Summary:
Ref T13258. The general idea here is "if arc land prompted you and you hit 'y', you get a warning about it on the timeline".
This is similar to the existing warning about landing revisions in the wrong state and hitting "y" to get through that. See D18808, previously.
These warnings make it easier to catch process issues at a glance, especially because the overall build status is now more complicated (and may legally include some failures on tests which are marked as unimportant).
The transaction stores which builds had problems, but I'm not doing anything to render that for now. I think you can usually figure it out from the UI already; if not, we could refine this.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/differential attach-commit` to trigger extraction/attachment.
- Attached a commit to a revision with various build states, and various build plan "Warn When Landing" flags.
- Got sensible warnings and non-warnings based on "Warn When Landing" setting.
{F6251631}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20239
Summary:
Ref T13216. See PHI985. You currently can't commandeer an abandoned revision, but this workflow is perfectly fine.
The caution here is just around weird use cases where, e.g., users want to reopen a revision to add a revert to it. These workflows tend to create problems so we try to guide users away from them.
Test Plan: {F6026841}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19835
Summary:
Ref T13216. See PHI970. Ref T13054. See some discussion in T13216.
When a Harbormaster Buildable object is first created for a Diff, it has no `containerPHID` since the revision has not yet been created.
We later (after creating a revision) send the Buildable a message telling it that we've added a container and it should re-link the container object.
Currently, we send this message in `applyExternalEffects()`, which runs inside the Differential transaction. If Harbormaster races quickly enough, it can read the `Diff` object before the transaction commits, and not see the container update.
Add a `didCommitTransaction()` callback after the transactions commit, then move the message code there instead.
Test Plan:
- See T13216 for substantial evidence that this change is on the right track.
- Before change: added `sleep(15)`, reproduced the issue reliably.
- After change: unable to reproduce issue even with `sleep(15)` (the `containerPHID` always populates correctly).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216, T13054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19807
Summary:
See PHI975. Ref T13216. Ref T2543. Previously, see D19204 and PHI433.
When you're acting on a draft revision, we change the button text to "Submit Quietly" as a hint that your actions don't generate notifications yet.
However, this isn't accurate when one of your actions is "Request Review", which causes the revision to publish.
Allow actions to override the submit button text, and make the "Request Review" action change the button text to "Publish Revision".
The alternative change I considered was to remove the word "Quietly" in all cases.
I'm not //thrilled// about how complex this change is to adjust one word, but the various pieces are all fairly clean individually. I'm not sure we'll ever be able to use it for anything else, but I do suspect that the word "Quietly" was the change in D19204 with the largest effect by far (see T10000).
Test Plan:
- Created a draft revision. Saw "Submit Quietly" text.
- Added a "Request Review" action, saw it change to "Publish Revision".
- Reloaded page, saw stack saved and "Publish Revision".
- Removed action, saw "Submit Quietly".
- Repeated on a non-draft revision, button stayed put as "Submit".
- Submitted the various actions, saw them have the desired effects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19810
Summary:
See PHI725. Ref T13151. These actions are somewhat unusual and I considered different ways to represent them (make them look like "status" transactions; build multiple synthetic transactions) but ultimately landed on the simplest approach of just exposing them more or less as they exist internally.
I haven't included data for any of them. Most don't really have any data, but "accept" does. I'm holding off on providing more data until after T731, which may shake up the internal format.
Test Plan: Applied most of these transactions against a revision, queried for it with `transaction.search`, got distinguishable transactions out.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13151
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19509
Summary:
See <https://twitter.com/HayleyCAnderson/status/988873585363009536>.
Currently, the action dropdown in Differential shows a heavy "X" after "Request Changes" and a heavy checkmark after "Accept Revision".
Although I'm not convinced that the messaging around "Request Changes" is too strong, I do think these marks are out of place in modern Differential. They came from a simpler time when this dropdown had fewer actions, but feel a little weird and inconsistent to me in the modern UI.
Let's try getting rid of them and see how it goes?
