Summary: Ref T13552. In the new combined "table/list" graph view, tidy up the graph rendering.
Test Plan: {F7633504}
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21411
Summary:
Ref T13552. Currently, commit lists are sometimes rendered as an object list and sometimes rendered as a table. There are two separate views for table rendering.
Add a fourth view ("list, with a graph") with the eventual intent of unifying all the other views. For now, this only replaces "HistoryListView" -- and needs some more work to really be a convincing replacement.
Test Plan:
- Looked at "History" in Diffusion, saw an ugly view with all the information we want.
- Grepped for "HistoryListView", no hits.
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21410
Summary:
Ref T13552. Currently, Diffusion has two effectively identical history views, the "Graph" view and the "History" view.
These arose out of product uncertainty about the importance of the graph, but I think we can just put the graph on the "object item list" view and merge these views.
Test Plan: Looked at repositories in Diffusion, no longer saw a "Graph" tab. Grepped for "graph"-related symbols.
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21409
Summary:
Ref T13552. Currently, the repository landing page has a panel with recent commits. This is accessible by clicking "History" and usually below the fold, so it's not clearly useful.
Since I'm consolidating this code anyway to fix an issue with the import pipeline, just get rid of this history view.
Test Plan: Viewed a repository landing page, no longer saw a history panel.
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21408
Summary: Ref T13552. This older class has no callers; tag and branch listings were replaced with an "ObjectList" view.
Test Plan: Grepped for "DiffusionTagTableView", got no hits.
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21407
Summary:
Ref T13552. I'm trying to reduce the number of direct callers to commit authorship metadata. This header seems low-value enough to simply remove; this information is shown more clearly and prominently in the "Provenance" UI.
In particular, commits have multiple dates (authored, committed, pushed) but this header shows only one. It currently shows the author identity and the commit date, which isn't entirely correct. And it potentially uses an "Identity" as a timeline actor, which is conceptually fine but not entirely firm ground.
Test Plan: Viewed a commit, saw no more subheader.
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21406
Summary:
Ref T13552. Give "Commit" objects a more modern, identity-aware way to render author and committer information.
This uses handles in a more modern way and gives us a single read callsite for raw author and committer names.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for callers to the old methods, found none. (There are a lot of "renderAuthor()" callers in transactions, but this call takes no parameters.)
- Viewed some commits, saw sensible lists of authors and committers.
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21405
Summary:
Ref T13552. When viewing a directory in Diffusion, we make an Ajax call to get the last commit for each path.
This call currently pulls author information, since an older version of this UI showed author information.
The current UI does not show author information, so this parameter is unused. Delete the code which builds it.
Test Plan: Grepped for `'author'` and references to the "pull-lastmodified" behavior. This behavior is invoked in only one place, which never generates an author placeholder.
Maniphest Tasks: T13552
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21404
Summary:
See PHI1834. Currently, the inline adjustment engine can sometime "adjust" an inline off the end of a diff. If it does, we lay it out on an invalid display line here and never render it.
Instead, make sure that layout never puts a comment on an invalid line, so the UI is robust against questionable decisions by the adjustment engine: no adjustment should be able to accidentally discard an inline.
Test Plan:
- Created a two diff revision, where Diffs 1 and 2 have "alphabet.txt" with A-Z on one line each. The file is unchanged across diffs; some other file is changed.
- Added a comment to lines P-Z of Diff 1.
- Before: comment is adjusted out of range on Diff 2 and not shown in the UI.
- After: comment is still adjusted out of range internally, but now corrected into the display range and shown.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21435
Summary:
Ref PHI1835. Generally, Jupyter notebooks in the wild may store source and markdown content as either a single string or a list of strings.
Make the renderer read these formats more consistently. In particular, this fixes rendering of code blocks stored as a single string.
This also fixes an issue where cell labels were double-rendered in diff views.
Test Plan:
Created a notebook with a code block represented on disk as a single string, rendered a diff from it.
{F7696071}
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21434
Summary:
See PHI1839. Currently, the "No newline at end of file" text is dropped in the 1-up diff view for changes that affect a file with no trailing newline.
Track it through the construction of diff primitivies more carefully.
