Summary:
Moves all remaining mail handling into ReplyHandlers.
Farewell, `getPhabricatorToInformation()`! You were a bad method and no one liked you.
Ref T1205.
Test Plan:
- Used test console to send mail to Revisions, Tasks, Conpherences and Commits (these all actually work).
- Used test console to send mail to Requests, Macros, Questions and Mocks (these accept the mail but don't do anything with it, but didn't do anything before either).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5953
Summary: This doesn't do anything, but touches a bunch of files so I split it out to reduce the size of the next diff. Basically, make `MailReceiver` classes responsible for loading their application objects. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Inspection / next diff / code is not reached.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5941
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary:
See discussion in T2832. In particular, this is pretty confusing:
{F38674}
The confusion created in situations like this is much worse than the tiny benefit in parseability the UI rule provides. We'll probably rewrite this table in terms of ObjectListView anyway.
Fixes T2832.
Test Plan: Looked at Audit list.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2832
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5610
Summary: Fixes T2698. When applications are installed, their Conduit calls should drop out. This will also let us land Releeph without exposing Conduit calls.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Conduit console; uninstalled some applications and verified their calls dropped out.
- Tried to make an uninstalled call; got an appropriate error.
Reviewers: edward, btrahan
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5302
Test Plan:
/ - didn't see all my commits
/owners/package/1/ - didn't see all package commits in Needs Attention
Reviewers: AnhNhan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2582
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5186
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.
There are a few notable cases here:
- I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
- I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
- I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
- Gave them viewers.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
Summary:
Prior to D5140, "PhabricatorAuditCommitQuery::STATUS_OPEN" was defined as "concern only". This didn't really make sense; we redefined it to "concern or audit required".
However, a couple of queries needed to be updated since they really meant "concern" even though they said "open".
I also switch the order of problem commits / audit required on the Audit homepage to be consistent with the bubbles on home.
Test Plan: Looked at home, /audit/.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5162
Summary: Oops, missed this in review.
Test Plan: Searched in the file for the property.
Reviewers: AnhNhan
Reviewed By: AnhNhan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5154
Summary:
Fixes T2582
You can filter Concern vs. No-Concern status
Choosing a concern filter that's not `all` implies filter `status` to be `open`
Test Plan: fiddled around with it in Audit
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2582
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5140
Summary: This includes assigned tasks in the Maniphest number.
Test Plan: Looked at it.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5067
Summary:
Fixes T2563. Instead of rendering "rPnnnnnn", render "rPnnnnnn: add feature X". Tweak Audit tables to accommodate.
@vrana / @nh, this migration might take a while. You could safely skip it when deploying and then run it after deployment.
I think I fixed all the other places where these render, but might have missed something.
Test Plan:
- Ran first schema migration, clicked around to make sure nothing broke.
- Ran `scripts/repository/reparse.php --message rXyyyyy`, verified summary populated.
- Ran second migration.
- Checked task/diffusion/audit/differential for weird rendering.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: nh, aran, chrisbolt, allixsenos
Maniphest Tasks: T2563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5012
Summary:
Also splits blocking and active revisions.
This could display 0 with non-empty tip over it.
It's intentional meaning that 0 objects need your attention but there is still some work to do.
Test Plan: Hovered over number.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5049
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary:
I like this abstraction better.
Result of `phutil_implode_html()` may be also used as a param of `hsprintf()`.
Test Plan: None.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4904
Summary:
Lots of killed `phutil_escape_html()`.
Done by searching for `AphrontTableView` and then `$rows` (usually) backwards.
Test Plan:
Looked at homepage.
echo id(new AphrontTableView(array(array('<'))))->render();
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4884
Summary: do so via event engine. note different order now...
Test Plan: toggled "show beta applications" to off and noted that Conpherence disappeared. Otherwise noted that links showed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4708
Summary:
Went through some files and pht'd some stuff while the kid was in the bath.
LINT
Test Plan: Doinked all over each of these apps, didn't spot anything out of the ordinary.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4613
Summary: Fixes T2339
Test Plan: Close Audit button does not appear if audit.can-author-close-audit option is disabled
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4525
Summary:
The search indexing API has several problems right now:
- Always runs in-process.
