Fixes T10981. Ref T10939. `arc` currently has some odd, hard-coded checks
(missing reviewers, all reviewers away) that depend on the field value being
in a certain format.
The recent changes swapped the field value from scalars (PHIDs) to
dictionaries and broke this workflow. It worked fine in testing because we
apply these checks very inconsistently (not on update or `--edit`).
To get around this for now, serialize into "PHID!" and then unserialize on
the other side. This is icky but keeps us from needing to require an `arc`
upgrade.
These checks are generally bad news and should move to the server side in the
long run (T4631).
(This probably prevents clean `arc diff`, so I'm just cowboy committing it.)
Auditors: chad
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T10174. We can currently trigger "uninteresting" auditors in two ways:
- Packages with auditing disabled ("NONE" audits).
- Packages with auditing enabled, but they don't need an audit (e.g., author is a pacakge owner; "NOT REQUIRED" audits).
These audits aren't interesting (we only write them so we can list "commits in this package" from other UIs) but right now they take up the audit slot. In particular:
- They show in the UI, but are generally useless/confusing nowadays. The actual table of contents does a better job of just showing "which packages do these paths belong to" now, and shows all packages for each path.
- They block Herald from adding real auditors.
Change this:
- Don't show uninteresting auditors.
- Let Herald upgrade uninteresting auditors into real auditors.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/repository reparse --owners <commit> --force`, and `--herald` to trigger Owners and Herald rules.
- With a package with auditing disabled, triggered a "None" audit and saw it no longer appear in the UI with the patch applied.
- With a package with auditing disabled, added a Herald rule to trigger an audit. With the patch, saw it go through and upgrade the audit to "Audit Required".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10174, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15940
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T10181. This slightly simplifies, then documents the auditing rules, which haven't been updated for a while. In particular:
- If an owner authored the change, never audit.
- Examine all reviewers to determine reviewer audit status, not just the first reviewer.
- Simplify some of the loading code a bit.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/repository reparse --owners <commit> --force` to trigger this stuff.
- Verified that the web UI did reasonable things with resulting audits.
- Read documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10181, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15939
Summary: Ref T10939. This adds UI, transactions, etc, to adjust dominion rules.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Changed dominion rules.
- Created packages on `/` ("A") and `/x` ("B") with "Auto Review: Review".
- Touched `/x`.
- Verified that A and B were added with strong dominion.
- Verified that only B was added when A was set to weak dominion.
- Viewed file in Diffusion, saw correct ownership with strong/weak dominion rules.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15936
Summary:
Ref T10939. This supports two settings for packages (although they can't be configured yet):
- **Strong Dominion**: If the package owns `a/`, it always owns every subpath, even if another package also owns the subpath. For example, if I own `src/differential/`, I always own it even if someone else claims `src/differential/js/` as part of the "Javascript" package. This is the current behavior, and the default.
- **Weak Dominion**: If the package owns `a/`, but another package owns `a/b/`, the package gives up control of those paths and no longer owns paths in `a/b/`. This is a new behavior which can make defining some types of packages easier.
In the next change, I'll allow users to switch these modes and document what they mean.
Test Plan:
- Ran existing unit tests.
- Added new unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: joel
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15935
Summary: Ref T10939. Fixes T4887. Supports "username!" to add a reviewer as blocking.
Test Plan: Added and removed blocking and non-blocking reviewers via CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15934
Summary:
Ref T10939. Adds a `blocking(...)` token.
This code is pretty iffy and going to get worse before it gets better, but the fix (T10967 + EditEngine) is going to be a fair chunk of work down the road.
Test Plan: {F1426966}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: scode
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15933
Summary: Fixes T10975. The "scramble attached file permissions when an object is saved" code is misfiring here too. See T10778 + D15803 for prior work.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Edited the view policy of an OAuth server (prepatch: fatal; postpatch: worked great).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10975
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15938
Summary: Fixes T10972. Nothing actually updates this anymore, and only repositories ever did (e.g., Harbormaster and Drydock have never tracked it). Keeping track of this is more trouble than it's worth.
Test Plan: Grepped for constants, viewed a passphrase credential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10972
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15932
Summary:
Ref T10939. I don't think this is hugely important, but it doesn't clutter things up much and it's nice as a hint.
T4055 was the original request specifically asking for this. It wanted a separate bucket, but I think this use case isn't common/strong enough to justify that.
I would like to improve Differential's "X depends on Y" feature in the long term. We don't tend to use/need it much, but it could easily do a better and more automatic job of supporting review of a group of revisions.
Test Plan: {F1426636}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15930
Summary: Ref T10939. These poor stragglers got left out in the rain. Didn't catch any issues otherwise.
Test Plan: {F1426604}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15929
Summary: Ref T10939. For various historical reasons, revision status is a numeric string. This comparison fails because it's `(string) !== (int)`. Just use `!=` so this will still work if we turn it into a real string in the future.
Test Plan: Tried a more specific test case locally, got better looking results in "Must Review" and "Should Review".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15928
Summary:
Ref T10939. I'm not //totally// opposed to the existence of this element, but I think it's the kind of thing that would never make it upstream today. I think this should just be a T418 custom sort of thing in the long run, not a mainline upstream feature.
Overall, I think this thing is nearly useless and just adds visual clutter. My dashboard is about 100% red. This also sort of teaches users that it's fine to let revisions sit for a couple of days, which isn't what I'd like the UI to teach. Finally, removing it helps the UI feel a little less cluttered after the visually busy changes in D15926.
Test Plan: Grepped for removed config. Viewed revision list.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15927
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T9263. Ref T4144.
First, this resolves users (converting users into all packages and projects they are responsible for) earlier, so bucketing can act on that data correctly. Previously, your own blocking reviews would appear in "Must Review" but your packages/projects' would not. Now, all of them will.
Second, this adds `exact(username)` to mean "just me, not my packages/projects". You can use this along with "Bucket: By Required Action" to create a personal view of "Active Revisions" if you'd like, and ignore all your project/package reviews.
Test Plan: Queried by "me" and "exact(me)", got reasonable looking results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T9263, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15925
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This splits the existing buckets ("Blocking Others", "Action Required", "Waiting on Others") into 6-7 buckets with a stronger focus on what the next action you need to take is.
See T10939#175423 for some discussion.
Overall, I think some of the root problems here are caused by reviewer laziness and shotgun review workflows (where a ton of people get automatically added to everything, probably unnecessarily), but these buckets haven't been updated since the introduction of blocking reviewers or project/package reviewers and I think splitting the 3 buckets into 6 buckets isn't unreasonable, even though it's kind of a lot of buckets and the root problem here is approximately "I want to ignore a bunch of stuff on my dashboard".
I didn't remove the old bucketing code yet since it's still in use on the default homepage.
This also isn't quite right until I fix the tokenizer to work properly, since it won't bucket project/package reviewers accurately.
Test Plan: {F1395972}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15924
Summary:
Ref T10939. Currently, Differential hard-codes some behaviors for the "active" filter. This introduces "buckets" to make this grouping behavior more general/flexible.
The buckets don't actually do any grouping yet, this just gets rid of the `$query === 'active'` stuff so far.
These buckets change the page size to a large value, becuase pagination won't currently work with bucketing.
The problem is that we normally paginate by selecting one more result than we need: so if we're building a page of size 10, we'll select 11 results. This is fast, and if we get 11 back, we know there's a next page with at least one result on it.
With buckets, we can't do this, since our 11 results might come back in these buckets:
- A, B, C, A, C, C, A, A, B, B, (B)
So we know there are more results, and we know that bucket B has more results, but we have no clue if bucket A and bucket C have more results or not (or if there's anything in bucket D, etc).
We might need to select a thousand more results to get the first (D) or the next (A).
So we could render something like "Some buckets have more results, click here to go to the next page", but users would normally expect to be able to see "This specific bucket, A, has more results.", and we can't do that without a lot more work.
