Summary: Ref T2543. All writers now write modern statuses. Make all readers explicit about whether they are reading modern or legacy statuses, so I can swap the storage format.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `getStatus()`, scanned the list. Other applications have methods with this name so it's possible I missed something.
- Browed around, changed revision statuses.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18417
Summary: Ref T2543. Update these for the modern stuff.
Test Plan: Created a new revision, got a revision in the right state ("Needs Review"). Accepted, planned, requested, abandoned revision; state transitions looked good.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18415
Summary: Ref T2543. Swaps these over to modern constants.
Test Plan: Viewed dashboard, no chagnes to bucketing.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18414
Summary: Ref T2543. This cleans up all the "when no one is rejecting/blocking and someone accepted, mark the revision overall as accepted" logic to use more modern status stuff instead of `ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus`.
Test Plan:
- Updated revisions, saw them go to "Needs Review".
- Accepted, requested changes to revisions.
- Updated one with changes requested, saw it go to "needs review" again.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18413
Summary:
Ref T2543. Converts the TYPE_STATUS transaction (used to render "This revision now requires changes to proceed.", "This revision is accepted and ready to land.", etc) to ModularTransactions.
Also, continue consolidating all the status-related information (here, more colors and icons) into a single place. By the end of this, we may learn that NEEDS_REVIEW uses //every// color.
Test Plan:
Reviewed old status transactions (unchanged) and created new ones (looked the same as the old ones).
(I plan to migrate all of these a few diffs from now, around when I change the storage format.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18410
Summary: Ref T2543. Now that the integer status constants are banished to the internals, we can expose status information from "differential.revision.search".
Test Plan:
Searched for revisions.
{F5093873}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18400
Summary:
Ref T2543. Add `isPublished()` to mean: exactly the status 'closed', which is now interally called 'published', but still shown as 'closed' to users.
We have some callsites which are about "exactly that status", vs "any 'closed' status", e.g. including "abandoned".
This also introduces `isChangePlanned()`, which felt less awkward than `isChangesPlanned()` but more consistent than `hasChangesPlanned()` or `isStatusChangesPlanned()` or similar.
Test Plan: `grep`, loaded revisions, requested review.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18341
Summary:
Ref T2543. Further consolidates status management into DifferentialRevisionStatus.
One change I'm making here is internally renaming "CLOSED" to "PUBLISHED". The UI will continue to say "Closed", at least for now, but this should make the code more clear because we care about "is closed, exactly" vs "is any closed status (closed, abandoned, sometimes accepted)". This distinction is more obvious as `isClosed()` vs `isPublished()` than, e.g., `isClosedWithExactlyTheClosedStatus()` or something. I think "Published" is generally more clear, too, and more consistent with modern language (e.g., "pre-publish review" replacing "pre-commit review" to make it more clear what we mean in Git/Mercurial).
I've removed the IN_PREPARATION status since this was just earlier groundwork for "Draft" and not actually used, and under the newer plan I'm trying to just abandon `ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus` entirely (or, at least, substantially).
Test Plan:
- Viewed revisions.
- Viewed revision list.
- Viewed revisions linked to a task in Maniphest.
- Viewed revision graph of dependencies in Differential.
- Grepped for `COLOR_STATUS_...` constants.
- Grepped for removed method `getRevisionStatusIcon()` (no callsites).
- Grepped for removed method `renderFullDescription()` (one callsite, replaced with just building a `TagView` inline).
- Grepped for removed method `isClosedStatus()` (no callsites after other changes).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18340
Summary:
Ref T2543. These are currently numeric values, like "0" and "3". I want to replace them with strings, like "accepted", and move definitions from Arcanist to Phabricator.
To set the stage for this, reduce the number of callsites where Phabricator invokes `ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus`.
This is just the easy ones. I'll hold this until the release cut.
Test Plan:
- Called `differential.find`.
- Called `differential.getrevision`.
- Called `differential.query`.
- Removed all reviewers from a revision, saw warning.
- Abandoned the no-reviewers revision, no more warning.
- Attached a revision to a task to get it to show the state icon with the status on a tooltip.
- Viewed revision bucketing on dashboard.
- Used `bin/search index` to reindex a revision.
- Hit the "Land Revision" endpoint.
I didn't explicitly test these cases:
- Doorkeeper Asana integration, since setup takes a thousand years.
- Disambiguation logic when multiple hashes match, since setup is also very involved.
- Releeph because it's Releeph.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18339
Summary: Fixes T12952. This never work AFAIK, so resolves this mis-information. See T4411 for follow up.
Test Plan: Click on policy for a diff, no longer see text.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18349
Summary: Adds a very basic list of all inline comments, threaded, and their status. Kept this a little simpler than the mock, mostly because sorting here feels a little strange given threads would be all over the place. Not sure sorted is needed in practice anyways. I'd probably lean towards just adding a JS checkbox to hide certain rows if needed in the future.
