5378. This repackages an existing check to see if a URI is a URI for the current install into a more reasonable form.
In an upcoming change, I'll use this new check to test whether `http://example.whatever.com/T123` is a link to a task on the current install or not.
Test Plan: This stuff has good test coverage already; added some more.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5378
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17502
Summary:
Ref T12392. The logic currently goes like this:
- Try a fetch.
- If that fails, try repairing the origin URI.
- Then try again.
This is pretty complicated, and we can use this simpler logic instead:
- Set the origin URI to the right value.
- Try a fetch.
Setting the origin URI is very fast. This can normally only get us in any trouble in very obscure situations which haven't occurred for many years:
- Pretty much all of this is already covered by `verifyGitOrigin()`, which we run earlier.
- Origins could be configured to have multiple URIs for some reason, but shouldn't be.
- Years ago, you could configure Phabricator to point at a local repository it didn't own and that could conceivably have a different "origin" that you might not want us to delete. If you did this, the daemons have been spewing errors for 3-4 years without you fixing it. The cost of fixing the remote URI is very small even if anyone is affected by this (just set it back to the old value) and there's zero reason to do this and the scenario is ridiculous.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/repository update PHABX --trace --verbose`, saw fetches go through cleanly after URI adjustment.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17498
Summary:
Ref T12296. Ref T12392. Currently, when we're observing a remote repository, we periodically run `git fetch ...`.
Instead, periodically run `git ls-remote` (to list refs in the remote) and `git for-each-ref` (to list local refs) and only continue if the two lists are different.
The motivations for this are:
- In T12296, it appears that doing this is //faster// than doing a no-op `git fetch`. This effect seems to reproduce locally in a clean environment (900ms for `ls-remote` + 100ms for `for-each-ref` vs about 1.4s for `fetch`). I don't have any explanation for why this is, but there it is. This isn't a huge change, although the time we're saving does appear to mostly be local CPU time, which is good for us.
- Because we control all writes, we could cache `git for-each-ref` in the future and do fewer disk operations. This doesn't necessarily seem too valuable, though.
- This allows us to tell if a fetch will do anything or not, and make better decisions around clustering (in particular, simplify how observed repository versioning works). With `git fetch`, we can't easily distinguish between "fetch, but nothing changed" and "legitimate fetch".
If a repository updates very regularly we end up doing slightly more work this way (that is, if `ls-remote` always comes back with changes, we do a little extra work), but this is normally very rare.
This might not get non-bare repositories quite right in some cases (i.e., incorrectly detect them as changed when they are unchanged) but we haven't created non-bare repositories for many years.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/repository update --trace --verbose PHABX`, saw sensible construction of local and remote maps and accurate detection of whether a fetch would do anything or not.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12392, T12296
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17497
Summary: Ref T12270. Builds out a BadgeCache for PhabricatorUser, primarily for Timeline, potentially feed? This should still work if we later let people pick which two, just switch query in BadgeCache.
Test Plan: Give out badges, test timeline for displaying badges from handles and without queries. Revoke a badge, see cache change.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17503
Summary:
Fixes T12406. When importing commits, we automatically add auditors if the message lists "Auditors: username".
If the list of auditors includes the commit author, this edit fails because you can't audit your own commits (previously, you sometimes could and/or we didn't validate).
Instead, just ignore "Auditors: author".
Test Plan:
- Made a commit with "Auditors: epriestley".
- Pushed it.
- Saw the HeraldWorker get stuck with the error in T12406.
- Applied the change; worker now succeeded.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: alexmv
Maniphest Tasks: T12406
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17507
Summary:
Fixes T12409. Config entries may be marked as "deleted", and `bin/config set --database` doesn't un-delete them, so the edit doesn't do anything.
The "most correct" fix here is to swap to transactions so we run the same code, but just fix this narrowly for now since it's one line of code.
Test Plan:
- Set `maniphest.default-priority` to `123`.
- Deleted `maniphest.default-priority` from the web UI by deleting all the text in the box.
- Before patch: `bin/config set --database maniphest.default-priority 789` had no effect.
- After patch: `bin/config set --database maniphest.default-priority 789` worked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12409
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17506
Summary: Extends PHUIListItemView to take an icon, link as an "Action Item" that displays on the right side of the menu link. Does not display on Favorites. This allows for adding edit, external, or other links (documentation?) to any menu item. Right now the secondary link is only visible when the item is selected. This feels right, but if we offer it in other ways, users may always want it visible. We could look at making it onhover.
Test Plan:
Add a bunch of random global and personal dashboards to my menu. Add a menu to Favorites, see no link. Test mobile, link works.
{F4136699}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17505
Summary:
Fixes T12372. Long-term fix is T12404, this is a bandaid in the interim.
See T12372 for additional discussion.
Test Plan: Confirmed functional by a user in T12372.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12372
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17501
Summary:
Via HackerOne. When you view a raw file in Differential, we currently generate a permanent file with default permissions. This may be incorrect: default permissions may be broader than the diff's permissions.
