Summary:
Fixes T8547. I wasn't immediately able to reproduce this locally (although I didn't try too hard), but I think the issue is that when atoms extend ghosts (probably they are usually ghosts themselves?), we try to check the ghost language and fatal.
Instead, don't match ghosts when figuring out what an atom extends.
This could maybe be a little cleaner (match the ghosts, at lower priority, and show that they're ghosts?) but I'm not sure there's a real product use case for it, and this looks like a safer way to stop the bleeding for now.
Test Plan: Poked around Diviner locally.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8547
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13300
Summary:
Fixes T8548. This needs to be cleaned up more generally at some point, but stop the bleeding for now.
If a thread member is invited to an event with a non-thread-member host, we try to render the host but don't have their handle (this is a holdover from the bygone days of events as statuses).
For now, just don't render anything. In the future, it might be nice to render (some of?) the attendees who are thread members, but I suspect we may revisit this widget more generally.
Test Plan:
- As a non thread-member, created an event and invited a thread member.
- Viewed thread as thread-member.
- Saw widget fatal.
- Applied patch.
- As thread-member, saw widget render with just "9AM-10AM", instead of "host, 9AM-10AM".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8548
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13299
Summary: Fixes T8551, Creating a recurring event should save it as a recurring event
Test Plan: Before patch: -create an event -flag as recurring -save -Result: event is not recurring -After patch Result: event saves as recurring.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13302
Summary: Ref T8362, Date controls should respect user time preferences
Test Plan: Set user time preference to 24-hour format, create an event, type 23 in time input, 23:00 should be suggested. Saveing a 24-hour format time should save correctly.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8362
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13291
Summary: Ref T8362, Make event lists respect the user preference for time format
Test Plan: Set time format preference to 24-hour format, open Calendar month view, all events should show time tips in 24-hour format.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8362
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13290
Summary: Ref T8362, Add date format preference and respect it in date selection controls
Test Plan: Set date format preference in the user settings panels, create new event, select new start date in the correct format.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: jasonrumney, eadler, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8362
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13262
Summary: I think that I've caught the bulk of these issues now.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13296
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary:
This translation string is wrong and causes the following warning when running unit tests:
```
[2015-06-15 16:03:41] ERROR 2: vsprintf(): Too few arguments at [/home/joshua/workspace/github.com/phacility/libphutil/src/internationalization/PhutilTranslator.php:95]
arcanist(head=master, ref.master=956bfa701c36), phabricator(head=master, ref.master=80f11427e576), phutil(head=master, ref.master=3ff84448a916)
#0 vsprintf(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/internationalization/PhutilTranslator.php:95]
#1 PhutilTranslator::translate(string)
#2 call_user_func_array(array, array) called at [<phutil>/src/internationalization/pht.php:17]
#3 pht(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthStartController.php:75]
#4 PhabricatorAuthStartController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/AphrontController.php:69]
#5 AphrontController::delegateToController(PhabricatorAuthStartController) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/base/controller/PhabricatorController.php:213]
#6 PhabricatorController::willBeginExecution() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/base/controller/__tests__/PhabricatorAccessControlTestCase.php:270]
#7 PhabricatorAccessControlTestCase::checkAccess(string, PhabricatorTestController, AphrontRequest, array, array) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/base/controller/__tests__/PhabricatorAccessControlTestCase.php:112]
#8 PhabricatorAccessControlTestCase::testControllerAccessControls()
#9 call_user_func_array(array, array) called at [<arcanist>/src/unit/engine/phutil/PhutilTestCase.php:492]
#10 PhutilTestCase::run() called at [<arcanist>/src/unit/engine/PhutilUnitTestEngine.php:65]
#11 PhutilUnitTestEngine::run() called at [<arcanist>/src/workflow/ArcanistUnitWorkflow.php:186]
#12 ArcanistUnitWorkflow::run() called at [<arcanist>/scripts/arcanist.php:382]
```
Test Plan: `arc lint`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, chad
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13292
Summary:
Ref T4345. This error is per object-type in the query implementations, not a mail/permissions issue.
Without `didRejectResult()`, we can't distinguish between "restricted" and "unknown" for objects filtered by `willFilterPage()`.