- It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it.
- Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster.
- Instead, make the API phid-oriented.
- No uniform indexing API.
- Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird.
- Instead, provide a uniform API.
- No uniform CLI.
- We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers.
- Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing.
- Not application-oriented.
- All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world.
- Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader.
Test Plan:
- `bin/search index`
- Indexed one revision, one task.
- Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types.
- Indexed `--all`.
- Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it.
- Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing.
- Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing.
- Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
Summary: This is used in every other view.
Test Plan: Browsed around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4248
Summary:
Issues here:
- Need an application-sized "eye", or a "home" icon for "Phabricator Home".
- Some of the "apps_lb_2x" sliced images are the "_dark_" versions, not the light versions.
- If you slice an application-sized "logout" (power off) icon and application-sized "help" (questionmark in circle) icon I can replace the current menu icons and nearly get rid of "autosprite".
- To replace the icons on /applications/, the non-retina size is "4x", so we'd need "8x" for retina. Alternatively I can reduce the icon sizes by 50%.
- The "Help", "Settings" and "Logout" items currently have a "glowing" hover state, which needs a variant (or we can drop it).
- The /applications/ icons have a white hover state (or we can drop it).
- The 1x application (14x14) icons aren't used anywhere right now, should they be? Maybe in the feed in the future, etc?
- The "apps-2x" and "apps-large" sheets are the same image, but getting them to actually use the same file is a bit tricky, so I just left them separate for now.
Test Plan:
{F26698}
{F26699}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1960
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4108
Summary: we need to make sure we should publish to the auditor in a given audit request. write some custom logic for this as it is subtly different than other things like CC.
Test Plan: repro from T2087 produced expected results. further, former auditors who resigned did not get feed stories published.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2087
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3987
Summary: do this by making sure to filter out those who've "resigned" from the email CC list
Test Plan: resigned from an audit and no longer got emails on updates
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2033
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3890
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary: Followup to D3804. Makes Diffusion main comments (not just inlines) render properly with the modern markup pipeline.
Test Plan: Created previews and inline previews. Edited inlines. Saved comment, viewed comment. Verified caches were read and written using "Services" tab.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3805
Summary:
See T1963 for discussion of the Facebook-specific hack.
Differential currently uses a one-stage cache (render -> postprocess -> save in cache) rather than the two-stage cache (render -> save in cache -> postprocess) offered by `PhabricatorMarkupInteface`. This breaks Differential comments coming out of cache for the lightbox, and makes various other things suboptimal (status of handles like @mentions and embeds are not displayed accurately).
Instead, use the modern stuff.
Test Plan:
- Created preview comments and inlines in Differential.
- Edited a Differential inline.
- Submitted main and inline Differential comments.
- Viewed and edited Differential summary and test plan.
- Created preview comments and inlines in Diffusion.
- Submitted comments and inlines in Diffusion.
- Verified Differential now loads and saves to the generalized markup cache (Diffusion is close, but main comments still hold a single-stage cache).
- Verified old Differential comments work correctly with the lightbox.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1963
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3804
Summary: When we receive an email, figure out if any of the other tos and ccs are users. If they are, pass their phids through the stach as "exclude phids" and exclude them from getting the email.
Test Plan: used the various applications (audit, differential, maniphest) and noted emails were sent as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1676
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3645
Summary:
D03646 works, I don't want it to work.
Theoretically, it can cause us some troubles if we use this string in JS number context where 030 is 24.
Test Plan: D03646, D3646
Reviewers: epriestley, edward
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3646
Summary: So they're maybe a little easier to deal with? I'm going to take this formally to "plz @chad plz help" land.
Test Plan: {F20329}
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3609
Summary: We have lots of empty drafts in DB.
Test Plan: Wrote revision comment, deleted it, checked db.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3591
Summary: this plugs this at the controller level. the editor could also be more aware of the "action" and the fix could be there.
Test Plan: set some ccs, changed it to comment, made teh comment, noted no ccs.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3590
Summary:
I've replaced all `id(new PhabricatorObjectHandleData(...))->loadHandles()` by `$this->loadViewerHandles(...)`.
Lint caught one usage in a static method.
