Summary: Ref T13072. Make large Conduit doc pages a bit more navigable. This prepares for updating "harbormaster.sendmessage" to support sending messages to builds.
Test Plan: Viewed various Conduit API documentation pages, clicked links.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21696
Summary: Ref T13072. These don't do anything useful yet, but get the skeletons in.
Test Plan: Loaded documentation pages without fataling.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21695
Summary: Ref T13072. Trivially convert this into a modular transaction type.
Test Plan: Issued commands to a buildable.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21694
Summary: Ref T13072. This transaction type has no writers and is mooted by EditEngine.
Test Plan: Grepped for transaction constant.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21693
Summary: Ref T13072. Update the last few constant references to this class and remove it.
Test Plan: Grepped for "HarbormasterBuildCommand", got no hits.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21692
Summary: Ref T13072. Push nearly all Harbormaster build message logic into the new per-message transaction classes.
Test Plan:
- Issued every message to Buildables.
- Issued every message to Builds.
- Looked at a big pile of error messages, couldn't find any typos.
- Grepped for affected symbols, etc.
- Ran `bin/harbormaster restart ...`.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21691
Summary:
Ref T13072. Further modularize build messages by applying each one in a separate transaction type.
This makes it easier to add new types of messages (although I have no particular plans to do this, offhand) and reduces the amount of switch-boilerplate.
This will probably also simplify validating "harbormaster.sendmessage".
Test Plan:
- Applied all commands.
- Ran migration, saw transactions render properly
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21690
Summary: Ref T13072. Update "HarbormasterBuild" to use modern modular transactions.
Test Plan:
- Aborted, restarted, paused, and resumed a build.
- Used `bin/harbormaster restart`.
- Grepped for use of old "::TYPE_COMMAND" constant, didn't find any hits.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21689
Summary: Ref T13072. No callers currently generate these transactions, and they probably never have. Remove them.
Test Plan: Grepped for "HarbormasterBuildTransaction::TYPE_CREATE" and "self::TYPE_CREATE" in the class, found no hits.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21688
Summary:
Ref T13072. Currently, Harbormaster builds react to messages by applying a transaction inline (which can race) that has no real effect.
Later, the BuildEngine picks up the mesasge and applies a real effect, but this isn't transactional.
This is backwards, and makes it more difficult to transition to ModularTransaction and EditEngine. The desired workflow is:
- sending a message //just// writes to the message table (and queues a worker to process the message);
- the BuildEngine processes the message and applies effects in a transactional way.
Force this into at least roughly the right sequence of behaviors. This paves the way for porting to ModularTransaction, which should allow further cleanup.
Test Plan: Paused, resumed, aborted, and restarted a build. Ran BuildWorkers to process the commands, saw builds update appropriately.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21687
Summary:
Ref T13072. Currently, Builds have basic states (like "passed" and "failed") and pending states where a command has been issued but not yet executed (pausing, resuming, restarting, and aborting).
These are handled in a bit of an ad-hoc way, and not everything treats them the same way. In particular, the build page can concurrently report a build as "Aborting" and "Pausing", with different icons and colors.
Make everything use the same logic so that a Build can only be in exactly zero or one pending state, and use the same icons and colors.
Also tighten up which transitions are allowed: for example, it doesn't make sense to pause an aborting build.
The tighter rules don't all produce great UX right now (like "You can't pause this build.", when it would be better as "You can't pause a build which is already aborting." or similar), but just leave that alone for now.
Test Plan: Viewed builds, applied various state changes, ran BuildWorker to effect the state changes, grepped for affected methods, tried to issue various out-of-sequence build commands.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21685
Summary:
Ref T13072. These two similar tables don't make sense to keep separate. Instead, make Build a valid receiver for BuildMessage objects.
These tables are practically the same, so this is straightforward: just copy the rows in and then drop the old table.
(This table was trivial and ephemeral anyway, so I'm not bothering to do the usual "keep it around for a couple years just in case".)
