Summary:
See PHI1834. Currently, the inline adjustment engine can sometime "adjust" an inline off the end of a diff. If it does, we lay it out on an invalid display line here and never render it.
Instead, make sure that layout never puts a comment on an invalid line, so the UI is robust against questionable decisions by the adjustment engine: no adjustment should be able to accidentally discard an inline.
Test Plan:
- Created a two diff revision, where Diffs 1 and 2 have "alphabet.txt" with A-Z on one line each. The file is unchanged across diffs; some other file is changed.
- Added a comment to lines P-Z of Diff 1.
- Before: comment is adjusted out of range on Diff 2 and not shown in the UI.
- After: comment is still adjusted out of range internally, but now corrected into the display range and shown.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21435
Summary:
See PHI1839. Currently, the "No newline at end of file" text is dropped in the 1-up diff view for changes that affect a file with no trailing newline.
Track it through the construction of diff primitivies more carefully.
Test Plan: {F7695760}
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21433
Summary:
Reverts D21419. See PHI1814. Previously, I used "user-select: all" to group sequences of spaces for selection.
However, this has a side effect: the sequence is now selected with a single click. I didn't read the docuementation on the CSS property thoroughly and missed this in testing, since I was focused on drag-selection behavior.
This behavior is enough of a net negative that I think we're in a worse state overall; revert it.
Test Plan: Straight revert.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21429
Summary: See PHI1819. This structure may have `null` elements.
Test Plan: Will confirm user reproduction case.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21420
Summary:
Ref T2495. See PHI1814. Currently, Phabricator replaces tabs with spaces when rendering diffs.
This may or may not be the best behavior in the long term, but it gives us more control over expansion of tabs than using tab literals.
However, one downside is that you can use your mouse cursor to select "half a tab", and can't use your mouse cursor to distinguish between tabs and spaces. Although you probably shouldn't be doing this, this behavior is less accurate/correct than selecting the entire block as a single unit.
A specific correctness issue with this behavior is that the entire block is copied to the clipboard as a tab literal if you select any of it, so two different visual selection ranges can produce the same clipboard content.
This particular behavior can be improved with "user-select: all", to instruct browsers to select the entire element as a single logical element. Now, selecting part of the tab selects the whole thing, as though it were really a tab literal.
(Some future change might abandon this approach and opt to use real tab literals with "tab-size" CSS, but we lose some ability to control alignment behavior if we do that and it doesn't have any obvious advantages over this approach other than cursor selection behavior.)
Test Plan:
- In Safari and Firefox, dragged text to select a whitespace-expanded tab literal. Saw browsers select the whole sequence as though it were a single tab.
- In Chorme, this also mostly works, but there's some glitchiness and flickering. I think this is still a net improvement, it's just not as smooth as Safari and Firefox.
Maniphest Tasks: T2495
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21419
Summary:
See PHI1810. In situations where:
- An author submits an urgent change for review.
- The author pings reviewers to ask them to look at it.
...the reviewers may not be able to move the review forward if the review is currently a "Draft". They can only "Commandeer" or ask the author to "Request Review" as ways forward.
Although I'm hesitant to support review actions (particularly, "Accept") on draft revisions, I think there's no harm in allowing reviewers to skip tests and promote the revision out of draft as an explicit action.
Additionally, lightly specialize some of the transaction strings to distinguish between "request review from draft" and other state transitions.
Test Plan:
- As an author, used "Request Review" to promote a draft and to return a change to reviewers for consideration. These behaviors are unchanged, except "promote a draft" has different timeline text.
- As a non-author, used "Begin Review" to promote a draft.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21403
Summary:
See PHI1810. Build toward support for "Request Review" by non-authors on drafts, to forcefully pull a revision out of draft.
Currently, some action strings can't vary based on revision state or the current viewer, so this "pull out of draft" action would have to either: say "Request Review"; or be a totally separate action.
Neither seem great, so allow the labels and messages to vary based on the viewer and revision state.