Test Plan: Displayed revision with sporadic author.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3432
Summary: said differently, if the user included another to address or one or more cc's, don't send the error message email.
Test Plan: played around in the metamta test console and verified that blank replies generated the error handler.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1643
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3345
Summary:
- Fix width, corresponding to wider sprites.
- Sprite the "Audit" icon.
- Mark the meta-application as device-ready.
- Fix some collapse/expand bugs with the draggable local navs.
- Add texture to local nav.
- Darken the application nav to make it more cohesive with the main nav. I think this is an improvement?
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, netfoxcity
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3338
Summary:
Add a new left-side application menu. This menu shows which application you're in and provides a quick way to get to other applications.
On desktops, menus are always shown but the app menu can be collapsed to be very small.
On tablets, navigation buttons allow you to choose between the menus and the content.
On phones, navigation buttons allow you to choose between the app menu, the local menu, and the content.
This needs some code and UI cleanup, but has no effect yet so I think it's okay to land as-is, I'll clean it up a bit as I start integrating it. I want to play around with it a bit and see if it's good/useful or horrible anyway.
Test Plan: Will include screenshots.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, alanh
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3223
Summary: We managed to move enough Owners stuff aside to make this reasonable; make projects implement the policy interface and projectquery use cursor-based paging.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for ProjectQuery callsites.
- Created an audit comment.
- Used `project.query` to query projects.
- Loaded homepage.
- Viewed Maniphest task list, grouped by project.
- Viewed project list.
- Created / edited project.
- Browsed Owners.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3200
Summary:
This is a step toward unearthing Project queries enough that I can make them policy-aware. Right now, some ProjectQuery callsites do not have reasonable access to the viewer. In particular, Owners packages need to issue Project queries because we allow projects to own packages and resolve project members inside of some package queries.
Currently, we have a very unmodern approach to querying packages, with a large number of one-off static load methods:
PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadAffectedPackages()
PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadOwningPackages()
PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadPackagesForPaths()
PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAllForPackages()
PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedUserPHIDs()
PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedPackages()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryAll()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByOwner()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByAffiliatedUser()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByPath()
We should replace `PhabricatorOwnersOwner` with an Edge and move all of these calls to a Query class. I'm going to try to do as little of this work as I can for now since I'm much more interested in getting a functional policy implementation into other applications, but ProjectQuery needs to be policy-aware before I can do that and I need to dig some at least some of the callsites out enough that I can get a viewer in there without making the code worse than it is.
This adds a PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery class and removes one callsite of one of those static methods.
I also intend to dissolve the two separate concepts of an "owner" (direct owner) and an "affiliated user" (indirect owner via project membership) since I think we're always fine with "affiliated users" owners.
Test Plan: Loaded home page / audit tool, which use the modified path. Ran queries manually via script. Made sure results included directly owned packages and packages owned through project membership.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, meitros
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3193
Summary: This is clearer and more consistent with other Query classes.
Test Plan: Used home page, conduit api, project list, other interfaces.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3179
Summary:
When we match an application route, select it as the current application and store it on the controller.
Move routes for the major applications into their PhabricatorApplication classes so this works properly.
Test Plan: Added a var_dump() and made sure we picked the right app for all these applications.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3144
Summary:
- Adds a new "Applications" application.
- Builds an application list via application config instead of via hard-coding, so we can move toward better concepts of installing/uninstalling applications, etc.
- Applications indicate that they need attention with notice counts and brief status messages rathern than 50 giant tables of all sorts of app data.
I want to try replacing the home screen with this screen, pretty much. Not sure if this is totally crazy or not. What does everyone else think?
Test Plan: Will add screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, vrana, alanh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, davidreuss, champo
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3129
Summary: Our auditors requested displaying this field and I can image that it can be useful.
Test Plan: /audit/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3044
Summary:
This doesn't indicate which path is part of which package - I think it would be too heavy.
It just highlights the paths in a similar way as audits are highlighted.
Maybe we can use different colors for highlighting different packages and use them also in paths. We can mix the colors if one path is part of more packages :-).
Test Plan:
Viewed commit with 9 files and 4 packages where I am responsible only for one of them.
