Summary: Ref T12297. When a page is generated with the profiler active, keep it active by adding a `__profile__` input to any forms we generate.
Test Plan: Hit Conduit API page with `__profile__` active, saw it reflected in forms.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12297
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17399
Summary:
Fixes T12172. Fixes T12060. This allows runtime code building CSS for mail to read CSS variables, then makes all the code do that.
It reverts the non-colorblind red/green to the colors in use before T12060, which seem better for non-colorblind users since no one really complained?
Test Plan:
- Viewed code diffs in Web UI.
- Viewed prose diffs in Web UI.
- Viewed code diffs in email.
- Viewed prose diffs in email.
All modes respected the accessibility color scheme.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12172, T12060
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17269
Summary: Ref T10390. Basically hides policy controls when creating a panel on a dashboard. Shows when you edit them or through normal workflow. I think we should maybe also get rid of view policy? Not sure the benefit since results will be filtered anyways. Maybe Text panels? Not sure the use case.
Test Plan: Add a panel, edit a panel.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hskiba, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17393
Summary:
Fixes T12301. In D17372, this changed to use generic EditEngines instead of the proper runtime engine. Normally this doesn't matter, but can in this case.
After loading the configurations normally, swap their attached engines for the specific configured runtime engine we're currently executing.
Test Plan: Clicked "Create Form" from the Maniphest form list, saw it go to "Create Maniphest Form", not "Create Generic Meta-Form".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12301
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17398
Summary:
Fixes T12306. Currently, we warn about daemons not running even if they're in normal "alive" states, particularly "waiting to restart after a failure".
This check was made more strict in D12088, back when we tried to version check running daemons. Since we implemented auto-restart-after-config-change we don't do this anymore, so it should be fine to make this more lax again.
Test Plan:
- Faked an exception for all tasks.
- Before patch: reloading the daemon setup error sometimes raised a false positive ("waiting" daemon detected as dead).
- After patch: daemon setup error no longer triggers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12306
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17397
Summary:
Ref T12298. This updates `bin/phd` for minor changes to daemon configuration. In particular:
- Every daemon now has an autoscale pool (for trigger/pull, the maximum pool size is 1).
- Pools now have labels to make debugging a little easier.
- Some minor structural changes.
Test Plan: See D17389.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12298
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17390
Summary: Ref T10390. Simplifies dropdown by rolling out canUseInPanel in useless panels
Test Plan: Add a query panel, see less options.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17341
Summary:
See downstream <https://phabricator.kde.org/T5404>. This code was doing some `.firstChild` shenanigans which didn't survive some UI refactoring.
This whole UI is a little iffy but just unbreak it for now.
Test Plan: Allowed and rejected desktop notifications, got largely reasonable UI rendering.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17388
Summary: I broke this at the last second in D17374. `getStrList()` doesn't read arrays. It probably should (more modern analogs do) but don't rock the boat in the leadup to the release cut.
Test Plan: Hovered over a thing, saw a hovercard and no `getStrList()` error in my logs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17383
Summary:
Ref T12287. See D17361. That fixed a mostly-theoretical bug with crumbs named things like "MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM", but caused a less-theoretical buggy side effect in Safari.
For now, just keep the "MMMMMMMM" crumbs around since that's the easiest/least-bad/safest fix prior to the release cut. We can fix this more broadly when we have more time to look at it.
Test Plan: Looked at profiles, saw the entire name for "hector" and the too-long-crumb for "MMMMM".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12287
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17382
Summary:
Ref T12268. Ref T12157. When you mention or interact with a user who is unlikely to be able to respond (for example, because their account is disabled), we try to show a colored dot to provide a hint about this.
Recently, we no longer send any normal mail to unverified addresses. However, the rules for showing a dot haven't been updated yet, so they only care about this if `auth.require-verification` is set. This can be misleading, because if you say `Hey @alice, what do you think about this?` and she hasn't verified her email, you may not get a response.
Update the rule so users with unverified email addresses get a grey dot in all cases. The hint is basically "you shouldn't expect a response from this user".
Make the meaning of this hint more clear on the hovercard and profile.
Also:
- Allow the non-ajax version of the hovercard page (which is basically only useful for testing hovercards) accept `?names=...` so you can just plug usernames, hashtags, etc., in there.
- Fix a bug where the user's join date was based on their profile creation date instead of account creation date on the hovercard. Users may not have a profile creation date (if they never changed any account details), and it may be different from their account creation date.
