Summary:
Ref T13373. When you "bin/config set x ..." a value, the success message ("Set x ...") is somewhat ambiguous and can be interpreted as "First, you need to set x..." rather than "Success, wrote x...".
Make the messaging more explicit. Also make this string more translatable.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/config set ...` with various combinations of flags, saw more clear messaging.
Maniphest Tasks: T13373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20711
Summary: Fixes T13374. The "Temporary Failures" row is missing a cell definiton from the addition of "Average Queue Time".
Test Plan: Viewed "/daemon/" with some temporary failures and and odd number of rows above the "Temporary Failures" row. Saw cell properly zebra-striped.
Maniphest Tasks: T13374
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20710
Summary:
Ref T13349. This is almost the same change as D20678, but for project profiles instead of user profiles.
The general reproduction case is "view a project where you can't see more than 50 of the 500 most recent feed stories".
Test Plan:
- Forced all queries to overheat.
- Viewed a project profile page.
- Before: overheating fatal near top level.
- After: damage contained to feed panel.
Maniphest Tasks: T13349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20704
Summary: See downstream <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T229757>. The "autofocus" attribute mostly just works, so add it to this input.
Test Plan: As a user with TOTP enabled, established a new session. Saw browser automatically focus the "App Code" input on the TOTP prompt screen.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20703
Summary:
Fixes T13370. We currently show an "Award Badge" button conditionally, based on whether the viewer can award any badges or not.
The query to test this may overheat and this pattern isn't consistent with other UI anyway. Stop doing this test.
Test Plan:
- Created 12 badges.
- As a user who could not edit any of the badges, viewed the "Badges" section of a user profile.
Maniphest Tasks: T13370
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20702
Summary: Fixes T13368. Some workflows (like "Move tasks to...") execute board layout without objects to update. In these cases, we can hit a warning because `objectPHIDs` is not initialized to `array()`.
Test Plan: Went through the "Move tasks to..." workflow on a workboard, no longer saw a warning when trying to iterate over an empty `objectPHIDs` list.
Maniphest Tasks: T13368
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20701
Summary:
Ref T13368. Currently, both visible and hidden columns are shown in the "Move tasks to..." dropdown on workflows from workboards.
When the dropdown contains hidden columns, move them to a separate section to make it clear that they're not likely targets.
Test Plan:
- Used "Move tasks to project..." targeting a board with no hidden columns. Saw a single ungrouped dropdown.
- Used "Move tasks to project..." targeting a board with hidden columns. Saw a dropdown grouped into "Visible" and "Hidden" columns.
Maniphest Tasks: T13368
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20700
Summary:
Ref T13368. Proxy columns should not be selectable from this workflow. If you want to move tasks to milestone/subproject X, do "Move tasks to project..." and pick X as the project.
(This could be made to work some day.)
Test Plan: Went through a "Move tasks to project..." workflow targeting a project with subprojects. No longer saw subproject columns presented as dropdown options.
Maniphest Tasks: T13368
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20699
Summary: Ref T13368. The column options presented to the user are currently incorrect because the wrong set of columns are drawn from.
Test Plan: On a workboard, used "Move tasks to project..." to target another board, saw that board's columns.
Maniphest Tasks: T13368
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20698
Summary:
Fixes T13341. Currently, cart emails (invoices/receipts) are sent to members of the associated merchant account. This was just a simple way to keep an eye on things when this was first written.
The system works fine, and recent changes (almost certainly D20525) stopped these emails from working (presumably because of the slightly weird merchant permissions model).
This could be sorted out in more detail, but it looks like the path forward is to introduce a side channel for email anyway (via T8389), and that's a better way to implement this behavior since it means the normal recipients won't see a bunch of random staff/merchant email addresses on their receipts.
Test Plan: Grepped for `merchant` in this editor.
Maniphest Tasks: T13341
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20696
Summary:
Ref T13339. If a search pattern matches more than once on a line, we currently render the line incorreclty, duplicating some of the text.
`substr()` is being called as though the third parameter was `end_offset`, but it's actually `length`. Correct the parameter.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F6676625}
After:
{F6676623}
Maniphest Tasks: T13339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20695
Summary:
Fixes T8830. Fixes T13364.
- The inability to destroy objects from the web UI is intentional. Make this clear in the messaging, which is somewhat out of date and partly reflects an earlier era when things could be destroyed.
- `bin/remove destroy` can't rewind time. Document expectations around the "put the cat back in the bag" use case.