Test Plan: {F7695760}
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21433
Summary:
Although I'm not entirely thrilled about doing flow control like this (as an actual action in a build plan), I believe this build step works correctly and there's no fancy replacement mechanism on the immediate horizon, and this didn't send us down a slippery slope of Turing-complete builds encoded without real structure or context. Just kick it out of prototype.
(Other approaches which might be better in the long run are things like "this is a top-level behavior on the build plan itself" and/or "build plans are written in a DSL, not a Javascript UI".)
Test Plan: Added a new build step, saw this as an option in the "Flow Control" section.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21432
Summary:
Reverts D21419. See PHI1814. Previously, I used "user-select: all" to group sequences of spaces for selection.
However, this has a side effect: the sequence is now selected with a single click. I didn't read the docuementation on the CSS property thoroughly and missed this in testing, since I was focused on drag-selection behavior.
This behavior is enough of a net negative that I think we're in a worse state overall; revert it.
Test Plan: Straight revert.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21429
Summary:
Ref T13556. These options are very old and effectively obsoleted by "bin/phd debug [--trace]". I haven't used either option diagnostically in many years, and they aren't mentioned in the documentation.
Remove them to simplify configuration, and because "phd.trace" doesn't work anyway and likely hasn't for a long time -- it has specific issues with TTY detection (see T13556).
Test Plan: Grepped for "phd.trace" and "phd.verbose". Ran "bin/phd debug [--trace]" and saw verbose/trace output.
Maniphest Tasks: T13556
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21426
Summary: See PHI1819. This structure may have `null` elements.
Test Plan: Will confirm user reproduction case.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21420
Summary:
Ref T2495. See PHI1814. Currently, Phabricator replaces tabs with spaces when rendering diffs.
This may or may not be the best behavior in the long term, but it gives us more control over expansion of tabs than using tab literals.
However, one downside is that you can use your mouse cursor to select "half a tab", and can't use your mouse cursor to distinguish between tabs and spaces. Although you probably shouldn't be doing this, this behavior is less accurate/correct than selecting the entire block as a single unit.
A specific correctness issue with this behavior is that the entire block is copied to the clipboard as a tab literal if you select any of it, so two different visual selection ranges can produce the same clipboard content.
This particular behavior can be improved with "user-select: all", to instruct browsers to select the entire element as a single logical element. Now, selecting part of the tab selects the whole thing, as though it were really a tab literal.
(Some future change might abandon this approach and opt to use real tab literals with "tab-size" CSS, but we lose some ability to control alignment behavior if we do that and it doesn't have any obvious advantages over this approach other than cursor selection behavior.)
Test Plan:
- In Safari and Firefox, dragged text to select a whitespace-expanded tab literal. Saw browsers select the whole sequence as though it were a single tab.
- In Chorme, this also mostly works, but there's some glitchiness and flickering. I think this is still a net improvement, it's just not as smooth as Safari and Firefox.
Maniphest Tasks: T2495
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21419
Summary:
See PHI1810. In situations where:
- An author submits an urgent change for review.
- The author pings reviewers to ask them to look at it.
...the reviewers may not be able to move the review forward if the review is currently a "Draft". They can only "Commandeer" or ask the author to "Request Review" as ways forward.
Although I'm hesitant to support review actions (particularly, "Accept") on draft revisions, I think there's no harm in allowing reviewers to skip tests and promote the revision out of draft as an explicit action.
Additionally, lightly specialize some of the transaction strings to distinguish between "request review from draft" and other state transitions.
Test Plan:
- As an author, used "Request Review" to promote a draft and to return a change to reviewers for consideration. These behaviors are unchanged, except "promote a draft" has different timeline text.
- As a non-author, used "Begin Review" to promote a draft.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21403
Summary:
Currently, adding subscribers to a draft revision raises a warning that they won't get an email/notification.
This warning has some false positives:
- it triggers on any subscriber change, including removing subscribers; and
- it triggers if you're only adding yourself as a subscriber.
Narrow the scope of the warning so it is raised only if you're adding a subscriber other than yourself.
Test Plan:
- Added a non-self subscriber, got the warning as before.
- Added self as a subscriber, no warning (previously: warning).
- Removed a subscriber, no warning (previously: warning).
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21402
Summary:
See PHI1810. Build toward support for "Request Review" by non-authors on drafts, to forcefully pull a revision out of draft.
Currently, some action strings can't vary based on revision state or the current viewer, so this "pull out of draft" action would have to either: say "Request Review"; or be a totally separate action.