Test Plan: {F2998517}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12268, T12157
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17374
Summary:
Fixes T12281. Some forms (like Settings) can't actually create new objects. Currently, though, you can select them and add them to profile menus; if you do, they fail when building an item.
Kick them out of the typeahead, and decline to render them in menus.
Test Plan:
Added "Create Settings" to a menu, no longer fatals after patch (item vanished from menu, still editable normally to get rid of it).
Tried to add another "Create Settings", no longer available in typehaead.
Added some normal stuff.
Viewed a choose-among-forms dropdown in Maniphest, which still worked normally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12281
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17372
Summary: See D14617. This could probably go either way but we don't currently need `$engine` in `newStandardEditField()`, so just get rid of it.
Test Plan: Edited a task with standard custom fields defined.
Reviewers: vrana, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17370
Summary:
See D16676. When an export has an unsupported mode (bad database value, out-of-date object, etc) the intent of this code is to put it into the `<select />` so that you can save the form without silently changing the object.
However, it incorrectly calls `array_shift()` instead of `array_unshift()`.
Test Plan:
Edited a Calendar export with an invalid mode, saw the mode appear properly in the dropdown:
{F2957321}
Reviewers: vrana, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17369
Summary: Ref T12270. Any project, badge, dashboard, etc, that uses names in crumbs can over generate a long title. Restrict to a sane but generous width.
Test Plan: Make a project with a really long name, test various crumb layouts, boards, tasks, desktop, mobile.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17361
Summary: Ref T10798. Cleans up the UI a little and adds a sidenav.
Test Plan: Review badge and recipients in sandbox.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10798
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17358
Summary: Fixes T10473. Clever, didn't know we could do this, but works well. Renders out the tab names by ', '.
Test Plan:
Add a tab panel, change some names, review transactions.
{F2929594}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10473
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17359
Summary: Fixes T12248. Adds a flag for movable panels, and only allows those to be moved. Also cleaned up some CSS rules missing once a panel was drug into a new position.
Test Plan: Try to drag a tab panel content pane, cannot. Drag normal pane, see CSS, grab and drag same panel back, CSS looks the same.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12248
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17356
Summary: Fixes T11449. Feels.... magical? Probably a more efficient way of doing this, but only 6 tabs so...
Test Plan: Create a tab panel in old UI. Edit panel in new UI. Create a panel in new UI, edit panel in new UI.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11449
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17355
Summary: Fixes T10145. I went with "don't add two panels", since panels are easy to create, I expect this to be a reasonable limit until we have better use cases.
Test Plan: Try to add the same panel twice, get error. Add panel normally fine, move panels fine, edit panels fine.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10145
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17351
Summary: Bump up the CSS scope, since we altered the normal rule for device-desktop
Test Plan: /diviner/ in sandbox
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17352
Summary: Ref T10390, turns "add existing panel" into a typeahead, and add lots more information to search.
Test Plan: Add an existing panel, click the search icon, see more information (type, engine).
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17348
Summary: Fixes T10612. We're writing a new panel to any dashboard even if it already exists. No need when just updating a panel title.
Test Plan: Add "welcome" panel to column 2 of a clean dashboard. Edit title, save. See correct panel in correct place.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10612
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17349
Summary: Fixes T12160. Lightbox thread view should be visible if file is public.
Test Plan:
Add a file to a task, log out, click on file in task, get lightbox and no error. Expand comments, see login box.
{F2867067}
{F2867088}
{F2867098}
{F2867114}
{F2867124}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12160
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17347
Summary: Fixes T12258. I think these constants are just flipped.
Test Plan: Kinda winged it.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17346
Summary: Aligns the search result list to the right of the input box, adds a little space, removes a double border.
Test Plan: Search on desktop, mobile, tablet breakpoints. Double check normal typeahead results.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17345
Summary:
Ref T12237. This adds a UI cue for users who have unverified primary addresses, since we no longer send them mail.
Also adds a new `bin/mail unverify` to unverify an address (for example, because mail is bouncing).
Test Plan:
- Unverified my address, saw setup issue.
- Verified my address, no more setup issue.
{F2861820}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12237
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17344
Summary: Fixes T12253.
Test Plan:
- Before change: used "Quote Comment", saw "In null, alice wrote:" in quoted text.
- After change: used "Quote Comment", saw proper reference to the commit/page. Clicked reference, was sent to the comment properly.