Test Plan:
Test various commenting structures:
- Leave Comment
- Update Diff
- Leave new comment
- Reply to comment
- Reply to comment as revision author
- Mark items as done
- Update diff again
{F4996915}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18112
Summary:
Ref T12509. Many of the calls to HMAC+SHA1 are just to compute cachekeys for remarkup objects.
Make these use HMAC+SHA256 instead. There is no downside to swapping these since they just cause a cache miss in the worst case.
I also plan to get rid of `PhabricatorMarkupInterface` eventually, but this doesn't go that far.
Test Plan: Browsed some different types of documents (tasks, legalpad documents, phame blogs / posts, pholio mocks, etc).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17631
Summary: Allow API callers to retrieve reviewer information via a new "reviewers" attachment.
Test Plan: {F4675784}
Reviewers: chad, lvital
Reviewed By: lvital
Subscribers: lvital
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17633
Summary:
Ref T12272. If you own a package which owns "/", this allows you to force-accept package reviews for packages which own sub-paths, like "/src/adventure/".
The default UI looks something like this:
```
[X] Accept as epriestley
[X] Accept as Root Package
[ ] Force accept as Adventure Package
```
By default, force-accepts are not selected.
(I may do some UI cleanup and/or annotate "because you own X" in the future and/or mark these accepts specially in some way, particularly if this proves confusing along whatever dimension.)
Test Plan: {F4314747}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17569
Summary: Ref T10967. This change is similar to D17566, but for rejects.
Test Plan:
- Create a revision as A, with reviewer B.
- Reject as B.
- Request review as A.
- Before patch: stuck in "rejected".
- After patch: transitions back to "needs review".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17568
Summary: Ref T10967. This moves all remaining "request review" pathways (just `differential.createcomment`) to the new code, and removes the old action.
Test Plan: Requested review on a revision, `grep`'d for the action constant.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17567
Summary:
Ref T10967. This is explained in more detail in T10967#217125
When an author does "Request Review" on an accepted revision, void (in the sense of "cancel out", like a bank check) any "accepted" reviewers on the current diff.
Test Plan:
- Create a revision with author A and reviewer B.
- Accept as B.
- "Request Review" as A.
- (With sticky accepts enabled.)
- Before patch: revision swithced back to "accepted".
- After patch: the earlier review is "voided" by te "Request Review", and the revision switches to "Review Requested".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17566
Summary:
Ref T12271. Don't do anything with this yet, but store who accepted/rejected/whatever on behalf of reviewers.
In the future, we could use this to render stuff like "Blessed Committers (accepted by epriestley)" or whatever. I don't know that this is necessarily super useful, but it's easy to track, seems likely to be useful, and would be a gigantic pain to backfill later if we decide we want it.
Test Plan: Accepted/rejected a revision, saw reviewers update appropriately.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17537
Summary:
Ref T12271. Currenty, when you "Accept" a revision, you always accept it for all reviewers you have authority over.
There are some situations where communication can be more clear if users can accept as only themselves, or for only some packages, etc. T12271 discusses some of these use cases in more depth.
Instead of making "Accept" a blanket action, default it to doing what it does now but let the user uncheck reviewers.
In cases where project/package reviewers aren't in use, this doesn't change anything.
For now, "reject" still acts the old way (reject everything). We could make that use checkboxes too, but I'm not sure there's as much of a use case for it, and I generally want users who are blocking stuff to have more direct accountability in a product sense.
Test Plan:
- Accepted normally.
- Accepted a subset.
- Tried to accept none.
- Tried to accept bogus reviewers.
- Accepted with myself not a reviewer
- Accepted with only one reviewer (just got normal "this will be accepted" text).
{F4251255}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12271
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17533
Summary:
Ref T10967. I'm not 100% sure we need this, but the old edge table had it and I recall an issue long ago where not having this key left us with a bad query plan.
Our data doesn't really provide a way to test this key (we have many revisions and few reviewers, so the query planner always uses revision keys), and building a convincing test case would take a while (lipsum needs some improvements to add reviewers). But in the worst case this key is mostly useless and wastes a few MB of disk space, which isn't a big deal.
So I can't conclusively prove that this key does anything to the dashboard query, but the migration removed it and I'm more comfortable keeping it so I'm not worried about breaking stuff.
At the very least, MySQL does select this key in the query plan when I do a "Reviewers:" query explicitly so it isn't //useless//.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, ran dashboard query, the query plan didn't get any worse.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17532
Summary:
Fixes T11050. Today, when a user resigns, we just delete the record of them ever being a reviewer.
However, this means you have no way to say "I don't care about this and don't want to see it on my dashboard" if you are a member of any project or package reviewers.