Neither seem great, so allow the labels and messages to vary based on the viewer and revision state.
Test Plan: Grepped for affected symbols, see followup changes.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21401
Summary:
Modern Mercurial may emit some more patterns under "--debug".
This whole list is gross and can likely now be eliminated by increasing the minimum required Mercurial version (as `arc` has), but just paper over it for now.
Test Plan:
Locally, saw some views return to functional behavior that weren't previously working on a modern version of Mercurial.
The reproduction case is likely something in the vein of "repository is not writable by webserver, look at history view".
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21398
Summary:
See PHI1809. This query may join the "slug" table, but each project may have multiple slugs, and the query does not "GROUP BY" when this join occurs.
This may lead to partial result sets and unusual paging behavior.
This could likely be caught categorically in `loadAllFromArray()`; I'll adjust this in a followup.
Test Plan:
A minimal reproduction case is something like:
- Give project P slugs: a, b, c.
- Give project Q slugs: d.
- Query for slugs: a, b, c, d; with limit 2.
- Order the query so P returns first.
- Expect: P and Q.
- Actual: P generates 3 raw rows and the final result is just P with no pagination cursor.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21399
Summary:
A handful of Phacility production shards have run into memory pressure issues recently. Although there's no smoking gun, and at least two other plausible contributors, one possible concern is that the Fact daemon was written before hibernation and can not currently hibernate. Even if there's no memory leak, this creates unnecessary memory pressure by holding the processes in memory.
Allow the Fact daemon to hibernate, like other daemons do.
Test Plan: Ran "bin/phd debug fact", saw the Fact daemon hibernate.
Subscribers: yelirekim
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21389
Summary: Ref T13546. Companion change to D21372. Move URI normalization code to Arcanist to we can more-often resolve remote URIs correctly.
Test Plan: Grepped for affected symbols.
Maniphest Tasks: T13546
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21373
Summary:
See PHI1794, which reports an issue where a large number of queued webhook calls led to connection exhaustion. To make this easier to reproduce and test, add "--count" and "--background" flags to "bin/webhook call".
This primarily supports "bin/webook call ... --background --count 10000" to quickly fill the queue with a bunch of calls.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/webhook call` in foreground and background modes, with and without counts. Saw appropriate console and queue behavior.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21368
Summary:
The "Export Data" workflow incorrectly uses the "Policy Favorites" setting to choose a default export format. This is just a copy/paste error; the correct setting exists and is unused.
If the setting value is an array (as the "Policy Favorites" value often is), we try to use it as an array index. This generates a runtime exception after D21044.
```
[2020-06-16 06:32:12] EXCEPTION: (RuntimeException) Illegal offset type in isset or empty at [<arcanist>/src/error/PhutilErrorHandler.php:263]
#0 <#2> PhutilErrorHandler::handleError(integer, string, string, integer, array) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/search/controller/PhabricatorApplicationSearchController.php:460]
```
- Use the correct setting.
- Make sure the value we read is a string.
Test Plan:
- Used "Export Data" with a nonempty, array-valued "Policy Favorites" setting.
- Before: runtime exception.
- After: clean export.
- Used "Export Data" again, saw my selection from the first time persisted.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21361
Summary: Ref T13546. This makes some "arc" tasks a little easier, and will make them more correct if "arc" ever switches to using SSH.
Test Plan: Ran "harbormaster.buildable.search" from the web UI, saw URIs in the result set.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13546
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21346
Summary:
Currently, Phortune attempts to prevent users from removing themselves as account managers. It does this by checking that the new list includes them.
Usually this is sufficient, because you can't normally edit an account unless you're already a manager. However, we get the wrong result (incorrect rejection of the edit) if the actor is omnipotent and the acting user was not already a member.
It's okay to edit an account into a state which doesn't include you if you have permission to edit the account and aren't already a manager.
Specifically, this supports more formal tooling around staff modifications to billing accounts, where the actor has staff-omnipotence and the acting user is a staff member and only used for purposes of leaving a useful audit trail.
Test Plan: Elsewhere, ran staff tooling to modify accounts and was able to act as "alice" to add "bailey", even though "alice" was not herself a manager.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21288
Summary:
Ref T13513. An inline is not considered empty if it has a suggestion, but some of the shared transaction code doesn't test for this properly.
