Summary: do this by making sure to filter out those who've "resigned" from the email CC list
Test Plan: resigned from an audit and no longer got emails on updates
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2033
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3890
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary: Followup to D3804. Makes Diffusion main comments (not just inlines) render properly with the modern markup pipeline.
Test Plan: Created previews and inline previews. Edited inlines. Saved comment, viewed comment. Verified caches were read and written using "Services" tab.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3805
Summary:
See T1963 for discussion of the Facebook-specific hack.
Differential currently uses a one-stage cache (render -> postprocess -> save in cache) rather than the two-stage cache (render -> save in cache -> postprocess) offered by `PhabricatorMarkupInteface`. This breaks Differential comments coming out of cache for the lightbox, and makes various other things suboptimal (status of handles like @mentions and embeds are not displayed accurately).
Instead, use the modern stuff.
Test Plan:
- Created preview comments and inlines in Differential.
- Edited a Differential inline.
- Submitted main and inline Differential comments.
- Viewed and edited Differential summary and test plan.
- Created preview comments and inlines in Diffusion.
- Submitted comments and inlines in Diffusion.
- Verified Differential now loads and saves to the generalized markup cache (Diffusion is close, but main comments still hold a single-stage cache).
- Verified old Differential comments work correctly with the lightbox.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1963
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3804
Summary: When we receive an email, figure out if any of the other tos and ccs are users. If they are, pass their phids through the stach as "exclude phids" and exclude them from getting the email.
Test Plan: used the various applications (audit, differential, maniphest) and noted emails were sent as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1676
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3645
Summary:
D03646 works, I don't want it to work.
Theoretically, it can cause us some troubles if we use this string in JS number context where 030 is 24.
Test Plan: D03646, D3646
Reviewers: epriestley, edward
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3646
Summary: So they're maybe a little easier to deal with? I'm going to take this formally to "plz @chad plz help" land.
Test Plan: {F20329}
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3609
Summary: We have lots of empty drafts in DB.
Test Plan: Wrote revision comment, deleted it, checked db.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3591
Summary: this plugs this at the controller level. the editor could also be more aware of the "action" and the fix could be there.
Test Plan: set some ccs, changed it to comment, made teh comment, noted no ccs.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3590
Summary:
I've replaced all `id(new PhabricatorObjectHandleData(...))->loadHandles()` by `$this->loadViewerHandles(...)`.
Lint caught one usage in a static method.
Test Plan: Displayed revision with sporadic author.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3432
Summary: said differently, if the user included another to address or one or more cc's, don't send the error message email.
Test Plan: played around in the metamta test console and verified that blank replies generated the error handler.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1643
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3345
Summary:
- Fix width, corresponding to wider sprites.
- Sprite the "Audit" icon.
- Mark the meta-application as device-ready.
- Fix some collapse/expand bugs with the draggable local navs.
- Add texture to local nav.
- Darken the application nav to make it more cohesive with the main nav. I think this is an improvement?
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, netfoxcity
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3338
Summary:
Add a new left-side application menu. This menu shows which application you're in and provides a quick way to get to other applications.
On desktops, menus are always shown but the app menu can be collapsed to be very small.
On tablets, navigation buttons allow you to choose between the menus and the content.
On phones, navigation buttons allow you to choose between the app menu, the local menu, and the content.
This needs some code and UI cleanup, but has no effect yet so I think it's okay to land as-is, I'll clean it up a bit as I start integrating it. I want to play around with it a bit and see if it's good/useful or horrible anyway.
Test Plan: Will include screenshots.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, alanh
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3223
Summary: We managed to move enough Owners stuff aside to make this reasonable; make projects implement the policy interface and projectquery use cursor-based paging.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for ProjectQuery callsites.
- Created an audit comment.
- Used `project.query` to query projects.
- Loaded homepage.
- Viewed Maniphest task list, grouped by project.
- Viewed project list.
- Created / edited project.
- Browsed Owners.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3200
Summary:
This is a step toward unearthing Project queries enough that I can make them policy-aware. Right now, some ProjectQuery callsites do not have reasonable access to the viewer. In particular, Owners packages need to issue Project queries because we allow projects to own packages and resolve project members inside of some package queries.
Currently, we have a very unmodern approach to querying packages, with a large number of one-off static load methods:
PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadAffectedPackages()
PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadOwningPackages()
PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadPackagesForPaths()
PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAllForPackages()
PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedUserPHIDs()
PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedPackages()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryAll()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByOwner()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByAffiliatedUser()
ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByPath()
We should replace `PhabricatorOwnersOwner` with an Edge and move all of these calls to a Query class. I'm going to try to do as little of this work as I can for now since I'm much more interested in getting a functional policy implementation into other applications, but ProjectQuery needs to be policy-aware before I can do that and I need to dig some at least some of the callsites out enough that I can get a viewer in there without making the code worse than it is.