It doesn't really matter for revisions, because almost no one has 1K of them, but this may need to be resolved eventually.
(I have some OK-ish ideas for resolving it but nothing I'm particularly happy with.)
Test Plan: {F1376542}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15923
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T4144. This moves the revision SearchEngine to modern code so I can add some kind of bucketing layer on top of it.
This seems to have worked pretty cleanly. One thing is that I removed the ability to search for "pending drafts":
- This was added in D1927 from a bootcamp task, was an indirect solution to a questionable problem, and almost certainly would not meet the bar today.
- Later, in D3324, we added the icons to the list. I think this is a better solution in general. In particular, it specifically addressed the query being kind of junky.
- At the time, Differential had a prebuilt "Drafts" filter. This was removed in D6347 with the move to ApplicationSearch, which simplified the large number of prebuilt filters. Although we got a lot of feedback about that, none requested that the drafts filter be restored.
Test Plan: Searched for responsible users, subscribers, orders, projects, repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4144, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15921
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you already own a package, don't trigger the subscribe/review rules.
Document how these rules work.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Removed reviewers, updated a revision, got autoreviewed.
- Joined package.
- Removed reveiwers, updated a revision, no more autoreview.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15918
Summary: Ref T10939. Packages are valid reviewers, so let Herald "Add Reviewers" and "Add Blocking Reviewers" actions add them.
Test Plan:
- Wrote a rule to add package reviewers.
- Hit the rule, saw a package reviewer added, viewed transcript.
{F1311731}
{F1311732}
{F1311733}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15917
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T8887. This enables and implements the "review" and "blocking review" options for packages.
This is a bit copy-pastey from `DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction`, which doesn't feel awesome. I think the right fix is Glorious Infrasturcture, though -- I filed T10967 to track that.
Test Plan:
- Set package autoreveiw to "Review".
- Updated, got a reveiwer.
- Set autoreview to "blocking".
- Updated, got a blocking reviewer.
{F1311720}
{F1311721}
{F1311722}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15916
Summary:
Ref T10939. Ref T8887. This moves toward letting packages automatically become reviewers or blocking reviewers of owned code.
This change adds an "Auto Review" option to packages. Because adding reviewers/blocking reviewers is a little tricky, it doesn't actually have these options yet -- just a "subscribe" option. I'll do the reviewer work in the next update.
Test Plan:
Created a revision in a package with "Auto Review: Subscribe to Changes". The package got subscribed.
{F1311677}
{F1311678}
{F1311679}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8887, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15915
Summary:
Ref T10939. This lets you add packages as reviewers manually.
"Project Reviewers" now lists both projects and packages. I have renamed this to "Coalition Reviewers" but that's probably horrible and confusing. I'm not sure "Group Reviewers" is much better.
Test Plan:
- Added a package as a reviewer manually.
- Joined it, got authority over it.
- Saw the review on my dashboard.
- Accepted the revision, got authority extended to the package review.
{F1311652}
{F1311653}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15914
Summary:
Ref T10939. These appear in "Subscribers" tokenizers now and we got a maybe slightly better icon in the last FA update: {icon shopping-bag} instead of {icon list-alt}.
(I don't feel strongly about this, the old icon just doesn't seem very evocative.)
Test Plan:
o.( O___O ).o
{F1311641}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15913
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T7834.
- Make packages into mailable objects, like projects and users.
- Packages resolve recipients by resolving project and user owners into recipients.
Test Plan:
- Added a comment to a revision with a package subscriber.
- Used `bin/mail show-outbound` to see that owners got mail.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7834, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15912
Summary:
Ref T10939. This allows the CLI to parse reviewers and subscribers like this:
```Reviewers: epriestley, O123 Some Package Name```
The rule goes:
- If a reviewer or subscriber starts with a monogram (like `X111`), just look that up and ignore everything until the next comma.
- Otherwise, split it on spaces and look up each part.
This means that these are valid:
```
alincoln htaft
alincoln, htaft
#a #b epriestley
O123 Some Package, epriestley, #b
```
I think the only real downside is that this:
```
O123 Some Package epriestley
```
...ignores the "epriestley" part. However, I don't expect users to be typing package monograms manually -- they just need to be representable by `arc land` and `arc diff --edit` and such. Those flows will always add commas and make the parse unambiguous.
Test Plan:
- Added test coverage.
- `amend --show`'d a revision with a package subscriber (this isn't currently possible to produce using the web UI, it came from a future change) and saw `Subscribers: O123 package name, usera, userb`.
- Updated a revision with a package subscriber.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15911
Summary:
Ref T10939. This isn't ideal because it's easy to confuse with zero ("O" vs "0") but I think this will mostly be read-only so it's probably one of the least-bad uses we could make of "O". We haven't really gotten into trouble with "I" (vs "1") for initiatives. Still, open to better ideas.
The goal here is to allow commit messages to include packages in some reasonable way, like `Reviewers: O123 Package Name, epriestley, alincoln`. The parser will ignore the "Package Name" part, that's just for humans. And I don't expect humans to type this, but when the use `arc diff --edit` or similar to update an //existing// revision, the reviewer needs to be represented somehow. It also needs to appear in the commit messages that `arc land` finalizes somehow.
I didn't hook up `/O123` as a URI, but this should do everything else I think.
Test Plan:
- Viewed package list.
- Viewed package detail.
- Did global search for `O12`.
- Used `O12` and `{O12}` remarkup rules.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15910
Summary:
Ref T10939. This has no effect yet since packages can not actually become reviewers, I'm just inching toward support.
- When searching for "responsible users", include revisions that need review by packages you have authority over.
- When calculating review authority, include authority over packages you are a member of (these currently never exist).
Test Plan:
This isn't reachable so I just `var_dump()`'d stuff and looked at the generated queries, which appeared correct/reasonable.
I'll vet this more thoroughly once packages can actually become reviewers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15909
Summary:
Ref T10923. This extension needs to load a little more data (with `needURIs`) to function correctly now.
(There's a recent migration does this, so indexes got updated correctly when it ran, so it hasn't been obvious that they weren't getting updated properly after that.)
Test Plan: Made an arbitrary edit to a repository, observed no more error in daemon logs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15908
Summary:
Ref T10939. This is just a bug. I thought this was what was described in T10174 but that's actually talking about something completely different.
Also make a `<select />` slightly easier to use.
Test Plan:
- Created a package with auditing enabled.
- Pushed a change.
- Saw audit trigger.
- Disabled the package, pushed a change.
- Before patch: saw audit trigger improperly.
- After patch: restarted daemons, then saw audit correctly not trigger.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15907
Summary:
Ref T4292. Currently, we hold one big lock around the whole `bin/repository update` workflow.
When running multiple daemons on different hosts, this lock can end up being contentious. In particular, we'll hold it during `git fetch` on every host globally, even though it's only useful to hold it locally per-device (that is, it's fine/good/expected if `repo001` and `repo002` happen to be fetching from a repository they are observing at the same time).
Instead, split it into two locks:
- One lock is scoped to the current device, and held during pull (usually `git fetch`). This just keeps multiple daemons accidentally running on the same host from making a mess when trying to initialize or update a working copy.
- One lock is scoped globally, and held during discovery. This makes sure daemons on different hosts don't step on each other when updating the database.
If we fail to acquire either lock, assume some other process is legitimately doing the work and bail more quietly instead of fataling. In approximately 100% of cases where users have hit this lock contention, that was the case: some other daemon was running somewhere doing the work and the error didn't actually represent an issue.
If there's an actual problem, we still raise a diagnostically useful message if you run `bin/repository update` manually, so there are still tools to figure out that something is hung or whatever.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/repository update`, `pull`, `discover`.
- Added `sleep(5)`, forced processes to contend, got lock exceptions and graceful exit with diagnostic message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15903
Summary: Ref T10959. This does not fix the problem because the `.differential-diff td` rule is still stronger, but it does let you choose a more compact or breezy style for remarkup blocks and pastes.