Test Plan:
- Viewed these actions in the dropdown, no longer saw the mark icons.
- Grepped for these unicode sequences without getting any other hits.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19405
Summary:
Ref T13130. See PHI483. Currently, "Plan Changes + Draft" uses rules like "Plan Changes", not rules like "Draft", and allows "Accept".
This isn't consistent with how "Draft" and "Accept" work in other cases. Make "Plan Changes + Draft" more like "Draft" for consistency.
Also fix a string that didn't have a natural English version.
Test Plan:
- Added a failing build plan.
- Created a revision.
- Loaded the revision before builds completed, saw a nicer piece of text about "waiting for builds" instead of "waiting for 2 build(s)".
- Builds failed, which automatically demoted the reivsion to "Changes Planned + Draft".
- As the author and as a reviewer, verified all the actions available to me made sense (particularly, no "Accept").
- Abandoned the revision to test "Abandoned + Draft".
- As the author and as a reviewer, verified all the actions available to me made sense.
- Reclaimed the revision, then used "Request Review" to send it to "Needs Review". Verified that actions made sense and, e.g., reviewers could now "Accept" normally.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13130
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19398
Summary:
See PHI573. Ref T13120. Drafts were recently changed so that "draft" and "broadcast" are separate flags, and you can have non-broadcasting revisions in states other than "draft" if builds fail on a draft or you abandon a draft.
However, when draft mode is entered with `arc diff --draft` and you have prototypes off, this flag wasn't being set correctly.
Test Plan: Disabled prototypes, created a revision with `arc diff --draft`, observed that `draft.broadcast` is now correctly `false`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13120
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19360
Summary: Depends on D19287. Ref T13110. Currently, "Abandon" and then "Reclaim" moves you out of "Draft" without setting the "Should Broadcast" flag. Keep these revisions in draft instead.
Test Plan: Reclaimed an abandoned + draft revision, got a draft revision instead of a "needs review + nonbroadcast" revision (which isn't a meaningful state).
Maniphest Tasks: T13110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19288
Summary:
Depends on D19286. Ref T13110. After builds fail remote builds, put revisions back in the author's queue.
This doesn't actually notify the author quite yet.
Test Plan: Made a failing build plan run on revisions, created a revision, saw it demote after builds failed.
Maniphest Tasks: T13110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19287
Summary: Depends on D19285. Ref T13110. When you update an "Abandoned + But, Never Promoted" revision or (in the future) a "Changes Planned + But, Never Promoted" revision, return it to the "Draft" state rather than promoting it.
Test Plan: Updated an "Abandoned + Draft" revision, saw it return to "Draft".
Maniphest Tasks: T13110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19286
Summary:
Depends on D19283. Ref T13110. To enable "Changes Planned + But, Still A Draft" and "Abandoned + But, Never Promoted From Draft" states, decouple the "broadcast" flag from the "draft" state.
Broadcast behavior is now based only on the `shouldBroadcast` flag, and revisions in any state may have this flag.
Revisions gain this flag when created as a non-draft, or when they leave the draft state for the first time.
There are probably still some ways you can get the wrong result here -- maybe abandon + update -- but those can be cleaned up as they arise.
Test Plan: Kinda poked it a bit but I'll vet this more heavily at the end of this sequence.
Maniphest Tasks: T13110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19284
Summary:
Depends on D19280. Ref T13110. Although Harbormaster cares about all builds, Differential does not practically care about local lint and unit results in determining build status.
In Differential, orient publishing around "remote builds" instead of "builds".
This does not yet change any of the draft logic, it just makes the timeline story use newer logic.
Test Plan: Used `bin/harbormaster publish` (with some guard-clause removal) to publish some buildables to revisions without anything crashing.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19281
Summary:
Ref T13114.
- Followup fix for D19267, which didn't work correctly with //new// revision creation.
- Followup fix for changes in T11015. Some of the querying logic was still handling "/x.y" and "/x.y/" differently. Instead, normalize consistently to "/x.y/"
Test Plan:
- Created a new revision cleanly.
