Summary: Fixes T8464. We could lose the additional users from "Send an email..." rules //if// Herald did not apply any other transactions to the task.
Test Plan:
- Destroyed all Herald rules.
- Created a single "Send an email to..." rule.
- Created a task.
- Saw target get an email.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8464
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13245
Summary:
Ref T8449. Try out some more subtle behaviors:
- Make the "Space" control part of the policy control, so the UI shows "Visible To: [Space][Policy]". I think this helps make the role of spaces more clear. It also makes them easier to implement.
- Don't show the default space in headers: instead, show nothing.
- If the user has access to only one space, pretend spaces don't exist (no edit controls, no header stuff).
This might be confusing, but I think most of the time it will all align fairly well with user expectation.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a list of pastes (saw Space with non-default space, no space with default space, no space with user in only one space).
- Viewed a paste (saw Space with non-default space, saw no space with default space, saw no space with user in only one space).
- Edited spaces on objects (control as privileged user, no control as locked user).
- Created a new paste in a space (got space select as privileged user, no select as locked user).
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8449
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13229
Summary:
Fixes T8483. I did this incorrectly in D13159, by doing it correctly first and then editing it carelessly. For most transaction types, it didn't matter, but did for inline state.
Also, clean up any bad inline state transactions.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration, bad transactions vanished.
- Marked some inline comments as done.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8483
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13226
Summary: Now that Users implement PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface, we try to write an inverse edge. At least for now, we should retain the old behavior instead.
Test Plan:
- Unit tests which cover this stuff pass again.
- Grepped for other `instanceof PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface`, the all seemed either benign or irrelevant.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13215
Summary:
Fixes T8464. We could incorrectly use a cached value when computing CC's.
Just load a fresh value. There are no other callers that would benefit from this cache, so it's more complicated to reload it correctly prior to publishing than to just skip it.
Also make the PHID headers unique.
Test Plan:
- Verified that users received mail about the transactions which caused them to be added to an object.
- Veirfied that headers no longer have redundant values.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8464
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13206
Summary:
Ref T8424. This adds crude integration with Paste's edit/view workflows: you can change the space a Paste appears in, see transactions, and get a policy callout.
Lots of rough edges and non-obviousness but it pretty much works.
Test Plan:
- Created and updated Pastes.
- Moved them between spaces, saw policy effects.
- Read transactions.
- Looked at feed.
- Faked query to return no spaces, saw control and other stuff vanish.
- Faked query to return no spaces, created pastes.
- Tried to submit bad values and got errors.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13159
Summary: Ref T6367.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Sent mail to A (en_US) and B (en_A*).
- Got one mail in English and one mail in ENGLISH.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13142
Summary:
Ref T6367. Removes `multiplexMail()`!
We can't pass a single body into a function which splits it anymore: we need to split recipients first, then build bodies for each recipient list. This lets us build separate bodies for each recipient's individual translation/access levels.
The new logic does this:
- First, split recipients into groups called "targets".
- Each target corresponds to one actual mail we're going to build.
- Each target has a viewer (whose translation / access levels will be used to generate the mail).
- Each target has a to/cc list (the users who we'll ultimately send the mail to).
- For each target, build a custom mail body based on the viewer's access levels and settings (language prefs not actually implemented).
- Then, deliver the mail.
Test Plan:
- Read new config help.
Then did a bunch of testing, primarily with `bin/mail list-outbound` and `bin/mail show-outbound` (to review generated mail), `bin/phd debug taskmaster` (to run daemons freely) and `bin/worker execute --id <id>` (to repeatedly test a specific piece of code after identifying an issue).
With `one-mail-per-recipient` on (default):
- Sent mail to multiple users.
- Verified mail showed up in `mail list-outbound`.
- Examined mail with `mail show-outbound`.
- Added a project that a subscriber could not see.
- Verified it was not present in `X-Phabricator-Projects`.
- Verified it was rendered as "Restricted Project" for the non-permissioned viewer.
