Summary: Depends on D20486. Ref T13279. Now that the "Reports" UI uses a panel to draw a real chart from Facts, throw away the copy of the old code.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20487
Summary:
Ref T13279. Charting changes alter how the "line-chart" behavior works, but the "Burnup Chart" still relies on the old behavior.
Although I'm intending to remove "Maniphest > Reports" once Facts is a minimally sufficient replacement, copy this behavior to keep it working until we're ready to pull the trigger.
Also fix a leftover typo from D20435.
Test Plan: Viewed a legacy Maniphest burnup rate report.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20449
Summary:
Depends on D20439. Ref T13279. Some day, charts will probably need to reload themselves or do a bunch of defer/request-shaping magic when they're on a dashboard with 900 other charts.
Give the controller separate "HTML placeholder" and "actual data" modes, and make the placeholder fetch the data in a separate request.
Then, make the chart redraw if you resize the window instead of staying at whatever size it started as.
Test Plan:
- Loaded a chart, saw it load data asynchronously.
- Resized the window, saw the chart resize.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20440
Summary:
Ref T13279. I think I'm going to fling some stuff at the wall for a bit here and hope most of it sticks, so this series of changes may not be terribly cohesive or focused. Here:
The range of the chart is locked to "[0, 105% of max]". This is trying to make a pleasing extra margin above the maximum value, but currently just breaks charts with negative values. Later:
- I'll probably let users customize this.
- We should likely select 0 as the automatic minimum for charts with no negative values.
- For charts with positive values, it would be nice to automatically pick a pleasantly round number (25, 100, 1000) as a maximum by default.
We don't have any storage for charts yet. Add some. This works like queries, where every possible configuration gets a short URL slug. Nothing writes or reads this yet.
Rename `fn()` to `css_function()`. This builds CSS functions for D3. The JS is likely to get substantial structural rewrites later on, `fn()` was just particularly offensive.
Test Plan: Viewed a fact series with negative values. Ran `bin/storage upgrade`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20438
Summary:
Ref T13074. Today, in normal task list views in Maniphest (not workboards), you can (sometimes) reorder tasks if the view is priority-sorted.
I suspect no one ever does this, few users know it's supported, and that it was basically rendered obsolete the day we shipped workboards.
This also means that we need to maintain a global "subpriority" for tasks, which distinguishes between different tasks at the same priority level (e.g., "High") and maintains a consistent ordering on workboards.
As we move toward making workboards more flexible (e.g., group by author / owner / custom fields), I'd like to try moving away from "subpriority" and possibly removing it entirely, in favor of "natural order", which basically means "we kind of remember where you put the card and it works a bit like a sticky note".
Currently, the "natural order" and "subpriority" systems are sort of similar but also sort of in conflict, and the "subpriority" system can't really be extended while the "natural order / column position" system can.
The only real reason to have a global "subpriority" is to support the list-view drag-and-drop.
It's possible I'm wrong about this and a bunch of users love this feature, but we can re-evaluate if we get feedback in this vein.
(This just removes UI, the actual subpriority system is still intact and still used on workboards.)
Test Plan: Viewed task lists, was no longer able to drag stuff. Grepped for affected symbols. Dragged stuff in remaining grippable lists, like "Edit Forms" in EditEngine config.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20263
Summary: See PHI1017. This is a trivial fix even though these burnups are headed toward a grisly fate.
Test Plan: Moused over some January datapoints, saw "1" instead of "0".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19967
Summary:
Depends on D18862. See PHI173. Ref T13025. Fixes T10005. This redefines bulk edits in terms of EditEngine fields, rather than hard-coding the whole thing.
Only text fields -- and, specifically, only the "Title" field -- are supported after this change. Followup changes will add more bulk edit parameter types and broader field support.
However, the title field now works without any Maniphest-specific code, outside of the small amount of binding code in the `ManiphestBulkEditor` subclass.
Test Plan: Used the bulk edit workflow to change the titles of tasks.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10005
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18863
Summary:
Depends on D18805. Ref T13025. Fixes T10268.
