Summary:
Ref T13025. See PHI173. This supports the "Assign to" field in the new editor.
This is very slightly funky: to unassign tasks, you need to leave the field blank. I have half a diff to fix this, but the way the `none()` token works in the default datasource is odd so it needs a separate datasource. I'm punting on this for now since it works, at least, and isn't //completely// unreasonable.
This also simplifies some EditEngine stuff a little. Notably:
- I reorganized EditType construction slightly so subclasses can copy/paste a little bit less.
- EditType had `field` and `editField` properties which had the same values. I canonicalized on `editField` and made this value set a little more automatically.
Test Plan: Used bulk editor to reassign some tasks. By leaving the field blank, unassigned tasks.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18874
Summary:
Depends on D18866. Ref T13025. Fixes T12415. This makes the old "Add Comment" action work, and adds support for a new "Set description to" action (possibly, I could imagine "append description" being useful some day, maybe).
The implementation is just a `<textarea />`, not a whole fancy remarkup box with `[Bold] [Italic] ...` buttons, preview, typeaheads, etc. It would be nice to enrich this eventually but doing the rendering in pure JS is currently very involved.
This requires a little bit of gymnastics to get the transaction populated properly, and adds some extra validation since we need some code there anyway.
Test Plan:
- Changed the description of a task via bulk editor.
- Added a comment to a task via bulk editor.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T12415
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18867
Summary: Depends on D18864. Ref T13025. Adds bulk edit support back for "status" and "priority" using `<select />` controls.
Test Plan:
Used bulk editor to change status and priority for tasks.
{F5374436}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18866
Summary: Depends on D18863. Ref PHI173. Ref T13025. After D18863, this job type is no longer used: the workflow uses a genric worker instead which can apply transactions to any object.
Test Plan: Grepped for callsites, found none.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18864
Summary:
Depends on D18862. See PHI173. Ref T13025. Fixes T10005. This redefines bulk edits in terms of EditEngine fields, rather than hard-coding the whole thing.
Only text fields -- and, specifically, only the "Title" field -- are supported after this change. Followup changes will add more bulk edit parameter types and broader field support.
However, the title field now works without any Maniphest-specific code, outside of the small amount of binding code in the `ManiphestBulkEditor` subclass.
Test Plan: Used the bulk edit workflow to change the titles of tasks.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10005
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18863
Summary:
Depends on D18805. Ref T13025. Fixes T10268.
Instead of using a list of IDs for the bulk editor, power it with SearchEngine queries. This gives us the full power of SearchEngine and lets us use a query key instead of a list of 20,000 IDs to avoid issues with URL lengths.
Also, split it into a base `BulkEngine` and per-application subclasses. This moves us toward T10005 and universal support for bulk operations.
Also:
- Renames most of "batch" to "bulk": we're curently inconsitent about this, I like "bulk" better since I think it's more clear if you don't regularly interact with `.bat` files, and newer stuff mostly uses "bulk".
- When objects in the result set can't be edited because you don't have permission, show the status more clearly.
This probably breaks some stuff a bit since I refactored so heavily, but it seems mostly OK from poking around. I'll clean up anything I missed in followups to deal with remaining items on T13025.
Test Plan:
{F5302300}
- Bulk edited from Maniphest.
- Bulk edited from a workboard (no more giant `?ids=....` in the URL).
- Hit most of the error conditions, I think?
- Clicked the "Cancel" button.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10268
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18806
Summary:
Ref T13025. See PHI50. Fixes T11286. Ref T10005. Begin modernizing the bulk editor.
For T10005 ("move the bulk editor to modern infrastructure"), rewrite the rendering of the editable set so that it is application-agnostic and can work with any kind of object.
For T11286 ("let users de-select items in the working set"), make the working set editable.
Test Plan:
{F5302158}
- Deselected some objects, applied an edit, saw the edit apply to only selected objects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T11286, T10005
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18805
Summary: See PHI273. Third time's the charm? This page has a "Project" filter which lets you view data for only one project, but the synthetic data currently ignores it.
Test Plan: Filtered burnup chart by various projects, saw sensible-looking data.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18860
Summary:
Ref T13020. See PHI273. See D18853. On `secure`, the chart looks less promising than it did locally, and is full of discontinuities:
{F5356544}
I think this is a sorting issue. But if I can't fake my way through this soon I'll maybe get the Fact engine running and use it to provide the data here, as a sort of half-step toward T1562?
Test Plan: Chart looks the same locally, will push and see if `secure` improves?
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13020
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18854
Summary:
See PHI273. Ref T13020. After D18777, tasks created directly into the default status (which is common) via the web UI no longer write a "status" transaction.
This is consistent with other applications, and consistent with the API/email behavior for tasks since early 2016. It also improves the consistency of //reading// tasks via the API.
However, it impacted the "Burnup Report" which relies on directly reading these rows to detect task creation. Until this is fixed properly (T1562), synthetically generate the "missing" transactions which this page expects by looking at task creation dates instead.
Specifically, we:
- Generate a fake `status: null -> "open"` transaction for every task by looking at the Task table.
- Go through the transaction list and remove all the legacy `status: null -> "any open status"` transactions. These will only exist for older tasks.
- Merge all our new fake transactions into the list of transactions.
- Continue on as though nothing happened, letting the rendering code continue to operate on legacy-looking data.
I think this will slightly miscount tasks which were created directly into a closed status, but this is very rare, and does not significantly impact the accuracy of this report relative to other known issues (notably, merging closed tasks).
This will also get the wrong result if the default status has changed from an "open" status to a "closed" status at any point, but this is exceptionally bizarre/rare.
Ultimately, T1562 will let us delete all this stuff and disavow its existence.
Test Plan:
- Created some tasks, loaded burnup before/after this patch.
- My local chart looks more accurate afterwards, but the data is super weird (I used `bin/lipsum` to create a huge number of tasks a couple months ago). I'll vet this on `secure`, which has more reasonable data.
Here's my local chart:
{F5356499}
That's what it //should// look like, it's just hard to be confident that nothing else is hiding there.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13020
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18853
Summary:
Ref T13020. See PHI221.
Freeze legacy method `maniphest.gettasktransactions` in favor of modern method `transaction.search`.
Remove legacy "null on create" behavior from Maniphest status and priority transactions. This behavior is obsolete with EditEngine, and leads to inconsistent transaction sets in the transaction record.
The desired behavior is that transactions which don't do anything (e.g., default value was not changed) don't appear in the transaction log.
Test Plan:
- Viewed API UI and saw `maniphest.gettasktransactions` marked as "Frozen".
- Created a new task via web UI (without changing status/priority), queried transactions with `maniphest.gettasktransacitons`/`transaction.search`, no longer saw "null on create" no-op transactions in record.
- Web UI is unchanged, since these transactions were hidden before and now do not exist.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13020
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18777
Summary:
See PHI197. Populates "status" transactions and a few other obvious types where there's no security/performance/payload/formatting issue I can come up with.
The names here are the same as the names for editing with `maniphest.edit`.
Test Plan: Used `transaction.search` to retrieve transactions of all new types.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18761
Summary: See PHI147.
Test Plan: Called the method from the web UI, got sensible results.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18706
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary:
See PHI66. See that issue for context. This UI is bad broken legacy junk, but was especially broken when reporting merges.