Test Plan:
- Set font to `24px / 48px impact`.
- Viewed a paste, saw lovely readable text.
- Viewed an inline code block which was very easy on the eyes.
{F1310420}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10959
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15904
Summary:
Fixes T10940. Two issues currently:
First, `PullLocal` deamon refuses to update non-cluster repositories on cluster devices. However, this is surprising/confusing/bad because as soon as you enroll a repository host in the cluster, most of the repositories on it stop working until you `clusterize` them. This is especially confusing because the documentation gives you a very nice, gradual walkthrough about going through things slowly and being able to check your work at every step, but we really drop you off a bit of a cliff here. The workflow implied by the documentation is a desirable one.
This operation is generally only unsafe/problematic if the daemon would be creating a //new// working copy. If a working copy already exists, we can reasonably guess that it's almost certainly because you've enrolled a previously un-clustered host into a new cluster. This allows the nice, gradual workflow the documentation describes to proceed as expected, without any weird surprises.
Instead of refusing to update these repositories, only refuse to update them if updating would create a new working copy. This should make transitioning much smoother without any meaningful reduction in safety.
Second, the lower-level `bin/repository update`, `refs`, `mirror`, etc., commands don't apply this same check. However, these commands are potentially just as dangerous. Use the same code to do a similar check there, making sure we only operate on repositories that are either expected to be on the current device, or which already exist here.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/phd debug pull`, saw diagnostic information choose to update most repositories (including some non-cluster repositories) but properly skip non-cluster repositories that do not exist locally.
- Ran `bin/repository update`, etc., saw the command apply consistent rules to the rules applied by `PullLocal` and refuse to update non-local repositories it would need to create.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10940
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15902
Summary: Fixes T9790. This uses a simple renderer, like the inline context renderer, that emphasizes getting a quick glance at small changes and working reasonably on mobile devices.
Test Plan:
- Set `inline` setting to `9999`.
- Created a diff.
- Saw it render reasonably in HTML mail.
- Also tested text mail to make sure I didn't break that.
{F1310137, size=full}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9790
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15901
Summary:
Ref T10923. Currently, users can disable or enable builtin URIs, but this doesn't actually do anything.
The behavior of "disable" has changed a bit over time and might need some further refinement, but it's currently meaningless for builtin URIs. Prevent adjustment of it. If users want to hide a URI, they should set "Display: Hidden" instead.
Test Plan:
- Disabled/enabled a non-builtin URI.
- Tried to disable a builtin URI, saw greyed out UI and got a helpful error message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15899
Summary: Ref T10923. Fixes T10955. This was accidentally excluded when I broke the form into pages.
Test Plan: Saw edit field in panel; changed project tags for a repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923, T10955
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15896
Summary: Ref T10751. These workflows have separate `getUser()` and `getViewer()` for weird legacy reasons. `getUser()` is correct.
Test Plan:
- Did a Git SSH push, verified that "Last Writer" reflected the proper user in the "Storage" UI in repository management.
- Grepped for other callsites, double-checked that they used correct users.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10751
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15893
Summary: Fixes T10952. Fixes T10930. I didn't implement this method correctly when I expanded this field for repositories.
Test Plan: Edited a paste without warnings.
Reviewers: avivey, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10930, T10952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15892
Summary:
Ref T10923. This makes the "Clone URI" UI a little nicer:
- Show whether each URI is read-only, read-write, or external.
- Clicking the button selects the URI.
- Add a link to manage the appropriate credentials.
Test Plan: {F1308302, size=full}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15891
Summary: These parameters wrongly extend List.
Test Plan:
Used createdStart field for a search - didn't get error about "should be a list".
`git grep 'extends ConduitListParameterType'`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15881
Summary:
Ref T10923. We sort of dead-end new users creating repositories right now, by dumping them into the manage UI without an obvious way forward.
You can click the crumb to get to the repository, but by default it will say something like `R1` which isn't very obvious.
Add a more obvious navigational link to get to the main view.
Test Plan: {F1308196}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15889
Summary:
Ref T10923. The old behavior was to show a full command in SVN, Mercurial, and Git, like this:
- `git clone <uri>`
- `hg clone <uri>`
- `svn checkout <uri> <directory>`
In Git and Mercurial, the `<uri>` ends in something like `/nice-repository-name.git` so the default directory it creates is called `nice-repository-name/`.
In Subversion, we don't (and can't easily) do that for various reasons so we provide an explicit `<directory>` with the nice name.
In the update, I've changed things to just show the URI. I often found that I wanted the URI alone, not the whole clone command (for example, to `fetch`, `remote-add`, etc). This is also consistent with GitHub. Because we have nice URIs for Git and Mercurial, `git clone <uri>` has good behavior.
In Subversion, `svn checkout <uri>` has bad beahvior (you get a directory named `47/` or whatever). So continue showing the whole command there.
We can possibly tailor this after T4245 finishes up and we get access to `/source/nice-repository-name/` URIs.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a Subversion repository, saw a full command.
- Viewed a Git repository, saw only a clone URI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15888
Summary: Fixes T10948. Ref T10923. Make these rules a little more thorough and document their behavior.
Test Plan: Looked at Diffusion clone URIs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923, T10948
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15887
Summary: Fixes T10941. This avoids a confusing dead end when configuring Subversion hosting, where `svnserve` will fail to execute hooks if the CWD isn't readable by the vcs-user.
Test Plan:
- Updated and committed in a hosted SVN repository.
- Ran some git operations, too.
- @dpotter confirmed this locally in T10941.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: dpotter
Maniphest Tasks: T10941
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15879
Summary: Ref T10694. This setting no longer has any effect: we always show a limited amount of context now.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15886
Summary: Ref T10923. Although I'd ideally like to get rid of this eventually, keep it around for now.
Test Plan:
- Edited value for an SVN repository.
- Observed no panel present for a Git repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15883
Summary: Fixes T10815. We already recovered reasonably from this for cluster repositories, but not for non-cluster repositories.
Test Plan:
- Viewed cluster and non-cluster empty Git repository.
- Viewed cluster and non-cluster empty Mercurial repository.
- Viewed cluster and non-clsuter empty hosted SVN repository.
- Viewed cluster and non-cluster empty observed SVN repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10815
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15878
Summary:
Ref T10923. Fixes T9554.
When hosting a repository, we currently have a heuristic that tries to detect when you're doing an initial import: if you push more than 7 commits to an empty repository, it counts as an import and we disable mail/feed/etc.
Do something similar for observed repositories: if the repository is empty and we discover more than 7 commits, switch to import mode until we catch up.
This should align behavior with user expectation more often when juggling hosted vs imported repositories.
Test Plan:
- Created a new hosted repository.
- Activated it and allowed it to fully import.
- Added an "Observe URI".
- Saw it automatically drop into "Importing" mode until the import completed.
- Swapped it back to hosted mode.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9554, T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15877
Summary:
Ref T10923. When regenerating the URI index for a repository, index every URI.
- Also, make the index slightly stricter (domain + path instead of just path). Excluding the domain made more sense when we were generating only first-party URIs.
- Make the index smarter about `/diffusion/123/` URIs.
- Show normalized URIs in `diffusion.repository.search` results.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Verified sensible-looking results in database.
- Searched for a repository URI by first-party clone URI.
- Searched for a repository URI by mirror URI.
- Used `diffusion.repository.search` to get information about repository URIs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15876
Summary: Ref T10923. Walk users through the "create, configure, activate" workflow a little better and set expectations more clearly.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository, saw new UI help.
- Activated repository, saw onboarding help disappear.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15875
Summary:
Ref T10923.
- Hide "Automation", "Staging" and "Branches" in repositories where they do nothing.
- Fix SVN SSH URIs to read "svn+ssh://" and have proper paths.
Test Plan:
- Verified irrelevant sections did not appear in Subversion in Manage UI.