- Added a subscriber, then changed the object policy so they could not see it and sent mail.
- Verified I received mail but the other user did not.
- Enabled public replies and verified mail generated with public addresses.
- Disabld public replies and verified mail generated with private addresses.
With `one-mail-per-recipient` off:
- Verified that one mail is sent to all recipients.
- Verified users who can not see the object are still filtered.
- Verified that partially-visible projects are completely visible in the mail (this violates policies, as documented, as the best available compromise).
- Enabled public replies and verified the mail generated with "Reply To".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: carlsverre, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13131
Summary:
Ref T6367. Do all mail, feed, notification and search stuff from the daemons, in all editors.
There are four relatively-stateful editors (Audit, Differential, Phriction, PhortuneCart) which needed special care to move state into the daemons properly.
Beyond that, I moved mailTo/mailCC/feedRelated/feedNotify to be computed before we enter the worker:
- This is simpler, since a lot of editors rely on being able to call `$object->getReviewers()` or similar to compute them.
- This is more correct, since we want to freeze the lists at this moment in time.
Finally, I renamed `loadEdges` to `willPublish` and made it a slightly more general hook.
---
This is a bit fragile and I'm not //thrilled// about it.
It would probably be cleaner to have separate Editor and Publisher classes (something like @fabe's D11329 did). However, I think that's quite a lot of work, and I'd like to see stronger motivation for it (either in this actually being more fragile than I think, or there being other things we get out of it). Overall, I'm comfortable with this change, just definitely not a big fan of the "save" + "load" pattern since I think it's really fragile, nonobvious, hard to debug/predict, etc.
Test Plan:
Directly updated editors:
- Created a new Phriction page, saw "Document Content".
- Edited a Phriction page, saw "Document Diff".
- Edited a revision, got normal looking mail.
- Faked in `changedPriorToCommitURI` and verified it survived the state boundary.
- Sent Audit mail.
- Sent invoice mail.
Indirect editors - for these, I just made a change and made sure the mail generated:
- Updated a paste.
- Updated an event.
- Updated a thread.
- Updated a task.
- Updated a mock.
- Updated a question.
- Updated a project.
- Updated a file.
- Updated an initiative.
- Updated a Legalpad document.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, fabe
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13115
Summary:
Ref T6367. This is similar to D11329, but not quite as ambitious.
Allow Editors to implement `supportsWorkers()` and move their publishing work into a daemon. So far, only Paste supports this.
Most of the complexity here is saving and restoring state across the barrier between the web process and the worker process, but I think this is ~90% of it and then we'll pick up a couple of random things in applications.
I'm primarily trying to keep this as gradual as possible.
Test Plan:
- Published transactions with and without daemon support.
- Looked at mail, feed.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: fabe, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13107
Summary: Fixes T8329. I was able to figure out a reasonable way to have the full conpherence default to the email settings panel. I think this is cleaner than making things a dialogue as I rambled about in the description for T8329.
Test Plan: using /bin/mail to verify correct email links were generated for conpherence notifications and maniphest (general) notifications.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8329
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13058
Summary: Fixes T6403. Remaining built-ins were already built-in effectively so this is a small re-factor plus some docs. I probably wouldn't have written anything if not for the TODO so please feel free to tell me to write something else or what have you.
Test Plan: NA since this didn't actually change anything.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12937
Summary: Ref XXXXX. I broke things a bit in XXXXX in that if the TYPE_EDGE had an inverse transaction, we weren't correctly "doing nothing" and instead were falling back to our old every editor has to implement a no-op ways... Fix things by putting the TYPE_EDGE code in the handle external builtin function like it belongs.
Test Plan: made a comment on a task referencng a commit successfully
Reviewers: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12939
Summary: Ref T6403. This was actually simple stuff.
Test Plan: changed the edit policy of a paste. changed the edit and join policy of a phame blog.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12933
Summary: Ref T6403. Conpherence keeps track of comments for message counts so we needed some special attention there. Otherwise, straight-forward.