These do not currently generate a "status" transaction, so they were never counted as task closures. Pretend they're normal closures.
This is still wrong, but should be much closer to the real numbers. Specifically, if you merge a closed task into another task, it will incorrectly be counted as an extra close. This could result in negative tasks, but the numbers should be much closer to reality than they are today even so.
The "Facts" application (T1562) is the real pathway forward here in the longer term.
Test Plan:
- Moved my `maniphest_transactions` table aside with `RENAME TABLE ...`.
- Created a new empty table with `CREATE TABLE ... LIKE ...`.
- Reloaded reports UI, saw empty chart.
- Created, closed, and reopened tasks while reloading the chart, saw accurate reporting.
- Merged an open task into another task, saw bad reporting.
- Applied patch, saw the right chart again.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18601
Summary:
Ref T12819. Obsoleted by the Ferret engine, which is unprototyping shortly.
This breaks compatibility in two ways:
- `maniphest.query` no longer supports "fullText" (now throws an explicit exception).
- Existing saved searches with a "Contains Words" constraint will no longer have that constraint.
It seems unlikely (?) that either of these are seeing too much use, and they should be easy to fix. I'll note them in the changelog.
Test Plan: Viewed Maniphest, no more "Contains Words" field. Called `maniphest.query` with "fullText", got explicit exception.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18586
Summary:
See brief discussion in D18554. All the index tables are the same for every application (and, at this point, seem unlikely to change) and we never actually pass these objects around (they're only used internally).
In some other cases (like Transactions) not every application has the same tables (for example, Differential has extra field for inline comments), and/or we pass the objects around (lots of stuff uses `$xactions` directly).
However, in this case, and in Edges, we don't interact with any representation of the database state directly in much of the code, and it doesn't change from application to application.
Just automatically define document, field, and ngram tables for anything which implements `FerretInterface`. This makes the query and index logic a tiny bit messier but lets us delete a ton of boilerplate classes.
Test Plan: Indexed objects, searched for objects. Same results as before with much less code. Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, got a clean bill of health.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18559
Summary:
Ref T12819. Currently, under the Ferret engine, we query each application's index separately and then aggregate the results.
At the moment, results are aggregated by type first, then by actual rank. For example, all the revisions appear first, then all the tasks.
Instead, surface the internal ranking data from the underlying query and sort by it.
Test Plan: Searched for "A B" with a task named "A B" and a revision named "A". Saw task first. Broadly, saw mixed task and revision order in result sets.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18551
Summary:
Ref T12819. I started trying to get individual engines to drive these constraints (e.g., `ManiphestTaskQuery` can do most of the work) but this is a big pain, especially since most engines don't support "any owner" or "no owner", and not everything has an owner, and so on and so on. Going down this path would have meant a huge pile of stub functions everywhere, I think.
Instead, drive these through the main engine using the fulltext document table, which already has everything we need to apply these constraints in a uniform way.
Also tweak some parts of query construction and result ordering.
Test Plan: Searched for documents by author, owner, unowned, any owner, tags, subscribers, fulltext in global search. Got sensible results without any application-specific code.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18550
Summary:
Ref T12819. Provides a Ferret-engine-based fulltext engine to ultimately replace the InnoDB fulltext engine.
This is still pretty basic (hard-coded and buggy) but technically sort of works.
To activate this, you must explicitly configure it, so it isn't visible to users yet.
Test Plan: Searched for objects with global fulltext search, got a mixture of matching revisions and tasks back.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18548
Summary: Ref T12819. Uses an extension rather than hard-coding support into Maniphest.
Test Plan: Saw "Query" field appear in Differential, which also implements the interface and has support. Used field in both applications.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18547
Summary: Adds a `MenuName` method to applications that `ProfileMenuItem` uses instead of the application name if set. This improves the home/menu/new user experience at little cost. Also renamed the label from Applications to Favorites, since this menu gets altered to provide more than just applications. This also allows instances to set back to Maniphest if they so choose. Overall I think this direction resolves 95% of my concerns, with maybe a small potential downside which I don't really anticipate. We already name Dashboard panels by their object, and that hasn't really caused confusion. I think these links are similar. I click 'Tasks' and get presented a list of my tasks from Maniphest.
Test Plan: Review each of the name changes as a default new install and a modified install.
Reviewers: epriestley, amckinley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Spies: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18524
Summary: Ref T12819. Move these out of the core engine into the Ferret engine. In the future different applications can define different functions, like "summary:..." or whatever. This may get more formalization when I possibly do "author:" and such some time down the road.
Test Plan: Searched for "title:...". Searched for "dog:...", got a useful error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18536
Summary:
Ref T12819. Distinguishes between "term" queries and "substring" queries, and tries to match them correctly most of the time. For example:
- `example` matches "example", obviously.
- `~amp` matches "example", but `amp` does not.
- `examples` matches "example" through stemming.
- `"examples"` does not match "example" (quoted text does not stem).
- `"an examp"` does not match "an example" (quoted text is still term text).
- `~"an examp"` matches "an example" (quoted, substring-operator text uses substring search).
Test Plan: Ran searches similar to the above, they seemed to do what they should.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18500
Summary:
Ref T12819. Depends on D18492. Instead of passing a raw query into the Query layer, parse it first.
This allows the query layer to figure out which parts should be substring vs term match, and would allow the SearchEngine layer to do `author:...` eventually by picking it out before sending it to the Ferret engine.
Test Plan: Ran some Ferret queries. They work like before, except that nonsense like `-+"quack"` raises an exception now.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18499
Summary:
Ref T12819. I gave this stuff a sweet code name because all the terms related to "fulltext" and "search" already mean 5 different things. It, uh, ferrets out documents for you?
I'm building this to work a lot like the existing ngram index, which seems to work pretty well. If this sticks, it will auto-resolve the join issue (in T12443) by letting us do the entire thing locally in a JOIN and thus dodge a lot of mess.
This index gets built alongside other indexes, but only shows up in the UI if you have prototypes enabled. If you do, it appears under the existing fulltext field in Maniphest. No existing functionality is affected or disrupted.
NOTE: The query engine half of this is still EXTREMELY primitive, and this probably performs worse than the existing field for now. If this doesn't show obvious signs of being awful on `secure` I'll improve that in followup changes.
Test Plan:
Indexed my tasks, ran some simple queries, got the results I wanted, even for queries "ko", "k", "v0.1".
{F5147746}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819, T12443
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18484
Summary:
See PHI42. Currently, `maniphest.search` incorrectly applies this default (group by priority) to all queries via Conduit.
The correct behavior is to apply no grouping constraint.
I think this is also a reasonable general behavior, and the current code seems to date from D6960 in 2013 and didn't seem particularly carefully considered.
This is a minor compatibility break -- saved queries which are more than 4 years old might change their group behavior. I'll note this in the change logs but expect essentially no one to be affected.
Test Plan: Ran a `maniphest.search` Conduit call and observed the underlying query. Before this change, it executed `ORDER BY priority, id`. After this change, it correctly executed `ORDER BY id` only.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18459
Summary:
See PHI39. This adds support for editing parents and subtasks of a task via Conduit.
It might be nice to tie this into the `PhabricatorObjectRelationship` stuff eventually, but I think we'd effectively end up in the same place anyway in terms of what the API looks like.