This adds a PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery class and removes one callsite of one of those static methods.
I also intend to dissolve the two separate concepts of an "owner" (direct owner) and an "affiliated user" (indirect owner via project membership) since I think we're always fine with "affiliated users" owners.
Test Plan: Loaded home page / audit tool, which use the modified path. Ran queries manually via script. Made sure results included directly owned packages and packages owned through project membership.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, meitros
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3193
Summary: This is clearer and more consistent with other Query classes.
Test Plan: Used home page, conduit api, project list, other interfaces.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3179
Summary:
When we match an application route, select it as the current application and store it on the controller.
Move routes for the major applications into their PhabricatorApplication classes so this works properly.
Test Plan: Added a var_dump() and made sure we picked the right app for all these applications.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3144
Summary:
- Adds a new "Applications" application.
- Builds an application list via application config instead of via hard-coding, so we can move toward better concepts of installing/uninstalling applications, etc.
- Applications indicate that they need attention with notice counts and brief status messages rathern than 50 giant tables of all sorts of app data.
I want to try replacing the home screen with this screen, pretty much. Not sure if this is totally crazy or not. What does everyone else think?
Test Plan: Will add screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, vrana, alanh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, davidreuss, champo
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3129
Summary: Our auditors requested displaying this field and I can image that it can be useful.
Test Plan: /audit/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3044
Summary:
This doesn't indicate which path is part of which package - I think it would be too heavy.
It just highlights the paths in a similar way as audits are highlighted.
Maybe we can use different colors for highlighting different packages and use them also in paths. We can mix the colors if one path is part of more packages :-).
Test Plan:
Viewed commit with 9 files and 4 packages where I am responsible only for one of them.
Verified that the only file in my package is highlighted.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, haugen
Maniphest Tasks: T1226
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2982
Summary:
See T931. LLVM users would also prefer simpler mail, and have similarly harsh opinions about the current state of affairs.
Allow installs to disable the hint blocks if they don't want them.
Test Plan: Sent myself mail with these settings on/off, got mail with/without the blocks.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T931
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2968
Summary:
Some e-mail clients display this header and it needs to be constant.
This is somehow involved but I doubt that there is a simpler solution.
Test Plan:
Applied SQL patch.
Commented on revision, commented on commit, changed package.
Verified that the `Thread-Topic` has constant and human readable value.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ola, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2745
Summary:
It seems that Outlook and Mail.app mostly ignores the threading headers and thread primarily by subject.
They are also very picky about the Re: part in the header.
I guess that's because users of these clients often hit Reply when they want to create a new message to the sender of an e-mail.
We need both of these applications to work with the same setting because we don't use multiplexing to prevent sending multiple e-mails to people in lists.
I also believe that the default behavior should just work in most setups.
I've tried several different combinations of putting "Re:" and none of them seems to always work in both clients.
This diff at least adds more abstraction to the code which should prevent copy/paste errors (two fixed by this diff!).
Test Plan: Sent several e-mails with varying subject, verified that they look as before in Outlook and Mail.app.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2709
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary: Mark these actions with the same markers we use in Differential.
Test Plan: {F12094}
Reviewers: csilvers, jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: csilvers
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1289
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2601
Summary:
For most actions (like "accept"), we write a row only if you aren't acting on behalf of anything else. This avoids cases like every accept causing two relationships:
Some Project | Accept
Some User | Accept
For "Resign", we must always write the row. Break the logic out and handle it separately.
Test Plan: Poked it locally, but let me know if this fixes things?
Reviewers: 20after4, btrahan
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2423
Test Plan:
Added CC's/Auditors, clicked the form elements, and saw correct
behaviour. Verified that metadata was present in the detail table.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, 20after4, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2002
Summary:
- Add an explicit multiplexing option, and enable it by default. This is necessary for Mail.app to coexist with other clients ("Re:" breaks outlook at the very least, and generally sucks in the common case), and allows users with flexible clients to enable subject variance.
- Add an option for subject line variance. Default to not varying the subject, so mail no longer says [Committed], [Closed], etc. This is so the defaults thread correctly in Gmail (not entirely sure this actually works).
- Add a preference to enable subject line variance.
- Unless all mail is multiplexed, don't enable or respect the "Re" or "vary subject" preferences. These are currently shown and respected in non-multiplex cases, which creates inconsistent results.
NOTE: @jungejason @nh @vrana This changes the default behavior (from non-multiplexing to multiplexing), and might break Facebook's integration. You should be able to keep the same behavior by setting the options appropriately, although if you can get the new defaults working they're probably better.
Test Plan:
Send mail from Maniphest, Differential and Audit. Updated preferences. Enabled/disabled multiplexing. Things seem OK?
