Summary: Without an existing root document, Phriction shows a nice little "fake" document as the landing page, which has its own nice "Edit this document" button. When showing that page, don't also render the standard "New Document" breadcrumb in the top right. That button always prompts first for a slug name, which is silly when the root document doesn't exist (because the slug name is required to be '').
Test Plan: Loaded Phriction with and without a root document.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19863
Summary: Depends on D19810. Ref T13217. Ref T13216. I mostly used `grep implode | grep OR` and `grep implode | grep AND` to find these -- not totally exhaustive but should be a big chunk of the callsites that are missing `%LO` / `%LA`.
Test Plan:
These are tricky to test exhaustively, but I made an attempt to hit most of them:
- Browsed Almanac interfaces.
- Created/browsed Calendar events.
- Enabled/disabled/showed the lock log.
- Browsed repositories.
- Loaded Facts UI.
- Poked at Multimeter.
- Used typeahead for users and projects.
- Browsed Phriction.
- Ran various fulltext searches.
Not sure these are reachable:
- All the lint stuff might be dead/unreachable/nonfunctional?
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13217, T13216
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19814
Summary:
Depends on D19682. Ref T13202. We currently fatal when trying to render a timeline if:
- an install is fresh, so there are no pages yet, and you look at "/w/"; or
- you're looking at a Phriction page which doesn't exist (yet) like "/w/aadsflknadsflnf/".
Rendering a timeline and comment area doesn't make sense in these cases, so don't render them.
Test Plan: Hit both cases described above, got "new/empty page" prompts instead of fatals.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13202
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19683
Summary:
Ref T13202. See PHI881. These stories have bad rendering methods, but they didn't previously render into the timeilne (since Phriction documents didn't have a timeline).
Update the rendering to work.
The rendered outcome isn't great (it isn't very clear or explicit about exactly what moved where), but I'll fix that in a followup. This is a net improvement since it doesn't fatal the page, at least.
Test Plan:
- Moved page "X" to "Y".
- Viewed the old page "X".
- Before patch: bad timeline story would fatal rendering.
- After patch: story renders, at least, just not great.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13202
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19682
Summary:
Ref T13077. Ref T13197. See PHI840.
- In the "History > Diff/Compare" view, the button language wasn't draft-aware.
- Revise language to avoid the word "Revert", since this can be ambiguous.
- "Edit this page, starting with an older version of the text" is now "Edit Older|Current|Draft Version X".
- "Mark this older version of the page as the current published version" is now "Publish Older Version".
- Let the user edit the current published version, too, since this is a reasonable operation if there are drafts.
Test Plan: Navigated the history diff view, saw better button and action text.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13197, T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19668
Summary: Depends on D19663. Ref T13077. When you edit a Phriction draft, don't publish a feed story. (The eventual "Publish" event gets a story.)
Test Plan: Made draft / non-draft / publish edits, only saw feed stories for non-draft and publish edits.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19664
Summary:
Depends on D19662. Ref T13077. See PHI840.
- If you're looking at the published version of a document, but a draft version exists and you can edit it, add a hint/link.
- Fix an issue where the "draft" transaction would complain when you created a document since the initial content is empty and no "draft" transaction is adding any content.
Test Plan: Created new documents, viewed documents with current published versions and unpublished drafts.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19663
Summary:
Depends on D19661. Ref T13077. See PHI840.
When a user edits a page normally, add a "Save as Draft" button. Much of this change is around making that button render and behave properly: it needs to be an `<input type="submit" ...>` so browsers submit it and we can figure out which button the user clicked.
Then there are a few minor rules:
- If you're editing a page which is already a draft, we only give you "Save as Draft". This makes edits to update/revise a draft more natural.
- Highlight "Publish" if it's a likely action that you might want to take.
Internally, there are two types of edits. Both types create a new version with the new content. However:
- A "content" edit sets the version shown on the live page to the newly-created version.
- A "draft" edit does not update the version shown on the live page.
Test Plan: Edited a published document, edited the draft. Published documents. Reverted documents.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19662
Summary:
Depends on D19660. Ref T5811. Ref T13077.
Long ago, if you started editing a Phriction document but didn't save it, we'd save the draft in the background as part of the preview.