Test Plan:
- Populated BuildCommand table, ran migration, saw Builds end up in the proper transitional state (e.g., pausing, aborting, restarting) with appropriate queued messages.
- Queued new messages by clicking UI buttons.
- Ran BuildWorkers, saw them process messages and mark them as consumed.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21684
Summary:
Ref T13072. Rename various "command" properties to "message" properties, to prepare for merging "HarbormasterCommand" into "HarbormasterMessage".
This change only renames variables and methods and should not affect program behavior.
Test Plan: Grepped for affected symbols, found no unmodified hits.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13072
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21683
Summary: Ref T13609. Add the Object PHID (object being built), Container PHID (container of the object being built), Build PHID, and Buildable PHID to Harbormaster build variables.
Test Plan:
{F8448191}
{F8448192}
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13609
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21569
Summary: Ref T13607. Add some time-oriented constraints to this API method to support compiling build statistics.
Test Plan:
- Called "harbormaster.target.search" with all new constraints.
- Viewed documentation in API console.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13607
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21559
Summary: Ref T13585. Provide a minimal but technically functional "harbormaster.step.edit" API method.
Test Plan: Used the web console to modify the URI for a "Make HTTP Request" build step.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13585
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21489
Summary: Ref T13585. This isn't particularly useful (notably, it does not include custom field values and isn't searchable by build plan PHID) but get the basics into place.
Test Plan: Used the web UI to make API calls, reviewed results.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13585
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21488
Summary: Ref T13577. After the fix in D21453, lint identifies additional static errors in Phabricator; fix them.
Test Plan: Ran `arc lint`; these messages are essentially all very obscure.
Subscribers: hach-que, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13577
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21457
Summary:
Although I'm not entirely thrilled about doing flow control like this (as an actual action in a build plan), I believe this build step works correctly and there's no fancy replacement mechanism on the immediate horizon, and this didn't send us down a slippery slope of Turing-complete builds encoded without real structure or context. Just kick it out of prototype.
(Other approaches which might be better in the long run are things like "this is a top-level behavior on the build plan itself" and/or "build plans are written in a DSL, not a Javascript UI".)
Test Plan: Added a new build step, saw this as an option in the "Flow Control" section.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21432
Summary: Ref T13546. This makes some "arc" tasks a little easier, and will make them more correct if "arc" ever switches to using SSH.
Test Plan: Ran "harbormaster.buildable.search" from the web UI, saw URIs in the result set.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13546
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21346
Summary: See PHI1743. If a build has no initiator PHID, the rendering pathway incorrectly tries to access a handle for it anyway.
Test Plan:
- Set a build to have no initiator PHID.
- Viewed the build plan for the build.
- Before: fatal when trying to access the `null` handle.
- After: clean build plan rendering.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21269
Summary:
Ref T13526. Currently, if a build plan is restricted, viewers may fatal when trying to view related builds.
The old behavior allowed them to see the build even if they can not see the build plan. This is sort of incoherent, but try to stabilize things before fixing this.
Test Plan:
This is a muddy change.
- Created a build with a build plan that Alice can't see.
- As Alice, viewed the build page (restricted before, restricted after); the buildable page (fatal before, works after).
- Also viewed a revision page (works before and after, but user-reported fatal).
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13526
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21194
Summary:
Depends on D21053. Ref T11968. Three things have changed:
- Overseers can no longer use FutureIterator to continue execution of an arbitrary list of futures from any state. Use FuturePool instead.
- Same with repository daemons.
- Probably (?) fix an API change in the Harbormaster exec future.
Test Plan:
- Ran "bin/phd debug task" and "bin/phd debug pull", no longer saw Future-management related errors.
- The Harbormaster future is easiest to test by just seeing if production works once this change is deployed there.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11968
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21054
Summary: Ref T10635. An install with large blocks of remarkup (4MB) in test details is reporting slow page rendering. This is expected, but I've mostly given up on fighting this unless I absolutely have to. Degrade the interface more aggressively.
Test Plan:
- Submitted a large block of test details in remarkup format.