Test Plan: Read documentation, clicked through both workflows.
Maniphest Tasks: T13364, T8830
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20694
Summary:
Fixes T13363. Currently, these are genuine links which we intercept events for.
Make them pseudolinks instead. Possible alternative approaches are:
- Keep them as genuine links, but mark them as non-navigation links for Quicksand. (But: yuck, weird special case.)
- Keep them as genuine links, and have the dialog handler `JX.Stratcom.pass()` to see if anything handles the event. (But: the "pass()" pattern generally feels bad.)
"Tableaus" or whatever comes out of T10469 some day will probably break everything anyway?
Test Plan:
- Opened the "Edit Related Tasks... > Edit Subtasks" dialog.
- Clicked task title links (not the "open in new window" icon, and not the "Select" button).
- Before: Dialog (sometimes) closed abruptly.
- After: Task is consistently selected as part of the attachment set.
Maniphest Tasks: T13363
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20693
Summary: Ref T13358. This is very minimal, but technically works. The eventual goal is to generate PDF invoices to make my life easier when I have to interact with Enterprise Vendor Procurement.
Test Plan: {F6672439}
Maniphest Tasks: T13358
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20692
Summary:
Fixes T13356. This option is supported and works fine, it just isn't documented.
Add documentation and fix the config option to actually link to it to make life a little easier.
Test Plan: Read documentation.
Maniphest Tasks: T13356
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20691
Summary: Fixes T13355. This didn't appear to be a ton of extra work, we just didn't get it for free in the original implementation in D14635.
Test Plan:
- Saw "date" custom fields appear in Conduit API documentation for "maniphest.edit".
- Set custom "date" field to null and non-null values via the API.
{F6666582}
Maniphest Tasks: T13355
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20690
Summary: Ref T4900. We may execute a bad query here if the task has no projects at all.
Test Plan: Edited a task with no new or old projects. Instead of an exception, things worked.
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20689
Summary:
Fixes T13353. If you:
- Visit a blog post and save the URI.
- Move the blog post to a different blog.
- Revisit the old URI.
...we currently 404. We know what you're trying to do and should just redirect you to the new URI instead. We already do this if you visit a URI with a noncanonical slug.
Test Plan:
- Created post A.
- Copied the live URI.
- Moved it to a different blog.
- Visited the saved URI from the earlier step.
- Before: 404.
- After: Redirect to the canonical URI.
Maniphest Tasks: T13353
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20688
Summary: Depends on D20686. Fixes T13350. Now that "slowvote.poll.search" exists, deprecate this old method.
Test Plan: Reviewed method description in Condiut API console in the web UI.
Maniphest Tasks: T13350
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20687
Summary:
Depends on D20685. Ref T13350. Currently:
- When a SearchEngine parameter is marked as hidden from Conduit, we may still render a table of possible values. Instead, only render the table if the parameter is actually usable.
- The table header is hard-coded to say `'statuses'`, which is just a silly mistake. (Most commonly, this table does have `statuses` constants.)
Test Plan: Viewed the Conduit API documentation for the new "slowvote.poll.search" API method, saw more sensible display behavior.
Maniphest Tasks: T13350
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20686
Summary: Ref T13350. Add a modern "*.search" API method for Slowvote so "slowvote.info" can be deprecated with a reasonable replacement.
Test Plan: Used Conduit test console to call method, saw reasonable results.
Maniphest Tasks: T13350
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20685
Summary:
Depends on D20680. Ref T4900. The "BoardLayoutEngine" operates on PHIDs without knowledge of the underlying objects, but this means it has to be sensitive to PHID input order when falling back to a default layout order.
We use "default layout order" on workboards which are sorted by "Natual" order but which have one or more cards which no user has ever reordered. For example, if you add 10 tasks to a project, then create a board, there's no existing order for those tasks in the "Backlog" column. The layout engine uses the input order to place them in the column, with the expectation that input order is ID/creation order, so new cards will end up on top.
I think this code never really made an explicit effort to guarantee that the LayoutEngine received objects in ID order, and it just sort of happened to by coincidence and good fortune. Some recent change has disrupted this, so the edit operation can end up with the PHIDs arranged in arbitrary order.
Explicitly put them in ID order so we always get an implicit default layout order to fall back to. Also, update to `msortv()`.
Test Plan:
- Tagged several tasks with project X, a project without a board yet.
- Created the project X workboard.
- (Did not drag any tasks around on the project X board!)