D11169 updated the preview to use shared infrastructure and broke this function, since we never save drafts.
Since this doesn't work right now, I want to add another thing called "draft", and the future of this feature should be more integrated with modern drafts and EditEngine (which fixed some bugs related to versioning), just get rid of this code for the moment.
Test Plan: Edited documents. This code doesn't do anything since D11169, so no behavior changed.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T5811
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19661
Summary:
Depends on D19659. Fixes T1894. Ref T13077. See PHI840.
- Add an EditEngine, although it currently supports no fields.
- Add (basic, top-level-only) commenting (we already had the table in the database).
This will probably create some issues. I'm most concerned about documents accumulating a ton of old, irrelevant comments over time which are hard to keep track of and no longer relevant. But I think this is probably a step forward in almost all cases, and a good thing on the balance.
This also moves us incrementally toward putting all editing on top of EditEngine.
Test Plan: {F5877347}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T1894
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19660
Summary:
Ref T13077. See PHI840. Ref T1894. I'm planning to just let you comment on Phriction documents. I think this will create a few problems (e.g., around popular documents which collect long comment threads that are eventually obsolete) but nothing should be too terribly critical (e.g., we handle it gracefully when objects have very large number of comments/transactions) and for most documents this is likely just a net improvement.
"Just enable comments" is probably not the final iteration on this, but I think it's probably a step forward on the balance, not a step sideways or a slippery slope down into a dark hole or anything.
Test Plan: {F5877316}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T1894
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19659
Summary: Ref T13077. This is currently a little too confusing to go out into the world, mostly because there's no way to edit documents without auto-publishing them. Keep it out of the spotlight for this release.
Test Plan: Viewed Phriction, saw publish operation marked as a prototype.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19627
Summary: Ref T13077. Updates the "History" view to be slightly better organized and draft-aware.
Test Plan: Viewed page history in Phriction.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19626
Summary:
Ref T13077. We need to know the maximum version of a document in several cases, so denormalize it onto the Document object.
Then clean up some behaviors where we edit a document with, e.g., 7 versions but version 5 is currently published. For now, we: edit starting with version 7, save as version 8, and immediately publish the new version.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Edited a draft page without hitting any weird version errors.
- Checked database for sensible `maxVersion` values.
Reviewers: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19625
Summary:
See T13193. See T13077. If we drop a column which is part of a UNIQUE KEY, MariaDB raises an error.
This is probably a bad idea on our side anyway, but in this case it wasn't an obviously bad idea.
To get around this:
- Drop the unique key, if it exists, before dropping the column.
- Explicitly add the new unique key afterward.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade` locally without issue, but I'm on MySQL. Will follow up on T13193.
Reviewers: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19624
Summary: Depends on D19621. Ref T13077. Fixes T4815. This adds previous/current/next/draft buttons and makes navigation between unpublished and published versions of a document more clear.
Test Plan: {F5841997}
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T4815
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19622
Summary:
Depends on D19620. Ref T13077. This adds a "Publish" operation which points the current version at some historical version of the document -- not necessarily the most recent version. Newer versions become "drafts".
This is still quite rough and missing a lot of hinting in the UI, I'm just making it work so I can start making the UI understand it.
Test Plan: Used the "Publish" action to publish older versions of a document, saw the document revert. Many UI hints are missing and this operation is puzzling and not yet usable for normal users.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19621
Summary: Depends on D19619. Ref T13065. Ref T13077. Migrate Phriction mail keys to the new infrastructure and drop the column.
Test Plan: Ran migrations, spot-checked the database.
Reviewers: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T13065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19620
Summary:
Ref T13077. This is mostly just a small cleanup change, even though the actual change is large.
We currently reference content and document objects from one another with `contentID` and `documentID`, but this means that `contentID` must be nullable. Switching to PHIDs allows the column to be non-nullable.
This also supports reorienting some current and future transactions around PHIDs, which is preferable for the API. In particular, I'm adding a "publish version X" transaction soon, and would rather callers pass a PHID than an ID or version number, since this will make the API more consistent and powerful.