Instead of using a list of IDs for the bulk editor, power it with SearchEngine queries. This gives us the full power of SearchEngine and lets us use a query key instead of a list of 20,000 IDs to avoid issues with URL lengths.
Also, split it into a base `BulkEngine` and per-application subclasses. This moves us toward T10005 and universal support for bulk operations.
Also:
- Renames most of "batch" to "bulk": we're curently inconsitent about this, I like "bulk" better since I think it's more clear if you don't regularly interact with `.bat` files, and newer stuff mostly uses "bulk".
- When objects in the result set can't be edited because you don't have permission, show the status more clearly.
This probably breaks some stuff a bit since I refactored so heavily, but it seems mostly OK from poking around. I'll clean up anything I missed in followups to deal with remaining items on T13025.
Test Plan:
{F5302300}
- Bulk edited from Maniphest.
- Bulk edited from a workboard (no more giant `?ids=....` in the URL).
- Hit most of the error conditions, I think?
- Clicked the "Cancel" button.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10268
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18806
Summary: Reorgaizes the CSS here a bit, by object list style, adds in a new drag ui class, which will be used in menu ordering.
Test Plan:
Workboards, Home Apps.
{F2126266}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17057
Summary:
Mostly, this has just been sitting in my sandbox for a long time. I may also touch some charting stuff with subprojects/milestones, but don't have particular plans to do that.
D3 seems a bit more flexible, and it's easier to push more of the style logic into CSS so you can fix my design atrocities. gRaphael also hasn't been updated in ~3+ years.
Test Plan:
{F1085433}
{F1085434}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cburroughs, yelirekim
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15155
Summary:
Ref T9132. Like D14659, I'll hold this until after the cut.
This swaps commenting in Maniphest over to EditEngine / stackable actions. New code doesn't have parity yet, although none of the things we're missing should technically be //strictly mandatory//. There's a list inline. I'll restore these in the next diffs.
Briefly -- comments, subscribers and projects work. Status, owners and priority do not yet.
Test Plan:
- Made comments and added subscribers and projects.
- Read through the old code to look for missing features and tried to document them all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14663
Summary: Ref T8099, Fixes T8338. This allows re-ordering of Maniphest Tasks in the redesign. Somehow seems more fragile, but I couldn't break anything with it.
Test Plan: Try ordering into first position after header, last position, changing priority outright, everything I can drag.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099, T8338
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13487
Summary: Ref T8498. This editor is an artifact of the Old World at this point, but it still works fine.
Test Plan: Moved tasks between spaces using the batch editor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8498
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13249
Summary: Fixes T4846. These are one off (for now) since they have various crazy actions with them. I think this will get unified and more cleaned up when we refine the UI for taking multiple actions at once, etc.
Test Plan: noted no "commented on x" in either maniphest or differential. starting making a comment and noted prevew showed. started adding a subscriber (added to tokenizer) and preview showed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4846
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12936
Summary: Ref T5750. This makes browse work for all of the dynamic tokenizers in Herald, Policies, batch editor, etc.
Test Plan: Used tokenizers in Herald, Policies, Batch editor.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12442
Summary: Fixes T7099, also picked some new colors. Raphael can bind the graph to a dom element, which resolved the scrolling issue.
Test Plan: Tested scrolling on my laptop, desktop. Seems resolved.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11879
Summary: This variable should be local, not global. This silences a few JSHint warnings.
Test Plan: `arc lint`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11068
Summary: This should be a fairly minor change that silences a bunch of JSHint warnings.
Test Plan: `arc lint` showed less warnings.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11064
Summary: As advised by JSHint.
Test Plan: I'm not really sure how to comprehensively test this. It looks okay to me.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9677
Summary: There are a bunch of unused variables in JavaScript files. These were identified with JSHint.
Test Plan: It's pretty hard to test this thoroughly... on inspection, it seems that everything //should// be okay (unless we are doing weird things with the JavaScript).
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9676
Summary: Ref T1812. Moves most specialized status handling into `ManiphestTaskStatus`. The only real missing case is reports.