Test Plan: Grepped for affected symbols, see followup changes.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21401
Summary:
Ref T13513. An inline is not considered empty if it has a suggestion, but some of the shared transaction code doesn't test for this properly.
Update the shared transaction code to be aware that application comments may have more complex emptiness rules.
Test Plan:
- Posted an inline with only an edit suggestion, comment went through.
- Tried to post a normal empty comment, got an appropriate warning.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21287
Summary:
Ref PHI1749. Instead of opening files to the last unchanged line on either side of the change, open files to the "simple" line number of the selected block.
For inlines, this is the inline line number.
For blocks, this is the first new-file line number, or the first old-file line number if no new-file line number exists in the block.
This may not always be what the user is hoping for (we can't know what the state of their working copy is) but should produce more obvious behavior.
Test Plan:
- In Diffusion, used "Open in Editor" with and without line selections. Saw same behavior as before.
- Used "n" and "r" to leave an inline with the keyboard, saw same behavior as before.
- Used "\" and "Open in Editor" menu item to open a file with:
- Nothing selected or changeset selected (line: 1).
- An inline selected (line: inline line).
- A block selected (line: first line in block, per above).
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21282
Summary: Ref T13276. Ref T13513. All readers and writers were removed more than a year ago; clean up the last remnants of this table.
Test Plan: Grepped for table references, found none.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13513, T13276
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21281
Summary:
Ref T13513. Syntax highlighting is potentially expensive, and the changeset rendering pipeline can cache it. However, the cache is currently keyed ONLY by Differential changeset ID.
Destroy the existing cache and rebuild it with a more standard cache key so it can be used in a more ad-hoc way by inline suggestion snippets.
Test Plan: Used Darkconsole, saw cache hits and no more inline syntax highlighting for changesets with many inlines.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21280
Summary: Ref T13513. Inline comment context information is somewhat expensive to construct and can be cached. Add a readthrough cache on top of it.
Test Plan: Loaded a source code changeset with many inline comments, used Darkconsole to inspect query activity. Saw caches get populated. Updated cache key, saw caches regenerate. Browsed Diffusion, nothing looked broken.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21279
Summary: Ref T13513. For now, I'm not supporting inline edit suggestions in Diffusion, although it's likely not difficult to do so in the future. Clean up some of the code so that plain ol' inlines work the same way they did before.
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines in Diffusion: familiar old behavior.
- Created, edited, reloaded, submitted inlines with suggestions in Differential: familiar new behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21278
Summary: Ref T13513. When rendering an inline suggestion for display, use highlighting and diffing.
Test Plan: {F7495053}
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21277
Summary:
Ref T13513. This still has quite a few rough edges and some significant performance isssues, but appears to mostly work.
Allow reviewers to "Suggest Edit" on an inline comment and provide replacement text for the highlighted source.
Test Plan: Created, edited, reloaded, and submitted inline comments in various states with and without suggestion text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21276
Summary:
Ref T13513. If your 10 most recently authored inlines have all been deleted, these queries can fail by overheating. This is silly and probably rarely happens outside of development.
For now, just let them overheat. This may create a false negative (incorrect "no draft" signal when the real condition is "drafts, but 10 most recent comments were deleted"). This could be sorted out later with a query mode like "executeAny()", perhaps.
Test Plan:
- Created and deleted 10 inlines.
- Submitted comments.
- Before: overheating fatal during draft flag generation.
- After: clean submission.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21274
Summary: See PHI1745. This callsite for "ChangesetParser" was not properly updated for recent changes.
Test Plan:
- Set `metamta.differential.inline-patches` to 100.
- Created a new revision with a small (<100 line) diff, with at least one reviewer.
- Ran `bin/phd debug` and observed outbound mail queue with `bin/mail list-outbound`.
- Before: fatal when trying to generate the inline changes for mail.
- After: clean mail generation.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21270
Summary:
Fixes T13539. See that task for discussion and a reproduction case.