NOTE: I haven't actually been able to repro the Gmail threading issue so I'm not totally sure what's going on there, maybe it started respecting "Re:" (or always has), but @cpiro and @20after4 both reported it independently. This fixes a bunch of bugs in any case and gives us more conservative set of defaults.
I'll see if I can buff out the Gmail story a bit but every client is basically a giant black box of mystery. :/
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: cpiro, 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1097, T847
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2206
Summary:
- Make some effort to simplify the code.
- Make "Skip Past This Commit" work in Git and Mercurial.
- Make blame work in Mercurial.
- Add tooltip hover state to show more information about commits.
Test Plan: Viewed blame views in SVN, Git, Hg. Clicked line numbers, hovered/clicked commits, hovered/clicked "blame past..."
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T378
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2142
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around Differential.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2103
Summary:
- The UI is pretty straightforward, since Handle just works (tm)
- Added two methods to the owners object to handle the new layer of
indirection. Then ran git grep PhabricatorOwnersOwner and changed
callsites as appropriate.
Sending this to get a round of feedback before I test the non-trivial
changes in this diff.
Test Plan:
- owners tool: edit, view, list for basic functionality.
- phlog for the two new methods I added
Reviewers: epriestley, blair, jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2079
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2091
Summary: We may overwrite $comment as a side effect of iteration.
Test Plan: Made some audit comments as different users.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2050
Summary:
See some discussion in D2002. Add two new actions:
- Resign: (auditor only) closes your open request (user request ONLY) by putting it in a "resigned" state.
- Close: (author only) closes all open requests by putting them in a "closed" state.
@davidreuss, this is probably conflict-city with D2002 -- I'll wait for you to land first and then handle the merge on my end.
Test Plan: Resigned from and closed audits.
Reviewers: 20after4, davidreuss, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2013
Summary:
Depends on D1929. In emails, notify recipients that inlines are attached.
Vaguely copy/pastey from Differential but they only share like six lines and this seems like a random piece of code to pull out.
Test Plan: Added inline comments, got email mentioning them
Reviewers: davidreuss, nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1930
Summary:
- Add inline comments to Audits, like Differential.
- Creates new storage for the comments in the Audits database.
- Creates a new PhabricatorAuditInlineComment class, similar to DifferentialInlineComment.
- Defines an Interface which Differential and Audit comments conform to.
- Makes consumers of DifferentialInlineComments consume objects which implement that interface instead.
- Adds save
NOTE: Some features are still missing! Wanted to cut this off before it got crazy:
- Inline comments aren't shown in the main comment list.
- Inline comments aren't shown in the emails.
- Inline comments aren't previewed.
I'll followup with those but this was getting pretty big.
@vrana, does the SQL change look correct?
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Diffusion, on the left and right side of diffs.
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Differentila, on the left and right side of primary and diff-versus-diff diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1898
Summary: No big surprises here, delted the unused "DarkConsole" class.
Test Plan: Ran 'testEverythingImplemented' to verify I wasn't finalizing anything we extend.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1876
Summary:
- Order audits by id desc so they tend to be in descending time order, like other content.
- In audit tables without commit context (audit tool, home page) show commit descriptions.
- Correctly hide pagers on "active" audit filter.
- Make pagers work correctly on commit / audit views.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage, audit, owners, differential. Paginated relevant interfaces.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1875
Summary:
- Use a join to effect this query.
- Fixes a bug where packages with no commits would raise an exception because of the awkward query construction.
- Fixes a bug on audit views.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a package with no commits.
- Altered audit filters.
Reviewers: btrahan, 20after4
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1801
Summary:
Adds an optional "Auditors" field (like "Reviewers") to commit messages which gives installs a zero-config method for making audit requests.
This field does not appear on templates unless set, and is mostly ignored (but validated and preserved) by Differential.
It is then parsed by the daemons if present, and audit requests are pushed to valid users.
Test Plan: Made an "Auditors" commit and verified it was retained with "arc amend --show". Pushed it and verified the audit was triggered.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904, T880
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1793
Summary:
- Move table to Repository, since we have no Owners joins in the application anymore but would like to do a Repository join.
- Rename "packagePHID" to "auditorPHID", since this column may contain package, project, or user PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Browsed Owners, Audit, and Differential interfaces to the Audit tool.
- Made comments and state changes.
- Ran "reparse.php --herald --owners" on several commits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, nh, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1787
Summary:
- Users may elect to receive an initial notification about a commit; allow it to be replied to in order to interact with the object.
- Share thread headers between emails.
- Add the "REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS" section to both emails.
Test Plan:
- Used "reparse.php --herald" to trigger herald emails, verified reply-to and email body.
