Summary:
Ref T4788. This fixes all the bugs I was immediately able to catch:
- "Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too many vertical lines.
- "Reverse-Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too few vertical lines.
- Terminated, branched graph shapes drew the very last line to the wrong place.
This covers the behavior with tests, so we should be able to fix more stuff later without breaking anything.
Test Plan:
- Added failing tests and made them pass.
{F1708158}
{F1708159}
{F1708160}
{F1708161}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16216
Summary: Ref T4788. This seems reasonable locally, but not sure how it will feel on real data. Might need some tweaks, or might just be a terrible idea.
Test Plan: {F1708059}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16214
Summary: Ref T10628. Turn these into tabs in a single box, since "local commits" and "similar revisions" are of particularly rare use.
Test Plan: {F1707196}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16209
Summary:
First pass at converting Differential, I likely have some buggy-poos but thought I'd toss this up now in case very bad bugs present.
To do:
- Need to put status back on Hovercards
- "Diff Detail" probably needs a better design
Test Plan: Looking at lots of diffs, admittedly I dont have harbormaster, etc, running locally. Checked Diffusion for Table of Content changes on small and large commits.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15463
Summary:
Ref T10563. This isn't a complete fix, but should make viewing complex inline threads a little more manageable.
This just tries to put stuff in thread order instead of in pure chronological order. We can likely improve the display treatment -- this is a pretty minimal approach, but should improve clarity.
Test Plan:
T10563 has a "before" shot. Here's the "after":
{F1169018}
This makes it a bit easier to follow the conversations.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15459
Summary:
Fixes T10562. I left this behavior sort of ambiguous in the original implementation because I didn't anticipate or stumble across this situation.
It's easy to fix: when you reply to a ghost, just put the reply in the exact same place as the ghost (even if it's a different diff), so they always move/ghost/port/thread together.
Test Plan:
See T10562 for reproduction steps and a "before" picture. Here's the after picture:
{F1168983}
The two comments at the bottom are pre-fix, and exhibit the bug. The comment at the top is post-fix, and appears adjacent to the original correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15458
Summary:
Two minor changes here:
- Replace `get/setUser()` with `get/setViewer()` for consistency with everything else.
- `getViewer()` now throws if no viewer is set. We had a lot of code that either "should" check this but didn't, or did check it in an identical way, duplicating work. In contrast, very little code checks for a viewer but works if one is not present.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `->user`.
- Attempted to fix all callsites inside `*View` classes.
- Browsed around a bunch of applications, particularly Calendar, Differential and Diffusion, which seemed most heavily affected.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15412
Summary: I can't find any reference to these used. Fixes T10244
Test Plan: Grep for "phui-text" and "PHUI::TEXT"
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10244
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15142
Summary: Mostly for consistency, we're not using other forms of icons and this makes all classes that use an icon call it in the same way.
Test Plan: tested uiexamples, lots of other random pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15125
Summary: Some linter messages, such as those produced by `ArcanistPHPCompatibilityXHPASTLinterRule`, contain backticks but are currently rendered as Remarkup literals. I think that it is generally desirable to allow lint messages to be rendered as Remarkup, although we should ideally have a way to render Remarkup for use on the command line (I actually think that this already exists, but I don't think that `arc lint` does this when rendering linter messages).
Test Plan: Resubmitted D14481 to my dev install and saw Remarkuped lint messages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14485
Summary:
Fixes T9126. In particular:
- Add "Browse" links to all history views.
- Use icons to show "Browse" and "History" links, instead of text.
- Use FontAwesome.
- Generally standardize handling of these elements.
This might need a little design attention, but I think it's an improvement overall.
Test Plan:
- Viewed repository history.
- Viewed branch history.
- Viewed file history.
- Viewed table of contents on a commit.
- Viewed merged changes on a merge commit.
- Viewed a directory containing an external.
- Viewed a deleted file.
{F788419}
{F788420}
{F788421}
{F788422}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9126
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14096
Summary: Fixes T8572. Ideally we would probably just permit this, but clean up the behavior until the day arrives when inline code is actually rewritten.
Test Plan:
- Tried to launch editors in Differential and Diffusion while comments were already open.
- Verified that "Jump to inline" works in both cases.
{F788008}
{F788009}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8572
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14094
Summary: Fixes T9135. This is (probably) never intended and can be confusing.
Test Plan: Saw no hide button on unpublished inlines. Saw hide button on published inlines. Clicked hide button.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9135
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14014
Summary:
Ref T9218. See discussion there for rationale; I think this is the right behavior to pursue.
The screenshot below is pretty ugly. I think it's a lot worse than most real-world cases will be, since you have to sort of opt-in to having crazy levels of overlapping packages, and it's perfectly normal/reasonable for files owned by one package. Owners is powerful enough to let you specify sub-packages with exclusive ownership.
That said, this may be more typical than I hope. I don't think we can reduce the complexity here much for free, but it would might be reasonable to add some view options (e.g.: group by package?, show only packages I own?, show packages as icons with a tooltip?) if it's an issue.