Test Plan:
Browsed most of the affected interfaces. Changed task status:
{F132697}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8579
Summary:
Added yformat to ManiphestReportController. Removed [yy] from the js.
Will pull config.yformat or send []. The old way with [yy] never seemed to worked having config.yformat, also would crash if yformat was in with value
Test Plan: Loadup burn up report, hover over a given date. Number of tasks opened should be an int
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8080
Summary: Fixes T4006.
Test Plan: clicked "select all" and dragged around tasks. Noted the task remained selected as I re-ordered, thus keeping hte count accurate. Verified when I hit "batch edit" the right tasks showed up.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4006
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7566
Summary:
Currently, draggable lists (in Config and ApplicationSearch, for example) don't let you drag an item into the first position.
This is because the behavior is correct in Maniphest: the first position is above an initial header, like "High Prioirty", and shouldn't be targetable.
Permit the behavior in general; forbid it in Maniphest.
Test Plan:
- Dragged elements into the first position in ApplicationSearch.
- Failed to drag elements into the first position in Maniphest.
Reviewers: garoevans, btrahan
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7128
Summary: Adds plain support for object lists that just look like lists
Test Plan: review UIexamples and a number of other applications
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6922
Summary:
Ref T3671. A lot of applications have pretty ad-hoc preview code. Clean it up a bit and add Summary preview to Differential.
After ApplicationTransactions we might want to try to serialize the whole form and show a preview of all the transactions, but this seems not very useful in most cases (I'd guess that Remarkup previews are 99% of the value) and tricky to get right (e.g., adding images which don't exist yet to Pholio mocks).
I think I can add this in a few other places, too.
Test Plan:
Edited Maniphest Tasks and Differential Revisions, mashed some buttons. Verified previews rendered correctly. Grepped for removed CSS classes (no hits).
{F52907}
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6673
Summary:
- Use the same styles for shared operations (`drag-ghost`, `drag-dragging`).
- Move shared code into the base class.
Test Plan: Dragged around tasks and named queries.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6141
Summary: See discussion in D6131, D6130. This turned into 35 layers of mess so throw it away and just tweak the JS to be more flexible.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "Show More Applications".
- Clicked "Show Fewer Applications".
- Edited tasks using popup dialog.
- Tried to drag tasks using pencil icon (correctly no longer works).
- Changed threads in Conpherence.
- Not sure how to actually hit the Conpherence "Load ... Threads" thing since
it seems to auto-load? But that works, at least, and the code doesn't really
care what you hit.
- Added a conpherence participant.
- Added a new calendar item.
- Poked around other menus.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6133
Summary:
I want to use draggable lists in at least three other interfaces:
- (Today) Reorganizing named search queries.
- (Today) Reorganizing custom fields.
- (Future) Dragging tasks around on boards.
This mostly generalizes the drag-and-drop code in Maniphest's task list. It isn't a total generalization and will need some more tweaking (for example, Maniphest's list is unusual in that the user can't drag items to the top of the list), but it substantially separates the Maniphest-specific behaviors from the general dragging behaviors.
This diff causes no functional changes.
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks in Maniphest.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6124
Summary:
Fixes T1945. Ref T2947. At various times, installs (Disqus, Dropbox, etc.) have asked for a way to edit tasks more quickly. Provide edit-from-lists.
{F44700}
{F44701}
The one rough edge on this is that if you change the task priority we update it inline but don't move it. It's probably infeasible to actually move it, but maybe we could give it some sort of visual style to indicate that it's dirty.
Test Plan: Edited tasks normally and via this action thing.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: tido, deuresti, ahoffer, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1945, T2947
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6086
Summary: If `jsxmin` is not available, use a pure PHP implementation instead (JsShrink).
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc lint --lintall` on all JS and fixed every relevant warning.
- Forced minification on and browsed around the site using JS behaviors. Didn't hit anything problematic.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5670
Summary:
This isn't quite complete, but everything else is technical cleanup. Broadly:
- Removed checkboxes. Selected state is now indicated with CSS, and toggled with shift-click. When nothing is selected, the text reads "Shift-Click Tasks to Select" to let users discover this feature.