- Before patch: they rendered inline.
- After patch: degraded display.
- Verified small blocks are not changed.
{F7180727}
{F7180728}
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T10635
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20970
Summary: Ref T13438. This is a sort of minimal plausible implementation.
Test Plan: Used "harbormaster.artifact.search" to query information about artifacts.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13438
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20878
Summary:
Fixes T7961. Currently, we present Herald users with actions like "Require legalpad signatures" and "Run build plans" even if Legalpad and Harbormaster are not installed.
Instead, allow fields and actions to be made "unavailable", which means that we won't present them as options when adding to new or existing rules.
If you edit a rule which already uses one of these fields or actions, it isn't affected.
Test Plan:
- Created a rule with a legalpad action, uninstalled legalpad, edited the rule. Action remained untouched.
- Created a new rule, wasn't offered the legalpad action.
- Reinstalled the application, saw the action again.
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T7961
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20808
Summary:
Fixes T13348. Currently, the Harbormaster UI shows "Restart All Builds", but it really means "Restart Restartable Builds", which is often fewer than "All" builds (because of autobuilds, permissions, and/or configuration).
Remove the misleading term "All" and make the workflow preview exactly which builds will and will not be affected, and why.
Test Plan:
{F6636313}
{F6636314}
{F6636315}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13348
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20679
Summary:
In some cases, we show a limited number of one type of object somewhere else, like "Recent Such-And-Such" or "Herald Rules Which Use This" or whatever.
We don't do a very good job of communicating that these are partial lists, or how to see all the results. Usually there's a button in the upper right, which is fine, but this could be better.
Add an explicit "more stuff" button that shows up where a pager would appear and makes it clear that (a) the list is partial; and (b) you can click the button to see everything.
Test Plan: {F6302793}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20315
Summary: See PHI1153. The "Runnable" and "Restartable" behaviors interact (to click "restart", you must be able to run the build AND it must be restartable). Make this more clear.
Test Plan: {F6301739}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20307
Summary:
Depends on D20291. Ref T13259. Move all the simple cases (where paging depends only on the partial object and does not depend on keys) to a simple wrapper.
This leaves a smaller set of more complex cases where we care about external data or which keys were requested that I'll convert in followups.
Test Plan: Poked at things, but a lot of stuff is still broken until everything is converted.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13259
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20292
Summary:
Ref T13249. Ref T13258. In some cases, builds are not idempotent and should not be restarted casually.
If the scary part is at the very end (deploy / provision / whatever), it could be okay to restart them if they previously failed.
Also, make the "reasons why you can't restart" and "explanations of why you can't restart" logic a little more cohesive.
Test Plan:
- Tried to restart builds in various states (failed/not failed, restartable always/if failed/never, already restarted), got appropriate errors or restarts.
- (I'm not sure the "Autoplan" error is normally reachable, since you can't edit autoplans to configure things to let you try to restart them.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258, T13249
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20252
Summary:
Depends on D20259. Now that we can index Herald rules to affected objects, show callers on the "Webhooks" UI.
A few other rule types could get indexes too ("Sign Legalpad Documents", "Add Reviewers", "Add Subscribers"), but I think they're less likely to be useful since those triggers are usually more obvious (the transaction timeline makes it clearer what happened/why). We could revisit this in the future now that it's a possibility.
Test Plan: {F6260106}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20260
Summary:
Ref T13258. Provide an easy way to find rules which trigger a particular build plan from the build plan page.
The implementation here ends up a little messy: we can't just search for `actionType = 'build' AND targetPHID = '<build plan PHID>'` since the field is a blob of JSON.
Instead, make rules indexable and write a "build plan is affected by rule actions" edge when indexing rules, then search on that edge.
For now, only "Run Build Plan: ..." rules actually write this edge, since I think (?) that it doesn't really have meaningful values for other edge types today. Maybe "Call Webhooks", and you could get a link from a hook to rules that trigger it? Reasonable to do in the future.
Things end up a little bit rough overall, but I think this panel is pretty useful to add to the Build Plan page.