Instead, store "resigned" as a distinct state from "not a reviewer", and treat it a little differently in the UI:
- On the bucketing screen, discard revisions any responsible user has resigned from.
- On the main `/Dxxx` page, show these users as resigned explicitly (we could just hide them, too, but I think this is good to start with).
- In the query, don't treat a "resigned" state as a real "reviewer" (this change happened earlier, in D17517).
- When resigning, write a "resigned" state instead of deleting the row.
- When editing a list of reviewers, I'm still treating this reviewer as a reviewer and not special casing it. I think that's sufficiently clear but we could tailor this behavior later.
Test Plan:
- Resigned from a revision.
- Saw "Resigned" in reviewers list.
- Saw revision disappear from my dashboard.
- Edited revision, saw user still appear as an editable reviewer. Saved revision, saw no weird side effects.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11050
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17531
Summary:
Ref T10967. Improves some method names:
- `Revision->getReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->getReviewers()`
- `Revision->attachReviewerStatus()` -> `Revision->attachReviewers()`
- `Reviewer->getStatus()` -> `Reviewer->getReviewerStatus()` (this is mostly to make this more greppable)
Test Plan:
- bunch o' `grep`
- Browsed around.
- If I missed anything, it should fatal in an obvious way. We have a lot of other `getStatus()` calls and it's hard to be sure I got them all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17522
Summary: Ref T10967. The old name was because we had a `getReviewers()` tied to `needRelationships()`, rename this method to use a simpler and more clear name.
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17519
Summary:
Ref T10967. There have been two different ways to load reviewers for a while: `needReviewerStatus()` and `needRelationships()`.
The `needRelationships()` stuff was a false start along time ago that didn't really go anywhere. I believe the idea was that we might want to load several different types of edges (subscribers, reviewers, etc) on lots of different types of objects. However, all that stuff pretty much ended up modularizing so that main `Query` classes did not need to know about it, so `needRelationships()` never got generalized or went anywhere.
A handful of things still use it, but get rid of them: they should either `needReviewerStatus()` to get reviewer info, or the ~3 callsites that care about subscribers can just load them directly.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed methods (`needRelationships()`, `getReviewers()`, `getCCPHIDs()`, etc).
- Browsed Diffusion, Differential.
- Called `differential.query`.
It's possible I missed some stuff, but it should mostly show up as super obvious fatals ("call needReviewerStatus() before getReviewerStatus()!").
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17518
Summary:
Ref T10967.
When we query for revisions with particular reviewers, use the new table to drive the query.
When we load revisions for use in the application, also use the new table to drive the query.
This doesn't convert everything: there's some old `loadRelationships()` stuff still using the old table. But this moves the major stuff over.
(This also changes the icon for "commented" from a question mark to a speech bubble.)
Test Plan:
- Viewed revision lists and detail views on old and new code, saw identical outcomes.
- Updated revisions, accepted/rejected/commented on revisions.
- Hit the "Accepted Older" and "Commented Older" states by taking an action and then updating.
- Grepped for removed methods (like `getEdgeData()` and `getDiffID()`).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17517
Summary:
Ref T10967. We have a "commented" state to help reviewers get a better sense of who is part of a discussion, and a "last action" state to help distinguish between "accept" and "accepted an older version", for the purposes of sticky accepts and as a UI hint.
Currently, these are first-class states, partly beacuse we were somewhat limited in what we could do with edges. However, a more flexible way to represent them is as flags separate from the primary state flag.
In the new storage, write them as separate state information: `lastActionDiffPHID` stores the Diff PHID of the last review action (accept, reject, etc). `lastCommentDiffPHID` stores the Diff PHID of the last comment (top-level or inline).
Test Plan: Applied storage changes, commented and acted on a revision. Saw appropriate state reflected in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17514
Summary:
Ref T10967. This is an incremental step toward removing "reviewers" back to a dedicated storage table so we can handle changes like T11050.
This adds the storage table, and starts doing double writes to it (so new or updated reviewers write to both the old edge table and the new "reviewers" table).
Then we can do a migration, swap readers over one at a time, and eventually remove the old write and old storage and then implement new features.
This change has no user-facing impact, it just causes us to write new data to two places instead of one.
This is not completely exhaustive: the Herald "Add Reviewers" action is still doing a manual EDGE transaction. I'll clean that up next and do another pass to look for anything else I missed.
This is also a bit copy/pastey for now but the logic around "RESIGN" is a little different in the two cases until T11050. I'll unify it in future changes.
Test Plan:
- Did a no-op edit.
- Did a no-op comment.
- Added reviewers.
- Removed reviewers.
- Accepted and rejected revisions.
After all of these edits, did a `SELECT * FROM differential_reviewer` manually and saw consistent-looking rows in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17495
Summary:
Ref T12173.
- If we want to fetch a tag, Buildkite needs it as a "branch" (this means more like "ref to fetch").