Test Plan: left a comment on a diff with inline comments. sent messages in conpherence successfully. verified unread count incremented correctly for sent messages for users.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12932
Summary: Ref T6403. This one was pretty easy since no one does anything custom with subscribers.
Test Plan: subscribed / unscribed to a random commit ("audit"). joined / left, watched / unwatched a project
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12930
Summary: Ref T6403. This does TYPE_EDGE since I just had to deal with T8252. Look like this fixes a few editors (maybe) that would have had fatals with mentions like slowvote and ponder.
Test Plan: made a phame post mentioning a task and it worked! joined / left a project, watched / unwatched a project and that worked! blind faith for other sites.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12929
Summary:
...which lets all the fancy settings for Email | Notify | Off be possible. Fixes T8164. Wasn't too sure the best way to break things up but members vs watchers felt meaningful to break out to me.
Also fixes a small bug where we were generating bad slug updated stories by messing with the signature of the slug data. Perhaps this fix isn't even good enough (the array_keys()) call and instead we'll need to implement transaction has effect and do a sort?
Test Plan: used ./bin/mail list-outbound and ./bin/mail show-outbound --id XX to verify reasonable emails were being generated. saw new preferences in settings.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12868
Summary:
Ref T8021.
- When "All Day" events are loaded, convert them into the viewer's time.
- When "All Day" events are saved, convert them into a +24 hour range.
Test Plan:
- Created and updated "All Day" events.
- Created and updated normal events.
- Changed timezones, edited and viewed "All Day" events and normal events.
- In all cases, "All Day" events appeared to be 12:00AM - 11:59:59PM to the viewer, on the correct day.
- Normal events shifted around properly according to timezones.
Reviewers: lpriestley
Reviewed By: lpriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12765
Summary: Closes T8023, Calendar event edit view should validate that start time preceeds end time .
Test Plan: Create Calendar event, add details, make end time be earlier than start time, try to save, get error, make sure all previously entered details are populated correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8023
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12656
Summary: Fixes T7756. This is the last little stray bit, though finishing T7757 also helps this feature IMO.
Test Plan: said "ZXX is the best" in comment on DXX and saw proper mention transaction on ZXX
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7756
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12405
Summary:
Fixes T7731. When a user writes a "Send me an email" rule, always try send them an email, even if their notification settings would normally downgrade it to a notification.
In particular, this is stronger than these downgrades:
- Downgrades due to "self actions";
- downgrades due to "mail tags".
Test Plan:
- Wrote various Herald rules with "Send me an email" rules.
- Used `bin/mail list-outbound` / `show-outbound` to vet generated mail.
- Mail reacted properly to a variety of conditions (disabled accounts, settings, "send me an email" rule, forced delivery).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12300
Summary:
Ref T7199. Although this is useful for discovery, it's un-useful enough that we already have an option to disable it, and most applications do not provide any meaningful instructions.
Throwing it away makes it easier to move forward and lets us get rid of a config option.
This is becoming a more advanced/power-user feature anyway, and the new syntax will be significantly more complex and hard to explain with a one-liner. I'm currently thinking that I'll maybe make the "help" menu a dropdown and give it some options like:
+---+
| O |
+---+---------------------+
| Maniphest Documentation |
| Maniphest Email Actions |
+-------------------------+
Then you click the "Email Actions" thing and get a runtime-derived list of available options. Not sure if I'll actually build that, but I think we can fairly throw the in-mail instructions away even if we don't go in that specific direction.
Test Plan: Grepped for `replyHandlerInstructions`, got no hits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12229
Summary:
Ref T7585. This implements everything specified, with a few caveats
- since rooms you have yet to join can't be viewed in the column yet, the column view has some bugs and isn't expected to work.
- the room you're looking at is just pre-pending to the top of the "recent" list
Test Plan: made a room that no one could join. verified when viewing that there was no comment ui. made a room that others could join. verified folks who had yet to join had a "join" button with an area for text. tried joining with / without message text and it worked in both cases
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7585
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12149
Summary:
Ref T1460. Ref T6403. Replace `Diffusion::INLINEDONE` with `Transactions::INLINESTATE` and generalize things enough that we can lift it into core.