- Checked out a new hosted SVN repository.
Reviewers: chad, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15874
Summary:
Ref T10923. Fixes T10406. This brings most of the guidance/instructions forward:
- Some remained as instructions.
- Some moved to documentation.
Test Plan: Went through all of the sections and hit the help.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10406, T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15873
Summary: Ref T10923. This provides a little guidance about hosted vs observed, and points at the `diffusion.ssh-*` options.
Test Plan: Poked around in the web UI, saw useful guidance.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15872
Summary: Ref T10923. This cleans up the remaining "pro" mess left by the cutover.
Test Plan: Viewed, managed, edited a repository.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15871
Summary:
Ref T10923. Primarily documents the process for creating repositories via the API.
Also fixes a couple of issues with `repositoryPHID` not being set yet when creating URIs via the API.
Test Plan:
- Followed all documented steps to create a new repository.
- Created and edited some new URIs from the web workflow, too.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15870
Summary: Ref T10923. This isn't complete yet, but reduces lies and increases truths.
Test Plan: Read documentation, clicked new "Documentation" nav item.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15868
Summary:
Ref T10923. Some of the dialogs ("Deactivate Repository", "Test Automation", etc.) had cancel or redirect URIs which I missed originally.
Go through them and make sure they all point to the right places.
Also removed one unused controller which I missed the first time around.
Test Plan:
- Opened all these dialogs in a new tab with Command-Click.
- Clicked every "cancel" and "submit" button on all of these dialogs.
- Got consistently sent to the place I came from.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15867
Summary:
Ref T10923.
- The "Policy" edit form currently goes "Push, View, Edit". Reorder the defaults to "View, Edit, Push".
- Editing Spaces doesn't currently work: the element appears in the UI, but isn't actually processed when handling transactions. Make that work.
Test Plan:
- Edited a repository policies, saw "View, Edit, Push".
- Moved a repository between Spaces.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15866
Summary:
Ref T10923. Paging wasn't being applied correctly when creating //new// repositories after API changes.
Also, the first redirect after creation wasn't sending users to the right place.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repostiory, got redirected properly.
- Verified that new repostiory flow has the correct fields (name, callsign, etc) and Conduit API has the correct fields (everything).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15865
Summary:
Ref T10694. General improvements:
- Remove leading empty lines from context snippets.
- Remove trailing empty lines from context snippets.
- If we removed everything, render a note.
- Try using `style` instead of `<pre>`? My thinking is that maybe Airmail has weird default rules for `<pre>`, since that's the biggest / most obvious thing that's different about this element to me.
Test Plan: Viewed normal comments locally, faked a comment on an empty line in the middle of a lot of other empty lines.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15864
Summary:
Ref T10694.
- Shift margins/padding around so inlines with multiple paragraphs get reasonable spacing.
- Add `text-decoration: none` to the "View Inline" link to kill the underline.
Test Plan: {F1265342}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15863
Summary: Ref T10694. Move the inline style more toward a mix of standard`<pre>` style and the web UI style for inlines.
Test Plan: See screenshots in comments.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15857
Summary:
Ref T10927. Pretty sure the issue is:
- User makes an HTTPS request.
- Load balancer terminates it, but with an `X-Forwarded-Proto` header.
- `secure001` (or whatever; acting as web host) proxies it to `secure002` (or whatever; acting as a repository host). **This** connection is plain HTTP.
- Since this proxied connection is plain HTTP, we check if the repository can serve over "http", but it can't: only "https". So we fail incorrectly, even though the original user request was HTTPS.
In the long run we should probably forward the `X-Forwarded-Proto` header, but that has some weird implications and it's broadly fine to allow either protocol to serve as long as the other one is active: configuration like `security.require-https` is already stronger than these settings.
Test Plan: This is likely only observable in production, but normal cloning still works locally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10927
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15856
Summary:
Ref T10694. This mostly prevents us from having a degenerate case if someone leaves a 200-line inline.
- For one-line inlines, show 1 line of context above and below (3 lines total).
- For 3+ line inlines, show just the inline.
- For 7+ line inlines, show only the first part.
Test Plan: Made a bunch of weird long/short/different-sized comments, saw reasonble-appearing context in text and HTML mail output.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15853
Summary:
Ref T10694. Ref T9790. When generating inline diff context, highlight it and then mangle the highlighted output into `style="..."` so it works in HTML.
Also try to tighten up some spacing/formatting stuff.
Test Plan:
Got some output in this vein:
{F1259937}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9790, T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15852
Summary:
Ref T10694. This is still missing some pieces, but seems to get most of the data into the mail in a plausible format:
- When an inline remarks on code, show the patch inline in the mail body.
- When an inline replies to another inline, show that other inline in the mail body.
- Apply remarkup rendering to inline content.
- Apply basic styling to mail body blocks.
Not covered yet:
- Syntax highlighting.
- Diff highlighting.
- Maybe clearer style/layout hints to connect comments to what they reply to? Current approach might get messy with inlines that have blockquotes and code blocks inside them, for example.
- I probably want to cap the amount of diff context we ever show to ~7 lines, even if you drag over 200 lines of code.
- CSS is a generally a bit rough still.
- The `unified-comment-context` option is effectively always on now, and should be removed.
- Text section is getting indented right now but probably shouldn't be.
- Spacing, etc., might be a bit off.
Test Plan:
Rigged Home to render these things, got a plausible-looking render (top is text, bottom is HTML):
{F1259052}
Sent myself some inline comment mail, got a plausible result.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15850
Summary:
Ref T9790. This prepares the syntax color rules to be reused in mail.
This goes about halfway toward T5701 by sort-of supporting different styles but not really.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/celerity syntax` to regenerate syntax map.
- Viewed some highlighted code, didn't see any differences.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9790
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15846
Summary: Ref T10748. We're returning a `PhabricatorRepositoryURI` here but the code expects an actual `PhutilURI`.
Test Plan:
This should clear this up in production:
```
Daemon 180278 STDE [Wed, 04 May 2016 23:25:16 +0000] [2016-05-04 23:25:16] EXCEPTION: (PhutilProxyException) Error while executing Task ID 1677075. {>} (RuntimeException) Object of class PhabricatorRepositoryURI could not be converted to string at [<phutil>/src/error/PhutilErrorHandler.php:205]
Daemon 180278 STDE [Wed, 04 May 2016 23:25:16 +0000] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=c58f1b9a2507), libcore(), phabricator(head=master, ref.master=29d1115037b8), phutil(head=master, ref.master=0709cd5cfc26), services(head=master, ref.master=04ae8c8f8e3b)
Daemon 180278 STDE [Wed, 04 May 2016 23:25:16 +0000] #0 <#2> PhutilErrorHandler::handleError(integer, string, string, integer, array) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php:1200]
Daemon 180278 STDE [Wed, 04 May 2016 23:25:16 +0000] #1 <#2> PhabricatorRepository::getPublicCloneURI() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryCommit.php:395]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15844
Summary:
Ref T10748. This needs more extensive testing and is sure to have some rough edges, but seems to basically work so far.
Throwing this up so I can work through it more deliberately and make notes.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Used `bin/repository list` to list existing repositories.
- Used `bin/repository update <repository>` to update various repositories.
- Updated a migrated, hosted Git repository.
- Updated a migrated, observed Git repository.
- Converted an observed repository into a hosted repository by toggling the I/O mode of the URI.
- Conveted a hosted repository into an observed repository by toggling it back.
- Created and activated a new empty hosted Git repository.
- Created and activated an observed Git repository.
- Updated a mirrored repository.
- Cloned and pushed over HTTP.
- Tried to HTTP push a read-only repository.
- Cloned and pushed over SSH.
- Tried to SSH push a read-only repository.
- Updated several Mercurial repositories.
- Updated several Subversion repositories.
