Summary:
Ref T13249. Ref T11738. See PHI985. Currently, we have a crude heuristic for guessing what line in a source file provides the best context.
We get it wrong in a lot of cases, sometimes selecting very silly lines like "{". Although we can't always pick the same line a human would pick, we //can// pile on heuristics until this is less frequently completely wrong and perhaps eventually get it to work fairly well most of the time.
Pull the logic for this into a separate standalone class and make it testable to prepare for adding heuristics.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests, browsed various files in the web UI and saw as-good-or-better context selection.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13249, T11738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20171
Summary:
Ref T13195. Fixes T8573. When you're adding inlines to your own stuff, mark them "Done" by default. You can unmark them as "Done" if you're legitimately leaving TODOs for yourself, although I think this is unusual.
(If this turns out to be less unusual than I think, we could consider an alternate rule: mark replies by the author as "Done" by default.)
Test Plan: Added some inlines as an author and a non-author. Saw my author inlines marked as "Done" by default. Submitted them; unmarked and submittted them.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13195, T8573
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19635
Summary:
Ref T13195. Ref T8573. This allows reviewers to mark their own inline comments as "Done" before they submit them.
If you're leaving a non-actionable comment like "this is good", you can pre-check "Done" to give the author a hint that you don't expect any response.
Test Plan: On revisions and commits, added inlines as the author and a reviewer/auditor. Marked them done/not-done before submitting. As author, marked the not-done ones done after submitting. Checked preivews, toggled done/not done states.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13195, T8573
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19634
Summary:
Ref T13195. Ref T8573. The inline comment controllers currently use outdated `$user = $this->getRequest()->getUser()` calls.
Instead, use `$viewer = $this->getViewer()`.
This is just a small consistency update with no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Viewed and added inlines in Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13195, T8573
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19633
Summary:
Ref T13164. See PHI823. (See that issue for some more details and discussion.)
Add aural labels to various buttons which were missing reasonable aural labels.
The "Search" button (magnifying glass in the global search input) had an entire menu thing inside it. I moved that one level up and it doesn't look like it broke anything (?). All the other changes are pretty straightforward.
Test Plan:
{F5806497}
{F5806498}
- Will follow up on the issue to make sure things are in better shape for the reporting user.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19594
Summary:
Ref T13151. See PHI654. Depends on D19477. If you have long package names, the table of contents (e.g., in Differential) can end up expanding to be gigantic.
Getting tables to behave nicely is hard (or, at least, I can't figure it out after spending a decent amount of time on it; see also `AphrontTableView::renderSingleDisplayLine()`). I tried a bunch of things and Googled for a bit but didn't make any progress on finding a CSS solution. Just truncate the package names to get reasonable behavior without falling down any kind of CSS rabbit hole.
Test Plan:
- Created a package named "Very long package name...".
- Created a package named "MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...".
- Had them own a file in a Differential revision, viewed that revision.
- Before: table is pushed out to several times the browser window width and everything is kind of a mess.
- After: package names get truncated to something reasonable.
{F5652953}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13151
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19478
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary:
Ref T12733. When a revision has unsubmitted checkmarks:
- Color the banner yellow.
- Show them in the "X unsubmitted" count.
- Make the "X unsubmitted" button cycle between all drafts (written but unpublished comments) and "draft done" (checked but unsubmitted "Done" checkbox comments).
Test Plan:
- Checked a "Done" box, saw "1 unsubmitted" and yellow banner.
- Clicked "5 unsubmitted" repeatedly, saw it cycle through all unsubmitted comments and checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18127
Summary:
Ref T12733. This paves the way for a separate "hide" operation which completely hides things.
(I didn't extend this to the server side because that would require schema changes and the new "hide" state is client-only.)
Test Plan: Collapsed and expanded inlines, viewed tooltips.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18126
Summary: Adds a very basic list of all inline comments, threaded, and their status. Kept this a little simpler than the mock, mostly because sorting here feels a little strange given threads would be all over the place. Not sure sorted is needed in practice anyways. I'd probably lean towards just adding a JS checkbox to hide certain rows if needed in the future.
Test Plan:
Test various commenting structures:
- Leave Comment
- Update Diff
- Leave new comment
- Reply to comment
- Reply to comment as revision author
- Mark items as done
- Update diff again
{F4996915}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18112
Summary:
Fixes T12806. Ref T12733.