- Call `didRejectResult()` on commits.
- Make `didRejectResult()` handle both existing policy exceptions and filtering.
- Recover from partial objects (like commits) which are missing attached data required to figure out policies.
Test Plan: Saw "Restricted Diffusion Commit" instead of "Unknown Object (Diffusion Commit)" when viewing nonvisible commit handle in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13289
Summary: This `break` statement causes `./bin/hunks migrate` to only migrate one-hunk-at-a-time, which is unnecessary and slightly misleading. Instead, allow the script to migrate //all// legacy hunks to modern storage. In particular, this means that we can recommend that installs run this command sometime before D13222 is landed.
Test Plan: It's a pain to setup the data necessary to test this, but this is identical to the change that I made on our production install when I migrated our hunk storage.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13288
Summary: Remove backticks from SQL statements for consistency. In //most// places, we don't use backticks around table/field names, so at least be consistent about this.
Test Plan: Learned what backticks are used for in MySQL.
Reviewers: eadler, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: eadler, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13267
Summary: This should (hopefully) be the last one of these since D13185 has landed.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13284
Summary: Add the language specification to code blocks in documentation.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13277
Summary: I don't believe that any subclass should override these methods.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13265
Summary: Ref T4558. When publishing a new Diviner book, use the most-open policy instead of `PhabricatorPolicies::POLICY_USER`.
Test Plan: Ran `diviner generate` in a directory which didn't have published Diviner documentation.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4558
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13254
Summary:
Ref T5681. Getting this to work correctly is a bit tricky, mostly because of the policy checks we do prior to applying an edit.
I think I came up with a mostly-reasonable approach, although it's a little bit gross. It uses `spl_object_hash()` so it shouldn't be able to do anything bad/dangerous (the hints are strictly bound to the hinted object, which is a clone that we destroy moments later).
Test Plan:
- Added + ran a unit test.
- Created a task with a "Subscribers" policy with me as a subscriber (without the hint stuff, this isn't possible: since you aren't a subscriber *yet*, you get a "you won't be able to see it" error).
- Unsubscribed from a task with a "Subscribers" policy, was immediately unable to see it.
- Created a task with a "subscribers" policy and a project subscriber with/without me as a member (error / success, respectively).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5681
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13259
Summary:
Ref T8488. Ref T5681.
Now you can just use `id(new ConpherenceThreadMembersPolicyRule())->getObjectPolicyFullKey()` as a policy.
Added tests for TaskAuthor + ThreadMembers.
Test Plan:
- Ran tests.
- Set a thread policy to "Members of thread'.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5681, T8488
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13258
Summary:
Ref T5681. Ref T8488. This allows policy rules to provide "Object Policies", which are similar to the global/basic policies:
- They show up directly in the dropdown (you don't have to create a custom rule).
- They don't need to create or load anything in the database.
To implement one, you just add a couple methods on an existing PolicyRule that let Phabricator know it can work as an object policy rule.
{F494764}
These rules only show up where they make sense. For example, the "Task Author" rule is only available in Maniphest, and in "Default View Policy" / "Default Edit Policy" of the Application config.
This should make T8488 easier by letting us set the default policies to "Members of Thread", without having to create a dedicated custom policy for every thread.
Test Plan:
- Set tasks to "Task Author" policy.
- Tried to view them as other users.
- Viewed transaction change strings.
- Viewed policy errors.
- Set them as default policies.
- Verified they don't leak into other policy controls.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5681, T8488
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13257
Summary:
Ref T5681. Policy rules can now select objects they can apply to, so a rule like "task author" only shows up where it makes sense (when defining task policies).
This will let us define rules like "members of thread" in Conpherence, "subscribers", etc., to make custom policies more flexible.
Notes:
- Per D13251, we need to do a little work to get the right options for policies like "Maniphest > Default View Policy". This should allow "task" policies.
- This implements a "task author" policy as a simple example.
- The `willApplyRule()` signature now accepts `$objects` to support bulk-loading things like subscribers.
Test Plan:
- Defined a task to be "visible to: task author", verified author could see it and other users could not.
- `var_dump()`'d willApplyRule() inputs, verified they were correct (exactly the objects which use the rule).