Test Plan: {F5116163}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18456
Summary: Fixes T12929. Sets a create transaction if new.
Test Plan: test a new task over email via command line
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12929
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18279
Summary:
Fixes T12870. Ref T12845.
Technically, this addresses the core issue in T12845 too, but I'm going to convert the rest of the `custom:...` types before closing that.
In particular, for T12870:
- Validates that keywords are unique across priorities.
- Fixes missing newline in documentation.
- Updates documentation to note that keywords are now mandatory and must be unique across priorities.
Test Plan: Edited, deleted and mangled all the Maniphest custom options (priorities, statuses, points, subtypes).
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12870, T12845
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18165
Summary:
Ref T12124. This is a fairly narrow fix for existing saved EditEngine forms with a default priority value.
These saved forms have a numeric (or probably "string-numeric") default value, like "50". They lost their meaning after D18111, when "50" no longer appears in the dropdown. Instead, these forms all select the highest available priority.
At time of writing, this form was broken on this install, for example:
> https://secure.phabricator.com/transactions/editengine/maniphest.task/view/13/
Additionally, `/task/edit/form/123/?priority=...` (for templating forms) stopped working with `priority=50`. This isn't nearly as important, but a larger and more sudden compatiblity break than we need to make.
Add support for an "alias map" on `<select />` controls, so if the value comes in with something we don't recognize we'll treat it like some other value. Then alias all the numeric constants -- and other keywords -- to the right constants.
This ended up only affecting the `<select />` control in the web UI.
Test Plan:
- On `stable`, created a form with "Priority: Low".
- Before patch: form has "Priority: Unbreak Now!" on `master`.
- After patch: form has "Priority: Low" again.
- Used `?priority=25`, `?priority=wish`, `?priority=wishlist` to template forms: all forms worked.
Reviewers: amckinley, chad
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18134
Summary:
Ref T12124. Currently, Conduit provides a fairly rough error message if you provide an invalid priority.
Instead, provide a more tailored message. Also, block `!!unknown!!` except from web edits.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F5007964}
After:
{F5007965}
Also, changed a priority to `999` in the database, edited it with the normal web UI form, it let me make the edit without being forced to adjust the priority.
Reviewers: amckinley, chad
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T12124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18135
Summary: Fixes T12124. Changes `ManiphestEditEngine` to populate the select using priority keywords instead of the integer value. Marks `maniphest.querystatuses` as frozen. Adds a new Conduit method for fetching potential task statuses.
Test Plan: Created tasks and changed their priorities, observed that transactions in the DB still have the same type (integers as strings). Invoked `maniphest.update` with `priority => '90'` and observed that it still works. Invoked `maniphest.edit` with `priority => 'unbreak'` and observed that it now works.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T12124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18111
Summary: Does the UI work that's part of T12234 and adds migrations for both of the old-style duplicate transactions.
Test Plan:
- Started with a clean DB.
- Checked out really old code that marks tasks as dupes using comments.
- Made a bunch of tasks and closed some as dupes. Made a bunch of additional comments.
- Checked out D10427 and did a `storage upgrade`.
- Made a bunch more new tasks and dupes.
- Snapshotted DB.
- Ran migration repeatedly until all expected edges showed up in the `phabricator_maniphest.edge`table.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T12234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18037
Summary: Try to dis-ambiguate various button types and colors. Moves `simple` to `phui-button-simple` and moves colors to `button-color`.
Test Plan: Grep for buttons still inline, UIExamples, PHUIX, Herald, and Email Preferences.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18077
Summary:
See D18018. Ref T12787. This doesn't actually work; we started publishing these stories as a side effect of converting to ModularTransactions, then I fixed the rendering.
This mechanism has very few callsites and I suspect we may want to get rid of it (see T12787) so just keep publishing these stories for now.
Test Plan: Changed the point value of a task, saw a feed story both before and after the patch.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18059
Summary: Fixes T12787. Modular Transactions don't actually support `shouldHideForFeed()`. I'll add some discussion to the task.
Test Plan: Created a subtask, saw no more "X reopened Y, a subtask of P" feed story.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18058
Summary: Start on plan outlined in T12124. Adds a new Conduit method for querying information about task priorities.
Test Plan: Ran locally; observed expected output: {F4979109}
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18035
Summary:
Ref T12314. Open to counterdiffs / iterating / suggestions / skipping most or all of this, mostly just throwing this out there as a maybe-reasonable first pass.
When a task has a subtype (like "Plant" or "Animal"), provide some hints on the task list, workboards, and task detail.
To make these hints more useful, allow subtypes to have icons and colors.
Also use these icons and colors in the typeahead tokens.
The current rule is that we show the subtype if it's not the default subtype. Another rule we could use is "show the subtype if there's more than one subtype defined", but my guess is that most installs will mostly have something like "normal task" as the default subtype.
Test Plan:
The interfaces this affects are: task detail view, task list view, workboard cards, subtype typeahead.
{F3539128}
{F3539144}
{F3539167}
{F3539185}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: johnny-bit, bbrdaric, benwick, fooishbar
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17451
Summary: Fixes T12744. Unclear why `null` doesn't work here but does for the title, but `!strlen` seems to work fine in both cases.
Test Plan: Create a new task, check mail folder, see [Created]
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12744
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18002
Summary: Grep for phui-tag-shade and verify we're no longer calling shade-color directly.
Test Plan: Search, workboard, story points, etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17993
Summary:
Ref T7664. The current algorithm for moving task subpriorities can end up stuck in a real sticky swamp in some unusual situations.
Instead, use an algorithm which works like this:
- When we notice two tasks are too close together, look at the area around those tasks (just a few paces).
- If things look pretty empty, we can just spread the tasks out a little bit.
- But, if things are still real crowded, take another look further.
- Keep doing that until we're looking at a real nice big spot which doesn't have too many tasks in it in total, even if they're all in one place right now.
- Then, move 'em out!
Also:
- Just swallow our pride and do the gross `INSERT INTO ... "", "", "", "", "", "", ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE` to bulk update.
- Fix an issue where a single move could cause two different subpriority recalculations.
Test Plan:
- Changed `ManiphesTaskTestCase->testTaskAdjacentBlocks()` to insert 1,000 tasks with identical subpriorities, saw them spread out in 11 queries instead of >1,000.
- Dragged tons of tasks around on workboards.
- Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17959
Summary: It's an icon. For story points.
Test Plan: Set some points, see icon.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17915
Summary: I think this is the correct fix, sets a consistent value for transactions, old and new, for Maniphest point values.
Test Plan:
Edit title, see no point feed story, set points, see point story, set points to same value, see no story, remove points, see remove point story.
{F4958233}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17885
Summary: Swaps out hovercard boring view for super cool workboard card view. Will have more diffs to add additional information down the road.
Test Plan: {F4921092}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17769
Summary:
Ref T12509. Many of the calls to HMAC+SHA1 are just to compute cachekeys for remarkup objects.
Make these use HMAC+SHA256 instead. There is no downside to swapping these since they just cause a cache miss in the worst case.
I also plan to get rid of `PhabricatorMarkupInterface` eventually, but this doesn't go that far.