Verified that the only file in my package is highlighted.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, haugen
Maniphest Tasks: T1226
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2982
Summary:
See T931. LLVM users would also prefer simpler mail, and have similarly harsh opinions about the current state of affairs.
Allow installs to disable the hint blocks if they don't want them.
Test Plan: Sent myself mail with these settings on/off, got mail with/without the blocks.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T931
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2968
Summary:
Some e-mail clients display this header and it needs to be constant.
This is somehow involved but I doubt that there is a simpler solution.
Test Plan:
Applied SQL patch.
Commented on revision, commented on commit, changed package.
Verified that the `Thread-Topic` has constant and human readable value.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ola, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2745
Summary:
It seems that Outlook and Mail.app mostly ignores the threading headers and thread primarily by subject.
They are also very picky about the Re: part in the header.
I guess that's because users of these clients often hit Reply when they want to create a new message to the sender of an e-mail.
We need both of these applications to work with the same setting because we don't use multiplexing to prevent sending multiple e-mails to people in lists.
I also believe that the default behavior should just work in most setups.
I've tried several different combinations of putting "Re:" and none of them seems to always work in both clients.
This diff at least adds more abstraction to the code which should prevent copy/paste errors (two fixed by this diff!).
Test Plan: Sent several e-mails with varying subject, verified that they look as before in Outlook and Mail.app.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2709
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary: Mark these actions with the same markers we use in Differential.
Test Plan: {F12094}
Reviewers: csilvers, jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: csilvers
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1289
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2601
Summary:
For most actions (like "accept"), we write a row only if you aren't acting on behalf of anything else. This avoids cases like every accept causing two relationships:
Some Project | Accept
Some User | Accept
For "Resign", we must always write the row. Break the logic out and handle it separately.
Test Plan: Poked it locally, but let me know if this fixes things?
Reviewers: 20after4, btrahan
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2423
Test Plan:
Added CC's/Auditors, clicked the form elements, and saw correct
behaviour. Verified that metadata was present in the detail table.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, 20after4, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2002
Summary:
- Add an explicit multiplexing option, and enable it by default. This is necessary for Mail.app to coexist with other clients ("Re:" breaks outlook at the very least, and generally sucks in the common case), and allows users with flexible clients to enable subject variance.
- Add an option for subject line variance. Default to not varying the subject, so mail no longer says [Committed], [Closed], etc. This is so the defaults thread correctly in Gmail (not entirely sure this actually works).
- Add a preference to enable subject line variance.
- Unless all mail is multiplexed, don't enable or respect the "Re" or "vary subject" preferences. These are currently shown and respected in non-multiplex cases, which creates inconsistent results.
NOTE: @jungejason @nh @vrana This changes the default behavior (from non-multiplexing to multiplexing), and might break Facebook's integration. You should be able to keep the same behavior by setting the options appropriately, although if you can get the new defaults working they're probably better.
Test Plan:
Send mail from Maniphest, Differential and Audit. Updated preferences. Enabled/disabled multiplexing. Things seem OK?
NOTE: I haven't actually been able to repro the Gmail threading issue so I'm not totally sure what's going on there, maybe it started respecting "Re:" (or always has), but @cpiro and @20after4 both reported it independently. This fixes a bunch of bugs in any case and gives us more conservative set of defaults.
I'll see if I can buff out the Gmail story a bit but every client is basically a giant black box of mystery. :/
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: cpiro, 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1097, T847
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2206
Summary:
- Make some effort to simplify the code.
- Make "Skip Past This Commit" work in Git and Mercurial.
- Make blame work in Mercurial.
- Add tooltip hover state to show more information about commits.
Test Plan: Viewed blame views in SVN, Git, Hg. Clicked line numbers, hovered/clicked commits, hovered/clicked "blame past..."
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T378
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2142
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around Differential.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2103
Summary:
- The UI is pretty straightforward, since Handle just works (tm)
- Added two methods to the owners object to handle the new layer of
indirection. Then ran git grep PhabricatorOwnersOwner and changed
callsites as appropriate.
Sending this to get a round of feedback before I test the non-trivial
changes in this diff.
Test Plan:
- owners tool: edit, view, list for basic functionality.
