Summary:
Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs.
Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like:
- "New Bug Report"
- "New Feature Request"
These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments:
- A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report").
- A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies).
- A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden.
- A form might have a different field order.
- A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it.
This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way".
This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future.
Test Plan:
ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form:
{F959025}
There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines:
{F959030}
And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it:
{F959038}
The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
Summary:
Ref T9132. Although forms do generally support prefilling right now, you have to guess how to do it.
Provide an explicit action showing you which values are supported and how to prefill them. This is generated automatically when an application switches to ApplicationEditor.
Test Plan:
{F939804}
{F939805}
{F939806}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14392
Summary:
This enables CORGI.
Currently, `AphrontSite` subclasses can't really have their own routes. They can do this sort of hacky rewriting of paths, but that's a mess and not desirable in the long run.
Instead, let subclasses build their own routing maps. This will let CORP and ORG have their own routing maps.
I was able to get rid of the `PhameBlogResourcesSite` since it can really just share the standard resources site.
Test Plan:
- With no base URI set, and a base URI set, loaded main page and resources (from main site).
- With file domain set, loaded resources from main site and file site.
- Loaded a skinned blog from a domain.
- Loaded a skinned blog from the main site.
- Viewed "Request" tab of DarkConsole to see site/controller info.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14008
Summary: Use `PhutilClassMapQuery` where appropriate.
Test Plan: Browsed around the UI to verify things seemed somewhat working.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13429
Particularly, in the cluster, it needs to be able to see Almanac services.
This permission may be conflated with the logged-out viewer, since neither
have PHIDs.
Auditors: btrahan
Summary:
Fixes T6787. I'm kind of cheating a little bit here by not unifying default selection with `initializeNew(...)` methods, but I figure we can let this settle for a bit and then go do that later. It's pretty minor.
Since we're not doing templates I kind of want to swap the `'template'` key to `'type'` so maybe I'll do that too at some point.
@chad, freel free to change these, I was just trying to make them pretty obvious. I //do// think it's good for them to stand out, but my approach is probably a bit inconsistent/heavy-handed in the new design.
Test Plan:
{F525024}
{F525025}
{F525026}
{F525027}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, joshuaspence, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13387
Summary: Ref T8575. We check if users can see applications frequently, and caching on the Query isn't especially effective. Use the new Request cache instead.
Test Plan:
- Saw `/feed/` drop 7% (from ~830ms to ~770ms) on profiles.
Reviewers: btrahan, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Subscribers: avivey, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8575
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13321
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: I don't believe that any subclass should override these methods.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13265
Summary:
Ref T5681. Policy rules can now select objects they can apply to, so a rule like "task author" only shows up where it makes sense (when defining task policies).
This will let us define rules like "members of thread" in Conpherence, "subscribers", etc., to make custom policies more flexible.
Notes:
- Per D13251, we need to do a little work to get the right options for policies like "Maniphest > Default View Policy". This should allow "task" policies.
- This implements a "task author" policy as a simple example.
- The `willApplyRule()` signature now accepts `$objects` to support bulk-loading things like subscribers.
Test Plan:
- Defined a task to be "visible to: task author", verified author could see it and other users could not.
- `var_dump()`'d willApplyRule() inputs, verified they were correct (exactly the objects which use the rule).
- Set `default view policy` to a task-specific policy.
- Verified that other policies like "Can Use Bulk Editor" don't have these options.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5681
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13252
Summary:
Ref T5681. Ref T6860. This doesn't do anything interesting on its own, just makes the next diff smaller.
In the next diff, policies become aware of the types of objects they're acting on. We need to specify which object type all the "Default View/Edit" settings are for so they get the right rules.
For example, a rule like "Allow task author" is OK for "View Policy" on a task, and also OK for "Default View Policy" on ManiphestApplication. But it's not OK for "Can Create Tasks" on ManiphestApplication.
So annotate all the "template"/"default" policies with their types. The next diff will use these to let you select appropriate rules for the given object type.
Test Plan:
- Used `grep` to find these.
- This change has no effect.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5681, T6860
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13251
Summary: Use `__CLASS__` instead of hard-coding class names. Depends on D12605.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12806
Summary:
See M1433. Fixes T7266. Fixes T4475. Ref T7314.
Future work/notes/etc:
- Write the User Guide (see TODO).
- This might needs some design tweaks -- I think it's functionally almost-equivalent to the mock, but the UI isn't quite the same.
- (Mobile design is a touch off-looking I think?)
- When you use a custom query, the duplicate "magnifying glass" icons are a little weird. Maybe change one or the other.
- Maybe worth adding an "Open Documents in Current Application" option? Planning to wait for feedback on that.
- Need a Quicksand integration to change the current application at some point.
- Searching in "Current Application" from, e.g., the 404 page just searches all documents. Current plan is to just document this behavior, since the icon is a pretty good callout and it seems plausible that this is intuitive enough that users won't have a hard time with it.