- Created and edited repositories via the API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15842
Summary:
Ref T10748. This migrates and swaps mirroring to `PhabricatorRepositoryURI`, obsoleting `PhabricatorRepositoryMirror`.
This prevents you from editing, adding or disabling mirrors unless you know a secret URI (until the UI cuts over fully), but existing mirroring is not affected.
Test Plan:
- Added a mirroring URI to an old repository.
- Verified it worked with `bin/repository mirror`.
- Migrated forward.
- Verified it still worked with `bin/repository mirror`.
- Wow, mirroring: https://github.com/epriestley/locktopia-mirror
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15841
Summary:
Ref T10748. In D14250#158181, I accepted this conditional on removing it once Conduit could handle it.
Conduit can now handle it, or at least will be able to as soon as T10748 cuts over.
Test Plan: Grepped for `repository edit`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15839
Summary:
Ref T10748. This has had many problems for a long time, can't create hosted repositories, can't create cluster repositories, etc. It is obsoleted by `diffusion.repository.edit`. Remove it.
(Right now `diffusion.repository.edit` isn't a strict replacement, but it will be as soon as the URI stuff cuts over.)
Test Plan: Grepped for `repository.create`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15838
Summary:
Ref T4039. Long ago these were more freely editable and there were some security concerns around creating a repository, then setting its local path to point somewhere it shouldn't.
Local paths are no longer editable so there's no real reason we need to provide a uniqueness guarantee anymore, but you could still make a mistake with `bin/repository move-paths` by accident, and it's a little cleaner to pull them out into their own column with a key.
(We still don't -- and, largely can't -- guarantee that two paths aren't //equivalent// since one might be symlinked to the other, or symlinked only on some hosts, or whatever, but the primary value here is as a sanity check that you aren't goofing things up and pointing a bunch of repositories at the same working copy by mistake.)
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations.
- Grepped for `local-path`.
- Listed and moved paths with `bin/repository`.
- Created a new repository, verified its local path populated correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15837
Summary: Seems to work ok, if you give `size=wide` to an image file, we blow it out a bit in DocumentPro mode.
Test Plan:
Test in Phame and Maniphest.
{F1256717}
{F1256718}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15840
Summary:
Ref T10748. These:
- Look nice.
- Hint at panel contents / effects.
- Hint which panels have been customized.
- Allow panels with issues or errors to be highlighted with an alert/attention icon.
Test Plan: {F1256156}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15836
Summary: Ref T10748. This copies existing code in the `CreateController` which will eventually be removed.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository with the EditPro workflow.
- Saw it come up into the cluster properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15835
Summary:
Fixes T10912. When you drag tasks within a milestone, we currently apply an overbroad, API-focused rule and add the parent board's project. This logic was added fairly recently, as part of T6027, to improve the behavior of API-originated moves.
Later on, this causes the task to toggle in and out of the parent project on every alternate drag.
This logic is also partially duplicated in the `MoveController`.
- Add test coverage for this interaction.
- Fix the logic so it accounts for subproject / milestone columns correctly.
- Put all of the logic into the TransactionEditor, so the API gets the exact same rules.
Test Plan:
- Added a failing test and made it pass.
- Dragged tasks around within a milestone column:
- Before patch: they got bogus project swaps on every other move.
- After patch: projects didn't change (correct).
- Dragged tasks around between normal and milestone columns.
- Before patch: worked properly.
- After patch: still works properly.
Here's what the bad changes look like, the task is swapping projects with every other move:
{F1255957}
The "every other" is because the logic was trying to do this:
- Add both the parent and milestone project.
- Whichever one exists already gets dropped from the change list because it would have no effect.
- The other one then applies.
- In applying, it forces removal of the first one.
- Then this process repeats in the other direction the next time through.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10912
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15834
Summary:
Ref T10748. This allows an EditEngine form to be broken up into pages.
This is less powerful than `PHUIPagedFormView`, because the pages are not sequential / stateful. Each form saves immediately once it's submitted, and can not take you to a new form or back/forward in a series of forms.
For example, you can't create a workflow where the user fills out 5 pages of information before we create an object, like the current repository workflow does.
However, the only place we've ever wanted to do this is repositories and it's fairly bad there, so I feel reasonably confident we aren't going to miss this in the future.
(We do "choose a type of service/repository/rule -> fill out one page of info" fairly often, but can do this without the full-power paging stuff.)
Test Plan:
- Created a repository usin the new Manage UI, filling out only a handful of fields.
- Edited a repository using the new Manage UI.
- All forms are now EditEngine forms offering paged views of the big huge underlying form:
{F1254371}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15832
Summary:
Ref T10748. Ref T10366. Allows users to set credential for new URIs.
- Ref T7221. Our handling of the "git://" protocol is currently incorrect. This protocol is not authenticated, but is considered an SSH protocol. In the new UI, it is considered an anonymous/unauthenticated protocol instead.
- Ref T10241. This fixes the `PassphraseCredentialControl` so it doesn't silently edit the value if the current value is not visible to you and/or not valid.
Test Plan:
Performed a whole lot of credential edits, removals, and adjustments. I'll give this additional vetting before cutting over to it.
{F1253207}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7221, T10241, T10366, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15829
Summary: Fixes T10906, Fixes T10820. Adds new icons, grey-er colors for previous states. Also, I think fixed a few bugs?
Test Plan: Fake each state, verify icon is as intended.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10820, T10906
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15830
Summary:
Ref T10748.
- Allow users to add new URIs by clicking a button instead of knowing a secret URI.
- Validate that URIs are actually valid URIs.
- Add enable/disable action and strings.
Test Plan:
- Created a new URI.
- Tried to create a nonsense URI, created a good URI.
- Enabled/disabled a URI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15825
Summary: Ref T10748. Adds a "uris" attachment with URI information.
Test Plan: Queried URI information via Conduit, saw reasonable looking information.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15822
Summary: Ref T10748. Brings the rest of the transactions to EditEngine, supports creating via API.
Test Plan:
- Created a URI via API.
- Created a URI via web.
- Tried to apply sneaky transactions, got rejected with good error messages. <_< >_>
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15821
Summary: Ref T10748. Ref T10366. This documents how everything is planned to work shortly.
Test Plan: Read documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler, scode
Maniphest Tasks: T10366, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15817
Summary:
Ref T10748.
- New View page for repository URIs.
- Make display and I/O behavior (observe, mirror, read, read/write) editable.
- Add a bunch of checks to prevent you from completely screwing up a repository by making it writable from a bunch of differnet sources.
Test Plan:
{F1249866}
{F1249867}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15816
Summary:
Ref T10748. Ref T10366. This adds a new EditEngine, EditController, Editor, Query, and Transaction for RepositoryURIs.
None of these really do anything helpful yet, and these URIs are still unused in the actual application.
Test Plan: {F1249794}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10366, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15815
Summary:
Ref T10748. Allow the new EditEngine workflow to create repositories by giving the user a modal repository type choice upfront.
(The rest of this flow is still confusing/weird, though.)
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository.
{F1249626}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15813
Summary: Ref T10748. This brings the "Actions" items (publish/notify + autoclose enabled) into the new UI.
Test Plan:
- Edited this stuff via EditEngine and Conduit.
- Viewed via new Manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15811
Summary: Ref T10748. Makes a "Branches" panel, enables these transactions in the EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Edited via EditEngine + Conduit.
- Viewed via manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15809
Summary: Ref T10748. Port this, add EditEngine support, add some type validation to the transaction.
Test Plan:
- Edited via EditEngine.
- Edited via Conduit.
- Viewed via Management UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15808
Summary:
Ref T10843. There are actually two separate notions of cacheability here:
- Is this cacheable by the browser (e.g., should we emit "Expires: long in the future")?
- Is this cacheable locally (e.g., should we stick it in APC, or just read it off disk every time)?
These got a little mixed up by D15775, so we aren't currently emitting proper "Expires" headers on font files and a few other resource types.