Test Plan: Browsed some different types of documents (tasks, legalpad documents, phame blogs / posts, pholio mocks, etc).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17631
Summary:
Fixes T12461. This returns the field as a dictionary with a `"raw"` value, so we could eventually do this if we want without breaking the API:
```
{
"type": "remarkup",
"raw": "**raw**",
"html": "<strong>raw</strong>",
"text": "raw"
}
```
Test Plan: Called `maniphest.search`, reviewed output.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12461
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17603
Summary: Ref T12450. These are like 95% my fault, but Elastic appears to spell the name "Elasticsearch" consistently in their branding.
Test Plan: `grep ElasticSearch`
Reviewers: chad, 20after4
Maniphest Tasks: T12450
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17601
Summary:
The goal is to make fulltext search back-ends more extensible, configurable and robust.
When this is finished it will be possible to have multiple search storage back-ends and
potentially multiple instances of each.
Individual instances can be configured with roles such as 'read', 'write' which control
which hosts will receive writes to the index and which hosts will respond to queries.
These two roles make it possible to have any combination of:
* read-only
* write-only
* read-write
* disabled
This 'roles' mechanism is extensible to add new roles should that be needed in the future.
In addition to supporting multiple elasticsearch and mysql search instances, this refactors
the connection health monitoring infrastructure from PhabricatorDatabaseHealthRecord and
utilizes the same system for monitoring the health of elasticsearch nodes. This will
allow Wikimedia's phabricator to be redundant across data centers (mysql already is,
elasticsearch should be as well).
The real-world use-case I have in mind here is writing to two indexes (two elasticsearch clusters
in different data centers) but reading from only one. Then toggling the 'read' property when
we want to migrate to the other data center (and when we migrate from elasticsearch 2.x to 5.x)
Hopefully this is useful in the upstream as well.
Remaining TODO:
* test cases
* documentation
Test Plan:
(WARNING) This will most likely require the elasticsearch index to be deleted and re-created due to schema changes.
Tested with elasticsearch versions 2.4 and 5.2 using the following config:
```lang=json
"cluster.search": [
{
"type": "elasticsearch",
"hosts": [
{
"host": "localhost",
"roles": { "read": true, "write": true }
}
],
"port": 9200,
"protocol": "http",
"path": "/phabricator",
"version": 5
},
{
"type": "mysql",
"roles": { "write": true }
}
]
Also deployed the same changes to Wikimedia's production Phabricator instance without any issues whatsoever.
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Tags: #elasticsearch, #clusters, #wikimedia
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17384
Summary: These were once ordered, but I think we switched to being defined in the Engine and never implemented the sorts there. This adds sort ordering to Tasks, Projects, and Repositories.
Test Plan: Review Favorites Menu in local install, see order is now set per the engine. Click Edit Favorites, and re-order. See order sticks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17490
Summary:
Fixes T12378. Two minor issues here:
- CAN_INTERACT on tasks uses "USER", but should just use the view policy, which may be more permissive ("PUBLIC").
- CAN_INTERACT is currently prevented from being "PUBLIC" by additional safeguards. Define an explicit capability object for the permission which returns `true` from `shouldAllowPublicPolicySetting()`.
Test Plan:
- Viewed an unlocked task as a logged-out user, saw "login to comment" instead of "locked".
- Viewed a locked task as a logged-out user, saw "locked".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12378
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17485
Summary: Ref T12337. This just fills out a couple more task relationships.
Test Plan: Viewed the edges in the Conduit console, queried for them.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12337
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17465
Summary:
Ref T12335. See that task for discussion. Here are the behavioral changes:
- Statuses can be flagged with `locked`, which means that tasks in that status are locked to further discussion and interaction.
- A new "CAN_INTERACT" permission facilitates this. For most objects, "CAN_INTERACT" is just the same as "CAN_VIEW".
- For tasks, "CAN_INTERACT" is everyone if the status is a normal status, and no one if the status is a locked status.
- If a user doesn't have "Interact" permission:
- They can not submit the comment form.
- The comment form is replaced with text indicating "This thing is locked.".
- The "Edit" workflow prompts them.
This is a mixture of advisory and hard policy checks but sholuld represent a reasonable starting point.
Test Plan: Created a new "Locked" status, locked a task. Couldn't comment, saw lock warning, saw lock prompt on edit. Unlocked a task.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12335
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17453
Summary:
Ref T12314. When we pick an "Edit" form for a subtyped object, only consider forms with the same subtype.
For example, editing an "Animal" uses the forms with subtype "animal" which are marked as edit forms.
This also makes "Create Subtask" carry the parent task's type.
Test Plan:
- Edited an Animal, got an animal edit form.
- Edited a normal task, got a normal task form.
- Edited a paste, got the normal workflow.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17445
Summary:
Ref T12314. Allow tasks to be queried by subtype using a typeahead.
Open to a better default icon. I'll probably let you configure them later.
Just hide this constraint if there's only one subtype.
Test Plan:
- Searched for subtypes.
- Verified that the control hides if there is only one subtype.
{F3492293}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17444
Summary:
Ref T12314. If you set a form to have the "plant" subtype, then create a task with it, save "plant" as the task subtype.
For Conduit, the default subtype is used by default, but a new "subtype" transaction is exposed. You can apply this transaction at create time to create an object of a certain subtype, or at any later time to change the subtype of an object.
This still doesn't do anything particularly useful or interesting.
Test Plan:
- Created a non-subtyped object (a Paste).
- Created "task" and "plant" tasks via different forms.
- Created "default" and "plant" tasks via Conduit.
- Changed the subtype of a task via Conduit.
- Tried to set a bad subtype.
{F3492061}
{F3492066}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17443
Summary:
Ref T12314. This adds a "Change Form Subtype" workflow to the EditEngine form configuration screen, for forms that edit/create objects which support subtyping (for now, only tasks).
For example, this allows you to switch a form from being a "task" form to a "plant" or "animal" form.
Doing this doesn't yet do anything useful or interesting. I'm also not showing it in the UI yet since I'm not sure what we should make that look like (presumably, we should just echo whatever UI we end up with on tasks).
Test Plan:
- Changed the subtype of a task form.
- Verified that the "Change Subtype" action doesn't appear on other forms (for example, those for Pastes).
{F3491374}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17442
Summary: Ref T12314. Provides a field on tasks for storing subtypes. Does nothing interesting yet.
Test Plan:
- Ran storage upgrade.
- Created some tasks.
- Looked in the database.
- Used Conduit to query some tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17441
Summary:
Ref T12314. Builds toward letting you define "animal" and "plant" tasks.
This just adds some configuration. I'll probably add some more quality-of-life options (like "icon") later but these are the only bits I'm sure I'll need.
Test Plan:
- Configured sensible subtypes.
- Tried to configure bad subtypes: bad key, missing "default", duplicate keys. Got sensible error messages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12314
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17440
Summary:
Ref T12319. Currently, `bin/lipsum` uses substring matches against human-readable text to chose which objects to generate.
Instead:
- Use separate selector keys which are guaranteed to be unique.
- When a match is exact, select only that generator.
- When a match is ambiguous, fail and warn the user.
Test Plan: Generated several types of objects, tried to generate ambiguous objects like "e".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12319
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17420
Summary: Ref T12319. The product name is misspelled in some methods, and a few places in the documentation.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12319
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17419
Summary: Ref T10390. Simplifies dropdown by rolling out canUseInPanel in useless panels
Test Plan: Add a query panel, see less options.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17341
Summary: Ref T12136. This just yanks the band-aid off. Fundamentally these were useful well before Dashboards and advanced bucketing, but not so much any more. They also have some performance hit.