Test Plan: {F734956}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9218
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13940
Summary:
Fixes T8004.
- For paths which are part of a package, show the package.
- Highlight paths which are part of a package you (the viewer) have authority over.
Test Plan:
{F725418}
- Viewed owned and unowned chagnes in Diffusion and Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13923
Summary:
Fixes T2183. We now use the same rendering element in both places.
Intentional changes:
- Package highlighting is out, coming back to both apps in next diff.
- removed redundant-feeling "Change" link. The information is now shown with a character ("M", "V", etc.) and the page is a click away under "History". Clicking the path also jumps you to substantially similar content. (We could restore it fairly easily, I just think it's probably the least useful thing in the table right now.)
Test Plan: Viewed a bunch of commits in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2183
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13910
Summary:
Ref T2183. Introduces a new View which can (in theory) unify the Revision, Diff and Commit table of contents views.
This has the same behavior as before, but accepts slightly more general primitives and parameters and has somewhat cleaner code.
I've made one intentinoal behavior change: removing the "Open All in Editor" button. I suspect this is essentially unused, and is a pain to keep around. We can look at restoring it if anyone notices.
Test Plan: Looked at a bunch of revisions, no changes from before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2183
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13908
Summary:
Fixes T8917. Prior to T2618, deleting inlines prompted users, then really deleted the rows.
After T2618, we delete immediately and offer "Undo". However, some interactions with drafts were missed, and we were only clearing the "this revision has a draft" flag on one of the delete pathways (when you delete all the comment text, then save the comment).
Make both the "Delete" action and the "Delete All Comment Text + Save" workflows do the same thing: mark the row as deleted, and clear any relevant drafts.
Test Plan:
- Made an inline comment on a clean revision with no "draft comments" marker in the list view.
- Used "delete" to delete it.
- After applying the patch, verified that no "draft commetns" marker appears in the list view.
- Used Delete and Edit + Remove Text + Save to delete comments in Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13665
Summary: Ref T8099. Better alignment with TODO and Ghost Icons.
Test Plan: Test more states of inline comments, ghosts, todos, unsubmitted, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13515
Summary: Ref T8099, Simplifies the button bar with a `borderless` option and implements in Differential Inline Commenting.
Test Plan:
Review new and old comments, submitted, unsubmitted, ghosts, done.
{F562765}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13475
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: Fixes T8354. Adds a class to each `th` and `td` for specificity.
Test Plan: Write a large table as an inline comment, see it wraps property on smaller screens.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8354
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13076
Summary:
Ref T7447. Implements per-viewer comment hiding. Once a comment is obsolete or uninteresting, you can hide it completely.
This is sticky per-user.
My hope is that this will strike a better balance between concerns than some of the other approaches (conservative porting, summarization, hide-all).
Specifically, this adds a new action here:
{F435621}
Clicking it completely collapses the comment into a small icon on the previous line, and saves the comment state as hidden for you:
{F435626}
You can click the icon to reveal all hidden comments below the line.
Test Plan:
- Hid comments.
- Showed comments.
- Created, edited, deleted and submitted comments.
- Used Diffusion comments (hiding is not implemented there yet, but I'd plan to bring it there eventually if it works out in Differential).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jparise, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13009
Summary: Ref T7447, these are more work than needed at least on an indivdual basis. JS openning all feels poor as well.
Test Plan: Review comments, past present and future.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12702
Summary: Ref T7447, Ref T1460. Moves "done" state to left, and no longer is a button (simpler CSS). Also feels a little nicer. Clean up some spacing issue with Ghosties.
Test Plan:
Test new and old comments, as author and reviewer.
{F389986}
{F389987}
{F389988}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aik099, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12641
Summary: This is a lighter UI treatment for previous/forward comments, where the comment is just hidden behind a click. This mayyy be too hard to discover, but I'd rather wait and make it more obvious if actually needed. Once you understand the interaction, the cleaner UI is preferable. Ref T7447
Test Plan:
Test a lot of previous and forward comments.
{F389658}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12627
Summary:
Ref T7447. Ref T7870. When you "reply" to a ghost inline, make it work properly.
This exact behavior is arguable. In particular, when you reply to a ghost inline, we //could// put the reply on the same diff as the original.
I suspect it aligns better with user exepectation to put the new inline on the current (visible) diff instead, and generally for inlines to flow forward through time and all of the ghosts to pretty much be older than all of the non-ghosts in most cases. We can see how it feels and adjust things if this turns out to not make sense.
Test Plan:
- Replied to ghost inlines, got new inlines on the proper display line.
- Replied to normal inlines, got normal behavior.
- Made some new inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7870, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12492
Summary:
Ref T7447. This might be overkill, but I want to over-explain things until we have more confidence that this is rarely confusing.
NOTE: I'm playing it a bit fast and loose with `setIsGhost()` (passing a dictionary) because making API changes requires changing the interface and Diffusion, which is a pain. I'll clean this up at the end once the interface is more final. This is well-contained for now.