- Viewed the board in "Natural" order.
This creates a view of the board where tasks are ordered by implicit/virtual/input order. The expectation, and "view" behavior of this board, is that this order is "newest on top".
- Edited one of the cards on the board, changing the title (don't reorder it!)
- Before: page state synchronized with cards in arbitrary/random/different order.
- After: page state synchronized with cards in the same order as before ("newest on top").
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20681
Summary:
Ref T4900. When a card is edited, we currently emit an update notification for all the projects the task is tagged with. This isn't quite the right set:
- We want to emit notifications for projects the task //was previously// tagged with, so it can be removed from boards it should no longer be part of.
- We want to emit notifications for ancestors of projects the task is or was tagged with, so parent project boards can be updated.
- However, we don't need to emit notifications for projects that don't actually have workboards.
Adjust the notification set to align better to these rules.
Test Plan:
- Removal of Parent Project: Edited a task on board "A > B", removing the "B" project tag. Saw board A update in another window.
- Normal Update: Edited a task title on board X, saw board X update in another window.
- Used `bin/aphlict debug` to inspect the notification set, saw generally sensible-seeming data going over the wire.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20680
Summary: Ref T13350. This ancient API method is missing modern policy checks.
Test Plan:
- Set visibility of vote X to "Only: epriestley".
- Called "slowvote.info" as another user.
- Before: retrieved poll title and author.
- After: policy error.
- Called "slowvote.info" on a visible poll, got information before and after.
Maniphest Tasks: T13350
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20684
Summary:
Fixes T13348. Currently, the Harbormaster UI shows "Restart All Builds", but it really means "Restart Restartable Builds", which is often fewer than "All" builds (because of autobuilds, permissions, and/or configuration).
Remove the misleading term "All" and make the workflow preview exactly which builds will and will not be affected, and why.
Test Plan:
{F6636313}
{F6636314}
{F6636315}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13348
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20679
Summary:
Depends on D20673. Ref T13343. Since we're now putting log IDs in email, make the UI a little better for working with log IDs.
Some day, this page might have actions like "report this as suspicious" or whatever, but I'm not planning to do any of that for now.
Test Plan: {F6608631}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20674
Summary:
Depends on D20672. Ref T13343. When a user requests an account access link via email:
- log it in the activity log; and
- reference the log in the mail.
This makes it easier to ban users misusing the feature, provided they're coming from a single remote address, and takes a few steps down the pathway toward a button in the mail that users can click to report the action, suspend account recovery for their account, etc.
Test Plan:
- Requested an email recovery link.
- Saw request appear in the user activity log.
- Saw a reference to the log entry in the mail footer.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20673
Summary: Depends on D20671. Ref T13343. Now that log types are modular, provide a datasource/tokenizer for selecting them since we already have a lot (even after I purged a few in D20670) and I'm planning to add at least one more ("Request password reset").
Test Plan: {F6608534}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20672
Summary:
Depends on D20670. Ref T13343. The user activity message log types are currently hard-coded, so only upstream code can really use the log construct.
Under the theory that we're going to keep this log around going forward (just focus it a little bit), modularize things so the log is extensible.
Test Plan:
Grepped for `UserLog::`, viewed activity logs in People and Settings.
(If I missed something here -- say, misspelled a constant -- the effect should just be that older logs don't get a human-readable label, so stakes are very low.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20671
Summary: Fixes T13349. If the user profile page feed query overheats, it currently takes the whole page with it. Contain the blast to a smaller radius.
Test Plan: {F6633322}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20678
Summary: Humble user cannot silence/mute project if he/she has no CAN_EDIT permissions in it. You can actually leave it but if project is locked - then you're scr*wed.
Test Plan:
1. On a testing phabricator instance created a dummy project
2. Changed that project permissions CAN_EDIT to be by admin only
3. Added poor soul with no CAN_EDIT permissions
4. Logged it in with poor soul
5. Tried to silence the project
6. The Project is successfully silenced
7. User is happy :)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, Pawka
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20675
Summary:
Depends on D20669. Ref T13343. Currently, the user activity log includes a number of explicit administrative actions which some administrator (not a normal user or a suspicious remote address) takes. In most/all cases, these changes are present in the user profile transaction log too, and that's //generally// a better place for them (for example, it doesn't get GC'd after a couple months).
Some of these are so old that they have no writers (like DELETE and EDIT). I'd generally like to modernize this a bit so we can reference it in email (see T13343) and I'd like to modularize the event types as part of that -- partly, cleaning this up makes that modularization easier.