- The API gets upset if we pass "refs/tags/...", so just pass the tag name without the prefix, which works.
- Do a better job with commits and pass a real branch to fetch.
Test Plan:
- Built a commit with Buildkite.
- Build a revision with Buildkite.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T12173
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17282
Summary:
Fixes T12095. Ref T6660. The old code for this was specific to Differential, using the `DifferentialDraft` table.
Instead, make the `EditEngine` / `VersionedDraft` code create and remove a `<objectPHID, authorPHID>` edge when a particular author creates drafts.
Some applications have drafts beyond `VersionedDrafts`, notably inline comments. Before writing "yes, draft" or "no, no draft", ask the object if it has any custom draft stuff we need to know about.
This should fix all the yellow bubble bugs I created in T11114 and allow us to bring the feature to Audit fairly easily.
Test Plan: Created and deleted comments and inlines, reloading the list view after each change. Couldn't find a way to break the list view anymore.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12095, T6660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17205
Summary:
Fixes T10968. In rare situations, we can generate a diff, then hit an error which causes this update to fail.
When it does, we tend to get stuck in a loop creating diffs, which can fill the database up with garbage. We saw this once in the Phacility cluster, and one instance hit it, too.
Instead: when we create a diff, keep track of which commit we generated it from. The next time through, reuse it if we already built it.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/differential attach-commit <commit> <revision>` to hit this code.
- Simulated a filesystem write failure, saw the diff get reused.
- Also did a normal update, which worked properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10968
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17164
Summary:
Fixes T9276. Fixes T8650. The story so far:
- We once published build updates to Revisions.
- An unrelated fix (D10911) sent them to the Diffs instead of Revisions, which isn't useful, since you can't see a diff's timeline anywhere.
- This also caused a race condition, where the RevisionEditor and DiffEditor would update the diff simultaneously (T8650).
- The diff update was just disabled to avoid the race (part of D13441).
- Instead, allow the updates to go somewhere else. In this case, we send commit updates to the commit but send diff updates to the revision so you can see 'em.
- Since everything will be using the revision editor now, we should either get proper lock behavior for free or it should be easy to add if something whack is still happening.
- Overall, this should pretty much put us back in working order like we were before D10911.
This behavior is undoubtedly refinable, but this should let us move forward.
Test Plan:
Saw a build failure in timeline:
{F2304575}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T9276, T8650
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17139
Summary:
Fixes T9648. Diffs currently use `return $this->getRevision()->getViewPolicy();` to inherit their revision's view policy.
After the introduction of object policies, this is wrong for policies like "Subscribers", because it means "Subscribers to this object, the diff". Since Diffs have no subscribers, this always fails.
Instead, use extended policies so that the object policy evaluates in the context of the correct object (the revision).
Test Plan:
- Create a revision.
- Subscribe `alice` to it.
- Set view policy to "Subscribers".
- View revision as `alice`.
- Before patch: nonsense fatal about missing diff because of policy error.
- After patch: `alice` can see the revision.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17123
Summary: Ref T11114. Although I plan to rewrite this system eventually (T10448) it's easy enough to punt for now.
Test Plan: punt
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17119
Summary: Ref T11114. This comments nearly working on EditEngine. Only significant issue I caught is that the "View" link doesn't render properly because it depends on JS which is tricky to hook up. I'll clean that up in a future diff.
Test Plan: {F2279201}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17116
Summary:
Ref T11114. See D17114 for some discussion.
For review actions: accept, reject, resign.
For revision actions, order is basically least-severe to most-severe action pairs: plan changes, request review, close, reopen, abandon, reclaim, commandeer.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions as an author and a reviewer, saw sensible action order within action groups.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17115
Summary: Ref T11114. This begins restoring comment actions to Differential, but on top of EditEngine.
Test Plan: {F2263148}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17107
Summary: Ref T11114. Keep mail and UI, toss the rest.
Test Plan: Edited/viewed repositories.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17087
Summary: Ref T11114. Keep rendering and mail, toss the rest.
Test Plan: Edited and viewed reviewers.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17086
Summary: Ref T11114. This leaves mail integration and UI integration, but strips all the editing (now handled by EditEngine) and commit message stuff (now handled by CommitMessageField).
Test Plan: Viewed and edited test plans and test plan transactions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17084
Summary: Ref T11114. Obsoleted by Modular Transactions + EditEngine + CommitMessageField + we just "hard code" the title of revisions into the page because we're craaazy.
Test Plan:
- Made an edit on `stable`.
- Viewed the edit on this change, it still had the proper UI strings.
- Edited/created/updated revisions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17083
Summary:
Ref T11114. This probably still has some bugs, but survives basic sanity checks.