The next change will lift Differential's similar implementation into the core.
Also start implementing a fix for T6403, providing an alternate hook for optional builtin transactions.
Test Plan: Changed inline state in Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12129
Summary: This ended up having a different signature; the discrepancy can cause a warning.
Test Plan: No more warning.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11971
Summary: The participant list can sometimes be `null`, which fails when we try to `array_fuse()` it.
Test Plan: Created a new thread cleanly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11969
Summary:
Ref T6516. Although this behavior is somewhat-arguable as desirable, I think it's less surprising and more consistent to disable mentions when a repository is publishing.
In particular, if you import a repository developed on another Phabricator install, this stops all the `T123` in commit messages from creating mentions on your unrelated `T123` tasks.
We already disable autoclose, so `Closes T123` and `Ref T123` already have no effect, but a bare `T123` would generate a mention. Likewise, `@epriestley` would generate a mention.
If you import such a repository and then update it periodically, updates will activate autoclose and publishing (if you didn't disable them), but presumably this will hit a couple of tasks and you'll go change the settings if you forgot.
At some point, we may have some kind of use case for separating the "publish" setting into a "publish" setting and a "this is a local repository" setting. For example, if you work at Widget Corp, want to import Phabricator locally, //and// want to write Herald rules against it, you can't currently configure the repository to let you do all of this. But we haven't actually seen a use case for this yet.
Test Plan:
- Pushed some commits with bare `T11`, saw mentions.
- Disabled publishing for the repository, pushed some commits with
- Imported a bunch of commits without seeing pipeline failures.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6516
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11966
Summary: Fixes T6819. This isn't as useful as you might think and has one horribly buggy behavior - if you edit an object which has a description and a projects field, you can be unable to remove the associated project as the automagic association from the description kicks in. Further, since we've added the ability for applications to create multiple email addresses AND herald can react to those emails - say by programmatically adding projects - the known needs for this feature are basically 0. If this proves to be false we can maybe add some other syntax for these mentions - see T6819 for ideas / discussion.
Test Plan: removed a project from a maniphest task while still mentioning it in the description and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11573
Summary: due to typehints, passing null is going to barf here. Ref D11564, ref T5039.
Test Plan: made an edit to a task from the web ui and it didnt fatal
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11571
Summary:
Fixes T5039. The trick / possibly lame part here is we only match 1 application email and its undefined which one. e.g. if a user emails us at address x, y, and z only one of those will pick up the mail. Ergo, don't let users define non-sensical herald conditions like "matches all". Also document what I think was non-intuitive about the code with an inline comment; we have to return an array with just a phid from an object and out of context it feels very "what the...???"
Note this needs to be deployed to other applications still, but I think its okay to close T5039 aggressively here since its done from a user story perspective.
Test Plan: set up a herald rule to flag tasks created as blue via app email x. sent an email to x via `bin/mail receive-test` and verified the task had the blue flag
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11564
Summary: Ref T6962. Mainly accomplished by re-factoring the base editor `buildMailBody` function and then using it differently in the `DifferentialTransactionEditor`.
Test Plan: commented on a revision leaving inline feedback. inspected via bin/mail and it looked good! also made a maniphest comment and checked that email, which still looked good.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6962
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11402
Summary:
Ref T3165. Builds a dedicated index for Conpherence to avoid scale/policy filtering concerns.
- This is pretty one-off but I think it's generally OK.
- There's no UI for it.
- `ConpherenceFulltextQuery` is very low-level. You would need to do another query on the PHIDs it returns to actually show anything to the user.
- The `previousTransactionPHID` is so you can load chat context efficiently. Specifically, if you want to show results like this:
> previous line of context
> **line of chat that matches the query**
> next line of context
...you can read the previous lines out of `previousTransactionPHID` directly, and the next lines by issuing one query with `WHERE previousTransactionPHID IN (...)`.