There's maybe some hand-wavey argument that administrative vs non-administrative events could be related and might be useful to see in a single log, but I can't recall a time when that was actually true, and we could always build that kind of view later by just merging the two log sources, or by restoring double-writes for some subset of events. In practice, I've used this log mostly to look for obvious red flags when users report authentication difficulty (e.g., many unauthorized login attempts), and removing administrative actions from the log is only helpful in that use case.
Test Plan: Grepped for all the affected constants, no more hits in the codebase.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20670
Summary: Depends on D20668. Ref T13343. Just an easy cleanup/simplification while I'm here.
Test Plan: `grep` for `getActionConstant()`
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20669
Summary:
Depends on D20667. Ref T13343. Password auth currently uses an older rate limiting mechanism, upgrade it to the modern "SystemAction" mechanism.
This mostly just improves consistency, although there are some tangential/theoretical benefits:
- it's not obvious that making the user log GC very quickly could disable rate limiting;
- if we let you configure action limits in the future, which we might, this would become configurable for free.
Test Plan:
- With CAPTCHAs off, made a bunch of invalid login attempts. Got rate limited.
- With CAPTCHAs on, made a bunch of invalid login attempts. Got downgraded to CAPTCHAs after a few.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20668
Summary:
Depends on D20666. Ref T13343. In D20666, I limited the rate at which a given user account can be sent account recovery links.
Here, add a companion limit to the rate at which a given remote address may request recovery of any account. This limit is a little more forgiving since reasonable users may plausibly try multiple variations of several email addresses, make typos, etc. The goal is just to hinder attackers from fishing for every address under the sun on installs with no CAPTCHA configured and no broad-spectrum VPN-style access controls.
Test Plan: {F6607846}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20667
Summary:
Depends on D20665. Ref T13343. We support CAPTCHAs on the "Forgot password?" flow, but not everyone configures them (or necessarily should, since ReCAPTCHA is a huge external dependency run by Google that requires you allow Google to execute JS on your domain) and the rate at which any reasonable user needs to take this action is very low.
Put a limit on the rate at which account recovery links may be generated for a particular account, so the worst case is a trickle of annoyance rather than a flood of nonsense.
Test Plan: {F6607794}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20666
Summary:
Depends on D20664. Ref T13343. There's a reasonable value for the default "Email Login" auth message (generic "you reset your password" text) that installs may reasonably want to replace. Add support for a default value.
Also, since it isn't completely obvious where this message shows up, add support for an extended description and explain what's going on in more detail.
Test Plan:
- Viewed message detail page, saw more detailed information.
- Sent mail (got default), overrode message and sent mail (got custom message), deleted message (got default again).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20665
Summary:
Depends on D20663. Ref T13343. Currently, if an Auth message hasn't been customized yet, clicking the message type takes you straight to an edit screen to create a message.
If an auth message has already been customized, you go to a detail screen instead.
Since there's no detail screen on the "create for the first time" flow, we don't have anywhere to put a more detailed description or a preview of a default value.
Add a view screen that works if a message is "empty" so we can add this stuff.
(The only reason we don't already have this is that it took a little work to build; this also generally improves the consistency and predictability of this interface.)
Test Plan: {F6607665}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20664
Summary:
Depends on D20662. Ref T13343. Installs may reasonably want to change the guidance users receive in "Email Login"/"Forgot Password" email.
(In an upcoming change I plan to supply a piece of default guidance, but Auth Messages need a few tweaks for this.)
There's probably little reason to provide guidance on the "Set Password" flow, but any guidance one might issue on the "Email Login" flow probably doesn't make sense on the "Set Password" flow, so I've included it mostly to make it clear that this is a different flow from a user perspective.
Test Plan:
- Set custom "Email Login" and "Set Password" messages.
- Generated "Email Login" mail by using the "Login via email" link on the login screen.
- Generated "Set Password" email by trying to set a password on an account with no password yet.
- Saw my custom messages in the resulting mail bodies.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20663
Summary:
Ref T13343. This makes "Password Reset" email a little more consistent with other modern types of email. My expectation is that this patch has no functional changes, just organizes code a little more consistently.
The new `setRecipientAddress()` mechanism deals with the case where the user types a secondary (but still verified) address.
Test Plan:
- Sent a normal "login with email" email.
- Sent a "login with email to set password" email by trying to set a password on an account with no password yet.