- Made audit comments, verified body.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1762
Summary: Since we embed comments/audits into Diffusion now, we don't need the
old edit interface.
Test Plan: Grepped for links to old interface.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1714
Summary:
We can drive this query better from the Audit tool now; get rid of the Diffusion
version.
Preserve usernames in URIs as per T900.
Test Plan: Clicked "Commits" from profile. Browsed audit commit filters.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1713
Summary:
The general idea here is to build a Differential-like dashboard which shows all
the things you need to audit and all the things that other people have raised
issues with, so you have a one-stop "what do I need to deal with?" interface.
- Add problem commits to the "active" view of /audit/.
- Add problem commits to homepage.
- Add commit browsing interfaces to /audit/.
- Add an "Audit" app button.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage, commit filters. Audited commits, verified state
changes reflected properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1712
Summary:
- Add a proper mailKey field to make these things mailable. Backfill all
existing objects.
- Denormalize authorPHID to the commit object so we can query by it
efficiently in a future diff. We currently use the search engine to drive
"commits by author" but that's not so good for audit, which needs more
constraints.
- Add an overall audit status field so we can efficiently query "commits that
needs your attention".
- Add enough code to convince myself that these fields are basically
reasonable and work correctly.
Test Plan:
- Ran schema upgrades. Checked database state afterward.
- Ran "reparse.php --owners --herald" to verify worker changes.
- Looked at a commit, altered aggregate status via audits / reparse.php,
verified it responded correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1706
Summary: Add more filters/options to the /audit/ interface (By User, By Package,
By Project...)
Test Plan: Looked at audits via /audit/.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1705
Summary: Add comment previews and saved drafts to audits, like Maniphest /
Differential.
Test Plan: Typed stuff into the box. Got a preview. Reloaded page. Stuff was
still there. Submitted comment. Stuff is gone.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1699
Summary:
When users submit an audit, send email to relevant parties informing them.
Allow email to be replied to. Just basic support so far; no "!raise" stuff and
no threading with the Herald commit notification.
Test Plan: Made comments, got email. Replied to email, got comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1698
Summary:
If a user comments on a commit but they don't currently have any audits they're
authoritative on, create a new one.
This makes it easier to handle other things more consistently, like figuring out
the overall audit status of a commit and who should get emails.
Test Plan: Made comments on commits I had authority on and did not have
authority on.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1697
Summary: Add audit information to the commit search index.
Test Plan: Updated a commit, searched for terms in its comments, got hits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1696
Summary: When a user posts an action in the audit tool, publish it to feed.
Test Plan: Made some comments, saw them show up in feed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1695
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Summary:
This is intended to supplant the existing "audit edit" interface. I've changed
them to both drive down the same write pathway, but the UIs are still different.
I'll fully merge them in a future diff.
Add a comment box (like Maniphest and Differential) to Diffusion. When users
make comments, their comments appear on the commit. Any audits triggers they are
responsible for are updated to reflect actions they take, as well.
Currently, audits can only be triggered by packages, but I intend to allow them
to be triggered by users and projects (via herald rules) in an upcoming diff.
Thus some of the language like "projects, users or packages" when the code is
clearly dealing only with "packagePHID".
Test Plan: Made audit updates via commit interface and via existing edit
interface. Verified both interfaces updated correctly, and that audit
responsibility rules were applied properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1688
Summary: We already allow you to create comments, but we don't show them on the
commit page. After style / view unification this is easy; show comments on the
commit page.
Test Plan: Made comments on a commit using the audit too, saw them show up in
Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1687
Summary:
Currently, audits are only accessible through the Owners tool. Start moving them
to their own first-class tool in preparation for broader audit integration.
- Lay some infrastructure groundwork (e.g. AuditQuery).
- Build a basic /audit/ view.
- Show audits on the commit page in Diffusion.
This has some code duplication with stuff we've already got, but I'll merge
everything together as we move forward on this.
Test Plan: Looked at /audit/ and a commit.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1685
Summary:
add basic auditing functionalities. For the related commits for a
package, we detect the following conditions which might be suspicious to the
owners of the package:
* no revision specified
* revision not found
* author not match
* reviewedby not match
* owners not involved
* commit author not recognized
The owners of the package can change the status of the audit entries by
accepting it or specify concern.
The owner can turn on/off the auditing for a package.
Test Plan:
* verified that non-owner cannot see the details of the audit and cannot modify
it
* verified that all the audit reasons can be detected
* tested dropdown filtering and package search
* verified really normal change not detected
* verified accept/concern a commit
* tested enable/disable a package for auditing
* verified one audit applies to all <commit, packages> to the packages the
auditor owns
* verified that re-parsing a commit won't have effect if there exists a
relationship for <commit, package> already
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, benmathews, btrahan, mpodobnik, prithvi, TomL, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1242