Test Plan: Add some tasks and diffs onto a new instance, see there is no count on the home menu bar.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12136
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17238
Summary: Ref T5867. Instead of hard-coding projects, tasks and repositories, let EditEngines say "I want a quick create item" so third-party code can also hook into the menu without upstream changes.
Test Plan: Saw same default items in menu.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5867
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17215
Summary:
Fixes T7076. This could probably use some tweaking but should get the basics in place.
This shows overall object state (e.g., "Needs Review"), not individual viewer state (e.g., "you need to review this"). After the bucketing changes it seems like we're mostly in a reasonable place on showing global state instead of viewer state. This makes the overall change much easier than it might otherwise have been.
Test Plan: {F2351867}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7076
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17193
Summary:
Ref T12074. The "v3" API methods (`*.search`, `*.edit`) are currently marked as "unstable", but they're pretty stable and essentially all new code should be using them.
Although these methods are seeing some changes, almost all changes are additive (support for new constraints or attachemnts) and do not break backward compatibility. We have no major, compatibility-breaking changes planned.
I don't want to mark the older methods "deprecated" yet since `arc` still uses a lot of them and there are some capabilities not yet available on the v3 methods, but introduce a new "frozen" status with pointers to the new methods.
Overall, this should gently push users toward the newer methods.
Test Plan: {F2325323}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17158
Summary:
Ref T12074. This allows callers to identify which columns an object appears in (currently, always tasks).
There are a few major cases:
- Object is in a normal column: we return column information.
- Object is in a proxy column (subproject or milestone). For example, when you look at the board for "Some Parent Project", the task might show up in a milestone column. I've chosen to not return anything in this case: you can figure out that the task is there by looking at the project structure, and this is kind of an internal artifact of the implementation and probably not useful to callers.
- Project does not have a workboard: we return nothing.
These seem fairly reasonable, I think?
Test Plan:
- Queried for tasks, using the "columns" attachment.
- Dragged a task across a board, querying it repeatedly. Got expected results for normal column (the column), subprojects with no board (nothing), milestones with no board (nothing) and mielstones/subprojects with a board (the column on //that// board, only, not the proxy column on the parent).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17156
Summary:
Ref T8345. See T8345#201048 for discussion.
This rule (don't show mentions of or from restricted objects) is more consistent with how we render mentions in the timeline and I think generally a better behavior.
Test Plan:
- Mentioned a task on a public task and a private task.
- Privileged user (foreground) sees both.
- Public user (background) sees only the public mention.
{F1929485}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16900
Summary:
Fixes T4788. This change:
- converts the "Task Graph" into a "Related Objects" tabgroup.
- makes "Task Graph" the first tab in the group.
- moves "Mocks" to become a tab.
- adds a new "Mentions" tab, which shows inbound and outbound mentions.
Primary goal of "mocks" is to give us room for a pinboard/thumbnail view after the next Pholio iteration. Might make sense to make it the default tab (if present) at that point, too, since mocks are probably more important than related tasks when they're present.
Primary goal of "mentions" is to provide a bit of general support for various freeform relationships between tasks: if you want to treat tasks as "siblings" or "related" or "following" or whatever, you can at least find them all in one place. I don't plan to formalize any of these weird one-off relationships in the upstream, although it's vaguely possible that some far-future update might just let you define arbitrary custom relationships and then you can do whatever you want.
Test Plan: {F1906974}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16806
Summary:
Fixes T11812.
- Pull the logic for building the "Create Whatever" dropdown out.
- Use it to generate NUX buttons, too.
- Use the new logic in Paste and Maniphest.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Paste NUX, button worked.
- Viewed Maniphest NUX with multiple create forms, button worked.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Subscribers: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T11812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16797
Summary:
Ref T10747. Rough flow is:
- Run a query.
- Select a new "Export Events..." action.
- This lets you define an "Export", which has a unique URL you can paste into Google Calendar or Calendar.app or whatever.
Most of this does nothing yet but here's the boilerplate.
Test Plan: Doesn't do anything yet.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10747
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16675
Summary: Ref T11132. This is a new default default (no dashboard) homepage. It offers (Diffs) (Tasks) (Repositories) in the main column and (Feed) in the side column. No NUX stuff, No logged out public view (upcoming diff). This should be complete, but unclear how to bucketize Differential.
Test Plan: Test new account's default homepage.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16449
Summary: Fixes T11420. These are selected in newest-to-oldest order from the database, but we should show them in oldest-to-newest order in the UI.
Test Plan:
Tagged a couple tasks with "A, B, C" projects, saw correct order in UI:
{F1749351}
{F1749352}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16367
Summary:
Fixes T9719. Currently, the Herald "Test Console" has a big `instanceof` thing, so new adapters (like a Calendar adapter, or third-party adapters) aren't available automatically. Instead, do a standard modular thing: load the available adapters, ask which ones can test the object the user selected, then let the user pick which one they want to move forward with.
Additionally, it isn't very clear that you can't test "commit hook" rules because they rely on push state which we don't really have a good way to simulate. When the user picks a commit, we now show them the "Hook" events, but the options are disabled and explain why they can not be selected.
Test Plan:
- Ran test rules for revisions, commits, mocks, tasks, wiki documents, questions, and outbound mail.
- Plugged in a commit, got a more-helpful choice screen explaining why you do a test run of hook rules.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9719
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16360
phpexcel.net currently serves a 500 page, and the top Google hit for
PHPExcel (on codeplex) gives you a site warning you that it is 3 years
out of date, and to see GitHub instead.
Update the link from Maniphest's 'please install PHPExcel to enable
export' prompt.
Summary:
Ref T4788. This gives us a new level of graceful degradation, so now we show:
- Zero through 100 connected tasks: whole graph.
- More than 100 connnected tasks, but fewer than 100 direct parents/subtasks: just parents and subtasks, with "..." to hint that the graph is cut off.
- More than 100 parents and children: just the "sorry, too much stuff" error message.
Test Plan: {F1740882}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16344
Summary:
Ref T4788. Add links to jump to search results with a task's parents or subtasks. This allows relationships to remain useful if there are a zillion of them, and you can sort/filter stuff more easily.
Language might need some tweaking at some point, feeling a little un-brainy today with wordstuff.
Test Plan:
{F1740855}
{F1740856}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16343
Summary:
Ref T8126. Ref T4788. This adds a way to query by parent or subtask.
I plan to link to this from the task graph (e.g., {nav View > Search Subtasks} or similar, in a dropdown on the "Task Graph" element) as a way to let us bail out if tasks have 300 subtasks and send the user to a big query result list. That'll give us more flexibility to tailor the UI for reasonable numbers of tasks.
There's no UI for this unless you specify a query yourself, so the only ways to get to it are:
- Manually put `?parentIDs=...` into the URI.
- Use the API.
- Future link from task graphs.
It doesn't seem too useful to me on its own, outside of the context of links from tasks.
Test Plan:
- Manually put `?parentIDs=...` and `?subtaskIDs=...` into Maniphest query UI, got expected results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T8126
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16341
Summary:
Ref T8126. See that task for discussion. This change:
- Updates language to be more consistent ("Parents", "Subtasks") since I moved us away from the often-confusing "Block" language in T4788.