- Don't count synthetic (lint) comments as anything.
- When you begin writing an inline then cancel it, don't count it as anything.
- When we would show "0 / X", just show "X".
Test Plan:
- Viewed a diff with synthetic comments, no button.
- Wrote, then cancelled an inline. No "X comments".
- Clicked / unlicked "Done", saw "X" -> "1 / X".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12806, T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18103
Summary: Ref T12733. Shows a comment snippet when hovering inlines in the objective list.
Test Plan: {F4968490}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12733
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17980
Summary:
Add important objectives (like waygates and quest markers) to the minimap.
This also probably fixes @cspeckmim's bug with the {key @} keyboard shortcut.
Test Plan:
(This is probably easier to undestand if you `arc patch` + click around.)
{F4966037}
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17955
Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T11648. Currently, we snug up replies with a negative margin (from T10563) but this throws off the anchor highlighting.
Instead:
- Remove padding from these dolumns.
- Use margins on the stuff inside them instead.
- Less margins for replies.
- Less margins for collapsed comments.
- Show some text for collapsed comments.
Test Plan:
{F4960890}
{F4960891}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616, T11648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17913
Summary:
Fixes T8420. Now that hidden inlines no longer fold into a big clump, anchors can just jump to them in a normal way.
Move the anchors up a smidge so thing work.
Test Plan: Clicked an anchor pointed at a hidden inline, ended up in the right place.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17910
Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T12715. I suspect these are very rarely used. (I think you tried to get rid of them before but I pushed back since we couldn't really offer great alternatives at the time?)
Now that the code is in a better place:
- Click an inline's header (just the colored part) to select it with the keyboard selection cursor.
- Click again to deselect it.
- You can use "n" and "p" to jump to comments, so "click + n" is the same as the old "V" action.
- This also makes it easier to swap between keyboard and mouse workflows, since you can jump into things with the keyboard at any inline.
Also, make "Reply" render more consistently.
Test Plan:
- Did all that stuff, things seemed to work OK.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12715, T12616
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17908
Summary:
Ref T12616. This moves "reply" to the new stuff and deletes DifferentialInlineEditor, which no longer does anything.
(This breaks some keyboard shortcuts, but I'll rebase D17859 shortly.)
Test Plan: Replied to inlines; things seemed to work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17894
Summary:
Ref T12616. This updates clicking the "Done" checkbox for the new stuff.
This one is pretty clean since the "Done" checkbox doesn't do too much weird magic.
Test Plan: Clicked the box a few times.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17888
Summary:
Ref T12616. Fixes T12153. Currently, when you hide inlines, they hide completely and turn into a little bubble on the previous line.
Instead, collapse them to a single line one-by-one. Narrowly, this fixes T12153.
In the future, I plan to make these changes so this feature makes more sense:
- Introduce global "hide everything" states (T8909) so you can completely hide stuff if you want, and this represents more of a halfway state between "nuke it" and "view it".
- Make the actual rendering better, so it says "epriestley: blah blah..." instead of just "..." -- and looks less dumb.
The real goal here is to introduce `DiffInline` and continue moving stuff from the tangled jungle of a million top-level behaviors to sensible smooth statefulness.
Test Plan:
- Hid and revealed inlines in unified and two-up modes.
- These look pretty junk for now:
{F4948659}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616, T12153
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17861
Summary:
Ref T12616. Diffusion, only, has a "Show All Context" button which expands the full context on all changes.
I don't remember the exact history on this, but it hasn't existed in Differential for some time and no one has complained. I suspect that the "View Options > Show All Context" on each file may replace it. I can't really come up with good reasons to use it, offhand. If we want to restore it, I think global options after T1591 is promising.
{F4945561}
Test Plan:
- Loaded a commit in Diffusion, no longer saw a button.
- Grepped for relevant sigils.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17843
Summary:
Earlier, I made some changes so that when you create or edit an inline, the comment at the bottom of the page updates (even though you didn't fiddle with the stacked actions inputs).
At the last second I broke them by spelling this wrong while cleaning things up, so they didn't actually work. Spell the property correctly ("showPreview", not "shouldPreview").