This index needs to be rebuilt with `bin/search index --type HeraldRule`. I'll call this out in the changelog but I'm not planning to explicitly migrate or add an activity, since this is only really important for larger installs and they probably (?) read the changelog. As rules are edited over time, this will converge to the right behavior even if you don't rebuild the index.
Test Plan: {F6260095}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20259
Summary:
Ref T13258. The general idea here is "if arc land prompted you and you hit 'y', you get a warning about it on the timeline".
This is similar to the existing warning about landing revisions in the wrong state and hitting "y" to get through that. See D18808, previously.
These warnings make it easier to catch process issues at a glance, especially because the overall build status is now more complicated (and may legally include some failures on tests which are marked as unimportant).
The transaction stores which builds had problems, but I'm not doing anything to render that for now. I think you can usually figure it out from the UI already; if not, we could refine this.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/differential attach-commit` to trigger extraction/attachment.
- Attached a commit to a revision with various build states, and various build plan "Warn When Landing" flags.
- Got sensible warnings and non-warnings based on "Warn When Landing" setting.
{F6251631}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20239
Summary: Ref T13258. Make the "Affects Buildable" option actually work.
Test Plan:
- As in previous change, created a "wait for HTTP request" build plan and had it always run against every revision.
- Created revisions, waited a bit, then sent the build a "Fail" message, with different values of "Affects Buildable":
- "Always": Same behavior as today. Buildable waited for the build, then failed when it failed.
- "While Building": Buildable waited for the build, but passed even though it failed (buildable has green checkmark even though build is red):
{F6250359}
- "Never": Buildable passed immediately (buildable has green checkmark even though build is still running):
{F6250360}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20233
Summary: Ref T13258. Makes the new "Hold Drafts" behavior actually work.
Test Plan:
- Created a build plan which does "Make HTTP Request" somewhere random and then waits for a message.
- Created a Herald rule which "Always" runs this plan.
- Created revisions, loaded them, then sent their build targets a "fail" message a short time later.
- With "Always": Current behavior. Revision was held as a draft while building, and returned to me for changes when the build failed.
- With "If Building": Revision was held as a draft while building, but promoted once the build failed.
- With "Never": Revision promoted immediately, ignoring the build completely.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20232
Summary:
Ref T13258. Implements the "Restartable" behavior, to control whether a build may be restarted or not.
This is fairly straightforward because there are already other existing reasons that a build may not be able to be restarted.
Test Plan: Restarted a build. Marked it as not restartable, saw "Restart" action become disabled. Tried to restart it anyway, got a useful error message.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20230
Summary:
Ref T13258. Fixes T11415. This makes "Runnable" actually do something:
- With "Runnable" set to "If Editable" (default): to manually run, pause, resume, abort, or restart a build, you must normally be able to edit the associated build plan.
- If you toggle "Runnable" to "If Viewable", anyone who can view the build plan may take these actions.
This is pretty straightforward since T9614 already got us pretty close to this ruleset a while ago.
Test Plan:
- Created a Build Plan, set "Can Edit" to just me, toggled "Runnable" to "If Viewable"/"If Editable", tried to take actions as another user.
- With "If Editable", unable to run, pause, resume, abort, or restart as another user.
- With "If Viewable", those actions work.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258, T11415
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20229
Summary: Ref T13258. This will support changing behaviors in "arc land".
Test Plan: Called "harbormaster.buildplan.search", saw behavior information in results.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20228
Summary:
Depends on D20219. Ref T13258. Ref T11415. Installs sometimes have long-running builds or unimportant builds which they may not want to hold up drafts, affect buildable status, or warn during `arc land`.
Some builds have side effects (like deployment or merging) and are not idempotent. They can cause problems if restarted.
In other cases, builds are isolated and idempotent and generally safe, and it's okay for marketing interns to restart them.
To address these cases, add "Behaviors" to Build Plans:
- Hold Drafts: Controls how the build affects revision promotion from "Draft".