- Set `default view policy` to a task-specific policy.
- Verified that other policies like "Can Use Bulk Editor" don't have these options.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5681
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13252
Summary: Fixed typo of the word "policy"
Test Plan: Google: "define policy" and see spelling
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Projects: #spaces
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13263
Summary: Self-explanatory.
Test Plan: Viewed the project page as a user without edit permissions and saw the link greyed out.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13255
Summary:
Ref T5681. Ref T6860. This doesn't do anything interesting on its own, just makes the next diff smaller.
In the next diff, policies become aware of the types of objects they're acting on. We need to specify which object type all the "Default View/Edit" settings are for so they get the right rules.
For example, a rule like "Allow task author" is OK for "View Policy" on a task, and also OK for "Default View Policy" on ManiphestApplication. But it's not OK for "Can Create Tasks" on ManiphestApplication.
So annotate all the "template"/"default" policies with their types. The next diff will use these to let you select appropriate rules for the given object type.
Test Plan:
- Used `grep` to find these.
- This change has no effect.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5681, T6860
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13251
Summary: Ref T8362, Fix query frequency unit and change time preference from input to dropdown.
Test Plan: Change user time preference in Date Time Settings panel, open feed, observe new time stamps.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8362
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13236
Summary: Ref T8498. This editor is an artifact of the Old World at this point, but it still works fine.
Test Plan: Moved tasks between spaces using the batch editor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8498
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13249
Summary:
Ref T8498. Allow ApplicationEmail addresses to be put into spaces:
- You can only see and send to addresses in Spaces you have access to.
- Objects are created into the same space their address is associated with.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/mail receive-test` to send mail to various `xyz-bugs@...` addresses.
- Saw objects created in the proper space.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8498
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13247
Summary: Fixes T8503. On 32-bit systems, these 64-bit integers will be mangled by the '%d' conversion implied by the 'int' type.
Test Plan: Somewhat guessing here since I don't have a 32-bit system handy, but this strongly echoes similar issues in the past. Feed works fine locally. Looked at the generated queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8503
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13250
Summary:
Ref T8498. I want to add Spaces to these, and the logic for getting Spaces right is a bit tricky, so swap these to ApplicationTransactions.
One new piece of tech: made it easier for Editors to raise DuplicateKeyException as a normal ValidationException, so callers don't have to handle this case specially.
One behavioral change: we no longer require these addresses to be at the `auth.email-domains` domains -- I think this wasn't quite right in the general case. It's OK to require users to have `@mycompany.com` addresses but add `@phabricator.mycompany-infrastructure.com` addresses here if you want.
Test Plan:
- Tried to create a duplicate email.
- Tried to create an empty email.
- Tried to create an invalid email.
- Created a new email.
- Deleted an email.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8498
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13246
Summary: Ref T8449. Get rid of the `S123` stuff in headers, it feels like clutter.
Test Plan: Looked at objects in Spaces.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8449
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13243
Summary: Ref T8498. Allow Herald rules to act on the Space which contains an object.
Test Plan:
- Wrote a "Space is any of..." rule, created tasks that matched and failed the rule.
- Also created a Pholio rule with the "Space..." condition.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8498
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13242
Summary:
Ref T8377. This adds a standard disable/enable feature to Spaces, with a couple of twists:
- You can't create new stuff in an archived space, and you can't move stuff into an archived space.
- We don't show results from an archived space by default in ApplicationSearch queries. You can still find these objects if you explicitly search for "Spaces: <the archived space>".
So this is a "put it in a box in the attic" sort of operation, but that seems fairly nice/reasonable.
Test Plan:
- Archived and activated spaces.
- Used ApplicationSearch, which omitted archived objects by default but allowed searches for them, specifically, to succeed.
- Tried to create objects into an archived space (this is not allowed).
- Edited objects in an archived space (this is OK).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8377
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13238
Summary: Fixes T8464. We could lose the additional users from "Send an email..." rules //if// Herald did not apply any other transactions to the task.
Test Plan:
- Destroyed all Herald rules.
- Created a single "Send an email to..." rule.
- Created a task.
- Saw target get an email.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8464
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13245