- Created a package owning only a `example.txt` file and saw Differential find it as an owning package in the table of contents.
Maniphest Tasks: T13114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19268
Summary: Ref T13114. See PHI515. Updating a revision with the same, currently active diff became an error at some point (probably D19175). This is inconsistent; make it an allowable no-op instead.
Test Plan:
- Updated a revision's diff via Conduit.
- Updated to the same diff, no-op.
- Tried to update a different revision, error ("already attached elsewhere").
- Updated with a different diff.
- Tried to update with the original diff, error ("previously attached version").
Maniphest Tasks: T13114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19267
Summary:
This change prevents the following error when using PHP 7.2:
```
ERROR 2: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable at [/usr/local/lib/php/phabricator/src/applications/differential/xaction/DifferentialRevisionActionTransaction.php:132]
```
A similar issue was fixed in D18964
Test Plan: Tested in a live system.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19242
Summary:
See PHI457. There's no real reason not to allow this, it just wasn't clear if it was useful. See D18626.
An install had a user `arc diff` and then sprint out the door to take a very long vacation before the builds finished. One failed, so the revision is stuck as a draft forever. This seems like a reasonable motivation for allowing "Commandeer".
Test Plan: Successfully commandeered a draft.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19228
Summary:
See PHI431. Ref T13102. An install is interested in a custom "non-sticky" accept action, roughly.
On the one hand, this is a pretty hacky patch. However, I suspect it inches us closer to T731, and I'm generally comfortable with exploring the realms of "Accept Next Update", "Unblock Without Accepting", etc., as long as most of it doesn't end up enabled by default in the upstream.
Test Plan:
- Accepted and updated revisions normally, saw accepts respect global stickiness.
- Modified the "Accept" action to explicitly be unsticky, saw nonsticky accept behavior after update.
Maniphest Tasks: T13102
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19211
Summary:
Ref T13099. Ref T12787. See PHI417. Differential has new "irresponsible" warnings in the timeline somewhat recently, but these publish feed stories that don't link to the revision or have other relevant details, so they're confusing on the balance.
These have a high strength so they render on top, but we actually just want to hide them from the feed and let "abraham closed Dxyz by committing rXzzz." be the primary story.
Modularize things more so that we can get this behavior. Also, respect `shouldHideForFeed()` at display time, not just publishing time.
Test Plan: Used `bin/differential attach-commit` on a non-accepted revision to "irresponsibly land" a revision. Verified that feed story now shows "closed by commit" instead of "closed irresponsibly".
Maniphest Tasks: T13099, T12787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19179
Summary: Depends on D19175. Ref T13099. This fills in "close" and "update" transactions so that they show which commit(s) caused the action.
Test Plan: Used `transaction.search` to query some revisions, saw commit PHID information.
Maniphest Tasks: T13099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19176
Summary: Ref T13099. Move most of the "Update" logic to modular transactions
Test Plan: Created and updated revisions. Flushed the task queue. Grepped for `TYPE_UPDATE`. Reviewed update transactions in the timeline and feed.
Maniphest Tasks: T13099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19175
Summary:
See PHI346. Ref T13054. If you have prototypes enabled on the server but use `master` / `stable` on the client and run `arc diff --plan-changes`, the transition is rejected because "Draft -> Changes Planned" isn't currently a legal transition.
Allow this transition if not coming from the web UI (to keep it out of the dropdown).
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc diff --plan-changes` on `master`, got a "Changes Planned" revision instead of a validation error.
- Ran `arc diff` without `--plan-changes`, got a draft, verified that "Plan Changes" still doesn't appear in the action dropdown.
Maniphest Tasks: T13054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19067
Summary:
Fixes T13027. Ref T2543. When revisions promote from "Draft" because builds finish or no builds are configured, the status currently switches from "Draft" to "Needs Review" without re-running Herald.
This means that some rules -- notably, "Send me an email" rules -- don't fire as soon as they should.
Instead of applying this promotion in a hacky way inline, queue it and apply it normally in a second edit, after the current group finishes.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision, reviewed Herald transcripts.
