Summary:
Ref T4403. Implements "only the first time" for Maniphest rules, and fixes the trigger itself.
The trigger would never fire and block rules because it was comparing a string (like "first") to an int (like 0).
The "only" vs "every" stuff is contributed and I should have pushed back harder on this toInt / toString stuff. Maybe I'll just get rid of it; it purely causes confusion and problems.
Test Plan: Wrote an "only the first time" rule, ran it twice, it applied once.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8193
Summary: Ref T1344. I don't think we'll need to destroy any data moving forward, and would like to get more feedback about what changes users want.
Test Plan: Looked at a project and clicked onto its board.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8191
Summary: ...by the surprising step of changing how this data is stored from id to phid. Also a small fix to not allow "disabled" rules to be used as herald rule conditions, i.e. can't make a rule that depends on a disabled rule.
Test Plan: viewed existing herald rule that had a rule condition and noted nice new display using handle. made a new rule that had a rule condition and verified it worked correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8186
Summary:
Ref T4379. Fixes T4359. Currently, `bin/search index` does not rebuild CustomField indexes. This is because they aren't really part of the main search index. However, from a user's point of view this is by far the most logical place to look for index rebuilds, and it's straightforward for us to write into this secondary store.
At some point, it might be nice to let you specify fields as "fulltext" too, although no one has asked for that yet. We could then dump the text of those fields into the fulltext index. Ref T418.
Test Plan: Used `bin/search index --type proj --trace`, etc., and examination of the database to verify that indexes rebuilt. Reindexed users, tasks, projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4359, T418, T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8185
Summary:
Ref T4379. Long ago, the "Project" vs "ProjectProfile" split was intended to allow a bunch of special fields on projects without burdening the simple use cases, but CustomField handles that far better and far more generally, and doing this makes using ApplicationTransactions a pain to get right, so get rid of it.
The only remaining field is `profileImagePHID`, which we can just move to the main Project object. This is custom enough that I think it's reasonable not to express it as a custom field.
Test Plan: Created a project, set profile, edited project, viewed in typeahead, ran migration, verified database results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8183
Summary: Ref T4379. Major goal here is to remove `ProjectProfile` so all edits use ApplicationTransactions. This also makes things more flexible, allowing users to disable this field if they don't like it.
Test Plan: Ran migration, verified data survived, edited/created projects, reordered fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8182
Summary:
Ref T4379. Ref T3794. Fixes T4010. This brings CustomFields to projects.
My primary goal is to get rid of the special casing around project profiles and profile editing, so all edits are ApplicationTransactions. Particularly, I want to make the "blurb/description" field a custom field which goes through builtin infrastructure.
A distant secondary goal is that this is a feature which users like/want because users like/want features.
Test Plan: Added a custom field and examined it in the edit, view, and search interfaces.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3794, T4010, T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8180
Summary: Use standard spacing and colors
Test Plan: Reload pinboard home, see correct gutters and colors
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8187
Summary:
Ref T4379. Currently, you can edit away your edit capability in Projects. Prevent this in a general way.
Since some objects have complex edit policies (like "the owner can always edit"), we can't just check the value itself. We also can't fairly assume that every object has a `setEditPolicy()` method, even though almost all do right now. Instead, provide a way to pretend we've completed the edit and changed the policy.
Test Plan: Unit tests, tried to edit away my edit capability.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8179
Summary:
Ref T4379. Projects currently include their "delete/disable" function as part of edit, which is atypical. Instead, provide it as a first-class action. This is primarily for consistency between applications.
(The action list on projects is getting pretty huge, but we can deal with that separately; I have some ideas.)
Test Plan: Archived/unarchived a project. Edited a project.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8177
Summary:
Ref T4379. Perform all editing with modern transaction infrastructure. A few practical changes here:
- Message for "project name required" should be a little nicer. I'll deal with this once more stuff gets straightened out. You get a reasonable message now, it's just not nicely handled as part of the form.
- Message for "project name is not unique" should be a little nicer. Same as above.
- Previously, we would automatically archive a project when the last member left or was removed. I'll probably restore this in a bit but am omitting it for the moment for simplicity.
- Previously, we would create projects with goofy nonsensical permissions. Now we create them with reasonable permissions.
Test Plan:
- Created project.
- Edited project.
- Ran unit tests.
- Viewed project edit history.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8168
Summary:
Ref T4379. Projects has been partially converted to ApplicationTransactions, but the rough state of the world is that all the //storage// is modern, but most of the stuff on top isn't yet. Particularly, there's a `PhabricatorProjectEditor` which is //not// a subclass of `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor`, but which fakes its way through writing reasonable data into modern storage.