Test Plan:
New dropdown:
{F379150}
Device-ish:
{F379151}
Normal search (current application, from maniphest, selects tasks):
{F379153}
Application search from non-application:
{F379154}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: johnny-bit, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7266, T7314, T4475
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12509
Summary:
Ref T7199. Convert the single help menu item into a dropdown and allow applications to list multiple items there.
When an application has mail command objects, link them in the menu.
Test Plan:
{F355925}
{F355926}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12244
Summary: Ref T7199. This needs some polish and isn't reachable from the UI, but technically has all of the information.
Test Plan:
{F355899}
{F355900}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12241
Summary:
Fixes T7060. Removes some hard-coding.
This assumes that "pages with no durable column" and "pages with no Quicksand" are the same, but that's correct today and I can't come up with a use case where they'd be different offhand.
Test Plan:
- Clicked a revision with column open, got Quicksand navigation.
- Clicked into Conpherence with column open, got real navigation.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7060
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12036
Summary: Select a similar or better FontAwesome icon to represent each application
Test Plan: Visual inspection
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11489
Summary: Ref T5952, T3404. This lays the basic plumbing for how this will work, all the way to deploying on Maniphest. Aside from what is mentioned on T5952, I think page(s) on editing application emails could use a little more helpful text about what's going on, similar to how the config page that's getting deprecated works.
Test Plan: ran migration and noted my create email address migrated successfully. used bin/mail to make a task. added another email and used bin/mail to make a task. deleted an email. edited an email. invoked various error states and they all looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3404, T5952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11418
Summary: We could still miss this if the policy had never been customized and we returned early after one of the other checks.
Test Plan:
Works great on instances now.
{F267067}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11374
Summary: Fast commit. Also forgot to make the config override the existing policy. I *think* this is the right spot and we're good? Ref T6947.
Test Plan: viewed the application settings page for people application and saw the correct overrode setting.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6947
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11373
Summary: In D10027, the `getName()` method was added to `PhabricatorApplication` to //allow// applications to explicitly declare their names rather than relying on the name being inferred from the name of the `PhabricatorApplication` subclass. I feel that sufficient time has passed such that we can //require// applications to explicitly declare their names.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11119
Summary: Fixes T6595. This diff has two issues as is... 1) the differential data fetching is pretty cheesey, but it looks like we can't just issue three separate databases to get the right data? 2) the translations break, since I am turning this into a string (and not an int) so the whole pluralization bit fails. I think 1 is okay as is and 2 needs to be fixed though I am not sure how to best do that...
Test Plan: loaded home page and it looked nice...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10979
Summary:
Fixes T6084. Changes:
- Rename `phabricator.show-beta-applications` to `phabricator.show-prototypes`, to reinforce that these include early-development applications.
- Migrate the config setting.
- Add an explicit "no support" banner to the config page.
- Rename "Beta" to "Prototype" in the UI.
- Use "bomb" icon instead of "half star" icon.
- Document prototype applications in more detail.
- Explicitly document that we do not support these applications.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Resolved "obsolete config" issue.
- Viewed config setting.
- Browsed prototypes in Applications app.
- Viewed documentation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T6084
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10493
Summary: Provide an implementation for the `getName` method rather than automagically determining the application name.
Test Plan: Saw reasonable application names in the launcher.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10027
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary:
This does some backend cleanup of the tile stuff, and some general cleanup of other application things:
- Users who haven't customized preferences get a small, specific set of pinned applications: Differential, Maniphest, Diffusion, Audit, Phriction, Projects (and, for administrators, Auth, Config and People).
- Old tile size methods are replaced with `isPinnnedByDefault()`.
- Shortened some short descriptions.
- `shouldAppearInLaunchView()` replaced by less ambiguous `isLaunchable()`.
- Added a marker for third-party / extension applications.
Test Plan: Faked away my preferences and viewed the home page, saw a smaller set of default pins.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9358
Summary:
Merge "Organization" and "Communication" into "Core". The split between these three was always tenuous, and this is easier to use and nicer looking on the new launcher.
Merge "Miscellaneous" into "Utilities" since they're basically the same thing.
Test Plan: Looked at app launcher.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9334
Summary:
This probably needs some tweaks, but the idea is to make it easier to browse and access applications without necessarily needing them to be on the homepage.
Open to feedback.
Test Plan:
(This screenshot merges "Organization", "Communication" and "Core" into a single "Core" group. We can't actually do this yet because it wrecks the homepage.)
{F160052}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5176
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9297
Summary:
Fixes T4619. Currently, even if a viewer can't see Maniphest, they'll still see empty panels on the home page. These panels will always be empty so there's no real policy violation, but it's confusing.
Longer term, dashboards should fix this.
Test Plan: Viewed home page with a user with and without permissions on the apps.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4619
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8545
Summary: Ref T3623. These are obsoleted by the global quick-create menu, so we can simplify the app launcher.