- Saw three Herald passes:
- First pass (revision creation) triggered builds and no email.
- Second pass (builds finished) did not trigger builds (no update) and did not trigger email (revision still a draft).
- Third pass (after promotion out of 'draft') did not trigger builds (no update) but did trigger email (revision no longer a draft).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13027, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18819
Summary:
Ref T10233. See PHI231. When users ignore the `arc land` prompt about bad revision states, make it explicitly clear in the transaction log that they broke the rules.
You can currently figure this out by noticing that there's no "This revision is accepted and ready to land." message, but it's unrealistic to expect non-expert users to look for the //absence// of a message to indicate something, and this state change is often relevant.
Test Plan: {F5302351}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T10233
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18808
Summary:
Depends on D18801. Ref T2543. See PHI229. I missed "Accept" before, but intended to disallow it (like "Reject") since I don't want drafts to be reviewable.
However, "Resign" seems fine to allow? So let's allow that for now.
Test Plan: Was no longer offered "Accept" on draft revisions.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18802
Summary:
Depends on D18771. See PHI206. Currently, `arc diff --draft` only holds revisions in draft mode: it doesn't put them into draft mode if the install isn't configured to use draft mode.
Instead, make it a bit more forceful so that `arc diff --draft` can create into draft mode explicitly even if protoypes are off. This aligns with expection a little more clearly.
Test Plan: Ran `arc diff --draft` with prototypes off, got a revision held in draft mode.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18772
Summary:
See PHI197. Populates "status" transactions and a few other obvious types where there's no security/performance/payload/formatting issue I can come up with.
The names here are the same as the names for editing with `maniphest.edit`.
Test Plan: Used `transaction.search` to retrieve transactions of all new types.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18761
Summary:
Ref T2543. Instead of autosubmitting revisions to "Needs Review" when builds finish, allow them to be held in "Draft" indefinitely.
There's currently no UI for this. I plan to just expose it as `arc diff --draft` for now, in a followup change.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision (via Conduit) with "hold as draft", saw it hold as draft after builds finished.
- Created a revision (normally), saw it autosubmit after builds finished.
- Requested review of a "hold as draft" revision to kick it out of draft state.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18737
Summary:
Ref T2543. Most actions are not available for drafts.
Authors can "Request Review" (move out of draft to become a normal revision) or "Abandon".
Non-authors can't do anything (maybe we'll let them do something later -- like "Commandeer"? -- if there's a good reason).
Test Plan: Viewed a draft revision as an author and non-author, saw fewer actions available.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18626
Summary:
Ref T2543. When called from the UI to build the dropdown, there's no Editor, since we aren't actually in an edit flow.
This logic worked for actually performing the edits, just not for getting the option into the dropdown.
Test Plan: Used the dropdown to close an "Accepted" revision which I authored.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18490
Summary: These come out of the database as strings (see T12678), force them to integers for the API.
Test Plan: Called `transaction.search`, got integers in JSON instead of strings.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18476
Summary:
Ref T5873. This provides paths and line numbers for inline comments.
This is a touch hacky but I was able to keep it mostly under control.
Test Plan:
- Made inline comments.
- Called API, got path/line information.
{F5120157}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5873
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18469
Summary:
Ref T5873. See PHI14. I don't want to just expose internal transaction data to Conduit by default, since it's often: unstable, unusable, sensitive, or some combination of the three.
Instead, let ModularTransactions opt in to providing additional data to Conduit, similar to other infrastructure. If a transaction doesn't, the API returns an empty skeleton for it. This is generally fine since most transactions have no real use cases, and I think we can fill them in as we go.
This also probably builds toward T5726, which would likely use the same format, and perhaps simply not publish stuff which did not opt in.
This doesn't actually cover "comment" or "inline comment", which are presumably what PHI14 is after, since neither is modular. I'll probably just put a hack in place for this until they can modularize since I suspect modularizing them here is difficult.
