Summary: Removes much of the UI around the beta logo.
Test Plan: test large and small tiles
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8372
Summary: Adds an li for semantics, fixes spacing around error view in a phui-box or not
Test Plan: view a project with no tasks, perform a search with no data returned.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8371
Summary: Better aligns the text area when leaving an inline comment. Also, phts
Test Plan: reload page, view new padding.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8370
Summary: Ref T2222. This probably doesn't get everything, but should improve many of the newer transactions.
Test Plan: Looked at feed after making some edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8368
Summary: Ref T2222. This should help new mail thread properly with old mail.
Test Plan: Will push.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8367
Summary: Although the defaults don't require a verified email address, it's easy to lock yourself out by accident by configuring `auth.require-email-verification` or `auth.email-domains` before setting up email. Just force-verify the initial/setup account's address.
Test Plan: Went through setup on a fresh install, saw address verify.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8365
Summary: Ref T2222. This updates the new JIRA field to be editable.
Test Plan: Used `/editpro/` to edit associated JIRA issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8364
Summary: Ref T2222. This will probabaly have a few rough edges too, but seems to work well.
Test Plan:
- Made a bunch of comments while building this.
- Made some new comments.
- Verified that the Asana/JIRA integration is only a little bit janky, not completely broken.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8362
Summary: Ref T2222. This will probably have some rough edges for a bit (e.g., weird cases I didn't remember or think of), but there's no change to the underlying data and we can easily revert if things get too messy.
Test Plan: Looked at a variety of revisions and saw sensible output.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8361
Summary:
Ref T2222. These are pretty straightforward.
For these fields and a few others, the existing code shows the value for the "current/manual" diff (i.e., the diff selected in the diff selection table), not the "active" diff (i.e., the most recent diff attached to the revision). I'm going to drop that for now (always showing the most recent diff instead) and then reevaluate it once we're switched over. In 95% of cases these are the same, anyway.
Test Plan: Looked at fields; this diff changes nothing on its own.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8359
Summary:
...this was nice to do for boards, since this diff also starts calling this code in the board move case. The big trick is to use the new expandTransactions hook to expand the subpriority transaction into a priority transaction if pertinent. The other stuff is just about hiding these new subpriority extractions.
...also removes the "edit" UI from the default board since we can't actually edit anything and it thus is buggy.
Ref T4422. Next step is to move board edits into the editor with their own little transaction.
Test Plan: re-orded tasks on a maniphest query, reloaded, and noted re-order stuck.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4422
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8358
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Gets the storage-based fields working.
This requires future changes to actually do anything, all this code is inactive.
Test Plan: {F118863}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8357
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Differential has a legacy storage table for auxiliary fields; move the data to modern storage.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Verified fields still worked properly afterward (view, edit, etc).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8355
Summary:
Ref T2222. This isn't complete and doesn't change runtime behavior yet (the new fields are not glued to the interface), but implements many fields.
(The remaining fields have something weird going on with them, for the most part.)
Test Plan:
With additional changes, rendered most fields sensibly:
{F118834}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8354
Summary:
The intent of getOrBuildEngine() is to save some boilerplate in cases where we're just using a standard engine, but it didn't get cached so we'd rebuilt it over and over again.
This was especially bad in Differential with a large number of inlines.
Test Plan: "Query" tab of services is no longer quite so ridiculous in Differential.
Reviewers: btrahan, dctrwatson
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8352
Summary:
Currently, the linter raises `XHP29` warnings for these files because they are not abstract or final.
I guess there are two possibly solutions, either making the classes final or marking them as `@concrete-extensible`. Given that there are no subclasses of these classes in the `phabricator`, `arcanist` and `libphutil` repositories... I opted to declare the classes as final.
Test Plan:
The following linter warnings are gone:
```
>>> Lint for src/aphront/configuration/AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
3 /**
4 * @group aphront
5 */
>>> 6 class AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration
7 extends AphrontApplicationConfiguration {
8
9 public function __construct() {
>>> Lint for src/applications/differential/mail/DifferentialReplyHandler.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
1 <?php
2
>>> 3 class DifferentialReplyHandler extends PhabricatorMailReplyHandler {
4
5 private $receivedMail;
6
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8347
Summary: This currently raises a linter `XHP37` warning.
Test Plan: The file now lints okay.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8349
Summary:
Put a test somewhere we can --ignore it.
Also fix path tests.
Test Plan: insert good/bad values at various positions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8353
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Ref T418. A few changes:
- CustomField can now index into global search.
- Use CustomField fields instead of older custom fields for Differential global search. (This slightly breaks any custom fields which exist, but they are presumably very rare, and probably do not exist; this break is also very mild.)
- Automatically perform CustomField and Subscribable indexing on applicable object types.
Test Plan: Used `bin/search index` to reindex a bunch of stuff, then searched for it. Debug-dumped abstract documents to inspect them.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8346
Summary: If an attacker somehow intercepts a verification URL for an email address, they can hypothetically CSRF the account owner into verifying it. What you'd do before (how do you get the link?) and after (why do you care that you tricked them into verifying) performing this attack is unclear, but in theory we should require a CSRF submission here; add one.