This introduces a real transaction editor, `PhabricatorProjectTransactionEditor`, with the eventual goal of moving all of the old functionality into it and deleting the old class. This diff only moves the membership transaction into new code (it doesn't even move all of it -- when we create a project, we add the author as a member, and that can't move quite yet since there are other transactions at the same time).
Test Plan:
- Created a new project.
- Edited members.
- Joined / left project.
- This already has a pile of unit test coverage.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8167
Summary:
Ref T4379. When you add a redundant edge, we currently compare the values strictly, using `===`. However, the old and new versions of the edge have slightly different member data, because one has been synthetically constructed and one has been read from the database.
Instead, compare only the things we actually care about:
# Were any destintations added or removed?
# Was any edge data changed?
If the answer to both questions is "no", consider the update a no-op.
Test Plan: In the next diff, I'm making project members use the EDGE transaction type. Before this change, adding an existing project member would generate a transaction with no changes. Now, it is correctly detected as a no-op, while normal transactions continue to work properly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8166
Summary:
Ref T4379. I want project subscriptions to work like this (yell if this seems whacky, since it makes subscriptions mean somethign a little different for projects than they do for other objects):
- You can only subscribe to a project if you're a project member.
- When you're added as a member, you're added as a subscriber.
- When you're removed as a member, you're removed as a subscriber.
- While you're a member, you can optionally unsubscribe.
From a UI perspective:
- We don't show the subscriber list, since it's going to be some uninteresting subset of the member list.
- We don't show CC transactions in history, since they're an uninteresting near-approximation of the membership transactions.
- You only see the subscription controls if you're a member.
To do this, I've augmented `PhabricatorSubscribableInterface` with two new methods. It would be nice if we were on PHP 5.4+ and could just use traits for this, but we should get data about version usage before we think about this. For now, copy/paste the default implementations into every implementing class.
Then, I implemented the interface in `PhabricatorProject` but with alternate defaults.
Test Plan:
- Used the normal interaction on existing objects.
- This has no actual effect on projects, verified no subscription stuff mysteriously appeared.
- Hit the new error case by fiddling with the UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8165
Summary: Add described, simple header and icon with divider.
Test Plan: Tested on an existing mock and created a new mock with and without a description.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8181
Summary: standard ish. Fixes T4388.
Test Plan: made a comment with L1 and noted L1 linked to L1. Also observed working-ish hovercard.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4388
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8178
Summary: Adds a handy bar full of tiny buttons. Use only when directed. Ref: T4394
Test Plan: View UI Examples.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8169
Summary: I don't think this is too terrible, and makes the future easier? Maybe?
Test Plan: ALLCAPS translation, Viewed a diff, feed, and notifications.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8175
Summary: After the recent search changes, the filter here changed from `type` to `types`. Currently, if you click "Attach Differential Revisions", it shows objects of too many types.
Test Plan: Clickced "Attach Differential Revisions" or whatever it's called, just saw revisions.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8164
Summary:
Ref T4387. By using `hg locate` to attempt to only list files in the given path
browsing diffusion is a bit faster. In a repo of about 600M it shaves a rough 100ms
off viewing the root of the project.
Test Plan: Looked around in diffusion and saw it showed everything including .files, which was nice
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4387
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8163
Summary: Lets you type any mailable into the "Subscribers" field.
Test Plan: Typed a list, got relevant tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8161
Summary:
See <https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/505>. When the status/event table moved, it broke this migration, which implicitly loads statuses by loading events.
Instead, access just the row we care about.
Test Plan: Used `--apply` to apply the new version of the patch.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8162
Summary: It used to say "Mark with flag 7" or whatever, and now it says "Mark with flag Checkered"
Test Plan: noted previous rule I made was more understandable
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8158
Summary: turn on herald rules ability to specify other herald rules. Fixes T4294.
Test Plan: made a rule to be cc'd on new tasks. made another rule to flag a task if it contained "test test" in the title AND the cc'd rule for new tasks matched. Made some new tasks and verified new "test test" tasks were flagged.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4294
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8157
Summary: adds a new FIELD and a new VALUE to support this. Slightly dodgy because priorities do not have phids so we have to special case how we handle this in a few spots. Ref T4294.