Straighten this out so that we "Expires" these unusual resources correctly.
Test Plan: Verified that `.woff` files get a proper "Expires" header now, not just CSS/JS.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10843
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15807
Summary: Ref T10748. Brings this forward in the UI and EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Edited via Conduit.
- Viewed via Manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15805
Summary: Ref T10748. Ports this UI and exposes it on the EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Edited via EditEngine.
- Viewed new manage UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15804
Summary:
Fixes T10778. This is a result of T10262: when we save a form configuration and adjust the policy, we try to scramble attached file secrets.
There aren't going to be any attached files, but there's also no edge table, so we fail.
We could skip this code, but we'll likely need an edge table here sooner or later so it's probably simpler in the long run to just add an empty one.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, got a clean bill of health.
- Saved a form configuration after making a policy edit, no more `edge` exception.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10778
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15803
Summary: Ref T4292. This provides at least some sort of hint about how to set up cluster repositories.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Ran `bin/repository clusterize` to add + remove clusters.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15798
Summary:
Fixes T10876. Currently, we can end up with a setup warning banner sticking on each web device, since the state is stored in local cache.
Instead:
- When we actually run the setup checks, save the current state in the database.
- Before we show a cached banner, make sure the database still says the checks are a problem.
This could lead to some inconsistencies if setup checks legitimately pass on some hosts but not on others. For example, if you have `git` installed on one machine but not on another, we may raise a setup warning ("No Git Binary!") about it on one host only.
For now, assume users have their operational environments in some sort of reasonable shape and can install the same stuff everywhere. In the future, we could split the issues into "global" and "per-host" issues if we run into problems with this.
Test Plan:
This is somewhat tricky to test locally since you really need multiple webservers to test it properly, but I:
- Created some setup issues, saw banner.
- Ignored/cleared them, saw banner go away.
- Verified database cache writes were occurring properly.
Then I sort of faked it like this:
- Created a setup issue.
- Manually set the database cache value to `[]` ("no issues").
- Reloaded page.
- No more banner.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10876
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15802
Summary: Ref T10748. Brings this over and adds EditEngine support for it.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited staging area information.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15801
Summary: Ref T10748. This merges "Storage" and "Cluster" into a single UI which combines the information of both.
Test Plan: {F1246882}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15800
Summary:
Ref T4292. This is a required step in configuring a cluster: document and explain it.
Previously `bin/almanac register` could //also// add and trust keys. I've removed this capability since I think it's needless and complicated. If there's some real use for it eventually, we could add a `bin/almanac add-key` or whatever. The workflow is simpler and has better guard rails that point you in the correct direction now.
Test Plan:
- Read documentation.
- Ran `bin/almanac` with various good/bad flags.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15795
Summary: This gets over-escaped instead of bolded right now, but I only ever hit it when exporting/importing and never both cleaning it up.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/repository move-paths`, saw bolded "Move" instead of ANSI escape sequences.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15797
Summary:
Ref T10860. This allows us to recover if the connection to the database is lost during a push.
If we lose the connection to the master database during a push, we would previously freeze the repository. This is very safe, but not very operator-friendly since you have to go manually unfreeze it.
We don't need to be quite this aggressive about freezing things. The repository state is still consistent after we've "upgraded" the lock by setting `isWriting = 1`, so we're actually fine even if we lost the global lock.
Instead of just freezing the repository immediately, sit there in a loop waiting for the master to come back up for a few minutes. If it recovers, we can release the lock and everything will be OK again.
Basically, the changes are:
- If we can't release the lock at first, sit in a loop trying really hard to release it for a while.
- Add a unique lock identifier so we can be certain we're only releasing //our// lock no matter what else is going on.
- Do the version reads on the same connection holding the lock, so we can be sure we haven't lost the lock before we do that read.
Test Plan:
- Added a `sleep(10)` after accepting the write but before releasing the lock so I could run `mysqld stop` and force this issue to occur.
- Pushed like this:
```
$ echo D >> record && git commit -am D && git push
[master 707ecc3] D
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
# Push received by "local001.phacility.net", forwarding to cluster host.
# Waiting up to 120 second(s) for a cluster write lock...
# Acquired write lock immediately.
# Waiting up to 120 second(s) for a cluster read lock on "local001.phacility.net"...
# Acquired read lock immediately.
# Device "local001.phacility.net" is already a cluster leader and does not need to be synchronized.
# Ready to receive on cluster host "local001.phacility.net".
Counting objects: 3, done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 254 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done.
Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0)
BEGIN SLEEP
```
- Here, I stopped `mysqld` from the CLI in another terminal window.
```
END SLEEP
# CRITICAL. Failed to release cluster write lock!
# The connection to the master database was lost while receiving the write.
# This process will spend 300 more second(s) attempting to recover, then give up.
```
- Here, I started `mysqld` again.
```
# RECOVERED. Link to master database was restored.
# Released cluster write lock.
To ssh://local@localvault.phacility.com/diffusion/26/locktopia.git
2cbf87c..707ecc3 master -> master
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10860
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15792
Summary:
Ref T10860. At least in Git over SSH, we can freely echo a bunch of stuff to stderr and Git will print it to the console, so we can tell users what's going on.
This should make debugging, etc., easier. We could tone this down a little bit once things are more stable if it's a little too chatty.
Test Plan:
```
$ echo D >> record && git commit -am D && git push
[master ca5efff] D
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
# Push received by "local001.phacility.net", forwarding to cluster host.
# Waiting up to 120 second(s) for a cluster write lock...
# Acquired write lock immediately.
# Waiting up to 120 second(s) for a cluster read lock on "local001.phacility.net"...
# Acquired read lock immediately.
# Device "local001.phacility.net" is already a cluster leader and does not need to be synchronized.
# Ready to receive on cluster host "local001.phacility.net".
Counting objects: 3, done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 256 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done.
Total 3 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0)
To ssh://local@localvault.phacility.com/diffusion/26/locktopia.git
8616189..ca5efff master -> master
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10860
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15791
Summary: Ref T10860. This doesn't change anything, it just separates all this stuff out of `PhabricatorRepository` since I'm planning to add a bit more state to it and it's already pretty big and fairly separable.
Test Plan: Pulled, pushed, browsed Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10860
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15790
Summary:
Fixes T10865.
- Mock descriptions did not markup.
- Image descriptions did not get a proper container `<div />`.
Test Plan:
- Created a mock with remarkup in the mock description and in an image description.
- Viewed mock detail.
- Saw list styles render properly in both mock description and image description.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10865
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15793
Summary: Fixes T10863. See that task for discussion.
Test Plan:
- Configured `aphlict` with no "logs".
- Started `aphlict`.
- Before change: exception.
- After change: worked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10863
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15788
Summary:
Ref T4292. Sometimes, we may not have a working copy for a repository. The easiest way to get into this condition is to deactivate a repository.
We could try to clone + fetch in this case, but that's kind of complex, and there's an easy command that administrators can run manually. For now, just tell them to do that.
This affects the inactive repositories on `secure`, like rGITCOINS.
Test Plan: Removed working copy, got message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15786
Summary:
Ref T7789. Currently, we use different viewers if you have `security.alternate-file-domain` configured vs if you do not.
This is largely residual from the days of one-time-tokens, and can cause messy configuration-dependent bugs like the one in T7789#172057.
Instead, always use the omnipotent viewer. Knowledge of the secret key alone is sufficient to access a file.
Test Plan:
- Disabled `security.alternate-file-domain`.
- Reproduced an issue similar to the one described on T7789.
- Applied change.
- Clean LFS interaction.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15784
Summary:
Ref T4292. When the daemons make a query for repository information, we need to make sure the working copy on disk is up to date before we serve the response, since we might not have the inforamtion we need to respond otherwise.
We do this automatically for almost all Diffusion methods, but this particular method is a little unusual and does not get this check for free. Add this check.
Test Plan:
- Made this code throw.