- Fixes bugs with finding the wrong set of tasks if tasks have a mixture of open and closed subtasks or parents.
Test Plan:
- Created four tasks: no subtasks, one closed subtask, one open subtask, mixture of open and closed subtasks.
- Created four more tasks: no parents, one closed parent, one open parent, mixture of open and closed parents.
- Searched for all this stuff, got the proper results:
{F1740683}
{F1740684}
{F1740685}
{F1740686}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8126
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16340
Summary:
Ref T4788. One install has some particularly impressive task graphs which are thousands of nodes large.
The current graph is pretty broken in these cases. For now, just render a "too big to show" message. In the future, I'd plan to finesse this (e.g., show parents/children, show links to parents/children, etc).
Test Plan:
- Viewed a normal task.
- Set limit to 3, viewed a task with graph size 6, saw an error message.
- Viewed a revision stack graph (unaffected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16295
Summary: Ref T4788. This seems reasonable locally, but not sure how it will feel on real data. Might need some tweaks, or might just be a terrible idea.
Test Plan: {F1708059}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16214
Summary:
Ref T4788. When closing a task as a duplicate of another task, you can only select one task, since it doesn't really make sense to merge one task into several other tasks (this operation is //possible//, but probably not what anyone ever wants to do, I think?).
Make the UI understand this: after you select a task, disable all of the "select" buttons in the UI to make this clear.
Test Plan:
- Used "Close as Duplicate", only allowed to select 1 task.
- Used other editors like "Merge Duplicates In", allowed to select lots of tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16203
Summary:
Ref T4788. Fixes T10703.
In the longer term I want to put this on top of ApplicationSearch, but that's somewhat complex and we're at a fairly good point to pause this feature for feedback.
Inch toward that instead: provide more appropriate filters and defaults without rebuilding the underlying engine. Specifically:
- No "assigned" for commits (barely makes sense).
- No "assigned" for mocks (does not make sense).
- Default to "open" for parent tasks, subtasks, close as duplicate, and merge into.
Also, add a key to the `search_document` table to improve the performance of the "all open stuff of type X" query. "All Open Tasks" is about 100x faster on my machine with this key.
Test Plan:
- Clicked all object relationships, saw more sensible filters and defaults.
- Saw "open" query about 100x faster locally (300ms to 3ms).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T10703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16202
Summary: Fixes T11240. Also simplify things a little and share a bit more code.
Test Plan:
- Viewed revisions and tasks, opened submenu.
- Viewed as a user without edit permission, saw the menus greyed out.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16201
Summary:
Ref T4788. Fixes T7820. This updates the "Merge Duplicates In" interaction, and adds a "Close as Duplicate" action.
These are the last interactions that were using the old code, so it removes that code.
Merges are now recorded as real edges, so we can show them in the UI later on (originally from T9390, etc).
Also provides more general support for relationships which need EDIT permission, not-undoable relationships like merges, preventing relating an object to itself, and relationship side effects like merges.
Finally, fixes a couple of behaviors around typing an exact object name (like `T123`) to find the related object.
Test Plan:
- Merged tasks into the current task.
- Closed the current task as a duplicate of another task.
- Edited other relationships.
- Searched for tasks, commits, etc., by object monogram.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T7820
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16196
Summary:
Ref T4788. Fixes T9232. This moves the "search for stuff to attach to this object" flow away from hard-coding and legacy constants and toward something more modular and flexible.
It also adds an "Edit Commits..." action to Maniphest, resolving T9232. The behavior of the search for commits isn't great right now, but it will improve once these use real ApplicationSearch.
Test Plan: Edited a tasks' related commits, mocks, tasks, etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T9232
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16189
Summary:
Ref T11179. This splits "Edit Blocking Tasks" into two options now that we have more room ("Edit Parent Tasks", "Edit Subtasks").
This also renames "Blocking" tasks to "Subtasks", and "Blocked" tasks to "Parent" tasks. My goals here are:
- Make the relationship direction more clear: it's more clear which way is up with "parent" and "subtask" at a glance than with "blocking" and "blocked" or "dependent" and "dependency".
- Align language with "Create Subtask".
- To some small degree, use more flexible/general-purpose language, although I haven't seen any real confusion here.
Fixes T6815. I think I narrowed this down to two issues:
- Just throwing a bare exeception (we now return a dialog explicitly).
- Not killing open transactions when the cyclec check fails (we now kill them).
Test Plan:
- Edited parent tasks.
- Edited subtasks.
- Tried to introduce graph cycles, got a nice error dialog.
{F1697087}
{F1697088}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6815, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16166
Summary: Ref T11179. This is basically a "pro" controller to replace the SearchAttach controller. It does basically the same stuff, just in a (mostly) more modern and modular way.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed mocks.
- Added and removed revisions.
- Everything worked just like it did before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16163
Summary:
Ref T11179. This generates the Maniphest menu items in a modular way. It doesn't change any of the underlying code yet.
Searching for commits doesn't work particularly well so I've just hidden that for now, but the item itself works fine.
Test Plan: {F1696849}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16162
Summary: Fixes T11193. Assume this is the correct place to check for permissions before attaching edges.
Test Plan: Create a task and set edit policy to Admins, log into test account. Try to Edit Subtasks, Merge Duplicates, Attach a Diff, or Attach a Mock, get a Policy Dialog explaing why.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11193
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16161
Summary:
Ref T11179. Alternative to D16152. I think this turned out a bit better than the other one did.
Currently, we render two copies of the menu (one for mobile, one for desktop). A big chunk of this is sharing the nodes instead: when you open the mobile dropdown menu, it steals the nodes from the document. When you close it, it puts them back. Magic! Sneaky!
Test Plan:
{F1695499}
{F1695500}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16157
Summary:
Ref T11034. This seems a little more promising. Two problems at the moment:
- This doesn't actually provide any useful information at all right now.
- Many object types have no profile images.
Test Plan:
{F1695254}
{F1695255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16155
Summary:
Ref T11035. This only fixes half of the issue: comment editing has been fixed, but normal transactions which edit things like descriptions haven't yet.
The normal edits aren't fixed because the "oldValues" are populated too late. The code should start working once they get populated sooner, but I don't want to jump the gun on that since it'll probably have some spooky effects. I have some other transaction changes coming down the pipe which should provide a better context for testing "oldValue" population order.
Test Plan:
- Mentioned `@dog` in a comment.
- Removed `@dog` as a subscriber.
- Edited the comment, adding some unrelated text at the end (e.g., fixing a typo).
- Before change: `@dog` re-added as subscriber.
- After change: no re-add.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16108
Summary:
Ref T10077. Currently, we issue 6+ queries on every page to build this menu, since the menu is built application-by-application.
Build the menu with dedicated modules instead so a single "EditEngine" module can provide all of them with one query.
I'd like to reduce this to 0 queries but I'm not totally sure what we want to do with this menu.
This change removes these items, because EditEngine can not currently provide them:
- Calendar: Eventually via EditEngine eventually.
- Conpherence: Probably via EditEngine, doesn't seem too important.
- People: Maybe via EditEngine, doesn't seem too important? "Welcome" is likely better?
- Pholio: Eventually via EditEngine.