Test Plan: Looked at app launcher, grepped for everything.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8104
Summary:
Ref T3623. I'm sure I didn't get the margins / drop shadow quite right, but this looks and works reasonably well:
{F105637}
Test Plan: Clicked stuff to quick create.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8089
Summary:
Ref T3623. This is like a pre-v0, in that it doesn't have a dropdown yet.
Clicking the button takes you to a page which can serve as a right click / mobile / edit target in the long run, but is obviously not great for desktop use. I'll add the dropdown in the next iteration.
Test Plan: {F105631}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3623
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8088
Summary:
Ref T603. Fixes T2823. This updates Paste and Macro.
- **Paste**
- Added default view policy.
- I didn't add a "create" policy, since I can't come up with any realistic scenario where you'd give users access to pastes but not let them create them.
- **Macro**
- Added a "manage" policy, which covers creating and editing macros. This lets an install only allow "People With An Approved Sense of Humor" or whatever to create macros.
- Removed the "edit" policy, since giving individual users access to specific macros doesn't make much sense to me.
- Changed the view policy to the "most public" policy the install allows.
- Added view policy information to the header.
Also fix a couple of minor things in Maniphest.
Test Plan:
- Set Paste policy, created pastes via web and Conduit, saw they got the right default policies.
- Set Macro policy, tried to create/edit macros with valid and unauthorized users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2823, T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7317
Summary: Ref T603. Use the new hotness.
Test Plan: Edited Herald in Applications, tried to create rules / global rules without capabilities, got reasonable error messages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7263
Summary:
Ref T603. I had to partially revert this earlier because it accidentally blocked access to Conduit and File data for installs without "policy.allow-public", since the applications are available to "all users" but some endpoints actually need to be available even when not logged in.
This readjusts the gating in the controller to properly apply application visibility restrictions, and then adds a giant pile of unit test coverage to make sure it sticks and all the weird cases are covered.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Executed most of the tests manually, by using logged in / admin / public / disabled users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7211
Summary:
Ref T603. Enables:
- Application policies can be edited.
- Applications can define custom policies (this will be used for setting defaults, like "what is the default visibiltiy of new tasks", and meta-policies, like "who can create a task?").
Test Plan: Edited application policies. A future diff does more with custom policies.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7205
Summary:
Fixes T3894. The "Log Out" icon has moved away from its rightmost position in the menubar.
In rP2e5ac12, I added a "Policy" application. This was the root cause.
The reordering logic (below) is slightly wrong. The `array_select_keys()` call is actually using the //strings// (like "Admnistration") to select the groups, not the correct constants (like "admin"). Use the constants instead and get the expected group ordering.
Test Plan: Loaded page, "Log Out" is in the rightmost position.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3894
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7177
Summary: Ref T3166. I moved the create logic into a static method in the editor class to keep things tidy.
Test Plan: created a conpherence from UI. purdy. tried errors and got UI to show "required". for conduit, created a thread with all the bells and whistles and it worked. verified i got proper exceptions with bum conduit calls
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6083
Summary:
Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications.
The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are:
# Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver).
# Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test.
# Normalize the test environment to install all applications.
I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage.
I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common.
So here's (3), which I think is reasonable.
I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests).
Test Plan: Added unit test.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: wez
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary:
Also join concepts of installed and enabled applications.
Also respect uninstalled Maniphest where disabled Maniphest was checked.
Test Plan:
Visited T1, D1.
Uninstalled Maniphest then visited T1, D1.
Disabled Maniphest then visited T1.
Visited /config/edit/maniphest.enabled/.
Reviewers: epriestley, Afaque_Hussain, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5602
Summary:
Currently, `isInstalled()` and `getAllInstalledApplications()` are inconsistent:
- `isInstalled()` returns true for beta apps, even if `phabricator.show-beta-applications` is false.
- `getAllInstalledApplications()` omits beta apps if `phabricator.show-beta-applications` is false.
Making the beta config control installs (not just homepage visibility) makes far more sense as we roll out more thorough application integrations.
Make `isInstalled()` respect beta, and clean up some callsites.
D5602 builds on this.
Test Plan: Installed/uninstalled beta apps, verified Conpherence menu/panel and other application integrations dropped out of the UI.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5603
Summary: We currently inspect `phabricator.uninstalled-applications` in two places -- when building a list of `getAllInstalledApplications()` and when asking an application if it `isInstalled()`. This diff moves that all to the latter function, meaning we can override it in clever and subtle ways for applications that want to add extra defensiveness about whether they should be considered installed or not (e.g. Releeph, in D4932.)
Test Plan: Load the main Phabricator page, pick an application, uninstall it, notice it is absent, then install it and notice the launch icon reappear.
Reviewers: epriestley, Afaque_Hussain
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5326
Summary: Fixes T2698. When applications are installed, their Conduit calls should drop out. This will also let us land Releeph without exposing Conduit calls.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Conduit console; uninstalled some applications and verified their calls dropped out.
- Tried to make an uninstalled call; got an appropriate error.
Reviewers: edward, btrahan
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5302