- Ran `bin/repository reparse --message ...`, saw the code get hit.
- Ran `bin/repository lookup-user ...`, saw this code get hit.
- Made this code not throw.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15783
Summary: I've possibly seen a couple of `aphlict` processes exit under suspicious circumstances (maybe?). Make sure any PHP errors get captured into the log.
Test Plan:
- Added an exception after forking.
- Before change: vanished into thin air.
- After change: visible in the log.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15782
Summary:
Fixes T10843. In a multi-server setup, we can do this:
- Two servers, A and B.
- You push an update.
- A gets pushed first.
- After A has been pushed, but before B has been pushed, a user loads a page from A.
- It generates resource URIs like `/stuff/new/package.css`.
- Those requests hit B.
- B doesn't have the new resources yet.
- It responds with old resources.
- Your CDN caches things. You now have a poisoned CDN: old data is saved in a new URL.
To try to avoid this with as little work as possible and generally make it hard to get wrong, check the URL hash against the hash we would generate.
If they don't match, serve our best guess at the resource, but don't cache it. This should make things mostly keep working during the push, but prevent caches from becoming poisoned, and everyone should get a working version of everything after the push finishes.
Test Plan:
- `curl`'d a resource, got a cacheable one.
- Changed the hash a little, `curl`'d again. This time: valid resource, but not cacheable.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10843
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15775
Summary: Ref T4292. This adds a new high-level overview panel.
Test Plan: {F1238854}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15772
Summary: Fixes T8897
Test Plan: Open any list view of Calendar events, every event should only show "Attending: ..." with users who are attending event.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15779
Summary: This still wasn't quite right -- a link like `[[ Porcupine Facts ]]` with a space would not lookup correctly, and would render as `porcupine_facts`.
Test Plan: Verified that `[[ Porcupine Facts ]]` now works correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15780
Summary: Fixes T10845.
Test Plan: Verified that `[[ quack ]]` and `[[ QUACK ]]` both work. Previously, the link had to exactly match the capitalization of the target.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10845
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15777
Summary: Fixes T10844. After recent changes to Aphlict (T6915 and T10697), `./bin/status` needs to be aware of the configuration file. As such, it is now necessary to run `./bin/aphlict status --config /path/to/config.json` rather than `./bin/aphlict status`.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/aphlict start ...` and `./bin/aphlict status` and saw "Aphlict (`$PID`) is running".
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10844
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15776
Summary:
Fixes T8952. When Herald changes subscribers, it is zzzzz very boring.
When users change subscribers, it is still super boring (more boring than a merge, for example).
Test Plan: Viewed feed, saw fewer Herald stories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15774
Summary:
Ref T8952. Currently, when an application (most commonly Herald, but sometimes Drydock, Diffusion, etc) publishes a feed story, we get an empty grey box for it in feed.
Instead, give the story a little application icon kind of "profile picture"-like thing.
Test Plan:
Here's how it looks:
{F1239003}
Feel free to tweak/counter-diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15773
Summary:
Ref T10751. Add support tooling for manually prying your way out of trouble if disaster strikes.
Refine documentation, try to refer to devices as "devices" more consistently instead of sometimes calling them "nodes".
Test Plan: Promoted and demoted repository devices with `bin/repository thaw`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10751
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15768
Summary:
Ref T10751. Make the UI more useful and explain what failure states mean and how to get out of them.
The `bin/repository thaw` command does not exist yet, I'll write that soon.
Test Plan: {F1238241}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10751
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15766
Summary: Fixes T10744
Test Plan: Create recurring event, cancel one instance, cancel the parent event, reinstate event. Wording in the reinstating dialog should be clear about reinstating only instances that haven't been individually cancelled.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10744
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15770
Summary: This is completely obsoleted by `owners.search`. See D15472.
Test Plan: Viewed API method in UI console.
Reviewers: avivey, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15769
Summary:
Fixes T10840. When rendering mail, this rule wasn't falling through in quite the right way.
Also adjust where the rules are for this so the special styles show up in Maniphest, etc.
Test Plan:
Made this comment:
{F1238266}
Which produced this HTML:
{F1238267}
...and sent this mail:
{F1238283}
Reviewers: hach-que, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15767
Summary: Ref T10751. This cleans this up so it's a little more modern, and fixes a possible bad access on the log detail page.
Test Plan: Viewed push log list, viewed push log detail.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10751
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15765
Summary: This will stop breaking if you have subscribers and tags when updating a revision (`Error parsing field "Subscribers": The objects you have listed include objects which do not exist (Tags:)`), which I broke in D15749.
Test Plan: run through arc-diff --update that failed earlier.
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15762
Summary:
Ref T4292. Right now, repository versions only get marked when a write happens.
This potentially creates a problem: if I pushed all the sync code to `secure` and enabled `secure002` as a repository host, the daemons would create empty copies of all the repositories on that host.
Usually, this would be fine. Most repositories have already received a write on `secure001`, so that working copy has a verison and is a leader.
However, when a write happened to a rarely-used repository (say, rKEYSTORE) that hadn't received any write recently, it might be sent to `secure002` randomly. Now, we'd try to figure out if `secure002` has the most up-to-date copy of the repository or not.
We wouldn't be able to, since we don't have any information about which node has the data on it, since we never got a write before. The old code could guess wrong and decide that `secure002` is a leader, then accept the write. Since this would bump the version on `secure002`, that would //make// it an authoritative leader, and `secure001` would synchronize from it passively (or on the next read or write), which would potentially destroy data.
Instead:
- Refuse to continue in situations like this.
- When a repository is on exactly one device, mark it as a leader with version "0".
- When a repository is created into a cluster service, mark its version as "0" on all devices (they're all leaders, since the repository is empty).
This should mean that we won't lose data no matter how much weird stuff we run into.
Test Plan:
- In single-node mode, used `repository update` to verify that `0` was written properly.
- With multiple nodes, used `repository update` to verify that we refuse to continue.
- Created a new repository, verified versions were initialized correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15761
Summary: Ref T4292. When we write a push log, also log which node received the request.
Test Plan: {F1230467}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15759
Summary:
Ref T4292. We currently synchronize hosted, clustered, Git repositories when we receive an SSH pull or push.
Additionally:
- Synchronize before HTTP reads and writes.
- Synchronize reads before Conduit requests.
We could relax Conduit eventually and allow Diffusion to say "it's OK to give me stale data".
We could also redirect some set of these actions to just go to the up-to-date host instead of connecting to a random host and synchronizing it. However, this potentially won't work as well at scale: if you have a larger number of servers, it sends all of the traffic to the leader immediately following a write. That can cause "thundering herd" issues, and isn't efficient if replicas are in different geographical regions and the write just went to the east coast but most clients are on the west coast. In large-scale cases, it's better to go to the local replica, wait for an update, then serve traffic from it -- particularly given that writes are relatively rare. But we can finesse this later once things are solid.
Test Plan:
- Pushed and pulled a Git repository over HTTP.
- Browsed a Git repository from the web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15758
Summary:
Ref T4292. Before we write or read a hosted, clustered Git repository over SSH, check if another version of the repository exists on another node that is more up-to-date.
If such a version does exist, fetch that version first. This allows reads and writes of any node to always act on the most up-to-date code.
Test Plan: Faked my way through this and got a fetch via `bin/repository update`; this is difficult to test locally and needs more work before we can put it in production.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15757
Summary:
Ref T4292. When you run `git fetch` and connect to, say, `repo001.west.company.com`, we'll look at the current version of the repository in other nodes in the cluster.
If `repo002.east.company.com` has a newer version of the repository, we'll fetch that version first, then respond to your request.
To do this, we need to run `git fetch repo002.east.company.com ...` and have that connect to the other host and be able to fetch data.
This change allows us to run `PHABRICATOR_AS_DEVICE=1 git fetch ...` to use device credentials to do this fetch. (Device credentials are already supported and used, they just always connect as a user right now, but these fetches should be doable without having a user. We will have a valid user when you run `git fetch` yourself, but we won't have one if the daemons notice that a repository is out of date and want to update it, so the update code should not depend on having a user.)