- phlog for the two new methods I added
Reviewers: epriestley, blair, jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2079
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2091
Summary: We may overwrite $comment as a side effect of iteration.
Test Plan: Made some audit comments as different users.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2050
Summary:
See some discussion in D2002. Add two new actions:
- Resign: (auditor only) closes your open request (user request ONLY) by putting it in a "resigned" state.
- Close: (author only) closes all open requests by putting them in a "closed" state.
@davidreuss, this is probably conflict-city with D2002 -- I'll wait for you to land first and then handle the merge on my end.
Test Plan: Resigned from and closed audits.
Reviewers: 20after4, davidreuss, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2013
Summary:
Depends on D1929. In emails, notify recipients that inlines are attached.
Vaguely copy/pastey from Differential but they only share like six lines and this seems like a random piece of code to pull out.
Test Plan: Added inline comments, got email mentioning them
Reviewers: davidreuss, nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1930
Summary:
- Add inline comments to Audits, like Differential.
- Creates new storage for the comments in the Audits database.
- Creates a new PhabricatorAuditInlineComment class, similar to DifferentialInlineComment.
- Defines an Interface which Differential and Audit comments conform to.
- Makes consumers of DifferentialInlineComments consume objects which implement that interface instead.
- Adds save
NOTE: Some features are still missing! Wanted to cut this off before it got crazy:
- Inline comments aren't shown in the main comment list.
- Inline comments aren't shown in the emails.
- Inline comments aren't previewed.
I'll followup with those but this was getting pretty big.
@vrana, does the SQL change look correct?
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Diffusion, on the left and right side of diffs.
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Differentila, on the left and right side of primary and diff-versus-diff diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1898
Summary: No big surprises here, delted the unused "DarkConsole" class.
Test Plan: Ran 'testEverythingImplemented' to verify I wasn't finalizing anything we extend.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1876
Summary:
- Order audits by id desc so they tend to be in descending time order, like other content.
- In audit tables without commit context (audit tool, home page) show commit descriptions.
- Correctly hide pagers on "active" audit filter.
- Make pagers work correctly on commit / audit views.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage, audit, owners, differential. Paginated relevant interfaces.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1875
Summary:
- Use a join to effect this query.
- Fixes a bug where packages with no commits would raise an exception because of the awkward query construction.
- Fixes a bug on audit views.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a package with no commits.
- Altered audit filters.
Reviewers: btrahan, 20after4
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1801
Summary:
Adds an optional "Auditors" field (like "Reviewers") to commit messages which gives installs a zero-config method for making audit requests.
This field does not appear on templates unless set, and is mostly ignored (but validated and preserved) by Differential.
It is then parsed by the daemons if present, and audit requests are pushed to valid users.
Test Plan: Made an "Auditors" commit and verified it was retained with "arc amend --show". Pushed it and verified the audit was triggered.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904, T880
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1793
Summary:
- Move table to Repository, since we have no Owners joins in the application anymore but would like to do a Repository join.
- Rename "packagePHID" to "auditorPHID", since this column may contain package, project, or user PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Browsed Owners, Audit, and Differential interfaces to the Audit tool.
- Made comments and state changes.
- Ran "reparse.php --herald --owners" on several commits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, nh, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1787
Summary:
- Users may elect to receive an initial notification about a commit; allow it to be replied to in order to interact with the object.
- Share thread headers between emails.
- Add the "REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS" section to both emails.
Test Plan:
- Used "reparse.php --herald" to trigger herald emails, verified reply-to and email body.
- Made audit comments, verified body.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1762
Summary: Since we embed comments/audits into Diffusion now, we don't need the
old edit interface.
Test Plan: Grepped for links to old interface.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1714
Summary:
We can drive this query better from the Audit tool now; get rid of the Diffusion
version.
Preserve usernames in URIs as per T900.
Test Plan: Clicked "Commits" from profile. Browsed audit commit filters.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1713
Summary:
The general idea here is to build a Differential-like dashboard which shows all
the things you need to audit and all the things that other people have raised
issues with, so you have a one-stop "what do I need to deal with?" interface.
- Add problem commits to the "active" view of /audit/.
- Add problem commits to homepage.