Continue pulling commit message logic out of CustomField so we can reduce the amount of responsibility/bloat in the classtree and send more code through EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Called `differential.getcommitmessage` via API console for various revisions/parameters (edit and create mode, with and without fields, with and without revisions).
- Used `--create`, `--edit` and `--update` modes of `arc diff` from the CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17066
Summary:
Fixes T11660. Currently, if you try to diff a path with more than 255 total characters, we fail to create the diff because we have a `text255` column.
There are actually two issues here:
- File names may be arbitrarily long (T11660).
- File names may not be UTF8 (T6633, etc). This is much more complicated and has other issues -- largely that we can't JSON-encode non-UTF8 filenames. I'm punting on that for now and will deal with it later. This doesn't specifically address non-UTF8 paths, although it is a change that's (probably?) required to eventually support them.
This will cause some potentially slow migrations, but better to do them now, if possible, so we have fewer complicated/slow upgrades overall.
Test Plan:
Created a change touching file: //very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_directory_name/very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_very_long_filename.txt//
{F2137737}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17062
Summary:
Ref T11114. This replaces the old edit controller with a new one based entirely on EditEngine.
This removes the CustomFieldEditEngineExtension hack for Differential, since remaining field types are fairly straightforward and work with existing EditEngine support, as far as I can tell.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision via web diffs.
- Updated a revision via web diffs.
- Edited a revision via web.
- Edited nonstandard custom fields ("Blame Revision", "JIRA Issues").
- Created a revision via CLI.
- Updated a revision via CLI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17054
Summary: Ref T11114. This one is a bit more complex, but I think I covered everything.
Test Plan:
- Added reviewers.
- Removed reviewers.
- Made reviewers blocking.
- Made reviewers nonblocking.
- Tried to make the author a reviewer.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17050
Summary:
Ref T11114. Currently, all of Differential is extremely custom CustomFields. I want to back away from that somewhat and leverage more EditEngine / ModularTransactions infrastructure.
This allows EditEngine, ModularTransactions, and CustomFields to coexist in an uneasy peace. The "EditPro" controller applies a //different edit// than the CustomFields do, but everything works out in the end. I think.
Hopefully the horrible mess I am creating here will be short-lived.
Test Plan:
- Edited a revision with the normal editor.
- Edited a revision with the pro editor.
- Created a revision with `arc diff`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17044
Summary: Ref T10967. This makes room for a `DifferentialReviewer` object which can be a real storage table.
Test Plan: Grepped for `DifferentialReviewer`, browsed Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17041
Summary: Ref T8475. This gets rid of most of the old "legacy hunk" code. I'll nuke the rest (and drop the old table) once we're more sure that we're in the clear.
Test Plan: Browsed Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8475
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17040
Summary:
This has been replaced by `PolicyCodex` after D16830. Also:
- Rebuild Celerity map to fix grumpy unit test.
- Fix one issue on the policy exception workflow to accommodate the new code.
Test Plan:
- `arc unit --everything`
- Viewed policy explanations.
- Viewed policy errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16831
Summary:
Fixes T11836. See some prior discussion in T8376#120613.
The policy hint in headers in the UI is not exhaustive, and can not reasonably be exhaustive. For example, on a revision, it may say "All Users", but really mean "All users who can see the space this object is in and the repository it belongs to, plus the revision author and reviewers".
These rules are explained if you click (and, often, in the documentation), but "All Users" is still at least somewhat misleading.
I don't think there's any perfect solution here that balances the needs of both new and experienced users perfectly, but this change tries to do a bit better about avoiding cases where we say something very open (like "All Users") when the real policy is not very open.
Specifically, I've made these changes to the header:
- Spaces are now listed in the tag, so it will say `(S3 > All Users)` instead of `(All Users)`. They're already listed in the header, this just makes it more explicit that Spaces are a policy container and part of the view policy.
- Extended policy objects are now listed in the tag, so it will say `(S3 > rARC > All Users)` for a revision in the Arcanist repository which is also in Space 3.
- Objects can now provide a "Policy Codex", which is an object that represents a rulebook of more sophisticated policy descriptions. This codex can replace the tag with something else.
- Imported calendar events now say "Uses Import Policy" instead of, e.g., "All Users".
I've made these changes to the policy dialog:
- Split it into more visually separate sections.
- Added an explicit section for extended policies ("You must also have access to these other objects: ...").
- Broken the object policy rules into a "Special Rules" section (for rules like "you can only see a revision if you can see the repository it is part of") and an "Object Policy" section (for the actual object policy).
- Tried to make it a little more readable?
- The new policy dialogs are great to curl up with in front of a fire with a nice cup of cocoa.
I've made these changes to infrastructure:
- Implementing `PhabricatorPolicyInterface` no longer requires you to implement `describeAutomaticCapability()`.
- Instead, implement `PhabricatorPolicyCodexInterface` and return a `PhabricatorPolicyCodex` object.