Today, `contentID` gets used as a cheaty way to order documents by (content) edit time. Since PHIDs aren't orderable and stuff is going to become actually-revertible soon, replace this with an epoch timestamp.
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, moved, retitled, and deleted Phriction documents.
- Grepped for `documentID` and `contentID`.
- This probably breaks //something// but I'll be in this code for a bit and am likely to catch whatever breaks.
Reviewers: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19619
Summary:
Ref T13077. We currently have these weird policy hints in Phriction that we don't use in other applications. Just remove them for consistency to make the eventual swap to EditEngine a little easier.
Also nuke some unreacahble code.
Test Plan: Loaded edit page, saw more standard UI.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19618
Summary:
Depends on D19616. Ref T13077. Fixes T8172. In the last round of design updates, a lot of actions got stuffed into "Actions" menus.
I never really got used to these and think they're a net usability loss, and broadly agree with the feedback in T8172. I'd generally like to move back toward a state where actions are available on the page, not hidden in a menu.
For now, just put a curtain view on these pages. This could be refined later (e.g., stick this menu to the right hand side of the screen) depending on where other Phriction changes go.
(Broadly, I'm also not satisfied with where we ended up on the fixed-width pages like Diffusion > Manage, Config, and Instances. In contrast, I //do// like where we ended up with Phortune in terms of overall design. I anticipate revisiting some of this stuff eventually.)
Test Plan:
- Looked at Phriction pages on desktop/tablet/mobile/printable -- actions are now available on the page.
- Looked at other DocumentView pages (like Phame blogs) -- no changes for now.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T8172
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19617
Summary: Ref T13077. There is no "PHUIDocumentView" so toss the "Pro" suffix from this classname.
Test Plan: Grepped for `PHUIDocumentView` and `PHUIDocumentViewPro`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19616
Summary:
Depends on D19583. Ref T13164. This continues the work of getting rid of `requireCapabilities()`.
This check is valid, but can be a `validateTransactions()` check instead. This is generally more consistent with how other applications work (e.g., creating subprojects).
The UI for this isn't terribly great: you get a policy error //after// you try to create the object. But that's how it worked before, so this isn't any worse than it was. The actual policy exception is (very) slightly more clear now (raised against the right object).
Test Plan:
- Created a child as a user with permission to do so to make sure I didn't break that.
- Set edit permission on `a/` to just me, tried to create `a/b/` as another user, got a policy exception since they can't edit the parent.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19584
Summary:
Ref T13164. See PHI797. The last edit is available in the page header, but it's not precise (just says "180 days ago") and a little weird (it's unusual for us to put that kind of information in the header).
Add a precise timestamp to the footer for now. I'd imagine re-examining this the next time Phriction gets some UI work and maybe trying to integrate timeline/transactions more cleanly (see also T1894).
Test Plan: Looked at a wiki page, then edited it. Saw precise "Last Edit" timestamp adjacent to "Last Author".
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19560
Summary:
Ref T13164. See PHI774. Fixes T12435.
Since Phriction is hierarchical, there isn't a super strong motivation to support Spaces: you can generally set policies on a small number of documents to get the desired effective policy behavior.
However, it still improves consistency and there's no reason //not// to support Spaces. In the case where you have some moderately weird/complex policy on one or more Spaces, using Spaces to define the policy behavior can make things a bit simpler and easier to understand.
This probably doesn't actually fix whatever the root problem in T12435 was (complicated, non-hierarchical access policies?). See also a bunch of discussion in T12442. So we might end up going beyond this to address other use cases, but I think this is reasonable regardless.
Test Plan: Created and edited Phriction documents and shifted them between Spaces. Searched by Space, etc.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13164, T12435
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19553
Summary:
Fixes T13128. Ref PHI590. This is a rough-and-ready implementation of a new `PhabricatorPolicyCodex->compareToDefaultPolicy()` method that subclasses can override to handle special cases of policy defaults. Also implements a `PolicyCodex` for Phriction documents, because the default policy of a Phriction document is the policy of the root document.
I might break this change into two parts, one of which maintains the current behavior and another which implements `PhrictionDocumentPolicyCodex`.