Test Plan: Ran `transaction.search` on a revision, saw some transactions (title and status transactions) populate with values.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5873
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18467
Summary:
Ref T2543. This updates and migrates the status change transactions:
- All storage now records the modern modular transaction ("differential.revision.status"), not the obsolete non-modular transaction ("differential:status").
- All storage now records the modern constants ("accepted"), not the obsolete numeric values ("2").
Test Plan:
- Selected all the relevant rows before/after migration, data looked sane.
- Browsed around, reviewed timelines, no changes after migration.
- Changed revision states, saw appropriate new transactions in the database and timeline rendering.
- Grepped for `differential:status`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18419
Summary:
Ref T2543. Rewrites all the storage to use constants.
Note that transactions still use legacy values, I'll migrate and update them separately.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Browsed around, changed revision states, viewed dashboard, etc.
- Selected `DISTINCT()` and `GROUP_CONCAT()` of the `status` field in the database, saw sane/expected before and after values.
- Verified that old Conduit methods still return numeric constants for compatibility.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18418
Summary: Ref T2543. All writers now write modern statuses. Make all readers explicit about whether they are reading modern or legacy statuses, so I can swap the storage format.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `getStatus()`, scanned the list. Other applications have methods with this name so it's possible I missed something.
- Browed around, changed revision statuses.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18417
Summary: Ref T2543. Update these for the modern stuff.
Test Plan: Created a new revision, got a revision in the right state ("Needs Review"). Accepted, planned, requested, abandoned revision; state transitions looked good.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18415
Summary:
Ref T2543. This cleans up a couple of remaining rough edges:
- We could do an older TYPE_ACTION "close" via the daemons.
- We could do an older TYPE_ACTION "close" via `arc close-revision`, explicitly or implicitly in `arc land`, via API (`differential.close`).
- We could do an older TYPE_ACTION "rethink" ("Plan Changes") via the API, via `arc diff --plan-changes` (`differential.createcomment`).
Move these to modern modular transactions, then get rid of all the validation and application logic for them. This nukes a bunch of `ArcanistDifferentialRevision::...` junk.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/repository reparse --message rXYZ...` to reparse a commit, closing a corresponding revision.
- Used `differential.close` to close a revision.
- Used `differential.createcomment` to plan changes to a revision.
- Reviewed transaction log for full "closed by commit" message (linking to commit and mentioning author).
- Grepped for `::TYPE_ACTION` to look for remaining callsites, didn't find any.
- Grepped for `differential.close` and `differential.createcomment` in `arcanist/` to look for anything suspicious, seemed clean.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18412
Summary:
Ref T2543. Converts the TYPE_STATUS transaction (used to render "This revision now requires changes to proceed.", "This revision is accepted and ready to land.", etc) to ModularTransactions.
Also, continue consolidating all the status-related information (here, more colors and icons) into a single place. By the end of this, we may learn that NEEDS_REVIEW uses //every// color.
Test Plan:
Reviewed old status transactions (unchanged) and created new ones (looked the same as the old ones).
(I plan to migrate all of these a few diffs from now, around when I change the storage format.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18410
Summary: Ref T2543. Cleans up some more references to ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus, moving toward getting rid of it completely.
Test Plan: Planned changes, requested review, inspected the "close" one since it isn't trivial to trigger.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18408
Summary: Ref T2543. I converted this condition the wrong way, missing a `!`. I'll cherry-pick this to `stable`.
Test Plan: No more "Reopen Revision" action available on open revisions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18399
Summary:
Ref T2543. Ref T10967. This isn't precisely related to "draft" status, but while I'm churning this stuff anyway, get rid of the old double writes to clean the code up a bit.
These were added in T10967 to make sure the migration was reversible/recoverable, but we haven't seen any issues with it in several months so I believe they can now be removed safely. Nothing has read this table since ~April.
Test Plan: Took various review actions on revisions (accept, reject, resign, comment, etc). If this change is correct, there should be no visible effect.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18398
Summary:
Ref T2543. Add `isPublished()` to mean: exactly the status 'closed', which is now interally called 'published', but still shown as 'closed' to users.