This algorithm currently counts "\ No newline at end of file" lines as though they were normal source lines. This can cause offset issues in the rare case that a diff contains two of these lines (for each side of the file) and has changes between them (because the last line of the file was modified between the diffs).
Instead, don't count "\" as a display line.
Test Plan:
- See T13539 and PHI1740.
- Before: got fatals on the "wild" diff and the synthetic simplified version.
- After: clean intradiff rendering in both cases.
Maniphest Tasks: T13539
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21267
Summary:
Ref T13513. The way I'm highlighting lines won't work for Jupyter notebooks or other complex content blocks, and I don't see an obvious way to make it work that's reasonably robust.
However, we can just ignore the range behavior for complex content and treat the entire block as selected. This isn't quite as fancy as the source behavior, but pretty good.
Also, adjust unified diff behavior to work correctly with highlighting and range selection.
Test Plan:
- Used range selection in a Jupyter notebook, got reasonable behavior (range is treated as "entire block").
- Used range selection in a unified diff, got equivalent behavior to 2-up diffs.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21257
Summary: Ref T13513. Support direct text selection for inlines. This is currently just an alternate way to get to the same place as using line numbers, but can preserve offset/range information in the future.
Test Plan:
- Selected some text, hit "c", clicked "New Inline Comment", got sensible comments on both sides of a diff in Safari, Chrome, and (with limitations) Firefox.
- Caveats: no unified support, doesn't work across lines in Firefox.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21248
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, viewing a Jupyter document, hidden context just gets a plain "* * *" facade with no way to expand it.
Support click-to-expand, like source changes.
Test Plan:
- Clicked to expand various Jupyter diffs.
- Clicked to expand normal source changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21243
Summary:
Ref T13513. If you leave an inline on line 20 of a Jupyter document, we currently render context around *raw* line 20, which is inevitably some unrelated piece of JSON.
Instead, drop this context. (Ideal behavior would be to render context around Jupyter block 20, but that's a whole lot of work.)
Test Plan:
- On Jupyter changes and normal source changes, made and submitted inline comments, then viewed text and HTML mail.
- Saw no context on Jupyter comments (instead of bad context), and unchanged behavior (useful context) on normal source changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21242
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, "View as Document Type..." lists every available engine.
This is hard to get completely right because we can't always rebuild the document ref accurately in the endpoint, but try harder to fake something reasonable.
Test Plan: Used "View as Document Type..." on Jupyter notebooks, was given "Jupyter" and "Source" as options.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21241
Summary:
Ref T13513. As part of inline metadata, save the document engine the change is being rendered with.
This will allow other parts of the UI to detect that an inline was created on a Jupyter notebook but is being rendered on raw source, or whatever else.
The immediate goal is to fix nonsensical inline snippet rendering in email on Jupyter notebooks.
Test Plan:
- Created inlines and replies on normal soure code, saw no document engine annotated in the database.
- Created inlines and replies on a Jupyter notebook rendered in Jupyter mode, saw "jupyter" annotations in the database.
- Swapped document engines between Jupyter and Source, etc.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21240
Summary:
Ref T13513. If an intradiff has at least one unchanged file ("hasSameEffectAs()") or more than 100 files ("Large Change"), we hit this block and don't upcast storage inlines to runtime inlines. I missed this in testing.
Add the conversion step.
Test Plan: Viewed an intradiff with at least one unchanged file and at least one inline comment, saw correct rendering instead of fatal.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21239
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently:
- If you click the "Show Changeset" button, your state change doesn't actually get saved on the server.
- It's hard to select a changeset path name for copy/paste because the "highlight the header" code tends to eat the event.
Instead: persist the former event; make the actual path text not be part of the highlight hitbox.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "Show Changeset", reloaded, saw changeset visibility persisted.
- Selected changeset path text without issues.
- Clicked non-text header area to select/deselect changesets.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21236
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, if you:
- click a line to create an inline;
- type some text;
- wait a moment; and
- close the page.