I'm not 100% sure this is useful, but it seemed like a reasonable thing to provide, since there's no way to query this efficiently otherwise and I figure a lot of chat might make way more sense with a couple of lines of context.
Test Plan:
- Indexed a thread manually (whole thing indexed).
- Indexed a thread by updating it (just the new comment indexed).
- Wrote a hacky test script and got reasonable-looking query results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3165
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11234
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary:
Ref T4411
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for this as it will be difficult to provide proper user feedback of why we removed a particular subscriber.
Is the ApplicationTransactionEditor generally the right place to extract mentioned phids in comments?
On the other hand in some cases we cannot really give user feedback why a user was not subscribed (e.g.: commits & diffs)
Adding a diff to a repo where the user mentioned has no view permissions the subscriber is currently still added. Still would have to find where this is donet...
Any other places?
Unrelated: Is there any way to remove a subscriber from a commit/audit ?
Test Plan:
- Edited tasks with the mentioned user having view permissions to this specific task and without
- Raised concern with a commit and commented on the audit with the user having view permissions to the repo and without
- Added a commit to a repo with and without the mentioned user having permissions
- Mention a user in a task & commit comment with and without permissions
- Mentioning a user in a diff description & comments with and without permissions to the specific diff
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4411
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11049
Summary: These classes are named differently from other `PhabricatorEdgeType` subclasses. Rename them for consistency.
Test Plan: I would expect the linter to complain if I missed anything.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11112
Summary: Fixes T6727. Repro is: mention a task on another task, in a comment.
The inverse edge editor applying the "alincoln mentioned this in <other task>" transaction doesn't have enough data to execute Herald rules.
Just don't try to execute the rules, since they don't make much sesne from a product perspective and are tricky from a technical perspective.
Test Plan: Commented on `T1` with `T2` in comment body and a Herald rule that examines subscribers.
Reviewers: btrahan
NOTE: Cowboy committing this since any task mention fatals.
Summary: Only necessary for edits, only bother if the comment version is greater than 1. Ref T6690. This is another way to fix T6690 -- this check will never run since you can't edit a conpherence comment -- **but** the fix already applied should happen too to future proof Conpherence.
Test Plan: made a comment on a diff - success. edited the comment and mentions were generated.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10928
Summary: Fixes T6648. We do some automagical hotness based on the text you enter in remarkup textareas - e.g. adding projects or mentioning other objects. Refine the code here so that even when just editing a comment we build these transactions and apply them.
Test Plan: edited a comment and noted new mentions and projects showed up appropriately...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10922
Summary: Ref T1217, Add link to email preferences to email template
Test Plan: Add comment to object like Maniphest task, check that email has a footer with a link to email preferences.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10883
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.
Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
Summary: Fixes T6059.
Test Plan: Made a comment on TX mentioning TX and TX+1. TX did not get a "mentioned" transaction while TX+1 did.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6059
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10464
Summary: Fixes T4036. Now if you say something on diff X like "This reminds me of Tx and Dy and commitHashFoo and Px." each of those objects gets a little visible transaction that the mention occurred. No feed, email, or notifications.
Test Plan: made a comment like above and verified transactions. also submitted a diff that "Fixes Tx" and Tx did not get the transaction as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4036
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10451
Summary: Fixes T6037. We don't currently write the "this file is attached to such-and-such object" edge on comment edits.
Test Plan: Edited a comment, adding `{Fnnn}`. Verified file was not attached before the edit, but was afterward.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6037
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10423
Summary:
Added support for side-by-side HTML and plaintext email building.
We can control if the HTML stuff is sent by by a new config, metamta.html-emails
Test Plan:
Been running this in our deployment for a few months now.
====Well behaved clients====
- Gmail
- Mail.app
====Bad clients====
- [[ http://airmailapp.com/ | Airmail ]]. They confuse Gmail too, though.
====Need testing====
- Outlook (Windows + Mac)
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: webframp, taoqiping, chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9375