It adds a bunch of other items as a side effect:
{F1677151}
This reduces the queries issued on every page by ~5.
This also makes quick create actions visible while logged out (see T7073).
Test Plan:
- Viewed menu while logged in.
- Viewed menu while logged out.
- Viewed standalone version of menu.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16045
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This moves the revision SearchEngine to modern code so I can add some kind of bucketing layer on top of it.
This seems to have worked pretty cleanly. One thing is that I removed the ability to search for "pending drafts":
- This was added in D1927 from a bootcamp task, was an indirect solution to a questionable problem, and almost certainly would not meet the bar today.
- Later, in D3324, we added the icons to the list. I think this is a better solution in general. In particular, it specifically addressed the query being kind of junky.
- At the time, Differential had a prebuilt "Drafts" filter. This was removed in D6347 with the move to ApplicationSearch, which simplified the large number of prebuilt filters. Although we got a lot of feedback about that, none requested that the drafts filter be restored.
Test Plan: Searched for responsible users, subscribers, orders, projects, repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15921
Summary:
Fixes T10912. When you drag tasks within a milestone, we currently apply an overbroad, API-focused rule and add the parent board's project. This logic was added fairly recently, as part of T6027, to improve the behavior of API-originated moves.
Later on, this causes the task to toggle in and out of the parent project on every alternate drag.
This logic is also partially duplicated in the `MoveController`.
- Add test coverage for this interaction.
- Fix the logic so it accounts for subproject / milestone columns correctly.
- Put all of the logic into the TransactionEditor, so the API gets the exact same rules.
Test Plan:
- Added a failing test and made it pass.
- Dragged tasks around within a milestone column:
- Before patch: they got bogus project swaps on every other move.
- After patch: projects didn't change (correct).
- Dragged tasks around between normal and milestone columns.
- Before patch: worked properly.
- After patch: still works properly.
Here's what the bad changes look like, the task is swapping projects with every other move:
{F1255957}
The "every other" is because the logic was trying to do this:
- Add both the parent and milestone project.
- Whichever one exists already gets dropped from the change list because it would have no effect.
- The other one then applies.
- In applying, it forces removal of the first one.
- Then this process repeats in the other direction the next time through.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10912
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15834
Summary:
In calendar, dashboard, diffusion, diviner, feed, fund,
maniphest, pholio, ponder, and slowvote use the term 'tags' if possible.
This intenctionally skips diffusion, differential, and the projects application itself.
Ref T10326 Ref T10349
Test Plan: inspection on a running, locally modified, system
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10835, T10326, T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15753
Summary: Going to render these all normal case instead of all caps, and bump up the font size. Should be more consistent. Yellow if you green anything orange.
Test Plan: grep, lint
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15645
Summary:
Ref T6027. Fixes T10734.
- If one of the projects a task is tagged with isn't visible to the user or doesn't have a board, it won't have columns.
- Don't show options for projects with disabled boards.
Test Plan:
- Viewed task with project with no columns; no fatal.
- Viewed task with project with disabled board; no options to move on that board.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10734, T6027
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15640
Summary:
Ref T6027. Normally, actions use the same order as the form, but in some cases (like moving stuff on workboards) it makes sense to reorder them explicitly.
Pin "Move on board" near the bottom, and "projects/subscribers" at the bottom. I think these are generally reasonable rules in all cases.
Test Plan: Opened menu, saw slightly better action order.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6027
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15639
Summary:
Ref T6027. Try this out and see how it feels? Clear issues:
- This definitely shouldn't be at the top.
- You should probably be able to select it multiple times?
- Some of the "which columns show up" rules might need adjustment?
- Diamond marker maybe not great?
Not sure I love this but it doesn't feel //terrible//...
Test Plan: {F1207891}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6027
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15638
Summary: Ref T5214. Fixes T10486. Ref T6027. This exposes the `TYPE_COLUMNS` transaction in a usable way via API, and fixes the interactions via prefilling.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks directly into columns via API.
- Moved tasks between columns via API.
- Used `?column=...` to try to create a template task with valid and bogus column PHIDs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: AmyLewis
Maniphest Tasks: T5214, T6027, T10486
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15636
Summary:
Ref T6027. We currently have two different transaction types:
- `TYPE_PROJECT_COLUMNS` does most of the work, but has a sort of weird structure and isn't really suitable for API use.
- `TYPE_COLUMN` is this weird, junk transaction which mostly just creates the other transaction.
Merge them into a single higher-level `TYPE_COLUMNS` transaction which works properly and has a sensible structure and comprehensive error checking.
Remaining work here:
- I've removed the old rendering logic, but not yet added new logic. I need to migrate the old transaction types and add new rendering logic.
- Although the internal representation is now //suitable// for use in the API, it isn't properly exposed yet.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks into a column.
- Ran unit tests.
- Moved tasks between columns.
- Will perform additional testing in followups.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6027
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15634
Summary: Moves these Maniphest pages over to modern UI, components
Test Plan: Batch Edit Tasks, View some reports.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15614
Summary: Cleans up EditEngine, adds new layout to EditEngine and descendents
Test Plan: Test creating a new form, reordering, marking and unmarking defaults. View new forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15531
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary: Fixes T10234. This usage is unusual, out of date, and has some bad interactions with engines and custom rules.
Test Plan:
- Added `CustomInlineCodeRule` from P1129 as an extension rule.
- Put a custom `<code> ... </code>` block in a Maniphest task description.
- Saw fatal as described in task; applied change; saw rule work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15501
Summary:
Ref T10493.
- Call this action "Unassigned" instead of "Up For Grabs", since the latter implies that it's OK for anyone to grab it, which is a social/context thing that we probably shouldn't assume.
- Show who a task was previously assigned to in the transaction.
The text is a little clunky, yell if you've got a better wording? Or maybe I'll come up with something.
Test Plan: {F1166299}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cburroughs
Maniphest Tasks: T10493
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15454
Summary: Adds a date with the author name on the Authored By panel in Maniphest. A basic treatment, will see how it feels.
Test Plan: Look at a few tasks
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15456
Summary: See D15432. There, we can use this test to check if the user //could// reassign the task by using "Edit Form" or the stacked actions, so any dedicated "claim" element is consistent with the other permissions.
Test Plan:
- Added a `var_dump($can_reassign)` after the call.
- Saw `true`.
- Edited the edit form, locked and disabled "Assigned To".
- Saw `false`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15433
Summary: Moves Maniphest over, and allows application to provide ad-hoc panels more easily.
Test Plan: {F1160591}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15417
Summary:
Every caller returns `true`. This was added a long time ago for Projects, but projects are no longer subscribable.
I don't anticipate needing this in the future.
Test Plan: Grepped for this method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15409
Summary: Reworks Maniphest into a two column view. Moves priority and color to header, assignee to sidebar. quest points to header, and author to gutter. may be some confusion since priority only displays on open tickets.
Test Plan: with and without description, custom fields, points, tablet, mobile and desktop.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15396
Summary:
Fixes T10426. When the owner of a task changes, we try to add the old owner to CC so they're kept in the loop.
Currently, we do this unconditionally. This can add the owner as a subscriber when someone didn't change anything, which is confusing.
Instead, only do this if the owner actually changed.
Test Plan:
- With "A" as owner, edited task and saved.