...you don't get an "Unsubmitted Draft" marker in the revision list.
Lift all the draft behavior to "InlineController" and make saving a draft dirty the overall container draft state.
Test Plan:
- Took the steps described above, got a draft state marker.
- Created, edited, submitted, etc., inlines in Diffusion and Differential.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21235
Summary: Ref T13513. All queries now go through a reasonably minimal set of pathways and should have consistent behavior.
Test Plan:
- Loaded a revision with inlines.
- Created a new empty inline, reloaded page, saw it vanish.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text, did not save, reloaded page, saw draft present.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text. Submitted feedback, got prompt, answered "Y", saw draft text submit.
- Created a new empty inline, typed draft text, scrolled down to bottom of page, typed non-draft text, saw preview include draft text.
- Marked and submitted "Done".
- Used hide/show on inlines, verified state persisted.
- Did much of the same stuff in Diffusion, where it all works the same way (except: there's no prompt when submitting draft is-editing inlines).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21234
Summary: Ref T13513. Replaces "DifferentialInlineCommentQuery" with the similar but more modern "DifferentialDiffInlineCommentQuery".
Test Plan: Viewed comments in timeline, changesets. Created, edited, and submitted comments. Hid and un-hid comments, reloading (saw state preserved).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21233
Summary: Ref T13513. Continue removing usage sites for the obsolete "DifferentialInlineCommentQuery".
Test Plan: Viewed the inline list in Differential, saw sensible inlines.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21232
Summary: Ref T13513. Move querying to "DiffInlineCommentQuery" classes and lift them into the base Controller.
Test Plan: In Differential and Diffusion, created, edited, and submitted inline comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21231
Summary:
Ref T13513. Improve consistency and robustness of the "InlineComment" queries.
The only real change here is that these queries now implicitly add a clause for selecting inlines ("pathID IS NULL" or "changesetID IS NULL").
Test Plan: Browed, created, edited, and submitted inlines.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21227
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, inline storage objects ("TransactionComment") can't directly generate a runtime object ("InlineComment").
Allow this transformation to be performed in a genric way so clunky code which does it per-object-type can be removed, lifted, or simplified.
Simplify an especially gross callsite in preview code.
Test Plan: Previewed inline comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21226
Summary: Ref T13513. See that task for some discussion. This prepares to lift "loadUnsubmittedInlineComments(...)" into shared code.
Test Plan: Grepped for callers, found none in the upstream. This is a backward compatibilty break. See T13513.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21225
Summary:
Ref T13519. This is a little fuzzy, but I think the workflow here is:
- View an intradiff, generating an ephemeral comparison changeset with no changeset ID. This produces a state key of "*".
- Apply "hidden" state changes to the changeset.
- View some other intradiff and/or diff view.
- The code attempts to use "*" as a changset ID?
I'm not entirely sure this is accurate; this was observed in production and I couldn't get a clean reproduction case locally.
Optimistically, try making changeset IDs explicit rather than relying on state keys to be "usually changeset-ID-like".
Test Plan: Used "hidden" locally across multiple intradiffs, but I wasn't cleanly able to reproduce the initial issue.
Maniphest Tasks: T13519
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21223
Summary: Ref T13523. If a file hasn't been touched in the newer changeset, we can currently hit an error in the interdiff.
Test Plan:
- Touched "moo.txt" in Diff 1.
- Reverted the changes to "moo.txt" in Diff 2.
- Diffed 2 vs 1.
- Before patch: fatal (call to getFilename() on null).
- After patch: clean interdiff.
Maniphest Tasks: T13523
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21220
Summary: Ref T13513. When users choose to publish inlines, we want to publish the visible text, not the last "checkpointed" state.
Test Plan:
- Created an inline ("AAA").
- Edited it into "BBB", did not save.
- Submitted.
- Confirmed that I want to publish the unsaved inline.
- Saw "BBB" publish.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21218
Summary:
Ref T13513. As users type text into inline comments, save the comment state as a draft on the server.