- This "codex" is a policy rulebook which can set all the policy icons, labels, colors, rules, etc., to properly explain complex policies.
- Broadly, the old method was usually either not useful (most objects have no special rules) or not powerful enough (objects with special rules often need to do more in order to explain them).
Test Plan:
{F1912860}
{F1912861}
{F1912862}
{F1912863}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: avivey
Maniphest Tasks: T11836
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16830
Summary:
Ref T9838.
Add a Properties field to Revision, and update a `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` when closing a revision.
Test Plan:
A quick run through the obvious steps (Close with commit/manually, with or w/o accept) and calling `differential.query` shows the `wasAcceptedBeforeClose` property was setup correctly.
Pushing closed + accepted passes the relevant herald, which was my immediate issue; Pushing un-accepted is blocked.
Test the "commit" rule (Different from "pre-commit") by hacking the DB and running the "has accepted revision" rule in a test-console.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T9838
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15085
Summary: Ref T11123. This implements a very basic skeleton for modern revision search.
Test Plan: Viewed and executed Conduit API method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11123
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16089
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary: Ref T9456. Some rough edges and we can't complete the build yet since I haven't written a webhook, but this mostly seems to be working.
Test Plan:
- Ran this build on some stuff.
- Ran a normal HTTP step build to make sure I didn't break that.
{F880301}
{F880302}
{F880303}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: JustinTulloss, joshma
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14286
Summary:
Every caller returns `true`. This was added a long time ago for Projects, but projects are no longer subscribable.
I don't anticipate needing this in the future.
Test Plan: Grepped for this method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15409
Summary: Ref T10457. This gives unit test results a more first-class treatment in the Differential UI, and consolidates some rendering code.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F1135536}
After:
{F1135537}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10457
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15365
Summary:
Ref T10457. This makes diffs/revisions show the revision as the buildable title, and commits show the commit as the title.
Previously, the title was "Buildable X".
Also makes icons/colors/labels more consitent.
Test Plan: {F1131885}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10457
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15355
Summary:
Ref T6183. Ref T10054. Historically, only members could watch projects because there were some weird special cases with policies. These policy issues have been resolved and Herald is generally powerful enough to do equivalent watches on most objects anyway.
Also puts a "Watch Project" button on the feed panel to make the behavior and meaning more obvious.
Test Plan:
- Watched a project I was not a member of.
- Clicked the feed watch/unwatch button.
{F1064909}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6183, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15063
Summary:
Ref T9319. When we discover a commit, we sometimes update the corresponding revision with a "this is the actual committed change" diff and send out a link to the changes between review and commit.
This is currently very difficult to test, because it only happens the first time and you have to either go set up a bunch of objects or add a bunch of special casing to the parser to hit the workflow.
I'm making some changes to how it pulls file content. To make those changes easier to test, first start extracting this stuff so the code can be run with `bin/differential extract ...` instead of needing to do a bunch of more complicated setup steps.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/differential extract ...` to extract diffs from commits.
- Forced my way through the daemon workflow by faking out a bunch of flags, got a clean extract + attach + update. After this patch, this should rarely be necessary.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9319
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14967
Summary: Ref T9979. This simplifies/standardizes the code a bit, but mostly gives us more consistent class names and structure.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/search index --type ...` to index documents of every indexable type.
- Searched for documents by unique text, found them.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14842
Summary:
Ref T9952. Ref T3462. After D14736, if we have information about the target/"onto" branch, use it in the UI:
- Show "feature (branched from master)" instead of "feature".
- Default "Land Revision" to hit the correct branch.
Test Plan:
- Branched from `test` with branch tracking.
- Diffed.
- Saw "feature (branched from test)" in UI.
- Saw "test" fill as default in "Land Revision", despite the repository having a different default branch.
{F1020587}
{F1020588}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3462, T9952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14737
Summary: Ref T182. Make a reasonable attempt to get the commit message, author, and committer data correct.
Test Plan: BEHOLD: rGITTEST810b7f17cd0c909256a45d29a5062fcf417d0489
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T182
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14280
Summary:
Ref T182. If 35 other things are configured completely correctly, make it remotely possible that this button may do something approximating the thing that the user wanted.
This primarily fleshes out the idea that "operations" (like landing, merging or cherry-picking) can have some beahavior, and when we run an operation we do whatever that behavior is instead of just running `git show`.
Broadly, this isn't too terrible because Drydock seems like it actually works properly for the most part (???!?!).
Test Plan: {F876431}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T182
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14270
Summary:
Ref T9252. This primarily allows Harbormaster to request (and Drydock to fulfill) working copies with a patch from a staging area. Doing this means we can do builds on in-review changes from `arc diff`.
This is a little cobbled-together but should basically work.
Also fix some other issues:
- Yielded, awakend workers are fine to update but could complain.