Test Plan: Created some Phriction docs, fiddled with policies, observed expected colors in the header. Will test more comprehensively after review for basic reasonable-ness.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, swisspol
Maniphest Tasks: T13128
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19409
Summary: This reverts D18524. See that revision for discussion.
Test Plan: Viewed home menu, saw application names as menu items.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19308
Summary:
Ref T13099. Ref T12787. See PHI417. Differential has new "irresponsible" warnings in the timeline somewhat recently, but these publish feed stories that don't link to the revision or have other relevant details, so they're confusing on the balance.
These have a high strength so they render on top, but we actually just want to hide them from the feed and let "abraham closed Dxyz by committing rXzzz." be the primary story.
Modularize things more so that we can get this behavior. Also, respect `shouldHideForFeed()` at display time, not just publishing time.
Test Plan: Used `bin/differential attach-commit` on a non-accepted revision to "irresponsibly land" a revision. Verified that feed story now shows "closed by commit" instead of "closed irresponsibly".
Maniphest Tasks: T13099, T12787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19179
Summary: Ref T13090. Ref T13077. This adds `parentPaths` and `ancestorPaths` constraints to `phriction.document.query`. These should be a little more usable than the internal `slugPrefix` / `depth` stuff -- that's technically more powerful, but requires callers to know more slug normalization rules. We could perhaps expose `minDepth` / `maxDepth` in the future.
Test Plan: Ran valid and invalid `parentPaths` and `ancestorPaths` queries for `/`, `aaa/`, `AAA/`, etc. Got sensible-seeming results.
Maniphest Tasks: T13090, T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19125
Summary: Ref T13077. The context object wasn't being passed into the engine properly here, affecting relative link rendering in Phriction.
Test Plan: Viewed rendered Phriction documents with relative links, got clean renders.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19115
Summary: Ref T13077. This content extraction rule wasn't right and caused rendering on Phriction pages to extract context improperly.
Test Plan: Viewed pages in Phriction with relative links to other documents.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19114
Summary: Ref T13077. Freeze "phriction.info" in favor of the more modern "phriction.document.search".
Test Plan: Reviewed older method in web UI, saw frozen markers.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19113
Summary: Ref T13077. Adds a "paths" constraint to the API query.
Test Plan: Used paths constraint to fetch documents.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19112
Summary: Depends on D19107. Ref T13077. The underlying datasource may need some adjustment but this appears to work properly locally.
Test Plan: Typed `[[ por` locally, was suggested "Porcupine Facts". Typed `[[ / ]]`, saw it render as a reference to the wiki root instead of the install root.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19108
Summary:
Depends on D19106. Fixes T5941. Ref T13077. Allows you to find Phriction documents as suggestions from global quick search.
Also supports `w` to jump to Phriction and `w query` to query Phriction.
The actual query logic for the datasource may need some tweaking after it collides with reality, but seems to produce fairly reasonable results in local testing against synthetic data.
Test Plan: Searched for "Porcupine Facts", "Travel Companions", and other useful local pages. Searched for `w`. Searched for `w zebra facts`.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T5941
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19107
Summary:
Depends on D19105. Ref T13077. Fixes T12344.
The `[[ ... ]]` syntax accepts and handles characters which would require URL encoding if they appeared in URIs. For example, `[[ 100% Natural Cheese Dust ]]` is a legitimate, supported piece of remarkup syntax, and does not need to be written as `... 100%25 Natural ...`.
Likewise, `[[ BUY $DOGE ]]` is legitimate and does not need to be written as `[[ BUY %24DOGE ]]`. This piece of syntax creates a link to `/w/buy_$doge/`. This may or may not appear in your browser's URL bar as `/w/buy_%24doge/`, but internally "$" is a valid slug character and you'll see `buy_$doge` over Conduit, etc.
However, since users may reasonably copy paths from their browser URL bar, they may have unnecessary URL encoding. The syntax `[[ buy_$doge ]]` is legitimate, but a user copy/pasting may write `[[ buy_%24doge ]]` instead.
Currently, this extra URL encoding causes links to break, since `[[ buy_%24doge ]]` is a treated as link to `/w/buy_24doge/`, just like `[[ Fresh 100%AB Blood ]]` is a link to `/w/fresh_100_ab_blood/`.