This has some rough edges, particularly around previews, but mostly works. See T13513 for notes.
Test Plan: Started an inline, typed some text, waited a second, reloaded the page, saw an editing inline with the saved text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21216
Summary: Ref T13513. When computing whether a revision has draft comments or not, ignore empty inlines.
Test Plan: Added empty inlines to a revision, no longer saw a yellow "draft" bubble in the list UI.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21215
Summary: Ref T13513. When you load a changeset, discard all empty inlines. This is likely a more desirable behavior than keeping empty editors around, even though the rest of the pipeline generally handles them fairly well now.
Test Plan:
- Started an inline, didn't type any text or save, reloaded page.
- Before: page restores empty editor in the same place.
- After: we just discard this likely-pointless empty inline.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21214
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, if you start an inline and then submit overall comments, we publish an empty inline. This is literally faithful to what you did, but almost certainly not the intent.
Instead, simply ignore empty inlines at publishing time (and ignore "done" state changes for those comments).
We could delete them outright, but if we do, they'll break if you have another window open with the empty inline (since the stored comment won't exist anymore). At least for now, leave them in place.
Test Plan: Created empty inlines, submitted comments, no longer saw them publish.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21211
Summary: Ref T13513. This slightly expands the existing-but-hacky "warning" workflow to cover both "mentions on draft" and "submitting inlines being edited".
Test Plan:
- Submitted changes to a revision with mentions on a draft, inlines being edited, both, and neither.
- Got sensible warnings in the cases where warnings were appropriate.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21191
Summary:
Ref T13513. If you submit top-level comments while an inline comment editor is open, kick the comment out of the editing state.
(An improvement to this behavior would be to warn the user that we're going to do this first, but this is currently less straightforward.)
Test Plan:
- Clicked a line number to create an inline.
- Type text, save, click edit.
- (Optional: reload page.)
- Save changes overall using the form at the bottom of the page.
- Outcome: published inline is no longer in an "editing" state.
Weirdness:
- If you click a line number (and, optionally, type text), then submit without using "Save", the server-side version of the inline has no content.
- This gives you a no-effect warning. Instead, these inlines should probably just be marked as deleted somewhere in the pipeline.
- This saves the last "Saved" copy of the inline. That's (probably?) desired, but somewhat destructive without a warning.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21188
Summary:
Ref T13513. This is mostly an infrastructure cleanup change.
In a perfect world, this would be a series of several changes, but they're tightly interconnected and don't have an obvious clean, nontrivial partition (or, at least, I don't see one). Followup changes will exercise this code repeatedly and all of these individual mutations are "obviously good", so I'm not too worried about the breadth of this change.
---
Inline comments are stored as transaction comments in the `PhabricatorAuditTransactionComment` and `DifferentialTransactionComment` classes.
On top of these two storage classes sit `PhabricatorAuditInlineComment` and `DifferentialInlineComment`. Historically, these were an indirection layer over significantly different storage classes, but nowadays both storage classes look pretty similar and most of the logic is actually the same. Prior to this change, these two classes were about 80% copy/pastes of one another.
Part of the reason they're so copy/pastey is that they implement a parent `Interface`. They are the only classes which implement this interface, and the interface does not provide any correctness guarantees (the storage objects are not actually constrained by it).
To simplify this:
- Make `PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface` an abstract base class instead.
- Lift as much code out of the `Audit` and `Differential` subclasses as possible.
- Delete methods which no longer have callers, or have only trivial callers.
---
Inline comments have two `View` rendering classes, `DetailView` and `EditView`. They share very little code.
Partly, this is because `EditView` does not take an `$inline` object. Historically, it needed to be able to operate on inlines that did not have an ID yet, and even further back in history this was probably just an outgrowth of a simple `<form />`.
These classes can be significantly simplified by passing an `$inline` to the `EditView`, instead of individually setting all the properties on the `View` itself. This allows the `DetailView` and `EditView` classes to share a lot of code.