Test Plan: {F118691}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8351
Summary: Ref T2222. This enriches mail a little bit to get these rendering pretty much like they do now.
Test Plan: {F118255}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8343
Summary: Fixes T4376. Only thing I don't like in the current implementation is clicking "Done" doesn't refresh the page so you don't see the viewed secret transaction until you reload. Also made the textarea read-only as when I was playing with this for the first time I assumed I could also edit from the view secret side of things.
Test Plan: Viewed some secrets, saw some transactions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4376
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8345
Summary: D8341 was a good start. However, I was looping through all the statuses each time, when I should only deal with a given status once. Instead, unset() a status from the list of statuses once we handled it. Also, delete the last old $key thing, which interfered with my chosen strategy.
Test Plan: made a two day event and verified it showed up in just those two days. (will push and test again just in case but this should be it)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8342
Summary:
...maybe anyway because I can't reproduce it live. This diff does two things that should help with bugginess though - uses $viewer rather than $user (...$user is who we are looking at...) *AND* upgrades a Conpherence util class to Calendar, and said util class has unit tests and came about from fixing a similar bug in Conpherence back in the day.
Wrote some comments in the util class because I think it has a tendency to trip people up. These comments are not partciularly good however.
Test Plan: viewed user profile - looked good. viewed conpherence - looked good. ran unit tests - they passed. (note I would also like to push this live and verify Chad's profile is fixed on secure.phabricator.com)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8341
Summary:
Ref T2222. This requires one new trick:
- When merging edge transactions which both add/update an edge, the Editor gets to control how the edge data is merged.
Specifically, we pick the "strongest" state to keep, so "accept + comment" leaves you with an accept instead of a comment.
Test Plan: Accepted, commented on, and comment + accepted revisions. Added some debugging dumps to verify that the merging was getting hit and working correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8340
Summary:
Ref T2222. This doesn't feel super clean, but doesn't feel too bad either.
Basically, Differential transactions can have secondary state-based effects (changing the overall revision status) when reviewers resign, are removed, accept, or reject revisions.
To deal with this in ApplicationTransactions, I did this:
- `applyFinalEffects()` can now alter the transaction set (notably, add new ones). This mostly matters for email, notifications and feed.
- In Differential, check for an overall revision state transition in `applyFinalEffects()` (e.g., your reject moving the revision to a rejected state).
- I'm only writing the transaction if the transition is implied and indirect.
- For example, if you "Plan Changes", that action changes the state on its own so there's no implicit state change transaction added.
The transactions themselves are kind of fluff, but it seems useful to keep a record of when state changes occurred in the transaction log. If people complain we can hide/remove them.
Test Plan: {F118143}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8339
Summary: Ref T2222. This mostly makes Accept/Reject work. The big missing piece is that overall revision status does not yet update properly. I need to think about how I want that to work a little bit more.
Test Plan: Accepted and rejected some stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8333
Summary: Ref T2222. This is obsolete and no longer used. We could deduce it from transactions or commits in modern Phabricator if we wanted it. We may implement a more general mechanism for T4434.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8330
Summary:
Ref T2222. This introduces two small new concepts:
- `expandTransactions()`: allows a transaction to expand into several transactions. For example, "resign" adds a "remove reviewers" transaction.
- We have some other cases which could use this, but currently hard-code things outside of the `Editor`.
- One example is that in Maniphest, closing a task implies claiming it if it is unowned.
- `setIgnoreOnNoEffect()`: The whole Editor can be set to continue or stop if any transactions have no effect, but this allows the behavior to be refined at the individual transaction level. This is primarily to make the UX less confusing, so the user gets only a single relevant error instead of one for each expanded transaction.
Otherwise, this is pretty straightforward.
Test Plan:
Rigged comment form to use SavePro controller, enabled resign action, then tried to resign from a bunch of stuff.
{F117743}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8328
Summary: We store the `arc` commandline in this 255-character column, but it can be more than 255-characters long. If it's huge, truncate it.
Test Plan:
Executed:
arc list --conduit-uri=http://local.aphront.com:8080/ --conduit-version 6.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Works fine after this patch.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8327
Summary: If I'm not mistaken, `project_id` was recently replaced by `project.name` and `conduit_uri` replaced by `phabricator.uri`.
Test Plan: I guess if this differential works, then everything is okay.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8338
Summary: Hardens up the logic for DST and makes them easier to access elsewhere.
Test Plan: view sample events, all day and multiday, in my sandbox
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8332
Summary:
These methods already exist in AphrontView. The redefinition can sometimes cause this warning:
[2014-02-24 18:27:48] ERROR 2048: Declaration of PHUICalendarListView::setUser() should be compatible with AphrontView::setUser(PhabricatorUser $user) at [/INSECURE/devtools/phabricator/src/view/phui/calendar/PHUICalendarListView.php:138]
Test Plan: Viewed calendar on profile.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8329
Summary: Ref T2222. Implements the simpler actions (abandon, reclaim, close, reopen, plan changes, request review) in a transactional way with validation and effect checks.