Update the shared transaction code to be aware that application comments may have more complex emptiness rules.
Test Plan:
- Posted an inline with only an edit suggestion, comment went through.
- Tried to post a normal empty comment, got an appropriate warning.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21287
Summary:
Ref T13541. The passthru future does not have time limit behavior, so if we reach this code we currently fail.
Phabricator never reaches this code normally, but this code is reachable during debugging if you try to foreground a slow fetch to inspect it.
Passthru commands generally only make sense to run interactively, and the caller or control script can enforce their own timeouts (usually by pressing "^C" with their fingers).
Test Plan: Used a debugging script to run ref-by-ref fetches in the foreground.
Maniphest Tasks: T13541
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21284
Summary:
See PHI1752.
- Early exit of document layout can cause us to fail to populate available rows.
- Some Jupyter documents have "markdown" cells with plain strings, apparently.
Test Plan: Successfully rendered example diff from PHI1752.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21285
Summary:
Ref PHI1749. Instead of opening files to the last unchanged line on either side of the change, open files to the "simple" line number of the selected block.
For inlines, this is the inline line number.
For blocks, this is the first new-file line number, or the first old-file line number if no new-file line number exists in the block.
This may not always be what the user is hoping for (we can't know what the state of their working copy is) but should produce more obvious behavior.
Test Plan:
- In Diffusion, used "Open in Editor" with and without line selections. Saw same behavior as before.
- Used "n" and "r" to leave an inline with the keyboard, saw same behavior as before.
- Used "\" and "Open in Editor" menu item to open a file with:
- Nothing selected or changeset selected (line: 1).
- An inline selected (line: inline line).
- A block selected (line: first line in block, per above).
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21282
Summary: Ref T13276. Ref T13513. All readers and writers were removed more than a year ago; clean up the last remnants of this table.
Test Plan: Grepped for table references, found none.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13513, T13276
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21281
Summary:
Ref T13513. Syntax highlighting is potentially expensive, and the changeset rendering pipeline can cache it. However, the cache is currently keyed ONLY by Differential changeset ID.
Destroy the existing cache and rebuild it with a more standard cache key so it can be used in a more ad-hoc way by inline suggestion snippets.
Test Plan: Used Darkconsole, saw cache hits and no more inline syntax highlighting for changesets with many inlines.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21280
Summary: Ref T13513. Inline comment context information is somewhat expensive to construct and can be cached. Add a readthrough cache on top of it.
Test Plan: Loaded a source code changeset with many inline comments, used Darkconsole to inspect query activity. Saw caches get populated. Updated cache key, saw caches regenerate. Browsed Diffusion, nothing looked broken.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21279
Summary: Ref T13513. For now, I'm not supporting inline edit suggestions in Diffusion, although it's likely not difficult to do so in the future. Clean up some of the code so that plain ol' inlines work the same way they did before.
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines in Diffusion: familiar old behavior.
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines with suggestions in Differential: familiar new behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21278
Summary: Ref T13513. When rendering an inline suggestion for display, use highlighting and diffing.
Test Plan: {F7495053}
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21277
Summary:
Ref T13513. This still has quite a few rough edges and some significant performance isssues, but appears to mostly work.
Allow reviewers to "Suggest Edit" on an inline comment and provide replacement text for the highlighted source.
Test Plan: Created, edited, reloaded, and submitted inline comments in various states with and without suggestion text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21276
Summary:
Ref T13513. If your 10 most recently authored inlines have all been deleted, these queries can fail by overheating. This is silly and probably rarely happens outside of development.
For now, just let them overheat. This may create a false negative (incorrect "no draft" signal when the real condition is "drafts, but 10 most recent comments were deleted"). This could be sorted out later with a query mode like "executeAny()", perhaps.
Test Plan:
- Created and deleted 10 inlines.
- Submitted comments.
- Before: overheating fatal during draft flag generation.
- After: clean submission.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21274
Summary: See PHI1745. This callsite for "ChangesetParser" was not properly updated for recent changes.
Test Plan:
- Set `metamta.differential.inline-patches` to 100.
- Created a new revision with a small (<100 line) diff, with at least one reviewer.
- Ran `bin/phd debug` and observed outbound mail queue with `bin/mail list-outbound`.
- Before: fatal when trying to generate the inline changes for mail.