- Add commit browsing interfaces to /audit/.
- Add an "Audit" app button.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage, commit filters. Audited commits, verified state
changes reflected properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1712
Summary:
- Add a proper mailKey field to make these things mailable. Backfill all
existing objects.
- Denormalize authorPHID to the commit object so we can query by it
efficiently in a future diff. We currently use the search engine to drive
"commits by author" but that's not so good for audit, which needs more
constraints.
- Add an overall audit status field so we can efficiently query "commits that
needs your attention".
- Add enough code to convince myself that these fields are basically
reasonable and work correctly.
Test Plan:
- Ran schema upgrades. Checked database state afterward.
- Ran "reparse.php --owners --herald" to verify worker changes.
- Looked at a commit, altered aggregate status via audits / reparse.php,
verified it responded correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1706
Summary: Add more filters/options to the /audit/ interface (By User, By Package,
By Project...)
Test Plan: Looked at audits via /audit/.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1705
Summary: Add comment previews and saved drafts to audits, like Maniphest /
Differential.
Test Plan: Typed stuff into the box. Got a preview. Reloaded page. Stuff was
still there. Submitted comment. Stuff is gone.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1699
Summary:
When users submit an audit, send email to relevant parties informing them.
Allow email to be replied to. Just basic support so far; no "!raise" stuff and
no threading with the Herald commit notification.
Test Plan: Made comments, got email. Replied to email, got comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1698
Summary:
If a user comments on a commit but they don't currently have any audits they're
authoritative on, create a new one.
This makes it easier to handle other things more consistently, like figuring out
the overall audit status of a commit and who should get emails.
Test Plan: Made comments on commits I had authority on and did not have
authority on.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1697
Summary: Add audit information to the commit search index.
Test Plan: Updated a commit, searched for terms in its comments, got hits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1696
Summary: When a user posts an action in the audit tool, publish it to feed.
Test Plan: Made some comments, saw them show up in feed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1695
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Summary:
This is intended to supplant the existing "audit edit" interface. I've changed
them to both drive down the same write pathway, but the UIs are still different.
I'll fully merge them in a future diff.
Add a comment box (like Maniphest and Differential) to Diffusion. When users
make comments, their comments appear on the commit. Any audits triggers they are
responsible for are updated to reflect actions they take, as well.
Currently, audits can only be triggered by packages, but I intend to allow them
to be triggered by users and projects (via herald rules) in an upcoming diff.
Thus some of the language like "projects, users or packages" when the code is
clearly dealing only with "packagePHID".
Test Plan: Made audit updates via commit interface and via existing edit
interface. Verified both interfaces updated correctly, and that audit
responsibility rules were applied properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1688
Summary: We already allow you to create comments, but we don't show them on the
commit page. After style / view unification this is easy; show comments on the
commit page.
Test Plan: Made comments on a commit using the audit too, saw them show up in
Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1687
Summary:
Currently, audits are only accessible through the Owners tool. Start moving them
to their own first-class tool in preparation for broader audit integration.
- Lay some infrastructure groundwork (e.g. AuditQuery).
- Build a basic /audit/ view.
- Show audits on the commit page in Diffusion.
This has some code duplication with stuff we've already got, but I'll merge
everything together as we move forward on this.
Test Plan: Looked at /audit/ and a commit.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1685
Summary:
add basic auditing functionalities. For the related commits for a
package, we detect the following conditions which might be suspicious to the
owners of the package:
* no revision specified
* revision not found
* author not match
* reviewedby not match
* owners not involved
* commit author not recognized
The owners of the package can change the status of the audit entries by
accepting it or specify concern.
The owner can turn on/off the auditing for a package.
Test Plan:
* verified that non-owner cannot see the details of the audit and cannot modify
it
* verified that all the audit reasons can be detected
* tested dropdown filtering and package search
* verified really normal change not detected
* verified accept/concern a commit
* tested enable/disable a package for auditing
* verified one audit applies to all <commit, packages> to the packages the
auditor owns
* verified that re-parsing a commit won't have effect if there exists a
relationship for <commit, package> already
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, benmathews, btrahan, mpodobnik, prithvi, TomL, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1242
