Summary: been some changes here and this code was broked. turns out we re-assign $action like two lines later and never used the initial value, so we can simply delete the offending line. Fixes T5745.
Test Plan: submitted inline comment pre-patch and fatal. re-submitted post patch and great success!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5745
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10078
Summary: Currently, content runs before header. Instead, run header, content, footer. This makes it easier to use `header.php` for includes, for Phacility.
Test Plan: Made Phacility blog work better, see next diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10067
Summary:
Ref T4896. Depends on D10056. Moves search indexing to standard infrastructure.
Also, fixes a bug where inline comments would not be indexed.
Test Plan: Used `bin/search index ... --trace` to view index construction of a commit, saw all the comments and inlines get indexed.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10057
Summary: Ref T4896. Depends on D10055. This uses core rendering stuff for audit comments, and fixes all the wonkiness with inlines so we can actually land the migration.
Test Plan: Viewed, previewed and edited various types of comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10056
Summary:
Ref T4896. Depends on D10052. This is the major/scary migration, but not really so bad. It is substantially similar to D8210, but less complex because there are fewer actions here.
This moves `PhabricatorAuditComment` storage to `PhabricatorAuditTransaction`, then reads `PhabricatorAuditComment`s as a proxy around the new objects.
Test Plan:
- Before migrating, browsed around. Nothing appeared broken.
- Migrated cleanly.
- Viewed old transactions (inlines, comments, accept/reject/etc, add auditors, add ccs, implicit CCs).
- Added all of those comment types.
- Edited a draft.
- Deleted a draft.
- Spot checked the database for sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10055
Summary:
Ref T4896. Depends on D10023. Prepares the code for the final migration.
The transaction table stores one row per distinct effect (e.g., add CCs) rather than one row per user action (e.g., "add CCs + comment"). We can double-read that table as long as the code doesn't expect transactions/comments to have multiple different effects, and doesn't try to write any such rows.
Everywhere that we were writing a big "X + Y" comment, write two separate "X" and "Y" comments instead. Like D10023, this disrupts the UI a little (you get more boxes), but that will be resolved once the rendering code swaps over. Otherwise, this retains the existing behavior.
Test Plan:
- Used `diffusion.createcomment` to add comments, raise concern, and accept.
- Previewed commenting, adding auditors/ccs, accepting, raising concern.
- Actually performed commenting, adding auditors/ccs, accepting, raising concern.
- Added a user with mentions.
- Added an explicit CC and a mention user.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10052
Summary:
Ref T4896. Moves us closer to migrating comments to transactions by building a transaction per inline.
This makes the UI a little wonky, and it will get slightly worse until we swap to the new UI and grouping/collapsing starts working. It's still usable, there's just a box per inline.
Test Plan:
- Added a comment.
- Added an inline comment.
- Added a comment and an inline comment.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10023
Summary: Adds Phriction to list of apps that use Source Sans as default font in addition to Legalpad and Diviner.
Test Plan: Tested various layouts imported from secure. Should be reasonably tested, but will follow up on secure.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10064
Summary:
Fixes T5707. After work on T5245, the `$task` object may not have the correct set of task PHIDs attached to it when Herald is invoked.
Instead, just fetch the authoritative set. This is simple, and Herald is not super performance sensitive (happens on a write) so hitting the DB once is fine.
Test Plan: Created a task with projects, verified the projects field contained the correct values when processed by Herald.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5707
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10060
Summary: Fixes T5717. Like other partial edits, object links should not be blocked by unrelated missing fields on the object.
Test Plan:
- Linked two objects.
- Verified the inverse editor already sets "continue on missing fields" and "continue on no effect".
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5717
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10059
Summary:
Handling readmes with no extension is a bit of a hack, but seemed like a small cost.
The Big Win here is that you can commit README.remarkup and README.md and have both Phabricator and GitHub render __with__ //all// ##the## ~~pretty~~ **markup**.
Test Plan: Looked at some readme files.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10047
Summary: As mentioned on rP8ce35e6b67e7e2a81b274bab7a6dd19dedb4df06, `setConcreteOnly(true)` can be omitted since (lacking magical powers) `loadObjects()` will always only instantiate concrete objects.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10050
Fixes an issue with D9991. A user was hitting the following exception:
```
echo '{}' | arc --conduit-uri='http://phabricator.joshuaspence.com'
call-conduit conduit.query
Waiting for JSON parameters on stdin...