- Tried to email reset a bot account (no dice: they can't do web logins so this operation isn't valid).
- Tested existing "PeopleMailEngine" subclasses:
- Created a new user and sent a "welcome" email.
- Renamed a user and sent a "username changed" email.
- Reviewed all generated mail with `bin/mail list-outbound`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20662
Summary:
See D20650. Long ago, this got added as "pastebin", but that's the name of another product/company, not a generic term for paste storage.
Rename the database to `phabricator_paste`.
(An alternate version of this patch would rename `phabricator_search` to `phabricator_bing`, `phabricator_countdown` to `phabricator_spacex`, `phabricator_pholio` to `phabricator_adobe_photoshop`, etc.)
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `pastebin`, now only found references in old patches.
- Applied patches.
- Browsed around Paste in the UI without encountering issues.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20661
Summary:
Fixes T13345. See D20650. Currently, `PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery` does a JOIN against the "title" field so it can apply additional ranking/ordering conditions to the query.
This means that documents with no title (which don't have this field) are always excluded from the result set.
We'd prefer to include them, just not give them any bonus ranking/relevance boost. Use a LEFT JOIN so they get included.
Test Plan:
- Applied D20650 (diff 1), made it use raw `getTitle()` as the document title, indexed a paste with no title.
- Searched for a term in the paste body.
- Before change: no results.
- After change: found result.
{F6601159}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20660
Summary:
Depends on D20654. Ref T4900. When a task is edited, emit a "workboards" event for all boards it appears on (in a future change, this should also include all boards it //previously// appeared on, and all parents of both sets of boards -- but I'm just getting things working for now).
When we receive a "workboards" event, check if the visible board should be updated.
Aphlict has a complicated intra-window leader/follower election system which could let us process this update event exactly once no matter how many windows a user has open with the same workboard. I'm not trying to do any of this since it seems fairly rare. It makes sense for events like "you have new notifications" where we don't want to generate 100 Ajax calls if the user has 100 windows open, but very few users seem likely to have 100 copies of the same workboard open.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/aphlict debug`.
- Opened workboard A in two windows, X and Y.
- Edited and moved tasks in window X.
- Saw "workboards" messages in the Aphlict log.
- Saw window Y update in nearly-real-time (locally, this is fast enough that it feels instantaneous).
Then:
- Stopped the Aphlcit server.
- Edited a task.
- Started the Aphlict server.
- Saw window Y update after a few moments (i.e., update in response to a reconnect).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20656
Summary:
Fixes T13342. This does a few different things, although all of them seem small enough that I didn't bother splitting it up:
- Support export of "remarkup" custom fields as text. There's some argument here to export them in some kind of structure if the target is JSON, but it's hard for me to really imagine we'll live in a world some day where we really regret just exporting them as text.
- Support export of "date" custom fields as dates. This is easy except that I added `null` support.
- If you built PHP from source without "--enable-zip", as I did, you can hit the TODO in Excel exports about "ZipArchive". Since I had a reproduction case, test for "ZipArchive" and give the user a better error if it's missing.
- Add a setup check for the "zip" extension to try to avoid getting there in the first place. This is normally part of PHP so I believe users generally won't hit it, I just hit it because I built from source. See also T13232.
Test Plan:
- Added a custom "date" field. On tasks A and B, set it to null and some non-null value. Exported both tasks to Excel/JSON/text, saw null and a date, respectively.
- Added a custom "remarkup" field, exported some values, saw the values in Excel.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13342
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20658
Summary:
Depends on D20653. Ref T4900. Pass ordering details to the reload endpoint so it can give the client accurate ordering/header information in the response.
The removed comment mentions this, but here's why this is a difficult mess:
- In window A, view a board with "Group by: Owner" and no tasks owned by "Alice". Since "Alice" owns no tasks, this means the columns do not have an "Assigned to: Alice" header!
- In window B, edit task T and assign it to Alice.
- In window A, press "R".
Window A now not only needs to update to properly reflect the state of task T, it actually needs to draw a new "Assigned to: Alice" header in every column.
Fortunately, the "group by" code anticipates this being a big mess, is fairly careful about handling it, and the client can handle this state change and the actual code change here isn't too involved. This is just causing a lot of not-very-obvious indirect effects in the pipeline to handle these situations that need complex redraws.
Test Plan:
- After making various normal edits/creates/moves in window A, pressed "R" in window B. Saw ordering reflected correctly after sync.