The other three methods of downloading/viewing raw files ("Download" in Diffusion and Differential, "View Raw" in Diffusion and Differential) already apply policies correctly and generate temporary files. However, this workflow was missed when other workflows were updated.
Beyond updating the workflow, delete any files we've generated in the past. This wipes the slate clean on any security issues and frees up a little disk space.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration script, saw existing files get purged.
- Did "View Raw File", got a new file.
- Verified that the file was temporary and properly attached to the diff, with "NO ONE" permissions.
- Double-checked that Diffusion already runs policy logic correctly and applies appropriate policies.
- Double-checked that "Download Raw Diff" in Differential already runs policy logic correctly.
- Double-chekced that "Download Raw Diff" in Diffusion already runs policy logic correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17504
Summary:
Via HackerOne. When you view a raw file in Differential, we currently generate a permanent file with default permissions. This may be incorrect: default permissions may be broader than the diff's permissions.
The other three methods of downloading/viewing raw files ("Download" in Diffusion and Differential, "View Raw" in Diffusion and Differential) already apply policies correctly and generate temporary files. However, this workflow was missed when other workflows were updated.
Beyond updating the workflow, delete any files we've generated in the past. This wipes the slate clean on any security issues and frees up a little disk space.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration script, saw existing files get purged.
- Did "View Raw File", got a new file.
- Verified that the file was temporary and properly attached to the diff, with "NO ONE" permissions.
- Double-checked that Diffusion already runs policy logic correctly and applies appropriate policies.
- Double-checked that "Download Raw Diff" in Differential already runs policy logic correctly.
- Double-chekced that "Download Raw Diff" in Diffusion already runs policy logic correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17504
Summary:
Fixes T12400. Adds a "Has MFA" filter to People so you can figure out who you need to harass before turning on "require MFA".
When you run this as a non-admin, you don't currently actually hit the exception: the query just doesn't work. I think this is probably okay, but if we add more of these it might be better to make the "this didn't work" more explicit since it could be confusing in some weird edge cases (like, an administrator sending a non-administrator a link which they expect will show the non-administrator some interesting query results, but they actually just get no constraint). The exception is more of a fail-safe in case we make application changes in the future and don't remember this weird special case.
Test Plan:
- As an administrator and non-administrator, used People and Conduit to query MFA, no-MFA, and don't-care-about-MFA. These queries worked for an admin and didn't work for a non-admin.
- Viewed the list as an administrator, saw MFA users annotated.
- Viewed config help, clicked link as an admin, ended up in the right place.
{F4093033}
{F4093034}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12400
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17500
Summary: Fixes T12398. This adds `withBadgeStatuses` as a query parameter when searching for Awards to show. In most (all?) cases we currently only show active badges.
Test Plan: Assign myself a badge, archive it and verify it does not appear on profile, comment form, or timeline.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17499
Summary: Ref T12264. This allows users to install a dashboard they are viewing to their personal home menu or as a global home menu item. Has some basic ability to be extended later for maybe projects.
Test Plan:
Build a dashboard, click "Install Dashboard".
- As user only get personal option
- As HomeApp edit person, see both options
- Try installation as either, with and without label set
- Fake "global" form as user, get error
- Don't set anything, get error
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12264
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17492
Summary:
Ref T10967. This is an incremental step toward removing "reviewers" back to a dedicated storage table so we can handle changes like T11050.
This adds the storage table, and starts doing double writes to it (so new or updated reviewers write to both the old edge table and the new "reviewers" table).
Then we can do a migration, swap readers over one at a time, and eventually remove the old write and old storage and then implement new features.
This change has no user-facing impact, it just causes us to write new data to two places instead of one.
This is not completely exhaustive: the Herald "Add Reviewers" action is still doing a manual EDGE transaction. I'll clean that up next and do another pass to look for anything else I missed.
This is also a bit copy/pastey for now but the logic around "RESIGN" is a little different in the two cases until T11050. I'll unify it in future changes.
Test Plan:
- Did a no-op edit.
- Did a no-op comment.
- Added reviewers.
- Removed reviewers.
- Accepted and rejected revisions.
After all of these edits, did a `SELECT * FROM differential_reviewer` manually and saw consistent-looking rows in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17495
Summary: Fixes T12391. Adds better scoping to these rules to contain changes to just Conpherence.
Test Plan: Test Conpherence, Task comment, persistent chat on mobile / desktop.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12391
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17496
Summary: This alignment is off on edit forms, from the new overflow rules. Let's re-align everything for forms too.
Test Plan:
Add 2 new spaces, go to Maniphest, edit a task, see proper alignment of [Space] [Policy] view dropdowns. Check mobile alignment and Safari/FF.
{F3942187}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17491
Summary: Fix tag alignment on project cards when there are multiple tags. Also fixes T12381.
Test Plan: Review a project and people hovercard in sandbox, ensure multiple tags look as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12381
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17488