Test Plan:
- Rigged submissions to point at the Pro controller.
- Rigged dropdown to have all these options all the time.
- Tried to apply about 20-30 of these operations to various revisions and always got the expected result (success, error, or no-op).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8307
Summary: Ref T2222. Makes the "pro" controller work with inlines.
Test Plan: Added a bunch of inlines and saved them with the "pro" controller.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8306
Summary: Ref T2222. Adds a mostly-functional "Pro" comment controller. This does the core stuff, but does not yet do actions (accept, reject, etc.) or inline comments.
Test Plan: Changed the `if (false)` to an `if (true)`, then made some comments, etc. This is normally unreachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8304
Summary: Ref T2222. Adds basic support for email.
Test Plan: Received an email via `/editpro/`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8303
Summary:
@mbishopim3 reported an issue in IRC:
> mbishopim3: epriestley: "Error updating working copy: Commit "" has not been discovered yet! Run discovery before updating refs." any ideas?
I can't reproduce it and it went away for him, but one theory is that we're getting here and git/hg are spitting out nothing, which we incorrectly parse as `array("")` when we intend `array()`.
Test Plan:
Pushed some new commits, ran `bin/repositoy refs X`, got expected results.
I can't actually reproduce the bug, but this might fix it and appears to make the code more correct.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: mbishopim3, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8326
Summary: This advice is clearer if we also tell you to remove the comment.
Test Plan: Reading adventure!
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8325
Summary:
When you click the pencil icon in the Maniphest task list, we currently fatal:
Argument 1 passed to PhabricatorCustomFieldList::appendFieldsToForm() must be an instance of AphrontFormView, instance of PHUIFormLayoutView given, called in /core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestTaskEditController.php on line 576 and defined
This is because we build an `AphrontFormView` noramlly, but a `PHUIFormLayoutView` for dialogs, since they don't take a full form (they render their own form tag).
Instead, always build an `AphrontFormView` and just pull the `PHUIFormLayoutView` out of it when we're ready to put it in a dialog. This means `$form` is always the same type of object, and is generally better and makes more sense.
Test Plan: Clicked pencil edit icon in Maniphest task list.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, carl
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8324
Summary:
When we save a Conpherence draft, the draft part works fine but `$xactions` never gets defined, so this gets hit a little later on:
[24-Feb-2014 11:46:10] WARNING: [pool www] child 82805 said into stderr: "NOTICE: PHP message: [2014-02-24 11:46:10] EXCEPTION: (RuntimeException) Undefined variable: xactions at [/INSECURE/devtools/libphutil/src/error/PhutilErrorHandler.php:211]"
[24-Feb-2014 11:46:10] WARNING: [pool www] child 82805 said into stderr: "NOTICE: PHP message: #0 PhutilErrorHandler::handleError(8, Undefined variable: xactions, /INSECURE/devtools/phabricator/src/applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceUpdateController.php, 122, Array of size 13 starting with: { request => Object AphrontRequest }) called at [/INSECURE/devtools/phabricator/src/applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceUpdateController.php:122]"
[24-Feb-2014 11:46:10] WARNING: [pool www] child 82805 said into stderr: "NOTICE: PHP message: #1 ConpherenceUpdateController::processRequest() called at [/INSECURE/devtools/phabricator/webroot/index.php:87]"
Instead, define `$xactions`.
Test Plan:
- Type into Conpherence while tailing the error log.
- After patch, clean error log.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8323
Summary: If you copy the registration URL, then register, then load the URL again while logged out (i.e., attempt to reuse the registration URL), we try to show you a tailored error message. However, this call is not correct so we show you a not-so tailored exception instead.
Test Plan:
- Get to the registration screen.
- Save URL.
- Complete registration.
- Log out.
- Return to saved URL.
Previously, exception. Now, readable error.
{F117585}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8322
Summary:
Does a handful of things to make Calendar significantly more useful
- Enabled overlapping events
- Profile has a 'week view' of the user
- Profile has a 'month view' of the users
- Multiple users on a calendar are color coded
- Browse view slightly more useful
This stops short of implementing the new 'home' view on Calendar, mostly this is a big step though to make that happen next.
Test Plan: Make lots of events on diffent users.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2897, T4375
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8317
Summary: Put a very rough filter on what we'll accept as an email address. We can expand this if anyone is actually using local delivery or other weird things. This is mostly to avoid a theoretical case where some input is parsed differently by `PhutilAddressParser` and the actual mail adapter, in some subtle hypothetical way. This should give us only "reasonable" email addresses which parsers would be hard-pressed to trip up on.
Test Plan: Added and executed unit tests. Tried to add silly emails. Added valid emails.
Reviewers: btrahan, arice
Reviewed By: arice
CC: arice, chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8320