We have some callsites which are about "exactly that status", vs "any 'closed' status", e.g. including "abandoned".
This also introduces `isChangePlanned()`, which felt less awkward than `isChangesPlanned()` but more consistent than `hasChangesPlanned()` or `isStatusChangesPlanned()` or similar.
Test Plan: `grep`, loaded revisions, requested review.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18341
Summary:
When users use the web UI to enter text like "Reviewers: x" into the "Summary" or "Test Plan", we can end up with an ambiguous commit message.
Some time ago we added a warning about this to the "Summary" field, and //attempted// to add it to the "Test Plan" field, but it actually gets called from the wrong place.
Remove the code from the wrong place (no callers, not reachable) and put it in the right place.
This fixes an issue where users could edit a test plan from the web UI to add the text "Tests: ..." and cause ambiguities on a later "arc diff --edit".
Test Plan: {F5026603}
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18175
Summary:
Fixes T12757. Here's a simple repro for this:
- Add a package you own as a reviewer to a revision you're reviewing.
- Open two windows, select "Accept", don't submit the form.
- Submit the form in window A.
- Submit the fomr in window B.
Previously, window B would show an error, because we considered accepting on behalf of the package invalid, as the package had already accepted.
Instead, let repeat-accepts through without complaint.
Some product stuff:
- We could roadblock users with a more narrow validation error message here instead, like "Package X has already been accepted.", but I think this would be more annoying than helpful.
- If your accept has no effect (i.e., everything you're accepting for has already accepted) we currently just let it through. I think this is fine -- and a bit tricky to tailor -- but the ideal/consistent beavior is to do a "no effect" warning like "All the reviewers you're accepting for have already accepted.". This is sufficiently finnicky/rare (and probably not terribly useful/desiable in this specific case)that I'm just punting.
Test Plan: Did the flow above, got an "Accept" instead of a validation error.
Reviewers: chad, lvital
Reviewed By: chad, lvital
Subscribers: lvital
Maniphest Tasks: T12757
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18019
Summary:
Ref T12272. I wrote this correctly, then broke it by adding the simplification which treats "accept the defaults" as "accept everything".
This simplification lets us render "epriestley accepted this revision." instead of "epriestley accepted this revision onbehalf of: long, list, of, every, default, reviewer, they, have, authority, over." so it's a good thing, but make it only affect the reviewers it's supposed to affect.
Test Plan:
- Did an accept with a force-accept available but unchecked.
- Before patch: incorrectly accepted all possible reviewers.
- After patch: accepted only checked reviewers.
- Also checked the force-accept box, accepted, got a proper force-accept.
Reviewers: chad, lvital
Reviewed By: lvital
Maniphest Tasks: T12272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17634
Summary:
Fixes T12496. Sticky accept was accidentally impacted by the "void" changes in D17566.
Instead, don't always downgrade all accepts/rejects: on update, we only want to downgrade accepts.
Test Plan:
- With sticky accept off, updated an accepted revision: new state is "needs review".
- With sticky accept on, updated an accepted revision: new state is "accepted" (sticky accept working correctly).
- Did "reject" + "request review" to make sure that still works, worked fine.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12496
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17605
Summary:
Ref T12272. If you own a package which owns "/", this allows you to force-accept package reviews for packages which own sub-paths, like "/src/adventure/".
The default UI looks something like this:
```
[X] Accept as epriestley
[X] Accept as Root Package
[ ] Force accept as Adventure Package
```
By default, force-accepts are not selected.
(I may do some UI cleanup and/or annotate "because you own X" in the future and/or mark these accepts specially in some way, particularly if this proves confusing along whatever dimension.)
Test Plan: {F4314747}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17569
Summary: Ref T10967. This change is similar to D17566, but for rejects.
Test Plan:
- Create a revision as A, with reviewer B.
- Reject as B.
- Request review as A.
- Before patch: stuck in "rejected".
- After patch: transitions back to "needs review".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17568