Test Plan: made a new rule to get cc'd on unbreak now and wishlist tasks. verified got cc'd correctly and not cc'd correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4294
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8156
Summary: Fixes T4378. I just removed the `<em>` since this element is unusual and it's not convenient to switch it to translatable remarkup.
Test Plan: stared at it real good
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chrisbolt
Maniphest Tasks: T4378
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8155
Summary: See IRC. This migration inadvertently depends on the columns in the commit table, because it calls `save()`, and thus broke for installs with data after we added the `importStatus` column. Since that was ~9 months after this patch, probably not many installs are affected.
Test Plan: Ran patch locally with `--apply` on data. Had user verify fix.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8152
Summary: Ref T4375. We're going to need these for a bunch of infrastructure to work.
Test Plan: Ran migrations, checked DB, used `phid.query`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8151
Summary: Ref T4375. Very basic, but gives us a more standard place to put edit/delete operations.
Test Plan: {F108765}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8149
Summary: Ref T4375. Basic ApplicationSearch integration to power this more flexibly.
Test Plan: {F108762}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8148
Summary: Ref T4375. This doesn't get everything (I figure I'll clean up the actual UI strings when I touch the UIs) but should get the bulk of the URIs and class names and stuff.
Test Plan: Clicked every calendar-related link I could find/grep, they all still seem to work. URIs now say "event".
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8147
Summary: Ref T4375. Calendar uses oldschool `loadOneWhere()` calls. Make CalendarEvent policy-aware, do the edit/delete policy checks through the policy framework, and use modern query infrastructure.
Test Plan:
- Viewed calendar;
- created, edited, deleted event;
- viewed calendar tab in Conpherence.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8146
Summary: Ref T4375. We never join this table, so this is a pretty straight find/replace.
Test Plan: Browsed around Calendar, verified that nothing seemed broken. Saw my red dot in other apps.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8145
Summary: Currently, mentioning two projects in a block (`{#a} {#b}`) produces an overzealous parse. Forbid these characters in project monograms.
Test Plan: Got correct markup.
Reviewers: btrahan, dctrwatson, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8141
Summary: Ref T1139. This has some issues and glitches, but is a reasonable initial attempt that gets some of the big pieces in. We have about 5,200 strings in Phabricator.
Test Plan: {F108261}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8138
Summary: ...and surface it in all adapters except commit adapters. Values are true or false. Ref T4294
Test Plan: made a herald rule to be cc'd on new tasks. was cc'd on new tasks and not cc'd on updates to existing tasks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4294
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8142
Summary: I've only seen this be an issue with PhabricatorBot.
Test Plan: Comment on something with characters that are automatically converted like "<>", and see what the irc bot reports
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8140
Summary: Ref T4365. Aligns jump nav with the normal search behavior.
Test Plan: Typed some junk into the jump nav, mashed return.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8136
Summary:
Fixes T4365. See discussion in D8123.
This implements the most conservative solution of approaches discussed in D8123. Basically:
- When you search in primary search, we overwrite "query" in your default (topmost) search filter, and execute that.
This doesn't implement any of the other "sticky" stuff, where the query sticks around. Maybe we'll do that eventually, but it gets messy and could be confusing. Practically, this addresses the major use case in the wild, which is to make the menu bar search mean "Open Tasks" by default.
This also removes the old, obsolete "search scope" stuff. A long time ago, searching from within Maniphest would search tasks, etc., but this was pretty weird and confusing and is no longer used, and no one complained when we got rid of it.
Test Plan: Dragged "Open Tasks" to my top search, searched for "asdf", got "asdf in open tasks" results.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: bigo, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8135
Summary:
Ref T4365. Drive primary search through ApplicationSearch instead of through a bunch of custom nonsense. Notably, this allows you to save searches, notably.
The one thing this doesn't do -- which I'd like it to -- is carry your query text across searches. When you search for "quack", I want to overwrite the query in your default filter and give you those results, so you can turn the search into an "Open Tasks" search by default by reordering the queries. I'll probably do that next. It feels a little hacky but I want to try it out.
Test Plan: {F106932}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, bigo
Maniphest Tasks: T4365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8123
Summary: Ref T4365. It's not practical to cursor-page all engines; allow main search engines to be offset-paged. Basically, this comes down to setting a flag and then doing a couple of tiny things differently.
Test Plan: Used this two diffs from now.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8121
Summary: Ref T4365. Two diffs from now, I'm changing the UI a bit to let you search for closed and unowned documents more explcitly. To support this in ElasticSearch and more easily in MySQL search, make these explicit, positive relationships.
Test Plan: `bin/search index --all`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8122