The `EditView` can not fully render its content. Move the content rendering code into the view.
---
Prior to this change, some operations need to work on inlines that don't have an inline ID yet (we assign an ID the first time you "Save" a comment). Since "editing" comments will now be saved, we can instead create a row immediately.
This means that all the inline code can always rely on having a valid ID to work with, even if that ID corresponds to an empty, draft, "isEditing" comment. This simplifies more code in `EditView` and allows the "create" and "reply" code to be merged in `PhabricatorInlineCommentController`.
---
Client-side inline events are currently handled through a mixture of `ChangesetList` listeners (good) and ad-hoc row-level listeners (less good). In particular, the "save", "cancel", and "undo" events are row-level. All other events are list-level.
Move all events to list-level. This is supported by all inlines now having an ID at all stages of their lifecycle.
This allows some of the client behavior to be simplified. It currently depends on binding complex ad-hoc dictionaries into event handlers in `_drawRows()`, but it seems like almost all of this code can be removed. In fact, no more than one row ever seems to be drawn, so this code can probably be simplified further.
---
Finally, save an "isEditing" state. When we rebuild a revision on the client, click the "edit" button if it's in this state. This is a little hacky, but simpler to get into a stable state, since the row layout of an inline depends on a "view row" followed by an "edit row".
Test Plan:
- Created comments on either side of a diff.
- Edited a comment, reloaded, saw edit stick.
- Saved comments, reloaded, saw save stick.
- Edited a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Created a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Deleted a comment, "undeleted" to get state back.
Weirdness / known issues:
- Drafts don't autosave yet.
- Fixed in D21187:
- When you create an empty comment then reload, you get an empty editor. This is a bit silly.
- "Cancel" does not save state, but should, once drafts autosave.
- Mostly fixed in D21188:
- "Editing" comments aren't handled specially by the overall submission flow.
- "Editing" comments submitted in that state try to edit themselves again on load, which doesn't work.
Subscribers: jmeador
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21186
Summary: Ref T13513. This plans for "currently editing", character range comments, code suggestions, document engine tracking. And absolutely nothing else.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, got a clean upgrade.
- Created and submitted some inline comments; nothing exploded.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21184
Summary:
Ref T13523. In the caching layer, there's a tricky clause about filetypes that skips some body rendering behavior.
Provide file type information which at least has a better chance of representing all changes (e.g., an image file may be replaced with a text file, but this can not be represented by a single file type).
Formalize "hasSourceTextBody()", to mean the changeset parser should engage the change as source text.
Test Plan: Intradiffed text changes, saw the body render properly.
Maniphest Tasks: T13523
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21210
Summary:
See PHI1722, which requests transaction details about reviewer changes.
This adds them; they're structured to be similar to "projects" and "subscribers" transactions and the "reviewers" attachment on revisions.
Test Plan: {F7410675}
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21207
Summary:
Ref T13526. Currently, if a build plan is restricted, viewers may fatal when trying to view related builds.
The old behavior allowed them to see the build even if they can not see the build plan. This is sort of incoherent, but try to stabilize things before fixing this.
Test Plan:
This is a muddy change.
- Created a build with a build plan that Alice can't see.
- As Alice, viewed the build page (restricted before, restricted after); the buildable page (fatal before, works after).
- Also viewed a revision page (works before and after, but user-reported fatal).
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13526
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21194
Summary:
Ref T13520. Generally, make the table of contents look and more like the paths panel:
- Show a hierarchy, with compression for single-sibling children.
- Use the same icons, instead of "M D" and "(img)" stuff.
- Use EditDistanceMatrix to do a piece-by-piece diff of paths changes.
- Show path changes within the path list.
I'm not entirely sold on this, but it was complicated to write and I've never heard the term "sunk cost fallacy". I think this is mostly a net improvement, but may need some adjustments and followup.
Test Plan: Viewed various changes in Differential and Diffusion, saw a more usable table of contents.
Maniphest Tasks: T13520
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21183