Test Plan:
```
$ PHABRICATOR_AS_DEVICE=1 ./bin/ssh-connect local.phacility.com
Warning: Permanently added 'local.phacility.com' (RSA) to the list of known hosts.
PTY allocation request failed on channel 0
phabricator-ssh-exec: Welcome to Phabricator.
You are logged in as device/daemon.phacility.net.
You haven't specified a command to run. This means you're requesting an interactive shell, but Phabricator does not provide an interactive shell over SSH.
Usually, you should run a command like `git clone` or `hg push` rather than connecting directly with SSH.
Supported commands are: conduit, git-lfs-authenticate, git-receive-pack, git-upload-pack, hg, svnserve.
Connection to local.phacility.com closed.
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15755
Summary:
Ref T4292. This consolidates code for figuring out which user we should connect to hosts with.
Also narrows a lock window.
Test Plan: Browsed Diffusion, pulled and pushed through an SSH proxy.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15754
Summary:
In calendar, dashboard, diffusion, diviner, feed, fund,
maniphest, pholio, ponder, and slowvote use the term 'tags' if possible.
This intenctionally skips diffusion, differential, and the projects application itself.
Ref T10326 Ref T10349
Test Plan: inspection on a running, locally modified, system
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10835, T10326, T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15753
Summary:
Ref T10832. In practice, `git --version` is not a useful test for this issue:
- Vendors like Debian have backported the patch into custom versions like `0.0.0.1-debian-lots-of-patches.3232`.
- Vendors like Ubuntu distribute multiple different versions which report the same string from `git --version`, some of which are patched and some of which are not.
In other cases, we can perform an empirical test for the vulnerability. Here, we can not, because we can't write a 2GB path in a reasonable amount of time.
Since vendors (other than Apple) //generally// seem to be on top of this and any warning we try to raise based on `git --version` will frequently be incorrect, don't raise this warning.
I'll note this in the changelog instead.
Test Plan: Looked at setup issues, no more warning for vulnerable git version.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10832
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15756
Summary:
Ref T4292. Ref T10366. Depends on D15751. Today, generating repository commands is purely a function of the repository, so they use protocols and credentials based on the repository configuration.
For example, a repository with an SSH "remote URI" always generate SSH "remote commands".
This needs to change in the future:
- After T10366, repositories won't necessarily just have one type of remote URI. They can only have one at a time still, but the repository itself won't change based on which one is currently active.
- For T4292, I need to generate intracluster commands, regardless of repository configuration. These will have different protocols and credentials.
Prepare for these cases by separating out command construction, so they'll be able to generate commands in a more flexible way.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests.
- Browsed diffusion.
- Ran `bin/phd debug pull` to pull a bunch of repos.
- Ran daemons.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292, T10366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15752
Summary: Users can't find the "Tags" field in the Edit Menu; Added keyword "Tag".
Test Plan: Looked in Edit page; I think this shouldn't change anything else?
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15749
Summary: Ref T4292. This will let the UI and future `bin/repository` tools give administrators more tools to understand problems when reporting or resolving them.
Test Plan:
- Pushed fully clean repository.
- Pushed previously-pushed repository.
- Forced write to abort, inspected useful information in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15748
Summary:
Ref T4292. Small fixes:
- There was a bug with the //first// write, where we'd write 1 but expect 0. Fix this.
- Narrow the window where we hold the `isWriting` lock: we don't need to wait for the client to finish.
- Release the lock even if something throws.
- Use a more useful variable name.
Test Plan:
- Made new writes to a fresh cluster repository.
- Made sequential writes.
- Made concurrent writes.
- Made good writes and bad writes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15747
Summary:
Fixes T10830.
- The return code from `storage adjust` did not propagate correct.
- There was one column issue which I missed the first time around because I had a bunch of unrelated stuff locally.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f` with failures, used `echo $?` to make sure it exited nonzero.
- Got fully clean `bin/storage adjust` by dropping all my extra local tables.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10830
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15746
Summary: Ref T10832. Raise a setup warning for out-of-date versions of `git`.
Test Plan: {F1224632}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10832
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15745
Summary:
Fixes T10830. Ref T10366. I wasn't writing to this table yet so I didn't build it, but the fact that `bin/storage adjust` would complain slipped my mind.
- Add the table.
- Make the tests run `adjust`. This is a little slow (a few extra seconds) but we could eventually move some steps like this to run server-side only.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, got a clean `adjust`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10366, T10830
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15744
Summary:
Ref T10748. This supports more transaction types in the modern editor and improves validation so Conduit benefits.
You can technically create repositories via `diffusion.repository.edit` now, although they aren't very useful.
Test Plan:
- Used `diffusion.repository.edit` to create and edit repositories.
- Used `/editpro/` to edit repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15740
Summary: Ref T10748. Ref T10366. No support for editing and no impact on the UI, but get some of the basics in place.
Test Plan: {F1223279}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10366, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15742
Summary: Ref T10748. Pretty straightforward. I'd like to put a little "!" icon in the menu if there's a warning/error eventually, but can deal with that latre.
Test Plan: {F1223096}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15741
Summary:
Ref T10748. This is roughly where I'm headed, if it makes some kind of sense? The "Edit" links in sub-sections don't work yet since I haven't built the thing.
Probably depends on D15736.
Test Plan: Manually navigated to `/manage/`, clicked around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15737
Summary: Ref T10748. Ref T10337. This technically implements this stuff, but it does not do anything useful yet. This skips all the hard stuff.
Test Plan:
- Technically used `diffusion.repository.search` to get repository information.
- Technically used `diffusion.repository.edit` to change a repository name.
- Used `editpro/` to edit a repository name.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10337, T10748
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15736
Summary: This error message is pointless and dead-ends logged-in users needlessly if they're sent to the register page by documentation or Advanced Enterprise Sales Funnels.
Test Plan: Visited `/auth/register/` while logged in, was sent home.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15739
Summary: Also make `../` work to start relative a link so I don't have to document it as `./../path`.
Test Plan:
- Used `./`, `../`. `./../`, and normal links (proper title pickup).
- Used bad links (red).
- Regenerated documentation:
{F1221692}
Reviewers: hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15734
Summary: Ref T7691 (errata). This shows links to Phriction documents in red if they're missing, and links to Phriction documents in grey with a lock icon if the user doesn't have the correct permissions to see the document.
Test Plan:
Tested a bunch of different configurations:
```
[[ ./../ ]] Back to Main Document
[[ ./../subdocument_2]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ./../invisible_document]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ./../ | Explicit Title ]] Back to Main Document
[[ ./../subdocument_2 | Explicit Title ]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ./../invisible_document | Explicit Title ]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ]] Absolute link
[[ subdocument_2 ]] Absolute link
[[ invisible_document ]] Absolute link
[[ | Explicit Title ]] Absolute link
[[ subdocument_2 | Explicit Title ]] Absolute link
[[ invisible_document | Explicit Title ]] Absolute link
```
Got the expected result:
{F1221106}
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7691
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15733
Summary:
Resolves T7691. This turned out more complex than I really wanted, mainly because I needed to feed the slug information through to both the document renderer and the preview window that appears in the edit controller.
After this change, you can now create relative links in Phriction by doing `[[ ./../some/relative/path ]]`. Relative paths aren't handled anywhere else (they'll still render, but the dots are turned into a literal 'dot' as per existing behaviour).
Test Plan: Created some Phriction documents with relative links, saw them all link correctly.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7691
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15732
Summary:
This nearly works but I didn't have time to get back to it and it isn't stable enough to turn on in the cluster yet.
We have enough other stuff going out this week, so just disable it before `stable` gets cut. Should be ready by next week if things go well.
Test Plan: Fetched a Git SSH repo locally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15731