Test Plan:
- Viewed "base vs 2" in a diff with 3 diffs, saw some "older comments" and some "newer comments".
- Hovered the tags for an explanation of comment spookiness.
{F377703}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12490
Summary:
Ref T7447. This ports comments forward and backward in the best case:
- The old comment is on a changeset with the same filename.
- The old and new files are pretty much the same, line-for-line.
This will fail to port a lot of comments around and probably port a lot of comments into goofy places. We can see how bad it is in practice.
Errata:
- Design is me cobbling something together, probably worth tweaking.
- "Old Comment" should, at a minimum, say "Newer Comment" sometimes, or we should come up with some better name for this stuff.
Test Plan: {F377214}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12484
Summary: These arrays looks a little odd, most likely due to the autofix applied by `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_ARRAY_SEPARATOR`. See D12296 in which I attempt to improve the autocorrection from this linter rule.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12281
Summary: Fixes T7720. We currently leak the "draft" state of checkboxes; never treat checkboxes as drafts if you can't mark them.
Test Plan: Checked a box, reloaded page in other browser. Previously, the draft state partially propagated. Now, it no longer does.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12262
Summary:
Ref T1460. Overall:
- Pass `objectOwnerPHID` consistently.
- Pass viewer consistently.
- Set the correct draft state for checkboxes on the client.
Test Plan:
- Made inline comments in Differential.
- Made inline comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12186
Summary:
Rebuilds the UI in Differential commenting. Specifically we look at the following design patterns:
**To the author:**
- The author of the diff should be able to easily identify what comments are done and not done.
- We keep undone comments yellow
- Clicking done turns comment block into 'unsubmitted state'
**To the reviewer:**
- Easier understanding of unsubmitted states
- All conversations to be yellow/important
**Todo**
- Not all color CSS states correct
- Unpulished checkbox support
Test Plan:
Test leaving comments, published and unpublished. Checking Done, unpublished and published. Check delete states.
From the Diff Author's perspective:
{F352094}
For a Diff commenter's perspective:
{F352095}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460, T7660, T7503
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12171
Summary:
This returns the PHID of the current revision owner, or the commit author, if one exists.
NOTE: For drafts, we currently return `null`; I'll fix that in a future change. Should be correct for submitted comments.
Test Plan: Added an inline, nothing seemed broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12185
Summary: Ref T7660. I'm not toggling "inline-state-is-draft" correctly in JS yet since it's a little tricky (you can reload to see it) but the main state should work.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "done", saw comment opacity fade with placeholder style.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12160
Summary:
Ref T1460. When a revision author updates/comments/etc on a revision, publish all their checkmarks.
This doesn't handle Diffusion/audits yet.
Test Plan: {F346870}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12126
Summary:
Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc.
Specifically, these are the behaviors:
- You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider..").
- You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff.
- When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold:
- Be consistent with how inlines work.
- Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories.
- The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented.
- UI is bare bones.
- No integration with the rest of the UI yet.
Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
Summary:
Ref T2009. Ref T1460.
Fixes T2618. When users hit "Delete" on inline comments, delete immediately and offer them "Undo". If they delete indirectly (e.g., by clicking "Delete" from the preview at the bottom of the page), we still prompt them, because the "Undo" action either won't be available or may not be easy to find. This is a "refdelete".
Fixes T6464. This was just a mess. Make it not as much of a mess. It should work now. Pretty sure.
Fixes T4999. We did not refresh these links often enough to find targets for them, so they could race with content. Reevaluate them after loading new changes.
Test Plan:
- Deleted and undid deletion of inlines from main view and preview.
- Clicked "View" on inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6464, T4999, T2618, T1460, T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12032
Summary:
Ref T2009. Ref T1460. The way Diffusion and Differential load inlines is horrible garbage right now:
- Differential does an ad-hoc query to get the PHIDs, then does a real load to policy check.
- Diffusion completely fakes things. In practice this is not a policy violation, but it's dangerous.
Make TransactionCommentQuery extensible so we can subclass it and get the query building correctly in the right Query layer.
Specifically, the Diffusion and Differential subclasses of this Query will add appropriate `withX()` methods to let us express the query in SQL.
Test Plan: Loaded, previewed, edited, and submitted inlines in Differential and Diffusion
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12026
Summary:
Ref T1460. Ref T2618.
When publishing a draft inline, mark the inline it replies to (if any) as replied to.
Also, don't load deleted comments as drafts (sets the stage for T2618).
I'll make an effort to clean up the loading mess here in the next revision, and find some more appropriate home for the shared code.
Test Plan: Made and replied to comments in Differential and Diffusion. Saw comments get marked as "Has Replies" and "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2618, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12025
Summary: Ref T2009. These subclasses have a mixture of similar methods, move them all to the base class.
Test Plan: Created/edited/undo/submitted comments on the left and right sides of a diff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12024