- Before patch, A was added as subscriber.
- After patch, A not added.
- With "A" as owner, changed owner to "B" and saved.
- Both before and after patch, "A" is added as a subscriber.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10426
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15333
Summary:
Ref T10349. At HEAD, if you create a task //on a board//, it floats to the top correctly.
If you create a task elsewhere and tag it with the board, you were subject to the whims of the layout engine and it would generally end up on the bottom.
Instead, make the rules consistent so that "virtual" positions (of tasks which haven't been committed to a particular position yet) still float to the top.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks from a board.
- Created tasks from Maniphest, then looked at them on a board.
- Moved tasks around.
- In all cases, newly created tasks floated to the top.
- Sorted by natural and priority.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15276
Summary:
This commit adds the `transactionID` field to manphest.gettransactions, to
satisfy the request in T10327
Test Plan: Call the `maniphest.gettransactions` endpoint, verify `transactionID` is present
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15250
Summary:
Fixes T10343. All solutions here seem basically fine. I think adding this small bit of complexity is OK, and sorrrrt of like this behavior sometimes.
- Allow disabling this behavior per-status.
- Disable it by default for "Invalid" and "Duplicate" (I left "wontfix", since that's a resolution?).
Beyond being more flexible, I think this is slightly better?
Test Plan:
- Closed a task as invalid: no claim.
- Closed a task as resolved: claim.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15257
Summary: Ref T4427. Seems fine / not egregiously broken.
Test Plan: Edited points configuration. Tried to set a bad value. Set a good value. Persued examples and help text.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15256
Summary:
Fixes T8197. Currently, if you priority-sort a workboard and drag a card to the top or bottom, we change the priority even if we do not need to.
For example, if the lowest priority in a column is "Low", and you drag a "Wishlist" task underneath it, we incorrectly increase the priority of the task to "Low", when we do not actually need to touch it. This is bad/confusing.
A similar thing happens when dragging a "High" priority task to the top of a column where the highest priority is currently "Normal".
Test Plan:
- Create a column with a "Normal" task.
- Sort workboard by Priority.
- Drag a "High" task above it. After patch: task still "High".
- Drag a "Wishlist" task below it. After patch: task still "Wishlist".
Also dragged a ton of tasks into the middle of other tasks.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8197
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15240
Summary: Ref T4427.
Test Plan:
- Dragged a 17 XP task from "Hunting" to "Slain".
- Saw 17 XP move.
- Level up!
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15237
Summary:
Ref T4900. Briefly:
- Much more layout and rendering is now done in Javascript.
- This should otherwise be identical to the behavior at HEAD, except that:
- editing a task and removing the current board from it no longer removes the task; and
- points still don't work.
However, this can now plausibly support realtime workboard updates and other complex state-based behaviors like points calculations in a future change.
Test Plan:
- Changed card covers.
- Moved cards.
- Sorted board by priority and natural.
- Added new cards.
- Edited cards in place.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15234
Summary:
Ref T4427.
- When points are configured, show them on the task detail page (just a simple property, at least for now).
- Typecast points better to avoid "joe changed points from 12 to 12." beacuse we compare the stored value (as a string) to the new value (as a double).
Test Plan:
- Saw points on detail view.
- Created task with points, then edited it without touching points. No more spurious "changed from 12 to 12" transaction.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15223
Summary:
Ref T4427.
- New config option for labels, enabling, etc., but no UI/niceness yet.
- When enabled, add a field.
- Allow nonnegative values, including fractional values.
- EditEngine is nice and Conduit / actions basically just work with a tiny bit of extra support code.
Test Plan:
- Edited points via "Edit".
- Edited points via Conduit.
- Edited points via stacked actions.
- Tried to set "zebra" points.
- Tried to set -1 points.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15220
Summary:
Currently never read or written.
Supports fractions.
There's no such thing as an unsigned double so this also supports negative values, technically, although I'll eventually prevent this in the UI.
Test Plan: `bin/storage upgrade`, then created and edited a task. Nothing was different.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15218
Summary:
Before edges, we stored some of this stuff directly on tasks.
- `attached` was migrated to edges in Jan 2013.
- `projectPHIDs` was never used, as far as I can tell?
- `ccPHIDs` was migrated away and dropped more than a year ago.
None of these columns are used in modern code (instead, modern code uses edges).
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed around, `bin/storage upgrade`, unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15216
Summary: This was slightly more complex than I believed, but not too terrible.
Test Plan:
{F1096126}
- Also used some normal file uploaders to make sure I didn't break that.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15202
Summary:
No way to set photos yet, but if you magic them in they work.
Primarily, this consolidates rendering logic so the move + edit + view controllers all run the same code to do tags / cover photos.
Test Plan: {F1095870}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15201
Summary: Ref T10010. This gets rid of, e.g., the "Iteration I" tag in the column for that milestone, as it is redundant with the column itself.
Test Plan: {F1090427}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15181
Summary:
Ref T10010. These aren't perfect but I think (?) they aren't horribly broken.
- When a project is a parent project, destroy (as far as the user can tell) any custom columns.
- When a project has milestones, automatically generate columns on the project's workboard (if it has a workboard).
- When you move tasks between milestones, add the proper milestone tag.
- When you move tasks out of milestones back into the backlog, add the proper parent project tag.
- (Plenty of UI / design stuff to adjust.)
Test Plan:
- Dragged stuff between milestone columns.
- Used a normal workboard.
- Wasn't able to find any egregiously bad cases that did anything terrible.
{F1088224}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15171
Summary: Ref T10010. This retires the old way of doing things inside ColumnPositionQuery. It is now obsolete and lives in BoardLayoutEngine instead.
Test Plan:
- Moved cards, created cards, swapped filters, orders, etc.
- Some degree of unit testing coming in the next diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15177
Summary:
Ref T10010. See D15174. This gets rid of the "actually apply the change" callsite and moves it to layout engine.
Next up is to make the board view use the layout engine, then throw away all the whack code in ColumnPositionQuery, then move forward with D15171.
Test Plan:
- Dragged tasks within a column.
- Dragged tasks between columns.
- Dragged tasks to empty columns.
- Created a task in a column.
- Swapped board to priority sort, dragged a bunch of stuff all over.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15175
Summary: No UI changes, just some search and replace for UI consistency.
Test Plan: Test person and object hovercards still work. UIExamples too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15172
Summary:
Ref T5240.
- Add proper class when dropping cards.
- Add proper class when creating new cards.
- Make X-drag explicit so that it works if there's only one column.
- Stop tootips when dragging, resume them after dropping.
- Move CSS rule for consistency.
- Allow user to hit "Escape" to cancel an in-progress drag.
Test Plan:
- Dropped cards.
- Created new cards.
- X-dragged on a workboard with one column and a dashboard.
- Dragged over a tooltip (no tip), dropped, moused over tooltip (tip).
- Hit escape during a drag.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15163
Summary:
Mostly, this has just been sitting in my sandbox for a long time. I may also touch some charting stuff with subprojects/milestones, but don't have particular plans to do that.
D3 seems a bit more flexible, and it's easier to push more of the style logic into CSS so you can fix my design atrocities. gRaphael also hasn't been updated in ~3+ years.
Test Plan:
{F1085433}
{F1085434}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cburroughs, yelirekim
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15155