- Updated drag-to-reorder code to work with ObjectItemListView.
- Closed/resolved is now shown with a grey footer icon.
- Assigned is now shown with a user profile image handle icon, with a hover state.
This could probably use some more tweaks, but overall I think it looks pretty reasonable?
Test Plan: {F35897}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5340
Summary:
- Commit detail view
- List of projects
- "edit" action which takes the user to a simple form where they can only add / remove projects.
- Integrated the project relationship into the commit search indexer
- fixed a bug from D790; it seems you must select the column if you're going to join against it later. Without this change searching for author or projectfails 100% for me.
Test Plan: added and removed projects. verified appropriate projects showed up in detail and edit view. searched for commits by project and found the ones I was supposed to...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1614
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3189
Summary: For any count fact, allow a chart to be drawn. INCREDIBLY POWERFUL DATA ANALYSIS PLATFORM.
Test Plan: Drew a chart of object counts. Drew the Maniphest burn chart.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3099
Summary:
...pretty sure the JS is too hack-tastic but it works...! :D
also fixed a small error from assert_instances_of change where a null value is all errors and what have you
Test Plan: played around with tasks in firefox and safari. made cc, owner, and project changes, as well as priority, etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2234
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary: I think these are all the actions which make any sense.
Test Plan:
- Performed and verified each action through the batch editor.
- Performed a large batch edit which applied each action type multiple times and verified the aggregate behavior was correct.
Reviewers: btrahan, cpiro
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1971
Summary:
- We incorrectly count resolution changes and other noise as opens / closes.
- Show one graph: open bugs over time (red line minus green line). This and its derivative are the values you actually care about. It is difficult to see the derivative with both lines, but easy with one line.
Test Plan: Looked at burnup chart. Saw charty things. Verified resolution changes no longer make the line move.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923, T982
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1945
Summary:
- These are still slow, awkward and hideous -- but slightly better than
before.
- Allow "open" reports to be sorted.
- Add a "burn" chart/table for assessing project volatility.
- Add navigation.
Test Plan: Looked at reports.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1737
Summary:
First stab at a batch editor for Maniphest. Basically, you can select a group of
tasks and then import them into the "batch" interface, where you can edit all of
them at once.
High level goal is to make it easier for users in PM/filer/support/QA roles to
deal with large numbers of tasks quickly.
This implementation has a few major limitations:
- The only available actions are "add projects" and "remove projects".
- There is no review / undo / log stuff.
- All the changes are applied in-process, which may not scale terribly well.
However, the immediate need is just around projects and this seemed like a
reasonable place to draw the line for a minimal useful version of the tool.
Test Plan: Used batch editor to add and remove projects from groups of tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, yairlivne
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, sandra
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1680
Summary: also fixes a small bug where the page title was always "Create Task".
switch it to the header name which is much more descriptive / correct IMO.
Test Plan:
created a new task and watched the description preview update.
edited an old task and saw the description preview populate with the correct
existing data.
edited an old task and edited the description and saw the description preview
update
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1489
Summary:
the details pages are using preload instead of ondemand for
typeahead, but the most common actions on the pages are commenting which
would not need the preloaded info. To improve the performance of the
pages, turn on ondemand according to the setting in the config file.
Test Plan: verify it is working with both modes, for both pages.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 995
Summary:
Provide a quick workflow for adding a new project. This ended up being sort of
complicated because we don't currently put forms in dialogs. I separated the
actual <form /> tag out of the display/layout of AphrontFormView to enable this
(the dialog is itself a form).
Limitations: if you create a new project and then remove it, it won't appear in
the tokenizer until you reload the page. We need to add the ability for the
datasource to drop its cache to enable this, which is super complicated.
Test Plan:
Used "Create new project" to add a new project when creating a task.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 422
Summary:
Make it discoverable, show uploading progress, show file thumbnails, allow you
to remove files, make it a generic form component.
Test Plan:
Uploaded ducks
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 334