Also, we have some JS which rewrites "Not Visible" into "View", but it fires in an inconvenient way now and is flickery for me. Ideally this should get cleaned up slightly better eventualy, but at least make is stop doing so much flickery layout for now.
Test Plan:
- Wrote no comment on a revision.
- Added an inline.
- Saw comment preview properly update immediately.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17229
Summary:
Fixes T12114. There were a couple of bugs here:
- We could draw too many joining lines if a node had a parent with multiple descendants.
- We could incorrectly ignore columns because of an `unset()`.
I //think// this fixes both things without collateral damage. This whole thing is a little hard to understand/debug and has grown beyond its original scope, so I'll probably rewrite it if there are more issues.
Test Plan:
- Unit tests.
- My local repro is clean now:
{F2424920}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17211
Summary:
Ref T11114. Recent changes broke the links to jump to inline comments from the previews because they get hooked up with JS.
Restore the linking behavior.
Test Plan: Clicked "View" on an inline comment preview, jumped to that comment.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17131
Summary: Ref T11114. This comments nearly working on EditEngine. Only significant issue I caught is that the "View" link doesn't render properly because it depends on JS which is tricky to hook up. I'll clean that up in a future diff.
Test Plan: {F2279201}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17116
Summary:
Ref T4788. This fixes all the bugs I was immediately able to catch:
- "Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too many vertical lines.
- "Reverse-Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too few vertical lines.
- Terminated, branched graph shapes drew the very last line to the wrong place.
This covers the behavior with tests, so we should be able to fix more stuff later without breaking anything.
Test Plan:
- Added failing tests and made them pass.
{F1708158}
{F1708159}
{F1708160}
{F1708161}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16216
Summary: Ref T4788. This seems reasonable locally, but not sure how it will feel on real data. Might need some tweaks, or might just be a terrible idea.
Test Plan: {F1708059}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16214
Summary: Ref T10628. Turn these into tabs in a single box, since "local commits" and "similar revisions" are of particularly rare use.
Test Plan: {F1707196}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16209
Summary:
First pass at converting Differential, I likely have some buggy-poos but thought I'd toss this up now in case very bad bugs present.
To do:
- Need to put status back on Hovercards
- "Diff Detail" probably needs a better design
Test Plan: Looking at lots of diffs, admittedly I dont have harbormaster, etc, running locally. Checked Diffusion for Table of Content changes on small and large commits.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15463
Summary:
Ref T10563. This isn't a complete fix, but should make viewing complex inline threads a little more manageable.
This just tries to put stuff in thread order instead of in pure chronological order. We can likely improve the display treatment -- this is a pretty minimal approach, but should improve clarity.
Test Plan:
T10563 has a "before" shot. Here's the "after":
{F1169018}
This makes it a bit easier to follow the conversations.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15459
Summary:
Fixes T10562. I left this behavior sort of ambiguous in the original implementation because I didn't anticipate or stumble across this situation.
It's easy to fix: when you reply to a ghost, just put the reply in the exact same place as the ghost (even if it's a different diff), so they always move/ghost/port/thread together.
Test Plan:
See T10562 for reproduction steps and a "before" picture. Here's the after picture:
{F1168983}
The two comments at the bottom are pre-fix, and exhibit the bug. The comment at the top is post-fix, and appears adjacent to the original correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15458
Summary:
Two minor changes here:
- Replace `get/setUser()` with `get/setViewer()` for consistency with everything else.
- `getViewer()` now throws if no viewer is set. We had a lot of code that either "should" check this but didn't, or did check it in an identical way, duplicating work. In contrast, very little code checks for a viewer but works if one is not present.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `->user`.
- Attempted to fix all callsites inside `*View` classes.
- Browsed around a bunch of applications, particularly Calendar, Differential and Diffusion, which seemed most heavily affected.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15412
Summary: I can't find any reference to these used. Fixes T10244
Test Plan: Grep for "phui-text" and "PHUI::TEXT"
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10244
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15142
Summary: Mostly for consistency, we're not using other forms of icons and this makes all classes that use an icon call it in the same way.
Test Plan: tested uiexamples, lots of other random pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15125
Summary: Some linter messages, such as those produced by `ArcanistPHPCompatibilityXHPASTLinterRule`, contain backticks but are currently rendered as Remarkup literals. I think that it is generally desirable to allow lint messages to be rendered as Remarkup, although we should ideally have a way to render Remarkup for use on the command line (I actually think that this already exists, but I don't think that `arc lint` does this when rendering linter messages).