Exception
[HTTP/500] Internal Server Error
>>> UNRECOVERABLE FATAL ERROR <<<
Call to a member function getAPIMethodName() on a non-object
/usr/src/phabricator/src/applications/conduit/method/ConduitQueryConduitAPIMethod.php:34
┻━┻ ︵ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ︵ ┻━┻
(Run with --trace for a full exception trace.)
```
Auditors: epriestley
Summary: Fixes T5695. A Conduit "method does not exist" exception is somewhat expected... there is no need to `phlog` the exception.
Test Plan: Called a non-existent Conduit method. Saw no exceptions in the error logs.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5695
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10042
Summary: Ref T4896. Begins laying groundwork to split comments apart so they behave like transactions, ultimately enabling the migration.
Test Plan: Made several different types of comments, verified resulting email looks OK.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10022
Summary:
Ref T4896. This is substantially similar to D8196.
Migrate the comment text out of the `audit_comment` table and into the `audit_transaction_comment` table. Do double reads on `PhabricatorAuditComment` so the APIs aren't disturbed. The old table is still updated.
Test Plan:
- Before applying migration, cleared cache and browsed around. Things looked fine, except no comment text.
- Applied migration.
- Cleared cache, browsed around, saw all my old comments.
- Added some new comments.
- Spot checked migrated and new rows in database.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10020
Summary: Ref T4896. Buries all direct access to the table so we can limit the surface area affected by the migration.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `PhabricatorAuditComment`.
- Grepped for `audit_comment`.
- Viewed a bunch of comments.
- Added a comment.
- Reindexed a commit.
- Searched for unique term in new comment.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10019
Summary:
Ref T4896. This is substantially identical to the process which Differential followed, and mostly copied from the original Differential migration and the Differential proxy object.
Basically, we move all the data over but the application can't tell, and the same APIs do reads and writes to the new table.
Test Plan:
- Browsed UI before migrating, everything looked fine (but no inlines).
- Ran migration.
- Verified draft and published comments survived migration.
- Added a draft.
- Previewed draft.
- Submitted draft.
- Viewed standalone with drafts and published comments.
- Sanity checked data in database, didn't see anything unusual.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10018
Summary:
Ref T4896. This adds the new storage, without any code changes.
This storage is substantially identical to the Differential storage, except that `changesetID` has been replaced by `pathID`.
I've retained the properties intended to be used to implement T1460. They might not be quite right, but at least we'll be able to make any fixes consistently to both applications. For now, these fields are empty and ignored.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade`. Nothing calls this code yet.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10017
Summary: Ref T4896. Move all direct accesses to the inline comment table behind a small amount of API to make it easier to migrate the table.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `PhabricatorAuditInlineComment`.
- Grepped for `audit_inlinecomment`.
- Created a draft comment.
- Previewed a draft comment.
- Reloaded page, still saw draft.
- Viewed standalone, still saw draft.
- Made comment, inline published.
- Added a draft, saw both.
- Edited inline comment.
- Reindexed commit.
- Searched for unique word in published comment, found commit.
- Searched for unique word in draft comment, no results.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10016
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getCapabilityKey` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPolicyCapability`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 and D9985 for similar implementations.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10039
Summary:
The ability to query by name(s) already exists
but is not bound to the conduit method. This binds it.
Test Plan:
Tested locally
echo '{"names": ["myprojectbyname"]}' | arc call-conduit project.query
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, 20after4
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10032
Summary: These files were added in D10001, which was submitted before (but landed after) D9982 had landed.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, chad
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10033
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T2787. There were some mega-uggo buttons and such; reduce the uggo-ness by a hair.
Test Plan: {F179686}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10006
Summary:
Ref T2787. Carts need a status so we can tell if they've been purchased. Also kind of get WePay working as a one-time provider, and let charges not have a methodPHID (they won't for one-time providers).
All the status stuff is still super crazy rough and you can do things like start a checkout, add a bunch of stuff to your cart, complete the checkout, and have Phabricator think you paid for all the stuff you added. But this is fine for now since you can't actually edit carts, and also none of this is at all usable anyway. I'll refine some of the workflows in future diffs, for now I'm just getting things hooked up and technically working.