{F2859093}
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T12253
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17343
Summary: Ref T10390. This removes the "Copy Dashboard" feature, which was more of a crutch to assist in the complexity of building and maintaining dashboards. I think we're close enough now that removing this and adding in some simpler edit dialogs should negate any benefit to keeping this around. Also removed an un-used "Uninstall Dashboard" dialog.
Test Plan: Visit manage, edit, no longer see option to copy dashboard. grep /dashboards/ for "copy" and remove all traces. Add some panels to a dashboard I own.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17338
Summary: Fixes T4984. This is about as fancy as I want to get this pass. Adds in the list of panel titles and the author. This does give me a rough idea what's on each dashboard.
Test Plan:
Visit a list of dashboards and see various authors and panels.
{F2810876}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4984
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17340
Test Plan: attempted to create a new auth provider; observed that "enabled" ui element does not render. viewed existing auth provider and observed that "enabled" ui element still renders
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17337
Summary: Fixes T12252.
Test Plan:
I just faked this, but likely repro is:
- Call method `x.y`.
- Remove method `x.y` from the codebase.
- View log.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17342
Summary: Fixes T12224. This brings "Autopay" on the View controller into line with how it works on the Edit controller.
Test Plan:
- Viewed subscriptions with no autopay, valid autopay, and deleted autopay.
{F2750725}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12224
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17334
Summary: Fixes T12213. Removes truncation and allows titles to be full width if needed.
Test Plan:
Chrome / Firefox / Safari on Mac, mobile and desktop widths.
{F2754679}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12213
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17336
Summary: Fixes T12243. That error occured due to network flakiness with some mounted filesystems so I'm not sure how best to simulate it. But you can look and see that the PhutilProxyException does indeed expect an exception as its second arg.
Test Plan: Look at method signature... look at callsite... now back at the method. Smile and nod.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, yelirekim, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T12243
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17335
Summary: Ref T12232. I can't reproduce the original issue, but this should probably fix it without side effects?
Test Plan: Added a card with Stripe, but I could do that before too.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12232
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17333
Summary: Fixes T12236. Headers are currently trying to generate an edit transaction for `maniphest.edit` and similar, but should not, since you can't edit them.
Test Plan:
- Configured Maniphest with a custom header field.
- Before change: `maniphest.edit` API console page fataled.
- After change: all good, no weird "header" transaction.
- Header still shows up on "Edit Task" form in web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12236
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17332
Summary: Ref T12240. When you "Reply All" to a Phabricator mail, we make an effort not to send the response to recipients who you hit with the original message. This isn't perfect and we can't always get it right, but the old description implies it's a bigger problem than it should be in practice.
Test Plan: Read text.
Reviewers: chad, eadler
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17331
Summary: Ref T10390. This mostly shuffles layout into "View" and keepts "Manage" around for Edit/Copy/History. This feels better to me overall. Also tweaked some spacing and color.
Test Plan:
New Dashboard, edit Dashboard, shuffle panels. Create new panels.
{F2684043}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17326
Summary:
Ref T12237. This tightens our delivery rules, which previously sent normal mail to unverified addresses:
- We sent general mail to unverified addresses so that you wouldn't miss anything between the time you sign up (or have an account created) and the time you verify your address. This was imagined as a slight convenience for users.
- We sent automatic reply mail to unverified addresses if they sent mail to us first, saying "we don't recognize that address". This was imagined as a convenience for users who accidentally send mail "From" the wrong address (personal vs work, for example).
I think both behaviors are probably a little better for users on the balance, but not having mail providers randomly shut us off without warning is better for me, personally -- so stop doing this stuff.
This creates a problem which we likely need to solve before the release is cut:
- On installs which do not require mail verification, mail to you will now mostly-silently be dropped if you never bothered to verify your address.
I'd like to solve this by adding some kind of per-user alert that says "We recently tried to send you some mail but you haven't verified your address.", and giving them links to verify the address and review the mail. I'll pursue this after restoring mail service to `secure.phabricator.com`.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test.
- Unverified my address, sent mail, saw it get dropped.
- Reverified my address, sent mail, saw it go through.
- Verified that important mail (password reset, invite, confirm-this-address) either uses "Force Delivery" (skips this check) or "Raw To Addresses" (also skips this check).
- Verified that Phacility instance stuff is also covered: it uses the same invite flow.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12237
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17329