To fix this:
- When the target for a link can be URL decoded, try to do lookups on both the un-decoded and decoded variations.
- If the un-decoded variation works, great: use it. This preserves behavior for all existing, working links.
- If the un-decoded variation fails but the decoded variation works, okay: we'll assume you copy-pasted a URL-encoded version and strip URL encoding.
- If both fail, same behavior as before.
Also, use a different spelling for "existent".
See T13084 for some "attacks" based on this behavior. I think the usability affordance this behavior provides greatly outweighs the very mild threat those attacks represent.
Test Plan:
- Created links to existing, nonexisting, and existing-but-not-visible documents, all of which worked normally.
- Created links to `[[ $doge ]]` and `[[ %24doge ]]`, saw them both go to the right place.
- Performed the "attacks" in T13084.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T12344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19106
Summary:
Fixes T10969. Ref T13077. When you create a Phriction document with a relative link (`[[ ./path/to/page ]]`) the initial email currently points to the wrong place.
This is because the context object (the page) isn't passed to the markup engine. Without this context, the relative link is rendered as though it appeared somewhere else (like a task or revision) where relative links don't make sense.
Test Plan: Created a new Phriction document with a relative link to `[[ ./porcupine_facts/starmap ]]`, saw a usable link in the resulting email.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T10969
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19105
Summary: Depends on D19100. Ref T13077. Adds a "content" attachment to get the actual page text. This works on both "phriction.document.search" and "phriction.content.search".
Test Plan: Called both API methods with the attachment, saw proper text content returned.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19103
Summary:
Depends on D19099. Ref T13077. Updates Phriction documents to string constants to make API interactions cleaner and statuses more practical to extend.
This does not seem to require any transaction migrations because none of the Phriction transactions actually store status values: status is always a side effect of other edits.
Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, moved documents. Saw appropriate UI cues. Browsed and filtered documents by status in the index.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19100
Summary:
Depends on D19098. Ref T13077.
Phriction status constants currently use the "bag of statuses" approach typical of older code, and store integers in the database.
This fixes the "bag of statuses" stuff; a future change will fix the integers.
Also adds a skeleton for `phriction.document.search`, but doesn't implement the Conduit interface yet.
Test Plan: Searched for documents with various status constraints. Grepped for removed status constants. Viewed document list.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19099
Summary: Depends on D19097. Ref T13077. Freeze the older method now that the newer one is available.
Test Plan: Viewed the older method's page and saw it frozen; called it to make sure I didn't break it by accident.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19098
Summary: Depends on D19096. Ref T13077. Adds a new "v3" API method for Phriction document content, to replace the existing "phriction.history" call.
Test Plan: Made various calls via web API console.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19097
Summary:
Depends on D19095. Ref T6203. Ref T13077. This column is nullable in an inconsistent way. Make it non-nullable.
Also clean up one more content query on the history view.
Test Plan: Ran migration, then created and edited documents without providing a descriptino or hitting `NULL` exceptions.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T6203
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19096
Summary: Depends on D19094. Ref T13077. Use modern infrastructure to perform these loads. I left a couple of calls in the older API methods unconverted.
Test Plan: Viewed documents. Viewed older versions. Viewed diffs. Did revert edits to older versions.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19095
Summary:
Depends on D19093. Ref T13077. Although content objects normally don't have any edges today, they may in the future.
Also implement Policy stuff properly.
Test Plan: Used `bin/remove destroy` to destroy a document, verified it also loaded and destroyed the correspoding Content correctly by looking at `--trace` and the database rows.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19094
Summary:
Depends on D19092. Ref T13077. This modernizes markup rendering for PhrictionContent.
This is a little messy because table of contents generation isn't straightforward.
Test Plan: Viewed Phriction documents with and without 3+ headers, saw ToC vs no ToC. Edited/previewed documents. Grepped for affected symbols. Checked DarkConsole for sensible cache behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19093
Summary: Ref T13077. Prepares for modern API access to document history using standard "v3" APIs.
Test Plan: Ran migration, verified PHIDs appeared in the database. Created/edited a document, got even more PHIDs in the database.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19092
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