- Warn on Land: Controls the "arc land" warning.
- Affects Buildable: Controls whether we care about this build when figuring out if a buildable passed or failed overall.
- Restartable: Controls whether this build may restart or not.
- Runnable: Allows you to weaken the requirements to run the build if you're confident it's safe to run it on arbitrary old versions of things.
NOTE: This only implements UI, none of these options actually do anything yet.
Test Plan:
Mostly poked around the UI. I'll actually implement these behaviors next, and vet them more thoroughly.
{F6244828}
{F6244830}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258, T11415
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20220
Summary:
Depends on D20218. Ref T13258. It's somewhat cumbersome to get from build plans to related builds but this is a reasonable thing to want to do, so make it a little easier.
Also clean up / standardize / hint a few things a little better.
Test Plan: {F6244116}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20219
Summary: Depends on D20217. Ref T13258. Mostly for completeness. You can't edit build steps so this may not be terribly useful, but you can do bulk policy edits or whatever?
Test Plan: Edited a build plan via API.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20218
Summary: Depends on D20216. Ref T13258. Bland infrastructure update to prepare for bigger things.
Test Plan: Created and edited a build plan.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20217
Summary: Ref T13088. Build Plans currently have a "Created" date in the right-hand "Curtain" UI, but this is unusual and the creation date is evident from the timeline. It's also not obvious why anyone would care. Remove it for simplicity/consistency. I think this may have just been a placeholder during initial implementation.
Test Plan: Viewed a build plan, no more "Created" element.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13088
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20216
Summary:
Depends on D20179. Ref T13088. See PHI351. See PHI1018. In various cases, unit tests names are 19 paths mashed together.
This is probably not an ideal name, and the test harness should probably pick a better name, but if users are fine with it and don't want to do the work to summarize on their own, accept them. We may summarize with "..." in some cases depending on how this fares in the UI.
The actual implementation is a separate "strings" table which is just `<hash-of-string, full-string>`. The unit message table can end up being mostly strings, so this should reduce storage requirements a bit.
For now, I'm not forcing a migration: new writes use the new table, existing rows retain the data. I plan to provide a migration tool, recommend migration, then force migration eventually.
Prior to that, I'm likely to move at least some other columns to use this table (e.g., lint names), since we have a lot of similar data (arbitrarily long user string constants that we are unlikely to need to search or filter).
Test Plan: {F6213819}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13088
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20180
Summary: Ref T13088. Prepares for putting test names in a separate table to release the 255-character limit.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions, buildables, builds, test lists, specific tests.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13088
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20179
Summary:
Depends on D19919. Ref T11351. This method appeared in D8802 (note that "get...Object" was renamed to "get...Transaction" there, so this method was actually "new" even though a method of the same name had existed before).
The goal at the time was to let Harbormaster post build results to Diffs and have them end up on Revisions, but this eventually got a better implementation (see below) where the Harbormaster-specific code can just specify a "publishable object" where build results should go.
The new `get...Object` semantics ultimately broke some stuff, and the actual implementation in Differential was removed in D10911, so this method hasn't really served a purpose since December 2014. I think that broke the Harbormaster thing by accident and we just lived with it for a bit, then Harbormaster got some more work and D17139 introduced "publishable" objects which was a better approach. This was later refined by D19281.
So: the original problem (sending build results to the right place) has a good solution now, this method hasn't done anything for 4 years, and it was probably a bad idea in the first place since it's pretty weird/surprising/fragile.
Note that `Comment` objects still have an unrelated method with the same name. In that case, the method ties the `Comment` storage object to the related `Transaction` storage object.
Test Plan: Grepped for `getApplicationTransactionObject`, verified that all remaining callsites are related to `Comment` objects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19920
Summary:
Depends on D19918. Ref T11351. In D19918, I removed all calls to this method. Now, remove all implementations.
All of these implementations just `return $timeline`, only the three sites in D19918 did anything interesting.
Test Plan: Used `grep willRenderTimeline` to find callsites, found none.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19919