- After: clean mail generation.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21270
Summary: See PHI1743. If a build has no initiator PHID, the rendering pathway incorrectly tries to access a handle for it anyway.
Test Plan:
- Set a build to have no initiator PHID.
- Viewed the build plan for the build.
- Before: fatal when trying to access the `null` handle.
- After: clean build plan rendering.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21269
Summary:
Fixes T13539. See that task for discussion and a reproduction case.
This algorithm currently counts "\ No newline at end of file" lines as though they were normal source lines. This can cause offset issues in the rare case that a diff contains two of these lines (for each side of the file) and has changes between them (because the last line of the file was modified between the diffs).
Instead, don't count "\" as a display line.
Test Plan:
- See T13539 and PHI1740.
- Before: got fatals on the "wild" diff and the synthetic simplified version.
- After: clean intradiff rendering in both cases.
Maniphest Tasks: T13539
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21267
Summary:
Ref T13538. See PHI1739. Synthetic Git commits with no author and/or no commit message currently extract `null` and then fail to parse.
Ideally, we would carefully distinguish between `null` and empty string. In practice, that requires significant schema changes (these columns are non-nullable and have indexing requirements) and these cases are degenerate. These commits are challenging to build and can not normally be constructed with `git commit`.
At least for now, merge the `null` cases into the empty string cases so we can survive import.
Test Plan:
- Constructed a commit with no author and no commit message using the approach described in T13538; pushed and parsed it.
- Before: fatals during identity selection and storing the commit message (both roughly NULL inserts into non-null columns).
- After: clean import.
This produces a less-than-ideal UI in Diffusion, but it doesn't break anything:
{F7492094}
Maniphest Tasks: T13538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21266
Summary:
Fixes T13536. See that task for discussion.
Older versions of MySQL (roughly, prior to 8.0.19) emit "int(10)" types. Newer versions emit "int" types. Accept these as equivalent.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade --force` against MySQL 8.0.11 and 8.0.20. Got clean adjustment lists on both versions.
Maniphest Tasks: T13536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21265
Summary: On the "New User" web workflow, if you use an invalid email address, you get a failure with an empty message.
Test Plan:
- Before: Tried to create a new user with address "asdf". Got no specific guidance.
- After: Got specific guidance about email address formatting and length.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21264
Summary:
Ref T13529. Now that instances can be renamed, an instance may have multiple valid SSH usernames and the preferred SSH username may not be the intenal instance name.
`PhacilitySiteSource` should already always set `diffusion.ssh-username` correctly, to the current preferred SSH username (which may be "new-name" after a rename from "old-name"), so we should never be able to reach this code without an accurate `diffusion.ssh-username` value available.
The code to resolve names into instances also already works for both "ssh old-name@..." and "ssh new-name@...".
So I believe this code has no beneficial effects and only causes harm: it may force us to return "old-name" when falling through would correctly return "new-name".
Test Plan:
- Previously: renamed an instance, then SSH'd to it using both the old and new names. Both work.
- Previously: verified that `diffusion.ssh-username` is set correctly after a rename.
- Verified that Diffusion "Clone" UI now shows "new-name" after an instance rename.
- The real question here is: does this break something I'm not thinking of? And the change probably has to go to production to answer that.
Maniphest Tasks: T13529
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21259
Summary:
Ref T13513. The way I'm highlighting lines won't work for Jupyter notebooks or other complex content blocks, and I don't see an obvious way to make it work that's reasonably robust.
However, we can just ignore the range behavior for complex content and treat the entire block as selected. This isn't quite as fancy as the source behavior, but pretty good.
Also, adjust unified diff behavior to work correctly with highlighting and range selection.
Test Plan:
- Used range selection in a Jupyter notebook, got reasonable behavior (range is treated as "entire block").
- Used range selection in a unified diff, got equivalent behavior to 2-up diffs.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21257
Summary:
Ref T13513. Give selected inlines a selection state and visual cues which are similar to the changeset selection state.
Also fix a couple of minor issues with select interactions and offset comments.
Test Plan: Selected inlines, saw obvious visual cues.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21256
Summary:
Ref T13513. When a user selects a text range and uses "New Inline Comment" to create a comment directly from a range, store the offset information alongside the comment.
When hovering the comment, highlight the original range.
Test Plan: {F7480926, size=full}
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21250