- We can't log slot lock failures to resources if we don't end up saving them.
- Killing the transaction would wipe out the log.
- Fix some TODOs, etc.
Test Plan: Ran Harbormaster builds on a local revision.
Reviewers: hach-que, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14214
Summary: Ref T9252. This is still crude in a few ways but basically works, at least for commits.
Test Plan:
- Made a build plan with just this build step.
- Ran `bin/harbormaster build --plan 10 ...` on a commit.
- It actually built a working copy, leased it, took no action, and released the lease. MAGIC~~~
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14160
Summary:
This reverts commit 1583738842.
See T8646 for discussion. This version of the feature feels terrible on real data.
Test Plan: Strict revert.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14097
Summary:
Ref T8646. This is fairly rough:
This interface is very niche, and not really flexible enough to accommodate other result customization (but I don't think we have any plans here)?
I'm just //summarizing// the content of documents, basically showing the first paragraph of their content, summary, etc. This isn't what Google does: it shows snippets surrounding the actual search terms. However, this is more involved and might be less useful in structured data: for example, I'd imagine that the first line of most phriciton documents, maniphest tasks and Differential revisions really might be the best machine-generatable summary of them. The actual contextual snippeting in Google doesn't often seem hugely useful to me. But this might also not be very useful.
There's not much design, not sure if you had any ideas.
I only implemented this for tasks, revisions and the wiki since those seem most useful.
I'm generally on the fence about this, but it's not a ton of work to swap out for something else later. Maybe we can see how it feels? But happy to toss it or rethink the approach.
Test Plan: {F788026}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8646
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14095
Summary:
Fixes T8004.
- For paths which are part of a package, show the package.
- Highlight paths which are part of a package you (the viewer) have authority over.
Test Plan:
{F725418}
- Viewed owned and unowned chagnes in Diffusion and Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13923
Summary:
Ref T8096. This modernizes the last thing which was reading the old datasource.
Also fix a bug where it didn't work.
Test Plan: {F698405}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8096
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13852
Summary: Ref T8096. This information has moved into Harbormaster.
Test Plan:
Pushed some test results in; see right margin:
{F698394}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8096
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13850
Summary: Fixes T7604. This is the big scary change which drops the "arcanist project" fields from the database permanently.
Test Plan:
`grep`ped for the following to ensure that I had found all remaining references:
- `/arcanistProject/i`
- `/arcanist_project/i`
- `/projectName/i`
- `/project_name/i`
- `/project_id/i`
WARNING: Wait at least one month before landing this.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12899
Summary: Fixes T8095. Still needs UI/UX work (see T8096) but this has all the core features now.
Test Plan: Saw Harbormaster lint/unit data as though it was Differential lint-unit data.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8095
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13401
Summary:
Ref T8095. Two general problems:
- I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results.
- I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically.
These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds.
I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan:
# Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`.
# Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs.
(1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile.
(2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell.
This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality.
Workflow is basically:
- `arc` creates a diff.
- `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing".
- Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results.
- `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place.
(This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.)
I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly.
- Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs.
- Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state.
- Verified plans and steps are not editable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8095
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
Summary:
Ref T8575. We run a big "(A) UNION (B)" query on the home page and on the main Differential page.
"A" can always be improved by using `%Ls`, so it can use the second half of the `(authorPHID, status)` key.
"B" can sometimes be improved if the fraction of open revisions is smaller than the fraction of revisions you are reviewing. This is true for me on secure.phabricator.com (I'm a reviewer, either directly or via 'Blessed Reviewers', on about 80% of revisions, but <5% are open). In these cases, a `(status, phid)` key is more efficient.
Test Plan: Tweaked queries and added keys on this server, saw less derpy query plans and performance.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8575
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13325
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: Ref T8463.
Test Plan:
- Created a new revision via web UI with a username `@mention` in the summary and no repository.
- Prior to patch, hit a "not attached" error.
- After patch, no error.
- Created a new web UI revision, as above, but with a repository; saw repository work fine.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8463
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13205
Summary: Remove the `*TransactionType` classes and define the constants in the corresponding `*Transaction` class instead.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13188
Summary:
Ref T7703. See that task and inline for a bunch of discussion.
Briefly, when we run implicit policy rules ("to see a revision, you must also be able to see its repository") at query time, they don't apply to other viewers we might check later.
We do this very rarely, but when we do we're often doing it for a bunch of different viewers (for example, in Herald) so I don't want to just reload the object a million times.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Wrote a "flag everything" Herald rule, as in the original report in T7703, and no longer got "Unknown Object" flags on revisions.
- Rigged up a lot of cases in the web UI and couldn't find any inconsistencies, although this case is normally very hard to hit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13104
Summary: Ref T7604. Remove these "arcanist project" fields from the `LiskDAO` classes, but leave the data intact (there are no more read/writes to this data).