Test Plan: Resubmitted D14481 to my dev install and saw Remarkuped lint messages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14485
Summary:
Fixes T9126. In particular:
- Add "Browse" links to all history views.
- Use icons to show "Browse" and "History" links, instead of text.
- Use FontAwesome.
- Generally standardize handling of these elements.
This might need a little design attention, but I think it's an improvement overall.
Test Plan:
- Viewed repository history.
- Viewed branch history.
- Viewed file history.
- Viewed table of contents on a commit.
- Viewed merged changes on a merge commit.
- Viewed a directory containing an external.
- Viewed a deleted file.
{F788419}
{F788420}
{F788421}
{F788422}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9126
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14096
Summary: Fixes T8572. Ideally we would probably just permit this, but clean up the behavior until the day arrives when inline code is actually rewritten.
Test Plan:
- Tried to launch editors in Differential and Diffusion while comments were already open.
- Verified that "Jump to inline" works in both cases.
{F788008}
{F788009}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8572
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14094
Summary: Fixes T9135. This is (probably) never intended and can be confusing.
Test Plan: Saw no hide button on unpublished inlines. Saw hide button on published inlines. Clicked hide button.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9135
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14014
Summary:
Ref T9218. See discussion there for rationale; I think this is the right behavior to pursue.
The screenshot below is pretty ugly. I think it's a lot worse than most real-world cases will be, since you have to sort of opt-in to having crazy levels of overlapping packages, and it's perfectly normal/reasonable for files owned by one package. Owners is powerful enough to let you specify sub-packages with exclusive ownership.
That said, this may be more typical than I hope. I don't think we can reduce the complexity here much for free, but it would might be reasonable to add some view options (e.g.: group by package?, show only packages I own?, show packages as icons with a tooltip?) if it's an issue.
Test Plan: {F734956}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9218
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13940
Summary:
Fixes T8004.
- For paths which are part of a package, show the package.
- Highlight paths which are part of a package you (the viewer) have authority over.
Test Plan:
{F725418}
- Viewed owned and unowned chagnes in Diffusion and Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13923
Summary:
Fixes T2183. We now use the same rendering element in both places.
Intentional changes:
- Package highlighting is out, coming back to both apps in next diff.
- removed redundant-feeling "Change" link. The information is now shown with a character ("M", "V", etc.) and the page is a click away under "History". Clicking the path also jumps you to substantially similar content. (We could restore it fairly easily, I just think it's probably the least useful thing in the table right now.)
Test Plan: Viewed a bunch of commits in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2183
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13910
Summary:
Ref T2183. Introduces a new View which can (in theory) unify the Revision, Diff and Commit table of contents views.
This has the same behavior as before, but accepts slightly more general primitives and parameters and has somewhat cleaner code.
I've made one intentinoal behavior change: removing the "Open All in Editor" button. I suspect this is essentially unused, and is a pain to keep around. We can look at restoring it if anyone notices.
Test Plan: Looked at a bunch of revisions, no changes from before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2183
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13908
Summary:
Fixes T8917. Prior to T2618, deleting inlines prompted users, then really deleted the rows.
After T2618, we delete immediately and offer "Undo". However, some interactions with drafts were missed, and we were only clearing the "this revision has a draft" flag on one of the delete pathways (when you delete all the comment text, then save the comment).
Make both the "Delete" action and the "Delete All Comment Text + Save" workflows do the same thing: mark the row as deleted, and clear any relevant drafts.
Test Plan:
- Made an inline comment on a clean revision with no "draft comments" marker in the list view.
- Used "delete" to delete it.
- After applying the patch, verified that no "draft commetns" marker appears in the list view.
- Used Delete and Edit + Remove Text + Save to delete comments in Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13665
Summary: Ref T8099. Better alignment with TODO and Ghost Icons.
Test Plan: Test more states of inline comments, ghosts, todos, unsubmitted, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13515
Summary: Ref T8099, Simplifies the button bar with a `borderless` option and implements in Differential Inline Commenting.
Test Plan:
Review new and old comments, submitted, unsubmitted, ghosts, done.
{F562765}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13475
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