Test Plan:
- Purcahsed a cart and got a sort of status/done screen instead of a "your money is gone" exception.
- Went through the WePay flow and got a successful test checkout.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10003
Summary: Ref T2787. Makes charges a real object, allows providers to apply them. We are now (just barely) capable of stealing users' money.
Test Plan: {F179584}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10002
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make carts and purchases real objects, with storage, that kind-of work.
Roughly, the idea here is that applications create "purchases" (like "1 large t-shirt") and add them to "carts" (a user can have a lot of different carts at the same time), then hand things off to Phortune to deal with actualy charging a card. Roughly this works like Paypal or other similar systems do, except Phortune is the thing the user gets handed off to.
This doesn't do anything interesting/useful yet.
Also fix some bugs and update some UI.
Test Plan: Added a product to a cart, saw it in cart screen.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10001
Summary: Provide an implementation for the `getName` method rather than automagically determining the application name.
Test Plan: Saw reasonable application names in the launcher.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10027
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getTypeConstant` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPHIDType`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 for a similar implementation.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9985
Summary: Ref T5655. It is superfluous to include "base" in the name of an abstract base class. Furthermore, it is not done consistently within the code base.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9989
Summary: Ref T5655. The `PhabricatorDestructibleInterface` interface is misspelled as `PhabricatorDestructableInterface`. Fix the spelling mistake.
Test Plan: `grep`. Seeing as this interface is fairly recent, I don't expect that this would cause any widespread breakages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9988
Summary: Fixes T5661. We may now pick up a conflicting `dateCreated` field from an edge table join.
Test Plan: Ran a project + dateCreated filtering query, no longer got an exception.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5661
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9997
Summary: Allow `PhrictionDocument` to be permanently deleted with `./bin/remove destroy`.
Test Plan:
Deleted a Phriction document with `./bin/remove` and verified that the database was in the expected state.
```
> ./bin/remove destroy PHID-WIKI-auj57rauigvcqvv5feh6
IMPORTANT: OBJECTS WILL BE PERMANENTLY DESTROYED!
There is no way to undo this operation or ever retrieve this data.
These 1 object(s) will be completely destroyed forever:
- PHID-WIKI-auj57rauigvcqvv5feh6 (PhrictionDocument)
Are you absolutely certain you want to destroy these 1 object(s)? [y/N] y
Destroying objects...
Destroying PhrictionDocument PHID-WIKI-auj57rauigvcqvv5feh6...
Permanently destroyed 1 object(s).
```
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9976
Summary:
Commits don't support `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` yet, so the "Edit Maniphest Tasks" dialog from the commit UI currently bombs.
Hard-code it to do the correct writes in a low-level way. After T4896 we can remove this and do `ApplicationTransaction` stuff.
Test Plan: Used the "Edit Maniphest Tasks" UI from Diffusion.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9975
Summary: Allow `PhabricatorMetaMTAMailingList` to be permanently deleted with `./bin/remove destroy`.
Test Plan:
```
./bin/remove destroy PHID-MLST-nseux3r55escj573shsf
IMPORTANT: OBJECTS WILL BE PERMANENTLY DESTROYED!
There is no way to undo this operation or ever retrieve this data.
These 1 object(s) will be completely destroyed forever:
- PHID-MLST-nseux3r55escj573shsf (PhabricatorMetaMTAMailingList)
Are you absolutely certain you want to destroy these 1 object(s)? [y/N] y
Destroying objects...
Destroying PhabricatorMetaMTAMailingList PHID-MLST-nseux3r55escj573shsf...
Permanently destroyed 1 object(s).
```
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9979
Summary:
Some mailers remove the duplicate entries themselves, but some (Mailgun) don't.
This affects installations with metamta.one-mail-per-recipient set to false, and will cause
- ugly looking "to" entries. Gmail, for example, collapses to+cc entries to one list, so you get something that looks like "to: me me john"
- It sometimes causes duplicate delivery of the same message when used in conjuction with Google Groups. I suspect that their message de-dup mechanism is confused by it (I fuzzed it directly with Mailgun, and saw the same message delivered twice - once directly through mailgun, and bounced again through Google Groups). This doesn't happen when the entries are not duplicated.
Test Plan: Created some tasks. Added subscribers. Things seem to work reasonably well.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9978