Test Plan:
- Grepped for calls to these methods.
- Ran `./bin/storage adjust` to check for schema issues.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13012
Summary: These could cause F442758.
Test Plan: {F442779}
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13042
Summary:
Ref T7447. Implements per-viewer comment hiding. Once a comment is obsolete or uninteresting, you can hide it completely.
This is sticky per-user.
My hope is that this will strike a better balance between concerns than some of the other approaches (conservative porting, summarization, hide-all).
Specifically, this adds a new action here:
{F435621}
Clicking it completely collapses the comment into a small icon on the previous line, and saves the comment state as hidden for you:
{F435626}
You can click the icon to reveal all hidden comments below the line.
Test Plan:
- Hid comments.
- Showed comments.
- Created, edited, deleted and submitted comments.
- Used Diffusion comments (hiding is not implemented there yet, but I'd plan to bring it there eventually if it works out in Differential).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jparise, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13009
Summary:
Fixes T6956. Before this change, we called PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser in the various delete methods to query the data. Now, we use $engine->getViewer(), since its always a good thing to have less calls to PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser thrown around the codebase.
I used the "codemod" tool to audit the existing calls to PhabricatorDestructorEngine (all of them) so ostensibly this gets all the spots. If I missed something though, its still going to work, so this change is very low risk.
Test Plan: ./bin/remove destroy P1; visit P1 and get a 404
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6956
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12866
Summary: Use `__CLASS__` instead of hard-coding class names. Depends on D12605.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12806
Summary:
Ref T7447. Fixes T7600. This likely needs significant adjustment, but implements content-aware comment porting for line changes.
Specifically, this moves lines around to adjust their position considering added and removed lines between the diffs and across rebases.
It does not try to do any actual content (line against line) matching.
Test Plan:
- Unit tests.
- Poking around in the web UI seems to generate mostly reasonable-ish results?
- This may be a huge step backward in some cases that I just haven't hit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7600, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12741
Summary: Ref T7776. This could get better, but I think I got most of the big stuff. It's ~4x faster now.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F393338}
After:
{F393339}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7776
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12730
Summary: See D12702.
Test Plan: Made something a link and clicked it, seemed to work OK.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12703
Summary:
Ref T7447. Ref T7870.
When a ghostly inline appears on the page, the timeline isn't currently aware that it's present, so it links elsewhere.
Instead, apply adjustments before rendering the timeline.
Ref T5030. This makes the behaviors in T5030 irrelevant most of the time.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F378106}
After:
- Inlines visible on page are linked directly.
- Inlines which we can't port (e.g., on files not present on current page) are still linked off-page.
- Used "Show Older" to page through and verify consistent rendering.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5030, T7870, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12497
Summary:
Ref T7447. This ports comments forward and backward in the best case:
- The old comment is on a changeset with the same filename.
- The old and new files are pretty much the same, line-for-line.
This will fail to port a lot of comments around and probably port a lot of comments into goofy places. We can see how bad it is in practice.
Errata:
- Design is me cobbling something together, probably worth tweaking.
- "Old Comment" should, at a minimum, say "Newer Comment" sometimes, or we should come up with some better name for this stuff.
Test Plan: {F377214}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12484
Summary:
Ref T7447. This class is currently a big mess with a lot of `withWeirdSpecialThingUsedInOnePlace()` type qualifiers.
Try to generalize/normalize it a bit.
Test Plan:
- Viewed inline comments.
- Created a new inline comment.
- Edited an inline comment.
- Marked an inline comment complete.
- Deleted, then undeleted an inline comment.
- Previewed inline comments.
- Viewed drafts as another user, verified they don't show up.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12483
Summary:
Ref T1266. We won't detect a move/copy if fewer than 3 lines are changed.
However, you may move a block like:
Complicated Line A
Trivial Line B
Complicated Line C
...where "Trivial Line B" is something like a curly brace. If you move this block somewhere that happened to previously have a similar trivial curly brace line, we won't be able to find 3 contiguous added lines in order to detect the copy/move.
Instead, consider both changed and unchanged lines when trying to find contiguous blocks. This allows us to detect across gaps where lines were not actually changed.
This new algorithm may be too liberal (for example, we may end up incorrectly identifying moved/copied code before or after changed lines, not just between changed lines), but we can keep an eye on it and tweak it. The algorithm is better factored and better covered, now.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test for this case.
- Spot-checked a handful of diffs and generally saw behavior that made sense and looked better than before.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12146
Summary:
Ref T1266. This prepares to fix case (2) on T1266 by improving the robustness of hunk parsing.
In particular, the copy detection code abuses this API because it isn't currently expressive or flexible enough.
Make it more flexible and cover it exhaustively.
I'll move callsites to the new stuff in upcoming revisions.
Test Plan: Unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12144