- Went through the whole "Group by: Owner" + assign to unrepresented owner flow above. After pressing "R", saw "Assigned to: Alice" appear on the board.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20654
Summary:
Depends on D20652. Ref T4900. When the user presses "R", send a list of cards currently visible on the client and their version numbers.
On the server:
- Compare the client verisons to the server versions so we can skip updates for objects which have not changed. (For now, the client version is always "1" and the server version is always "2", so this doesn't do anything meaningful, and every card is always updated.)
- Compare the client visible set to the server visible set and "remove" any cards which have been removed from the board.
I believe this means that "R" always puts the board into the right state (except for some issues with client orderings not being fully handled yet). It's not tremendously efficient, but we can make versioning better (using the largest object transaction ID) to improve that and loading the page in the first place doesn't take all that long so even sending down the full visible set shouldn't be a huge problem.
Test Plan:
- In window A, removed a card from a board.
- In window B, pressed "R" and saw the removal reflected on the client.
- (Also added cards, edited cards, etc., and didn't catch anything exploding.)
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20653
Summary:
Depends on D20639. Ref T4900. Currently, "BoardResponseEngine" has a `setObjectPHID()` method. This is called after edit operations to mean "we just edited object X, so we know it needs to be updated".
Move toward `setUpdatePHIDs(...)` in all cases, with `setUpdatePHIDs(array(the-object-we-just-edited))` as a special case of that. After this change, callers pass:
- An optional list of PHIDs they know need to be updated on the client. Today, this is always be a card we just edited (on edit/move flows), or a sort of made-up list of PHIDs for the moment (when you press "R"). In the future, the "R" endpoint will do a better job of figuring out a more realistic update set.
- An optional list of PHIDs currently visible on the client. This is used to update ordering details and mark cards for removal. This is currently passed by edit/move, but not by pressing "R" (it will be in the future).
- An optional list of objects. The "R" workflow has to load these anyway, so we can save a couple queries by letting callers pass them. For now, the edit/move flows still rely on the engine to figure out what it needs to load.
This does very little to actually change client behavior, it mostly just paves the way for the next update to the "R" workflow to make it handle add/remove cases properly.
Test Plan:
- Edited and moved cards on a workboard.
- Pressed "R" to reload a workboard.
Neither of these operations seem any worse off than they were before. They still don't fully work:
- When you edit a card and delete the current workboard project from it, it remains visible. This is also the behavior on `master`. This is sort of intentional since we don't necessarily want to make these cards suddenly disappear? Ideally, we would probably have some kind of "tombstone" state where the card can still be edited but can't be dragged, and the next explicit user interaction would clean up old tombstones. This interaction is very rare and I don't think it's particularly important to specialize.
- When a card is removed from the board, "R" can't currently figure out that it should be removed from the client. This is because the client does not yet pass a "visiblePHIDs" state. It will in an upcoming change.
- The "R" flow always sends a full set of card updates, and can not yet detect that some cards have not changed.
- There's a TODO, but some ordering stuff isn't handled yet.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20652
Summary:
Depends on D20638. Ref T4900. This is an incremental step toward proper workboard updates.
Currently, the client can mostly update its view because we do updates when you edit or move a card, and the client and server know how to send lists of card updates, so a lot of the work is already done.
However, the code assumes we're only updating/redrawing one card at a time. Make the client accept and process multiple card updates.
In future changes, I'll add versioning (so we only update cards that have actually changed), fix the "TODO" around ordering, and move toward actual Aphlict-based real-time updates.
Test Plan:
- Opened the same workboard in two windows.
- Edited cards in one window, pressed "R" (capital letter, with no modifier keys) to reload the second window.
- Saw edits and moves reflected accurately after sync, except for some special cases of header/order interaction (see "TODO").
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20639
Summary: I was poking around in `PhabricatorAuthProviderViewController` and noticed that none of the subclass-specific rendering was working. Figured out that no one ever calls `PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigTransaction->setProvider()`, so instead of adding all those calls, just pull the provider out of the config object.
Test Plan:
Before: {F6598145}
After: {F6598147}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20655
Summary: Ref T2784. These are lookin' pretty stable. Subclasses like `DiffusionGetLintMessagesConduitAPIMethod` have their warnings about unstable methods, so just remove this warning in the base class.
Test Plan: Loaded `/conduit`, observed lack of unstable warnings. Only unstable methods are now `diffusion.getlintmessages`, `diffusion.looksoon`, and `diffusion.updatecoverage`.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20651
